circuits courseoffered at a small private, technical teaching four-year institution in the Midwest. According toUS News and World Reports, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology is ranked as one of the topundergraduate engineering universities in the country. The electric circuits course is asophomore level course for non-majors that covers concepts related to DC and AC circuits. Thiscourse was offered online for two subsequent years during the summer session. The motivationwas to allow students who desired to get ahead or stay on schedule in their curriculum to do sowhile on internships, co-ops, or research experiences. It was vital that the teaching andengagement standards were not compromised in the transition to online. This institute has asmall
rising sophomore. At the NavalAcademy rising sophomores have recently declared their majors, but have not yet taken anyclasses in the discipline. The escorts were part of the Naval Academy Summer Seminar team, notnecessarily engineers or even technical majors. Each session was conducted by a primaryinstructor/facilitator plus at least one assistant. The escort was usually drafted to help. While ascript was provided for each instructor, they were encouraged to complete the disassembly andsubsequent reassembly themselves before presenting in order to familiarize themselves with theidiosyncrasies of these machines. The students were divided into fairly arbitrary groups of four tofive students. Facilitators circulated to assist and ensure that every
not only the aims of FYC, but also meet outcomes involving the knowledge andappreciation of literary culture, when delivered within an engineering/problem-solving context.However, the delivery of the course in semester 1 needs further evaluation and redesign tosupport students struggling in a reading-intensive environment. Overall, the practice is promisingin its approach to integrating WOV skill acquisition, engineering concepts, and literature, allwithin the first year of an engineering student’s academic career; therefore, continued study andrefinement of this process would be an important contribution to the non-technical componentsof engineering education. References1. Leydens, Jon A
progresses to foster social resiliencyAdapting from this, role-playing, public speaking and interpersonal scenarios and practice with aset of positive, coping behaviors that can be drawn upon in many different types of professionalsettings (and to do so in an accepting, low-stress environment) has been shown to be effectivewith shy children and is applied in the seminar. Audience connection is emphasized from theoutset, stressing the notion that the student must convince the audience of their position beyondsimply presenting data, and that can only be done if the student knows the audience.A series of stepped class sessions has been created as a series of modules that build uponprevious material (Figure 1). Each module covers a set of topics
MS degree (1999) in Electronics Engineering from Taganrog Institute of Technology, Russia.Dr. Ana M. Djuric, Wayne State University Dr. Ana Djuric, Assistant Professor of Engineering Technology, will be a Co-PI and will bring her ex- pertise in mechanical engineering, more specifically in industrial robotics and manufacturing to the team. She developed new introductory Robotic theory course and two robotic modules with industry grants (Omnibus Fund Support of Instructional Technology and Industrial Equipment Grant from General Mo- tors). Dr. Djuric research areas are Industrial robots, kinematics, dynamics, and control and advanced manufacturing systems.Dr. Petros J Katsioloudis, Old Dominion University Petros J
projects were asked to complete weekly “audio diary” entriesresponding to discursive verbal prompts posed to them during bi-weekly visits by a student-researcher. Youth apprentices were given control of the recording devices, and each recorded“audio-diary” session lasted three to five minutes taking place one-on-one, away from the rest ofthe group. Individual sessions were organized around a selected “set” of prompts (see Table 1.).The student-researcher was able to complete between two and five sessions per visit. Promptswere generally organized around three types themes 1) comprehension of sustainability and/orwicked sustainability problem contexts 2) perspectives on learning (hands-on, schooling, groupactivities, etc.) and 3) interest in or
Fridaysand our annual STEM challenge. We propose that a model similar to this could be successfullyand beneficially implemented more widely, with the goal of increasing both interest andretention in STEM fields.IntroductionThe goal of Bridges to STEM Careers is to increase retention rates and general interest in theSTEM programs offered by the university.1 The name itself refers to a bridge, reaching fromcommunity college, through university, all the way to a successful STEM career. The primarymethod of achieving this goal has been to forge mutually beneficial relationships among faculty,student mentors, and students. We believe that our goals are best effected on a personal levelrather than an institutional level, and that by focusing on
