identify gaps in teaching related to timber,creating an outline of the current state of timber-focused curriculum within civil engineering.Second is to assess where there are needs and opportunities to improve available resources tosupport programs interested in integrating mass timber structural design into their curriculum. Toachieve the first objective, this research identifies and documents existing timber engineeringcourses available to undergraduate and graduate students and instructors in the United States.The two largest higher educational institutions by enrollment in each state were assessed toinventory courses related to engineering design that mentioned “timber” or “wood” in theircourse description, resulting in 63 total identified
Paper ID #6638Using the Portfolio Approach to Assess Multi-year Engineering Projects: aCase StudyDr. Harold R Underwood, Messiah College Dr. Underwood received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at UIUC in 1989, and has been a faculty member of the Engineering Department at Messiah College since 1992. Besides teaching Circuit Analy- sis, Electromagnetics, and Communications Systems, he supervises students on projects in the Integrated Projects Curriculum (IPC) and within the Communications Technology Group of the Messiah College Collaboratory. His on-going projects include Flight Tracking and Messaging for small planes in
set of impactful and research-based playful learning pedagogy and assessment that will helpstudents confront social and ethical dilemmas in their professional lives.Introduction[Sections labeled “Introduction” and “Overview of the Work” are reprinted from the 2021 ASEEPoster Session Paper which provides preliminary material for the reader.] [1]Over the past twenty years, there has been a strong shift in the scope of US undergraduateengineering programs towards heightening students’ awareness of the professional, social andethical aspects of the profession. The impetus for this shift has come largely from professionalsocieties and sources of accreditation (such as ABET) in response to numerous high profileengineering failures that have
assessment as a tool to reflect on students’ emotional response during international experiencesAbstractInternational experience was an essential component of the Integrative Graduate Education andResearch Traineeship (IGERT)-Sustainable Electronics (SE) Program between PurdueUniversity and Tuskegee University as electronics manufacturing and recycling primarily occurabroad in India, many countries in Africa, and China. During this two-year IGERT-SE program,students visited Delhi and Rajasthan, India to meet with representatives throughout the supplychain including mining and extraction experts, electronics manufacturers, electronics assemblers,non-government organizations, recyclers and waste handlers, and many other subject
, oneperson stated, “There can be ways to add small amounts of creativity…work into a class…Justneed to be creative.” Other responses to this question included the “science behind creativity”and the “distinction between creativity and innovation.”The most frequent suggestion for improvement concerned the desire for “hands on” experiencesduring the actual workshop, similar to the marshmallow challenge. Participants also seemed towant longer periods to work and generate ideas on how to implement the creative process in theclassroom. As one individual stated, “Opportunity to more fully develop exercises, activities,projects, and assessments to use in the classroom.” One individual also wanted “more concretestrategies about assessment of student
Professor in Information Sciences and Technology at Penn State Altoona,Pennsylvania. His main research interests include information assurance and security, software engineering,and networking. More specifically, he is interested in software security, network/cyber security, security management particularly in small and medium-sized organizations, software architecture,Architecture Description Languages (ADLs), object-oriented software development, formal methods, and requirements engineering. He has a significant industry experience (Sprint and IBM) in architecting and implementing secure, high-performance software for large-scale network management systems. He received his Ph.D. in Computer
mathematics and science lesson plans to complete the learning circle by tyingmathematics/science problems to their experiences. Many of these students decide to apply foracademic magnet middle schools focused on STEM based on the success of the 4th and 5th gradeintegrated lesson/field trip curriculum to The Citadel. Assessment of curriculum changes basedon the field trip, student reflective essays, and future attendance at middle and high schoolSTEM magnets will demonstrate the importance of collaboration between universities andelementary and middle school programs (especially STEM focused programs) on engagementwith STEM disciplines in the future.IntroductionEverywhere you read there are discussions about the importance to increase the number
improvements to system safety and efficiency. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Aircraft Misfuelling: a Case Study Using Bayesian Probability Risk AssessmentIntroductionA statistics course or the application of statistical methods is a fundamental component ofengineering and technology education, though it can be challenging for many students. Thispaper highlights the applicability of statistics in understanding and solving problems in aviationand aerospace education. While many programs rely on descriptive statistics, which assume priorknowledge of the underlying probability distribution of observed data, Bayesian statisticsprovides a framework for updating
