battery technologies. The lessons learned from this effort led directly into a currentBEV construction (described later) and one of the battery storage mediums for renewable energyemployed in this paper. Furthermore, efforts on the reduced scale allowed a common threadwithin the curriculum as interdisciplinary cooperation became more feasible 9. As this information was learned, students actively published and presented their knowledgein order to enable others to take a similar sustainable path 10. Moreover, universityacknowledgement of the success of the program is illustrated through the University of KansasCenter for Sustainability Academic Project and Faculty Sustainability Leadership Awards, aswell as Student Organization of the Year Award
about gender and thegender binary (per Caroline Perez and Cordelia Fine). Assignments in Race & Technologyinclude an “infrastructure exploration” [25] in which students plan and execute a local journeyinformed by readings from Langdon Winner, Rayvon Fouché, Simone Browne, and others, thenpresent their observations to their classmates in ways that facilitate further discussion. For thecapstone project in Race & Technology, students may choose to propose a redesign of either aspecific technology or a STEM curriculum, drawing on the course readings and discussions. Thereadings lists for both classes are included as Appendices A and B.The Gender & STEM course was developed and taught by Mary Armstrong, a scholar ofliterature and gender
areas include stormwater management and green infrastructure, urban water, extreme floods, urban impacts on the water cycle and climate, and the water energy-nexus. Dr. Burian is active in numerous professional societies including the American Society of Civil Engi- neers (ASCE), American Water Resources Association (AWRA), Water Environment Federation (WEF), American Geophysical Union (AGU), American Meteorological Society (AMS), and American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). He is currently the co-Director of Sustainability Curriculum Develop- ment at the University of Utah and the chair of the ASCE Rainwater Harvesting technical committee. He is a registered professional engineer in Utah.Whitney A Lutey
outsourcing and subcontracting as the contractual means of tapping theircommunity network for skills they do not have “in house”. For example, one of the authors has abusiness in architectural services that contracts for engineering and information technologyservices so that the company can focus on architecture. One of the other authors has a businessin embedded computer systems engineering design services that contracts with a bookkeeper forcorporate accounting services, with an attorney for legal services, with a cleaning service to takeout the trash, and so forth. This allows the company to focus on its core identity and coreproduct.2.2 Literature referencesLow and MacMillan discuss the tension between entrepreneurial nature and nurture
use by students218 anywhere in the United States. The first tool, identified by two participants (one dean and one219 university director), is Curricular Analytics (https://curricularanalytics.org/), a free nationally220 available resource, provides tools and data analyses which helps students to visualize curricula221 and degree plans and analyze the impact on their student progress. This tool allows students to222 input curriculum or a degree plan in CSV file format and then provides an interactive223 visualization, generates an analysis of the complexity of the degree and potential bottlenecks,224 and provides 2-to-4 year articulation pathways. This tool allows students to simulate student225 progress under various
Paper ID #8851The efficacy of case studies for teaching policy in engineering and technologycoursesMr. Rylan C. Chong, Purdue University, West Lafayette Rylan Chong is a Ph.D. student in the Information Security Program and affiliated with The Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security (CERIAS) at Purdue University. He has a Master’s Degree in Information Security from Purdue University. He also has a B.S. in Computer Science from Chaminade University of Honolulu. His research area is on technology policy.Dr. Melissa Dark, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Dennis R. Depew, Purdue University, West
designed to measure the role that communalobligations play in Latino/Hispanic engineering students’ academic success. Initial evidencesuggested that Latino/Hispanic students’ level of engagement with the broader community canbe improved by developing curriculum that focuses on project-based learning situated in theirown community. The data also revealed that Latino/Hispanic students were not searching forculturally-based professional organizations to join. This research provides the initialdemonstration of the possibility for strengthening URM students’ ties to their own communities,even through activities exerted amongst ethnically/racially non-distinct peer groups.IntroductionAccording to the Diverse Issues in Higher Education publication [8
