others. But how does constructivism apply to engineering education? Within the constructs ofengineering education, constructivism supports learning activities that are relevant and engaging,where learners become active participants in problem-solving and critical thinking.Constructivism in engineering classrooms encourages learners to test ideas and approaches basedon prior knowledge and experience, then apply the knowledge to new situations; in doing so,they integrate new knowledge gained with pre-existing, intellectual constructs. An examination of constructivism from an ABET perspective reveals similaritiesbetween ABET’s “A-K” guidelines for designing engineering curriculum and the goals andobjectives of constructivism3,11
Engineering Education, 2001. 90(4): p. 589-596.15. Clark, W.A. and A.J. Czuchry. Technology-based business incubators: Living laboratories for entrepreneurial students. 2004. Salt Lake City, UT, United States: American Society for Engineering, Washington, DC 20036, United States.16. Oberst, B.S., R.C. Jones, and I. Tiginyanu. Teaching entrepreneurship to engineering students. 2005. Portland, OR, United States: American Society for Engineering Education, Chantilly, VA 20153, United States.17. Wierman, J.C. and M. Camerer. Lessons from starting an entrepreneurship program. 2003. Nashville, TN, United States: American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC 20036, United States.18. McCorquodale, M.S. and R.B
contexts for instruction since the materials used in them andtheir inherent geometric constraints are directly linked to important components of materialsengineering education. To illustrate, since ultra high molecular weight polyethylene(UHMWPE) is used in orthopedic bearing wear components, it is possible to conceptually linkthe required mechanical properties of bearing components to the effect of the degree ofpolymerization, examine the difference between semi-crystalline and amorphous plastics, andprobe wear properties. Arterial stents are often made from shape memory materials which areexcellent venues for hands-on learning about phase transitions. Device recall case studiesprovide an opportunity to link manufacturing processes to materials
Paper ID #14584A Building-Block Approach to Industrial Controls Laboratories Using Pro-grammable Logic ControllersProf. Robert J. Durkin, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Mr. Durkin teaches courses in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology; including the capstone design and independent study projects. He serves as a Faculty Senator and earned the 2013 Outstanding Teacher Award. He has over 25 years of engineering and manufacturing experience including; design, project management, and various engineering, research and manufacturing leadership roles. He has been awarded two US patents. He is an
students do not have therequired certificate to fly a drone, and not all institutions have nearby authorized UAV flyingzones, which make it difficult to carry out related educational activities.Considering the above facts, we are motivated to develop a platform with a list of laboratoryactivities that are consistent with the UAV cybersecurity curriculum materials, which aims atovercoming these non-technical challenges and enabling hands-on exercises. Besides, thisplatform is going to have the capacity of extension and serve as the base for instructors andresearchers to customize or develop additional modules. To be specific, software simulation (e.g.,SITL, software in the loop, known as SITL) will be mainly used in our developments, buthardware-in
Paper ID #10155Ethnography in Engineering Ethics Education: A Pedagogy for Transforma-tional ListeningDr. Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech Yanna Lambrinidou is a medical ethnographer and adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Sci- ence and Technology Studies (STS) at Virginia Tech. For the past 7 years, she has conducted research on the historic 2001-2004 Washington, DC lead-in-drinking-water contamination. This work exposed wrongdoing and unethical behavior on the part of local and federal government agencies. In 2010, Dr. Lambrinidou co-conceived the graduate level engineering ethics course ”Engineering
engineering curriculum, as has been done at times with Formula SAE [8].Some of the skills the competitions promote are an entrepreneurial mindset, project management,leadership skills [9], and systems engineering knowledge [10]. AutoDrive is not only one of thelatest collegiate competitions, but perhaps it is the most challenging competition involvingautonomous vehicles at a high level of complexity, defined as SAE Level 4 autonomy, per SAEStandard J3016 [11]. One of the related issues to address is the education and training of studentsdirectly participating in the competition and more generally, of students interested in a futurecareer in the area of autonomous vehicles.Many approaches exist to design and deliver education and training programs