including hurricanes, storm surges, waves,and riverine flash floods. This paper presents the outcome of a Basin-wide Flood Multi-hazardRisks module that was developed and offered as part of a collaboration between two researchprojects: the UPRM-DHS Coastal Resilience Center of Excellence (CRC) funded by theDepartment of Homeland Security and the Resilient Infrastructure and Sustainability EducationUndergraduate Program (RISE-UP) funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Thecontent was designed to give students an understanding of complex project management incoastal communities. The main learning objective was for students to be able to assess andrecognize the actions that can be taken to improve resiliency in coastal communities
, and conventional blenders are large, awkward, and difficult to keep clean. Mr. Jones lives with his daughter who is a new mother. His daughter Emily often finds herself with the two month old baby in one arm, and needing to puree fresh vegetables into baby food with the other. For such small amounts of food, Emily also considers a counter top blender large, awkward, and difficult to keep clean. Mr. Jones and Emily are convinced there is a market for their needs, and have asked a group of engineering students to design and prototype a device to help them safely and conveniently mix and puree small quantities of drink or food. CUSTOMER INTERVIEWS: Your team will conduct customer interviews and develop a detailed needs list for
Paper ID #14687A Mobile Telepresence Robot: A Case Study for Assessment of a CapstoneDesign CourseDr. Chan Ham, Kennesaw State University He is an Associate Professor in Mechatronics Engineering at the Kennesaw State University. He has over fifteen year experience in Mechatronics education and research.Ms. Jasmine Cherelle Washington Ms. Jasmine Washington graduated from Kennesaw State University, formerly Southern Polytechnic State University, with her bachelors of science in Mechatronics Engineering early 2014. Using the multidisci- plinary nature of the program, Jasmine became highly interested in controls systems
Paper ID #37316Assessing Engineering Student’s Representation andIdentification of Ethical Dilemmas through Concept Mapsand Role-PlaysAshish Hingle Ashish Hingle (he/his/him) is a Ph.D. student in the College of Engineering & Computing at George Mason University. His research interests include technology ethics, information systems, and student efficacy challenges in higher education.Aditya Johri (Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Assessing Engineering Student’s Representation and
HuntTo prepare for the scavenger hunt, the instructor will need to prepare several small programs toserve as clues. The output of each program is the location of the next clue. Before class begins,the instructor “hides” the clues at the various locations. Additionally, the instructor needs to putup error signs at locations included as wrong answers or for answers generated by commonmistakes by the students (see Figure 1). The approximate prep time for this activity is about onehour (writing the code and printing the clues takes 30-40 minutes and 20-30 minutes to set up theclues).The scavenger hunt begins in the classroom (or an agreed-upon location). Students form teamsof 2-4 students and are provided with a hard copy of a small C++ program
ofbudget figures that programs submitted.In the staffing section, we asked for numbers of professors, graduate students, undergraduates,professional staff, administrative staff, and others. We got responses here from 56 universities, six four-year schools, and three two-year schools. We present the results below as averages across thesecategories. The assessment and reporting section details the frequency and kinds of assessment programs carry outand to whom they provide this information.Budgets and staffingBefitting the largely local scope of most outreach programs, budget data show mostly small-scalefinancial operations. Twenty-three of the 32
associated pedagogies may lead students to real-world solutions. Students that have registered into our pilot program have the opportunity todesign, innovate and create 3D models that could aid them in their degree, courses and/or personalskills without being required to belong to a specific degree.Materials and MethodsThe paper will be divided into two segments. The first part will address the pedagogiesincorporated with 3D printing, which demands the creation of such a system. The second part willdiscuss the set up of the structure for a small- or large-scale deployment of a 3D printing open labwithin campus to meet the identified needs.Three of the authors of this paper teach an undergraduate engineering introductory course at TheUniversity of
minutes). In theflipped sections, students were required to watch short video tutorials prior to each class meetingand given quizzes in class to ensure compliance. Class time was used for example problems and“Team Battles,” an active learning exercise where student teams competed against each other tocomplete programming assignments for prizes. Academic performance on six quizzes and examswere compared and it was found that the flipped sections generally outperformed the traditionallecture sections on the high-stakes assessments (midterm and final exams), resulting in anoticeable difference in the overall course grades – in both flipped sections at least 50% ofstudents received an A- or A, while less than 20% of students in the traditional
societal context” (3h)• “a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning” (3i)• “a knowledge of contemporary issues” (3j) These abilities must be demonstrated with examples of student work. Of the 11 Criterion3 program outcomes, these four are notoriously difficult to document. In large part, this isbecause these require synthesis and higher order thinking. However, these program outcomes lend themselves very well to a case studies approach.Case studies require students to synthesize the facts and engineering principles they havelearned, and combine them with their broader education in the arts, humanities, and sciences.These intellectual merits, on a small scale, have been demonstrated so far with the