protocol consisting of 20questions that ask questions about teachers’ perceptions, challenges, practices, and any biases theymay have about teaching, assessment, and critical consciousness was designed to dig into theframes of mind, biases, and individualized approaches for recognizing or addressing their biases.Likewise, students being taught by the instructors were recruited for semi-structured interviews.The third stage of data collection involved classroom observations using a modified version of theCulturally Responsive Instruction Observation Protocol (CRIOP) - a validated instrument thatmeasures teachers’ classroom instruction along key pillars: assessment practices, teacherdispositions, classroom climate, planned curriculum activities
mainly focused on the reform strategies of engineering① The Engineers’ Council for Professional Development (ECPD) was founded in 1932 as an engineeringprofessional body dedicated to the education, accreditation, regulation and professional development ofengineering professionals and students in the United States. In 1980, ECPD was renamed the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) to more accurately describe its emphasis on accreditation.http://www.abet.org/about-abet/history/teaching and curriculum from the perspective of curriculum design, students appraisal andclassroom teaching evaluation under ABET accreditation, and impact of ABET upon thedevelopment of engineering disciplines and programs. A few monographs were also
about the redesign of Principles is to investigate how through a better designed courseyou can potentially influence more students, particularly engineers, toward developing orenhancing their entrepreneurial mindset and becoming more entrepreneurial in whatever theychose to do. Better design is assumed to mean a course more aligned with curriculum designmodels known to produce superior learning results in undergraduate students. Entrepreneurialmindset is assumed to be a set of individual factors related to the knowledge, skills and attributesthat research has shown lead to a higher probability of entrepreneurial success 10-14. This paper also introduces the learning outcomes model of Wiggins and McTighe15, theassessment triangle model of
URM achieving above GPA of 3.0, etc) of historically underrepresentedstudents. For faculty, excellence is the level of scholarship achieved by a faculty. Researchshowed that serious engagement of diversity in the curriculum increases students’ positiveattitudes and awareness of diversity, satisfaction with college, and commitment to education ingeneral 17. Institutionally, it means providing academic and professional development supportstructures that “make excellence inclusive.” This could require maintaining high admission andacademic achievement standards but paying attention to the cultural differences and abilitieslearners bring to the educational experience. This means fostering an academic culture thatchallenges and moves all students
. Page 14.80.2Some studies have shown that underrepresented (i.e., all women and ethnic men) students dropout of STEM programs at much higher rates. Thus, providing equal access to higher education isnecessary but not sufficient to ensure academic success. Colleges and universities must alsoprovide equal opportunity for retention, graduation, and advancement [5, 6].Underrepresented minority students are often low-income and/or first-generation collegestudents. As a result, many arrive on campus less prepared than others for the academic andsocial challenges they will encounter. They are less likely to have their own computers; theyhave less knowledge about the college experience; they are less knowledgeable about collegefinances and managing
both the Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Computer Engineering and been focusing on student focused pedagogy centered around Game-based learning techniques. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Enhancing Student Engagement and Interest in STEM Education through Game-Based Learning Techniques in Bioengineering and Electrical Engineering Core Curricula and How to Create ThemIntroduction:Engineering education has evolved greatly over the last decade [1, 2]. Implementations of activelearning techniques, student centered learning, and effort-based grading were traditionally nottypical in the STEM fields, but due in no small part to their ability to increase
assigned as a rotating military faculty member at CGA and in 2008, she was selected as a member of the Permanent Commissioned Teaching Staff (PCTS) in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Program. As a faculty member at CGA, she has expanded and modernize the Civil and Environmental Engineering curriculum with the development of elective courses in Water Resources Engineering and Coastal Resiliency. CAPT Fleischmann’s passion for teaching and learning began early in her career. In 2007, she was certified as a Sustainable Building Advisor through the National Sustainable Building Advisors Program. In 2009, she began her PhD work at the University of Connecticut in Civil Engineering. Since earning her PhD in 2014, she