engineering education [7]. However, the developmentand assessment of engineering judgment presents multiple pedagogical challenges, necessitatingrobust conceptual frameworks, scaffolded learning approaches, valid assessment methods, andwell-defined learning objectives. Francis, Paretti, and Riedner [5] note a significant gap inengineering education literature addressing these needs, leaving both researchers and educatorswith limited approaches for studying, teaching, or assessing engineering judgment. This gapbecomes evident in hypothetical student questions such as “What constitutes good engineeringjudgment?” “How can engineering judgment be improved?” and “When should I hold withholdjudgment?” While these questions might invite oversimplified
programming instruction, and how to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) technology for peer-like knowledge construction.Junior Anthony Bennett, Purdue University I am a Graduate Research Assistant, and Lynn Fellow pursuing an Interdisciplinary Ph.D. program in Engineering Education majoring in Ecological Sciences and Engineering (ESE) at Purdue University, West Lafayette IN. I earned a Bachelor of Education in TVET Industrial Technology – Electrical from the University of Technology, Jamaica, and a Master of Science in Manufacturing Engineering Systems from the Western Illinois University. I am a Certified Manufacturing Engineer with the Society for Manufacturing Engineers and have over a decade professional experience
program and the research presented will deal with an entrepreneurial andmultidisciplinary way to create and grow an engineering technology-based study abroadprogram. Most universities face the same challenges with curriculum, funding, recruitment,partnerships, along with many other issues. How does one initiate a study abroad program thatwill attract students to enroll, attain funding, provide a curriculum that will meet variousdisciplines, and grow with success? We have documented our successes and plans for futuregrowth for this engineering technology-driven study abroad program.VisionTo many students, studying abroad has been a life-changing experience. A study conducted byMary Dwyer, Ph.D. and Courtney Peters, from IES Abroad, evaluated the
educating innovators, these models help “make room for themselves” in the time-constrained educational curriculum, by virtue of their support for other aspects of that curriculum.Because the competencies of (1) are described at length elsewhere, the majority of this paper isconcerned primarily with (2) and (3) above—the effective and efficient educational experiencefor acquiring or improving those competencies.A Targeted Educational Outcome: The Innovation CompetenciesThe term innovation is widely used but lacks a common, precise definition. A review of theliterature shows that there are many different definitions of innovation5. Most of these includeelements of creativity, developing something new and different, and developing solutions
, US engineering schools generally provide no unrestrictedlaboratory courses suitable for a broad range of majors, in contrast to our sister scientificdisciplines of physics, chemistry, and biology. This paper attempts redress of that lack,through the utilization of our engineering device laboratory to provide cross-collegecollaborations through co-teaching or supplementation of existing courses taught in threeNCSU colleges: Colleges of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHASS), Education andPsychology (CEP), and Design. The collective set of students to be impacted includes (i)engineers in foreign language courses, (ii) pre-service technology education studentsseeking K-12 teaching degrees, (iii) in-service technology education for practicing K
supplies, a tarp-like-bag with a 4" PVC insert in the middle, which conveniently fit into the clean-out at the end of the biodigester. The rest was simple, shovel some manure, add some water, ram it down with a broom handle. And by simple I mean alternately comical, messy, educational, humbling, comical again, and ultimately successful. The best part is, we get to do it again tomorrow! Remember kids, get your degree, otherwise you could end up doing heaven knows what.”Figure 9: Latrine/Biodigester/Wetland Construction Phase CompleteFigure 10: Biodigester SeedingOngoing EvaluationAfter the interns worked with the locals to construct and commission the latrine, biodigester, andwetland, they immediately began
Paper ID #24604Semester-Long Project of a Part Failure for Freshman Students in Mechani-cal Engineering TechnologyMr. Fredrick A. Nitterright, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Mr. Fred Nitterright is a lecturer in Mechanical Engineering Technology at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He received the A. A. S. in Mechanical Drafting and Design in 1989 from Westmoreland County Community College, the B. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology in 1991 from Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, and the M. S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1998. Mr. Nitterright is a member of the
fellow engineering education researchers on howto design effective programs in this field. Figure 1: A cartoon depiction of an interdisciplinary conversation on responsible AI 1IntroductionFor decades, engineering educators have raised concerns about the need to embrace humanist and liberal artseducation in the engineering curriculum. Researchers have called for integration between technical and humanisticcontent [1], [2], [3] as a path towards achieving “humanistic engineers” who can engage in socio-humanisticcritiques: “Instead of—or alongside—traditional socio-humanistic coursework, we propose to integrate