“characteristics” of ideal professional engineers that thestudents identified in four groups: technical competence including creativity; communicationskills for effective teamwork; conscientiousness, diligence, persistence and a drive towardmaximal performance; and high moral standards. The third group is quite similar to many of theattitudes that were listed in the BOK, such as commitment, high expectations, persistence, andthoroughness. The fourth group of characteristics seems similar to the attitudes of fairness,honesty, and integrity.In general, engineering does not seem to readily associate itself with people-orientedattitudes.22,26 The distinction between people-orientation and thing-orientation has been proposedas a potential reason for the low
will be required to take measurements off the physical beam)Table 1. Relationship between assigned modeling exercise and different stages of deliverables Assignment (given) Student generated Part Student generated Assembly Student generated Drawing Reverse modeling exercise 2 1 B 10.00 12.80 B B
and teaching courses to satisfy ABET criteria, Journal of Engineering Education, 92 (1), 7-25 (2003).14. Hundhausen, C.D., Agrawal, A., Fairbrother, D., and Trevisan, M. “Does studio-based instruction work in CS1? An empirical comparison with a traditional approach.” Proceedings, 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '10). ACM, New York, NY, 500-504.15. Studio Based Learning. < http://www.studiobasedlearning.org/>. Retrieved on March 5, 2015.16. Lewis, T. (2013). New York Times, August 22, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/22/education/obamas-plan- aims-to-lower-cost-of-college.html?emc=eta1
about issues of transformation in engineering education; Strategies. Gain immediate insight into how to impact transformation; Methodological and pedagogical ideas. Gain insights into both research methodology and innovative pedagogy.The activities and timeline for the graduate students involved is provided in Figure 1, whichshows that the blended experience consisted of online training workshops, independent researchactivities, and an analysis workshop at ASEE. The monthly online training workshops were runusing Adobe Connect and were based on the pedagogical approach of active learning – somelecture, group discussion, and small group breakout sessions. The research team also provided apre- and post-workshop survey
the Maker Movement on college campuses. As an example of that scope,over 150 colleges and universities detailed their contributions to the Maker Movement in reportscataloged by the Executive Office of the White House.8Academic Makerspace Model: Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyThe Massachusetts Institute of Technology does not have a singular academic makerspace on itscampus, but a network of small makerspaces strategically located across campus is a key aspectof MIT’s long range plan.9 This plan details embedding the future spaces within academicvillages that include classrooms, meeting and study spaces, technical and library support, andfood service. The academic villages are based on a concept that “blended learning” requires“blended
DiscussionA summary of the information obtained from the teacher feedback forms is provided in Tables 1and 2 and a summary of the information obtained from the facilitator feedback forms is providedin Table 3. As indicated previously a five point Likert scale was used in the assessment with 5being strongly agree and 1 being strongly disagree. Averaged values obtained from the formsare provided in Tables 1-3 with the standard deviation indicated in parenthesis. Additionally, thedemographics of the student participants is also summarized in Table 1.As can be seen from Tables 1-3, both the facilitators and teachers had a positive response to theactivities and kits. The facilitators generally felt the kits were complete and the instructions wereclear and
the course’srequired competencies.Completion of work and subsequent achievement of competencies was managed throughPurdue’s Open Passport badging platform (http://www.openpassport.org). The badges presentthe challenges to be completed to demonstrate a desired competency. The PPI facultyrequested that the Libraries develop an information literacy badge to complement the badgesrelated to the English and Communications course content. The librarians created a badge withcontent equivalent to 1-credit hour of work, based on a one-credit 8-week course that theLibraries had traditionally provided as a General Studies course.The badge contains five challenges: Exploring a Topic, Searching for Information, EvaluatingInformation, Using and
aircraft engineer. Her research and professional interests include faculty development, innovations in engineering communication education, engineering student learning motivation, and nar- rative structure in technical communication.Dr. Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida Director of Undergraduate Laboratories, Faculty Lecturer, Department of Materials Science and Engi- neeringDr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli, Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering and research associate professor of engineering education at University of Michigan (U-M), earned B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from U-M in 1988, 1989, and 1993, respectively. Prior to joining U