Paper ID #33069Innovating Assessment: Using Innovative Impact as a Metric to EvaluateStudent Outcomes in an Innovation-Based Learning CourseEllen M. Swartz, North Dakota State University Ellen Swartz is currently pursuing a M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering at North Dakota State Univer- sity. Her research interests include STEM education, innovation-based learning, and agent-based mod- eling of complex adaptive systems. She previously received her B.S. degree from North Dakota State University in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Ryan Striker P.E., North Dakota State University Ryan Striker is a life-long learner
professor of learning sciences in the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Prof. Nathan received his Ph.D. in experimental (cognitive) psychol- ogy. He also holds a B.S. in electrical and computer engineering, mathematics and history. He has worked in research and development in artificial intelligence, computer vision and robotic mobility, including: design and development of autonomous robotic arms and vehicles; sensor fusion; the development of expert systems and knowledge engineering interview techniques; and the representation of perceptual and real-world knowledge to support inference-making in dynamic environments. Nathan also has worked on computer-based tutoring
identified.Table 1: Participant pseudonyms, gender, majors and minors (Major acronyms: BME = biomedical, CE = civil engineering, CHE =chemical engineering, CSE = computer science and engineering, EE = electrical engineering, ME = mechanical engineering, MSE =materials science and engineering). Pseudonym Gender Current Major Current Minors Michael Man CE N/A Kevin Man CSE Math Andy Man BME N/A David Man ME N/A Toby Man EE Math Roy Man EE CSE Stanley Man
low-resource settings and works alongside clinical partners at UW Medicine and Seattle Children’s Hospital. Kathleen graduated from the UW with a BS in Mechanical Engineering in 2021 with a focus in biomechanics and has worked at Novo Nordisk as a research operations intern to develop pilot projects in collaboration with the UW.Jonathan T.C. Liu, University of Washington Jonathan T.C. Liu (he/him) is a professor of mechanical engineering, bioengineering, and laboratory medicine & pathology at the UW, where his molecular biophotonics laboratory develops high-resolution optical-imaging devices and computational-analysis strategies for guiding treatment decisions. This work is funded by the NCI, NIBIB, DoD, NSF
courses.Dr. Naneh Apkarian, Arizona State University Dr. Naneh Apkarian (she/her) is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education in the School of Mathe- matical and Statistical Sciences at Arizona State University. Her work is generally in service of improving student experiences (and outcomes) in introductory and foundational STEM courses through systemic and cultural change.Mr. Antonio Estevan Martinez IV, UC San Diego & San Diego State University Antonio is a doctoral candidate in the Mathematics and Science Education (MSED) joint program be- tween San Diego State University and UC San Diego. His research focuses on incorporating computing into the introduction to proofs curriculum and supporting students as
Paper ID #34046Low-Income, High-Achieving Students and Their Engineering IdentityDevelopment After One Year of Engineering SchoolJanet Aderemi Omitoyin, The University of Illinois at Chicago Janet Omitoyin is a PHD student in the Department of Curriculum and Instructions, University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). An astute scholar, Janet’s quest for a solution to the problems of mathematics learning based on her experience as a student and later as a teacher is at the root of her enrollment for a PHD program at UIC with a view to be part of the solution to the systemic problems emanating from inadequa- cies in the
and Computer Engineering at the Univer- sity of Calgary. Her research interests include designing computer chips, electronic design automation and developing software for computer hardware. She has won several awards for her work on the devel- opment of software tools for computer engineering. In addition, Dr. Behjat has a passion for increasing the status of women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Dr. Behjat was the re- cipient of the 2015 Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) Women in Engineering Champion Award. She currently serves as the NSERC Chair for Women in Science and Engineering in the Prairie Region of Canada
Paper ID #34187Class Exercises Involving Ethical Issues Reinforce the Importance andReach of Biomedical Engineering (and the Impact of the Coronavirus onTeaching Strategy and Measures of Assessment)Dr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University IEEE Life Fellow, AIMBE Founding Fellow, U.N.E.S.C.O. Academician. Director, Center for Rehabilita- tion Engineering, Science, and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. (Retired) Senior Rehab Research Career Scientist, VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and
Engineering from the University at Buffalo – SUNY. He also holds a diploma in Civil Engineering (2005) from the National Technical University of Athens, Greece. Prior to joining the University of Colorado at Boulder, Dr. Sideris was appointed as Post-doctoral Research Fellow and Adjunct Lecturer at the University at Buffalo - SUNY (September 2012 - May 2013). Dr. Sideris has taught courses in statics, mechanics of materials, structural dynamics, applied mathematics and numerical methods, reinforced concrete design, and experimental methods. His research primarily focuses on the areas of Resilient and Sustainable Structures and Computational Mechanics for Damage, Softening and Structural Collapse. Dr. Sideris is an
