, then one can seehow important it is to provide courses that help students become successfully literate in thedisciplinary culture and research practices.81 Two quotes from panelists in this study highlighthow far many people are from embracing this view: “…several faculty members [say] that theywon’t approve [even a graduate level writing course] on a graduate study plan unless it is takenas an extra course. They basically don’t see it as a viable replacement for a technical course,”and “There's the rub: courses don't count toward graduation; advisors don't recommend thembecause it seems inefficient. The concept of an investment eludes both advisor and student.”In a recent article describing a graduate-level, credit-bearing Computer Science
, Innovation, and Leadership of Technology DevelopmentAs the National Society of Professional Engineers has pointed out, there are nine progressive leadershiplevels of responsibility in engineering practice beyond entry-level (See Appendix A).14 A major functionof the National Collaborative Task Force is to define the critical skill-sets for each of these levels,especially at Engineer IV for the professional master of engineering program, at Engineer VI for theprofessional doctor of engineering program, and at Engineer VIII for the professional fellow program.Following the definition of skill-sets, the National Collaborative Task Force will then purposefullydesign a coherent professional curriculum and educational process, which is integrative with
Paper ID #40293Let’s Talk about Disability: Disability Justice in EngineeringLibrarianshipProf. Elizabeth C. Novosel, University of Colorado Boulder Elizabeth Novosel is the Computer Science, Mathematics, & Social Sciences librarian at CU Boulder, where she has previously supported a wide variety of subject areas, including science, engineering, and social sciences. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Let’s Talk About Disability:Considering Disability Justice in STEM LibrarianshipAbstractDespite efforts to improve DEI on college campuses, bias and discrimination still exist in
Engineering from Purdue University in 2021. Since 2014, she has taught courses in Civil, Materials and First Year Engineering to undergraduates, and mentored undergraduate and graduate students in STEM to foster research and professional development skills. She also has relevant experiences in organizing undergraduate research symposium/conferences, hosting professional development workshops, providing guidance on undergraduate/graduate school application. Currently, she serves as a Teaching Scholar for the K-12 STEM Education Program at Berkeley Lab and is involved with curriculum development of K-12 outreach at LBNL. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A New Normal
Paper ID #39389”I haven’t really made those connections that maybe most would theirfirst year”: A qualitative study of the COVID-19 pandemic and studentsocial capital among 3 Cohorts of first-year engineering majors.Dr. Patricia Wonch Hill, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Hill is an applied sociologist, evaluator, and researcher whose primary scholarship is in gender, STEM and broadening participation in K-22 education and in professorate.Dr. Lance C. P´erez, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Lance C. P´erez is the Omar H. Heins Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln where he
engineering physics student at the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada. She enjoys learning about physics models and simulations. Outside of her studies, she is interested in education research and development directed towards improving the learning experiences of engineering students.Mustafa Nisar, University of Toronto, Canada Mustafa Nisar is an undergraduate student at the University of Toronto, where he is pursuing a degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering. He is passionate about robotics and AI, as well as STEM educa- tion. Mustafa is currently working as a research assistant at the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Practice, where he is
Paper ID #38314STEM Identity Development for Under-represented Studentsin a Research Experience for UndergraduatesGillian Roehrig (Professor)Ngawang Gonsar Ngawang Y. Gonsar, PhD. Biology Faculty, Normandale Community College, Minnesota.Alison Haugh Nowariak (Graduate Student STEM Education Researcher) Alison Haugh Nowariak is a Ph.D candidate at the University of Minnesota in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. She is also a STEM specialist teacher for K-5th grade students in ISD 196 in Minnesota. Prior to working in the schools and attending the University of Minnesota, she worked as an undergraduate
can have on children’sinvestment and interest in STEM disciplines and careers [16]. However, despite the significantamount of time spent in the home environment, there remains a dearth of research specificallyinvestigating the nature and impact that home-based, out-of-school learning may have on thelearning supports for and engagement with STEM disciplines [17].Compared to curriculum-focused approaches typical of formal STEM education, home-basedSTEM learning embraces families’ own cultures and lived experiences (i.e., funds of knowledge)[18]. Caregivers often bring their own prior knowledge and skills that represent a family’s innerculture and experience into learning and engaging with math problems [19], engineeringpractices [20], and
investigate a topicof interest, experts believe that research-based education can stimulate engagement and ultimatelybe a transformative experience by allowing students a glimpse into how scientific knowledge issynthesized [7]. Experts also consider research in education to be beneficial to students’competitiveness in the modern, global market, as developing specialized research competenciesallows students to meet the never-ending demand for further technological developments [8].These benefits allow research-based education to serve as a useful addition to a college curriculum,exposing students to the processes behind academic progress and preparing them with valuableskills for success after graduation.Seven of the eight students involved in the