Page 26.1625.8coders then worked together to negotiate consensus definitions for the groupings such that eachgroup was finally characterized by its differences from other categories as well as the similaritiesamong quotations within the group.ResultsThe preliminary data analysis yielded three major aspects that seemed to dictate the meaning ofmentoring within each relationship: context, formation and tone (Table 1). Context reflects thegeneral scope of the relationship, including both its focus and the dynamic between mentor andmentor. Formation represents the way in which the relationship was initiated, and in someinstances how it was maintained. Finally, tone reflects the general attitude of the mentor thatformed the basis of the student
also asked on the Spring 2015 post survey to rate the course delivery methods onwhether they feel that the method would help them outside of the course. Specifically, they wereasked to indicate their level of agreement to the statement “This course component gave me skillsor knowledge that I feel will be very valuable to me outside of this course; for example, insubsequent courses, jobs, technical projects, extracurricular activities, etc.” with 1 = stronglydisagree to 6 = strongly agree. Thus while Figure 12 indicates what methods were most helpful inlearning the course material, this question asks what would be most helpful in other circumstances.The results for both questions are compared in Figure 13. Students felt that most of the
. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-008-9114-7 4. Clewell, B.C., Cohen, C.C., Tsui, L, & Deterding, N. (2006). Revitalizing the Nation’s Talent Pool in STEM. Washington DC: The Urban Institute. 5. U.S. Census. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/20000.html, retrieved 1/27/2015. 6. Kansas State Department of Education. http://svapp15586.ksde.org/k12/state_reports.aspx, retrieved 1/27/2105. 7. Kansas State University Planning and Analysis: Student Reports and Historical Information. http://www.k- state.edu/pa/student/index.html, retrieved 1/28/2015. 8. National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our
assessed by allBME faculty and the advisors from ME and Nursing. (See appendix for rubrics used in BME atLTU for 1) needs finding 2) design concepts 3) final presentation during the first semester 4)poster session and 5) final presentation during the second semester)The faculty have started to implement pre and post surveys to assess student expectations andhighlight major hurdles in project execution. Currently, client satisfaction is qualitative andmostly done verbally. However, the faculty are also creating surveys for clients to get concretedata about patient expectations and satisfaction with project outcomes. Previous surveys ofstudents who have worked on developing assistive devices for people with disabilities haveshown that these projects
becoming an intrapreneur as we have defined intrapreneurship above.The Intrapreneurship Study Team then grouped these responses into these nine competency areasthat are shown in Figure 3. : 1. Technical competence 2. Innovation 3. Anthropologist 4. Cross-pollinator 5. Experimenter 6. Communication/value proposition 7. Teamwork 8. Breadth (“T-shaped) 9. Confidence 30 No. of Times Mentioned 25 20 15 10 5
communitycollege with intent to transfer to a four year university to complete their Bachelor of Sciencedegree.1 Community colleges play a substantial role in the production of engineering graduatesin Washington State. Several community colleges throughout the state offer comprehensiveengineering transfer programs that include all the courses necessary for students to transfer atjunior level in most engineering majors. Transfer students who completed their prerequisitecourse work at a community college make up approximately one third and one quarter ofengineering graduates at the main campuses of Washington State University in Pullman andUniversity of Washington in Seattle respectively. More broadly 36% of 2014 college graduatesin Washington had completed
Paper ID #11488System Analysis Methodology for Teaching Algebra: A Foundation in Engi-neering EducationDr. Jale F. Akyurtlu, Hampton University Jale Akyurtlu is Endowed University Professor of Engineering at Hampton University. She has BS and MS degrees in Chemical Engineering from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey; and a Ph.D. degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She has research interests in chemical reaction engineering, catalysis, and the modeling of chemical reactors, mainly related to general energy and environmental research, undergraduate education in