context of thelarger camp theme so students can understand how math and engineering work in tandem. Thisgives students more confidence to take more math and science courses at their schools [11-12].In addition, the literature shows aligning camp curriculum with state math, science, andengineering standards creates more effective learning and provides teachers the possibility toincorporate these projects into their classrooms to reach more students [10, 12].Another best practice in informal STEM education is to relate content to ideas familiar tostudents outside of their classrooms and within their communities. Many researchers found thatstudent interest in STEM increase when content areas relate in this manner [2, 3, 13, 14].Unfortunately, few
(particularly iterative cycles in design), interdisciplinary thinking, conceptions of engineering, building capacity in engineering education researhc, and strategies for connecting research and practice.Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Cheryl Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist at the Center for the Advancement for Engineering Education (CAEE), based at the University of Washington. Within CAEE, she works on the Institute for the Scholarship of Engineering Education (ISEE). She received her Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction and MA in cultural anthropology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a BA in sociology/anthropology from Carleton College. Her research
engineering managementprogram could be based on. The course can provide a good learning experience for both noviceand current leaders. Infact, one approach that could be used to teach such a global managementcourse would be to focus it around similar case studies as the ones presented later in this paperand use such exercises to educate on the topic of the barriers in a global team. Such a coursewould make the class more interactive and would instill the key points within the students. Interms of integration within educational programs for engineering managers, there are severalways of doing that.Integration with educational programsTeaching global management formally as part of an educational curriculum is one of the mosteffective ways of developing
Conference (FIE), 2011.; 2011:S3H--1.7. De Dreu CKW, West MA. Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(6):1191-1201.8. McLeod PL, Baron RS, Marti MW, Yoon K. The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(5):706-718.9. Bucciarelli LL, Kuhn S. Engineering Education and Engineering Practice: Improving the Fit. In: Barley SR, Orr JE, eds. Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in U.S. Settings. Cornell University Press; 1997:210-229.10. Leonardi PM, Jackson MH, Diwan A. The Enactment-Externalization Dialectic: Rationalization and the Persistence of Counterproductive
Large Southern Steel Mill, Curtis was sitting quietly at his desk infront of his computer. On this particular day, Curtis had just been given an assignment to make aform to use when measuring the dimensions of steel slabs in the cooling yard. As he wasdesigning the form in Excel, Will, a senior chemical engineer who was ostensibly Curtis’ssupervisor, glanced over and the following exchange occurred:Turn Time Speaker Quote or [action]1 [00:04:09] Curtis [Both giggle quietly at a humorous remark made by Researcher someone in the next cubicle]2 [00:04:10] Will [Turning to the researcher from his desk to Curtis’s
electronicallybefore the beginning of the next class. The beginning of the next class began with discussion ofsolutions from these assignments.Five types of assignments were available to students: concept questions, practice problems,homework problems, unit tests, and an advanced project. Concept questions were designed tohelp students learn to connect detailed course content with their outside experiences, othercourses in the curriculum, and their own career goals. Some of these questions asked students toreflect on and self-assess their own learning processes. Practice problems were similar tohomework and test problems. The advanced project was a group project that involved visiting alab to acquire EEG data during an “oddball” experiment and performing data
ready for the workshop, but only a staggering 11% of business leaders feel that graduateshave the competencies and skills necessary to succeed in the workplace [1]. This challenge does notescape engineering programs, and many are developing strategic programs to take on this industryreadiness gap. Some engineering programs have launched industry-sponsored senior capstone programswhile others bring industry influence into the classroom as guests, adjunct faculty or through industry-influenced curriculum or professional socialization [2-5]. Other engineering programs have sought toclose this industry readiness gap with mentorship programs [6-7].Mentorship is a vital component to career advancement. It is stated by the Association for Talent &