class engaging • Internet and computer hardware issues and access to resources • Non-conductive home living arrangements for educational success • Extended hours of screen time • Issues with staying motivated without the structure of a class routine • Loss of authentic, hands-on experiences The rapid transition in Spring 2020 forced instructors to be creative and innovative inlearning, but gaps persisted as the semester advanced. Ramo et al. [10] suggests that while somestudents quickly adjusted and continued to perform well with new technology-deliveredinstruction; yet, a significant number of students struggled with content disengagement. For theFall 2020 semester, many universities continued to conduct remote
survey responses and 8 follow-up interviews werecollected. Participants included undergraduate engineering students taking courses with at leastone group project that was moved online or executed virtually as a result of the COVID-19 in thespring of 2020. Participants represented a range of engineering majors including Aerospace,Biomedical, Chemical, Civil, Computer Science, Electrical, Material Science, Mechanical, andNuclear. Participants ranged in class standing from first-year students to fourth-year students.The size of the virtual teams and length of the projects that participants were part of also rangedfrom teams of two to 14 members and one week to two semester long projects. Virtual teamproject commitments ranged from 1 hour per week
Iconoclasts a videogame released digitally initially for computer platformsin 2018 and subsequently released on most major videogame consoles including the NintendoSwitch, the Xbox One and the Playstation 4. The game follows the story of protagonist Robin, ayoung rogue mechanic who stumbles into a conflict with her worlds ruling theocracy, the OneConcern, and its military force. See Figure 2 for a screen capture of Robin near her home at thebeginning of the game. Robin’s unnamed fictional universe features modern technology (cars,high-speed trains, and electricity) as well as advanced science fiction technology (such ascybernetically enhanced super soldiers called “Agents,” a mobile underground colony, and anentire artificial planet which was
they identified. This study reportsfindings related to the 22 engineering postdoctoral scholar interviews. The sample wascomprised of 10 White participants, six Asian Americans, and six URMs who identified asAfrican American or Latinx; seven females, 14 males, and one individual who identified as non-binary. The participants ranged in age from 29 to 43. Almost three quarters indicated they werecurrently employed in a postdoctoral position, while the other quarter were either in tenure-trackfaculty positions or in the private sector. Engineering fields of the sample included aerospace,biomedical, chemical, civil, computer, electrical, environmental/health, and nuclear. A summaryof participant demographics is presented in Table 1.Table
Carolina A&T State University Hyung Nam Kim, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University. He is the director of the Health-Human-Computer Interaction (Health HCI) Lab. His research interests include human factors, human-computer interaction, healthcare and safety. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Examining Black Diaspora Participation in Engineering using Narrative Inquiry Ekundayo Shittu* *Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, The George Washington
NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revo- lutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program fo- cused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Susannah C. Davis, Oregon
include teaching tools, communication tools,student engaging tools, marketing tools, assessment tools, and feedback tools. This paper isgoing to focus on teaching, communication, and engaging tools.DevicesFirstly, the requirement of the right equipment is highly important to conduct classes with theavailable online teaching tools. Suppose the device that is being used is not capable of handlinghigh bandwidth data over the internet, then handling the Wi-Fi connection with hundreds ofmegabytes of the video is not going to be possible. The capable hardware ranges from the iPodTouch to super smartphones and tablet computers. Secondly, a good internet connection isneeded using a good carrier, a modem, and a router.Online Teaching ToolsOnline teaching
entrepreneurial processes (ideation, customer discovery, clientvalidation, and commercial viability) that teach the above concepts. Furthermore, we draw onpedagogical research in experiential learning [26] and scaffolding [18] to “package” the processesto support student learning with a minimum of resources.1 It should be noted that n our approachas each of the processes can be implemented independently, different programs can choose toimplement only those that fit best with their program’s logistics and goals.We emphasize that the four entrepreneurial processes we have developed and integrated into ourcapstone curriculum are designed to familiarize our students with an early product developmentphase of a start-up, where limited resources both in terms
. Second, engineering administrators can use information gathered from the F-NSSE tobetter mentor new faculty member by: (1) seeing how faculty are incorporating innovations ininstruction and curriculum development; (2) helping to lay the groundwork for discussions aboutthe assumptions and values that underlie the role of new faculty members; (3) diagnosing facultymember’s strength and weaknesses; (4) developing professional development programming thataddresses identified teaching and learning issues; and (5) making fairer comparisons amongfaculty.The data collected from the E-NSSE and F-NSSE will provide all faculty members (both newand experienced) with: (a) tools to make them more effective teachers and (b) data which caninform classroom-based
, thinking as part of a team, and thinking and communicating inseveral “languages” of design. Fry12 has also discussed the importance of “design thinking” inengineering education and underscores the value of multidisciplinary teams. Until designpractices are fully integrated into engineering curricula, capstone design programs will bear asubstantial burden to better prepare undergraduates for careers that inevitably emphasize the“practice” of design.At RIT, the infusion of multidisciplinary design into the curriculum represents a strategicimperative for the KGCOE. Without strong top-down commitment, the likelihood of making anoticeable impact on the broader challenge outlined above seems remote. In addition to theMSD program discussed in this paper