for Penn StateKim Barron, Pennsylvania State University Kim Barron is a graduate student in Industrial Engineering at Penn State. Kim has a Bachelor's degree from Penn State in Industrial Engineering. Page 11.551.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Engineering Education and the Global Economy: The Search for PolicyAbstractEngineering education in the United States is confronted with some new realities, both real andperceived. Engineering is increasingly a globally distributed, cooperative activity and the USoutsourcing of research, design, manufacturing, and
the impact changes in configuration has on vehicle dynamics. ‚ The results from the pre- and post-test surveys show that the course has a considerable impact on how students felt about their engineering education. The use of experiential learning in the vehicle dynamics curriculum increased students’ opinions of their opportunity to have hands on experiences, use modern engineering tools, and solve problems that were similar to what they expect to see in the workplace. This outcome shows that using simulation to provide authentic learning environments provides educators with a means of following the guidance provided by ABET and the National Survey of Student Engagement, with
primary questions collected were: • How much power/voltage/current will this system produce? • What can you do with the power you produce? • Isn’t it hard to build? • Is it expensive? • Can I come and look at it when it’s finished?This paper describes detailed design and construction of an axial flux wind turbine/generator.This includes a cost analysis, and pictures of the project phases. Graphs showing wind speed andelectrical power data during testing are obtained. A brief layout of the educational module thatwill be taught with all the information is compiled into a teaching plan. Students involved in theproject have gained knowledge and skills in electrical and mechanical areas. They also
SolidWorks® Simulation—an “add-in” moduleavailable with the premium educational edition of SolidWorks®1. The five specific learningoutcomes for this course are listed below. At the completion of the course, students will have demonstrated the ability to I. create professional engineering drawings of mechanical components using computer- aided design (CAD) software; (a, e, k) II. use CAD software to create three-dimensional (3D; solid) computer models of mechanical components that can be used as input to commercial engineering analysis programs [i.e., finite element analysis (FEA) software]; (a, e, k) III. use commercial FEA software to generate numerical solutions for stress, strain, and
coached by specially-trained highschool teachers called “teacher-coaches.” Teams have access to real-world expertise andmentoring from professionals in academia and industry. HSE teams write business plans, solvereal-world problems, perform testing and analyses, build prototypes, manufacture parts, operatewithin budgets, and manage their projects. Each spring, HSE teams showcase their workalongside college students at the Michigan Tech’s Undergraduate Expo. At the conclusion oftheir HSE experiences, it is expected that the students will demonstrate proficiency in appliedworkforce skills, they will be more disposed to enter STEM careers, and they will be prepared toundertake the training and education needed to enter these careers
from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor in April 2021. Her doctoral research included both technical and educational research. She also holds an M.S.E. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor and a B.S.E. in civil engineering from Case Western Reserve University, both in the areas of structural engineering and solid mechanics.Jianyu Dong (Associate Dean)Lizabeth Thompson Dr. Lizabeth Thompson is the Director of General Engineering and a professor in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She holds a BS in Industrial Engineering from Cal Poly, SLO, a MS in Industrial and Systems Engineering and an MBA from University of Southern California, and a PhD in Education from University of
hands-on service projects. The school created adynamic model for introducing projects that allow students to learn about different types ofSTEM-related fields, such as manufacturing, architecture, construction, engineering, science,technology, and more. The competency-based model provides an opportunity for educators tointroduce projects to students at an early stage in their careers in an effort to help them develop apassion for a particular field. These projects can also help students make early choices anddecisions about their future career aspirations. The research shows that the competency-basedmodel supports students in learning and developing valuable skills such as collaboration, creativethinking and critical analysis, problem solving