generator, 16-channel logic analyzer, 16-channel digitalpattern generator, spectrum analyzer, network analyzer, voltmeter, and digital I/O.18 The ADBoards and supporting curriculum modules were piloted at multiple instructional/degree grantingHBCU setting in 2013-2015. The findings from this paper represented data from 623 studentsacross 13 institutions, 5 terms, and 32 separate course sequence numbers (e.g. introduction toelectrical engineering, electric circuits, and electronic circuits). Additional data includeobservations and interviews with faculty, administrators, and students at nine HBCU sites. Presented in Table 1 are the student demographics. The majority of students were male(77%); 75% self-reported ethnicity as Black, 5% as
understood to drive an increase in their representation in this labor market segment. With (1-3)minority groups currently accounting for the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population ,American global technical leadership and economic vitality will increasingly depend on minority (4)demographics succeeding in science and technology fields . However, minority and femalestudents face particular challenges in university settings, often finding themselves one among few,if any, in STEM courses . Freshman and sophomore “gateway” courses typical of STEM
," students will havecreated a tangible artifact, which represents the knowledge acquired during the activity.Students were supported through a four-stage process as they 1) conceived of the taskthey would like a robot to perform, 2) developed the steps needed for the task to beperformed, 3) decided how to implement the required steps, and 4) assessed whether theintended aims were achieved. At each stage of the process, the students were assisted inre-evaluating their goals. In this paper, we present a report of our participation in twoDrawing with Robots events. This experience report summarizes the design ofthe activity, the lessons learned in its execution and a description of the engineering skillstaught during these sessions. We found that the
nine laboratory sessions were usedfor heat transfer numerical projects using Excel, and solving heat transfer problems.Laboratory FeesEngineering and Science laboratory fees were approximately $35/student/ laboratory, then inlater years increased to $70/student /laboratory. Every year the author counted the number ofstudents enrolled in the Heat Transfer Laboratory, then multiplied the number of students by thelaboratory fees, the total ranged from $300 to approximately $1000. This money was used tofund projects and purchase the following equipment: 1. Thermocouple spot welder, crimping tool box, and thermocouple wire. Students learned to weld thermocouple wires and use thermocouples in projects. 2. Barometer, beakers, stands
General Labels from 2012 to 2014. Currently a PhD student at UTEP with expected graduation in 2016.Dr. Eric D Smith, University of Texas, El Paso Eric D. Smith is currently an Associate Professor at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), a Minor- ity Serving Institution (MSI) and a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI), He works within the Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering (IMSE) Department, in particular with the Master of Science in Systems Engineering Program. He earned a B.S. in Physics in 1994, an M.S. in Systems Engineering in 2003, and his Ph.D. in Systems and Industrial Engineering in 2006 from the University of Arizona in Tucson, AZ. His dissertation research lay at the interface of systems
. “Don’t be a dick” [in regards to how to behave] 2.2. Decision making will be done by consensus but will be done by voting if consensus cannot be reached. The topic must be discussed before a decision can be made.Team 2 met once a week for approximately 1-2 hours in tutorial and focused their discussion onplanning and decision making; additional meetings occurred around course deadlines. Theycompleted their written deliverables virtually on Google Docs, however they had long in-personediting sessions in a university computer lab the day before each deliverable was due. Page 26.1573.95. AnalysisGrounded in an
of teaching.1. IntroductionSkills such as communication, professionalism, ethics, and project management are notspecifically taught within the engineering graduate curriculum. These skills, referred to as softskills or professional skills, are often assumed to be acquired as a result of performing academictasks and “constant” communication with other graduate students and faculty members [1]. TheCanadian Association of Graduate Studies (CAGS) recognizes the duty and responsibility ofuniversities to train these soft skills. CAGS defines professional development as knowledge thatmust be provided along with practice and continuous coaching within the graduate programs [2].During their first year of graduate studies, many engineering students
Paper ID #16699Teaching with Graduate Teaching Assistants: Tips for Promoting High Per-formance Instructional TeamsDr. Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley Shannon Ciston is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Education in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Ciston holds degrees in chemical engineering from Northwestern University (PhD) and Illinois Institute of Technology (BS). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in technical communications and applied pedagogy, and conducts engineering education research.Dr. Colin Cerretani