FD2 for faculty and the sum of FA1 and FA2 for cadets. Though this superset is notspecified anywhere on the Time Allocation Worksheet, it is trivial to compute in data compilationfor comparative purposes. For Service as a faculty domain, the nearest cadet time category is Military and PhysicalObligations, because through these obligations cadets are preparing directly for their career ofservice. For Cadet Development as a faculty domain, the nearest cadet time category is Team andClub time, because most faculty time spent developing cadets is spent where the cadets are presentand engaged in their teams and clubs. For Faculty Development as a faculty domain, the nearest cadet time category isLeader/Peer/Character development. USMA is a
Laboratory Are Magnus Bruaset holds a PhD in mathematical modeling from the University of Oslo. Since 2007, he has served as the assistant director of the Simula School of Research and Innovation. In addition, since late 2004, he has built up Simula’s research group in Computational Geosciences in close collaboration with StatoilHydro. He still leads this research group. Bruaset is also a professor at Department of Informatics, University of Oslo. For this national workshop, he served the lead organizer and as a principal instructor in the critique sessions.Melissa Marshall, Pennsylvania State University Melissa Marshall is a lecturer with the Department of Communication Arts & Sciences at
testingplays in conducting structural engineering research and education, the basic approach to theproposed research in the REU Site is discovery through actual construction, experimental testingand/or computer simulation, observing and recording, synthesizing the data collected, andgeneralizations. This approach provides an opportunity for individual growth and challenge tothe young and inquisitive mind.Pre-Preparation. To prepare the students for the research, reading material is sent four weeksprior to their arrival, which includes: project goal and objectives, important literature, tentativestudy plan, descriptions of test procedures and equipment, weekly activities, and information ofteam partners.Targeted Progress. The first day of the REU Site
functions. This same student may become more open tostudying other aspects of polynomials and other functions. These techniques can provide a quickcheck of computer-generated graphs or be employed when a computer is unavailable orinconvenient. If we desire to recruit more students into the analytical and other sciences, weneed to discover better, easier and more pleasurable ways to present conventional math conceptsbefore attempting to accelerate curricula by moving advanced differential concepts into thelower grades.Contents 1. Introduction 2. Polynomials 3. Arithmetic operations on functions and their effect on curves Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division 4. Elementary operations on curves and
- standing cross-cultural factors impacting student learning process as well as design curriculum based on engineering classes to empower engineering skills through hands-on activities and blended learning en- vironment. He is also interested in design methods which are based on the technology tools usage to stimulate engineering thinking for diverse students.Prof. Charles Morton Krousgrill, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Charles M. Krousgrill is a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University and is affiliated with the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same institution. He received his B.S.M.E. from Purdue University and received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Applied
Paper ID #25605Sociotechnical Habits of Mind: Initial Survey Results and their FormativeImpact on Sociotechnical Teaching and LearningDr. Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines Kathryn Johnson is an Associate Professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Department of Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Science and is Jointly Appointed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Wind Technology Center. She has researched wind turbine control systems since 2002, with numerous projects related to reducing turbine loads and increasing energy capture. She has applied experiential learning techniques in
chemistry sets, kitchen chemistry Took care of or trained an animal Planted seeds, watched plants grow, watched animal behavior, collected things in nature (e.g., butterflies, rocks) Observed or studied stars and other astronomical objects Participated in science groups/clubs/camps Participated in science/math competition(s) Read/Watched non-fiction science Read/Watched science fiction Played computer/video games Wrote computer programs or designed web pages Talked with friends or family about scienceTable 5. Students’ intensity of experience with out-of-school experiences with follow up Tukey’sHSD for significant differences between groups. Tukey’s HSD Outcome
. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an Ameri- can Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies
Building Escape Rooms to Increase Student Engagement in First Year Engineering ClassesThis complete evidence-based practice paper will discuss building escape rooms usingprogramming, computer aided design (CAD), engineering design, and prototyping to teach firstyear engineering students the fundamentals of engineering. An escape room is a cooperative playexperience where a team of players solves a series of puzzles in a set amount of time to win. Inthe work described here, students design and build escape rooms containing puzzles made usingArduino hardware, laser cut and CNC milled parts, and 3D printed models.Students become more invested in their education when they find the course content interestingand engaging
persistence of various groups ofstudents in civil engineering education and careers, this paper describes findings from a surveytaken by 223 undergraduate (165) and graduate students (58) in civil engineering. The surveyaims to address the following questions:• What are the factors that affect why women and minorities choose to pursue education in civil engineering?• What aspects of the civil engineering curriculum and course work do students find particularly motivating and interesting? Do students feel that they have a mentor? What kind of work experience and internships have students had? Are they members of student/professional engineering organizations? Do the answers to this question depend on the gender or ethnic/racial