as three separate ones with separatecanvases is a teachable concept readily grasped by students.Concepts of ‘Creating Value’ in DesignIn this section, we focus on the opportunities to create value in product design activities. Being agood designer is a hallmark trait of an engineer and design curriculum is an integral componentof engineering education programs. As noted above, success in product design is elusive as 40%or more of products introduced to the marketplace fail to find success1.Concepts from systems engineering have been applied in developing a series of value-connectedviews (tables and diagrams) that have been applied in design courses at all levels22. The viewsare based upon a comprehensive metamodel23 that identifies items of
9.692.9Department faculty. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationTable 2. 4-Year Software Engineering Technology Curriculum Plan Fall Winter Spring Freshman General Education Core English Composition II Requirement (GECR) 5 (ENGL 201) 5 Calculus I (MATH 161) 5 Introduction to Chemistry Technical Writing (CHEM 100) 5 Digital Circuits I (ENGR 160) 4 (ENGL 205) 5
. As engineers and theiremployers place increasing emphasis on life-long learning and professional education, manyinstitutions have developed programs designed to make graduate education more accessible toworking professionals. While many excellent programs reach working professionals throughdistance learning and on-line programs, other programs provide a “high touch” approachdesigned to engage students in “systems thinking” and collaborative learning that is difficult toachieve through distance or on-line formats. This paper describes the program structure,curriculum, program delivery concept, and results of the Accelerated Master’s Program inSystems Engineering at the University of Virginia, tracing its evolution over the past decade andthe
that the research was responsive to community needs and had a direct, practical impacton educational practices.Pedagogical advancements. The reviewed literature highlights how educational practices in South Dakota have evolved topromote inclusion through various pedagogical structures and curriculum designs. These effortsemphasize culturally relevant teaching strategies, mentorship programs, and community engagementinitiatives to address systemic barriers faced by underrepresented groups, particularly Indigenousstudents. The papers analyzed demonstrate that inclusion in education can be achieved by integratinglocal culture, emotional intelligence, and professional development, creating pathways for Indigenousstudents and other
AC 2007-2274: COMBINING EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, RESEARCH ANDINTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES IN SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERINGEric Beckman, University of PittsburghMary Besterfield-Sacre, University of PittsburghGena Kovalcik, University of PittsburghMatthew Mehalik, University of PittsburghKim Needy, University of PittsburghRobert Ries, University of PittsburghLaura Schaefer, University of PittsburghLarry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Page 12.371.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Combining Educational Studies, Research and International Experiences in Sustainable EngineeringEric Beckman, Mary Besterfield-Sacre, Gena Kovalcik, Matthew Mehalik, Kim LaScola
proper value and what kind of tool we can use to detect them? Know what theoutput of this board is and where it is going to? Does the signal really reach the next functionblock with proper value and polarity?The author’s thoughts about changing courseware to more system level coincidently agrees with Page 22.1369.9a group of electronics people who are advocating revitalizing electronic programs by changingthe program from traditional component level to system level5. They are from NetWorks whichis an NSF-funded ATE Resource Center (Grant #0702753) supporting faculty in semiconductor,automated manufacturing, and electronics education. They state
Page 10.1029.2larger programs require proportionally longer time to debug.Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationList of Projects in First Course:Early projects prepare the student for later projects. Starting with the fourth project,students are required to read a statement of the project and design the I/O layout andprogram to perform the task. These projects include:Combinational Logic:The project uses the coin changer to allow some coin entries but not other entries.Outputs turn on with certain combinations of inputs. Several outputs may be usedincluding “Accept”, “Change”, and “Reject”.Traffic
” spreadsheet.The course is offered in both traditional classroom and online format. A series of studio recordedlectures and demonstrations are available on CD-ROM for the online version of the course.Early feedback from students indicated a strong desire for associated laboratory exercises thatwould provide “hands-on” experience with optical fiber and opto-electronic components.Unfortunately, communication grade optical hardware is very expensive and companies in theoptical space have not recently been in the position to make substantial contributions. Oursolution to this dilemma consisted of two initiatives • The purchase of relatively inexpensive “educator kits” manufactured by OptoSci Ltd. • The purchase of OptiSystem simulation software from