, PacificVis 2014, and SIBGRAPI 2013 and honorable mentions at the VAST Challenge 2017 and CG&A 2011 best paper. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing Intelligent Review Forms for Peer Assessment: A Data-driven Approach AbstractThis evidence-based practice paper employs a data-driven, explainable, and scalable approach to the de-velopment and application of an online peer review system in computer science and engineering courses.Crowd-sourced grading through peer review is an effective evaluation methodology that 1) allows the use ofmeaningful assignments in large or online classes (e.g. assignments
technology and society. There is aneed to reliably capture student learning about complex and dynamic socio-technical systemswithout privileging an assessment tool that a priori evaluates “more is better”. With that in mind this manuscript addresses three key issues in this area. The firstobjective, efficiency, is to interrogate the use of concept maps to capture student learning aboutthe complexity of socio-technical systems in large-scale engineering programs where a review ofeach individual map would require extensive time investments. Conducting the conceptmapping exercise and analysis strategy are impacted under this objective. This leads to thesecond objective, methodological development, which assesses how complexity can be evaluatedin
their own surveys [10] - [12]. Instructors with large classsizes have turned to software assessment tools to measure the teamwork skills of individuals andthe roles within the teams. For example, CATME and TeamUP provide a survey to gather selfand peer evaluations from individual team members as well as instructors [13],[14]. For thestudy presented below, it was necessary to create a customized assessment tool to determine howindividuals fill functional or task-oriented roles in their teams and the impact of that process ontheir engagement and course experience.ContextIPPD is an educational capstone design program where students from thirteen engineering andcomputer science programs work in multidisciplinary teams for two semesters in designing
ethical analysis The third workshop led to a number of agreements: 1. A small number of BEfaculty members would form a curriculum development team. Beginning in the summerof 2017, this team would identify existing course components or create new materials forteaching ethics across the BE curriculum. 2. Instructors of BE courses would work withthe curriculum team to implement newly developed materials and pedagogical models. 3.The BE program decided to submit a second grant proposal to the Engineering EducationCenter for supporting the implementation and assessment of the new curriculum. Figure 1illustrates the plan of work agreed by participants at the third faculty workshop
, good at explaining in ‘small’ words, personable, ready to learn and take risks, and self-confident and friendly.The experience also highlighted the broad scope and impact of engineering projects: This experience had a large impact on the team member’s concept of what it means to be an engineer. It became apparent that a large part of the project is not crunching numbers and taking measurements, but instead communicating with the customer (the community). This communications is key because the goal is to design a project that works for them. In order for it to “work,” the project must meet several criteria. It must be user friendly, easy to maintain, feasible to construct, and affordable. These
-worldcollaborations, and novel assessments (e.g., e-portfolios). These recommendations echo calls forengineering programs to partner with industry and communities, focusing on experientialprojects and competency-based curricula [1]. Makerspaces exemplify such experiential spaces,yet empirical data are needed to verify whether student-led workshops indeed promote these“future-ready” competencies in tangible, measurable ways.D. Bridging the Research GapWhile literature increasingly affirms the value of makerspaces for improving student engagementand technical proficiencies, questions persist regarding their impact on key interdisciplinaryoutcomes. These questions include whether makerspace workshops draw students from multiplemajors, whether participants
to assess the system of the Portuguese Higher Education qualityassurance, produced a report submitted before the end of 20063 pinpointing the systems’major weaknesses: limited independence, lack of sufficient operational efficiency andconsistency, lack of consequences or follow-up on evaluations, lack of commitment fromhigher education institutions and lack of activity by the former Higher Education NationalEvaluating Commission (CNAVES). Their recommendations were that a joint program accreditation with an academic audit atthe institutional level, mixing different quality assurance methods, should be put in place,including both the element of control (accreditation) and the element of improvement(academic audit). Furthermore, an
handling classes of varying sizes, from small seminars to large lecture courses. ● Flexibility: While designed for in-person exams, the system should be adaptable to various assessment formats, including quizzes, midterms, and finals, across different disciplines.Evaluation of Tool Efficacy and AcceptanceA critical aspect of our research focuses on evaluating the tool's effectiveness in reducing biasand its usability. However, we have not completed this part of the assessment. To achieve thisgoal, surveys will be crafted to collect both qualitative and quantitative data from students,assessing their perceptions of the anonymous grading process, their interaction with the tool, andits perceived impact on their performance and anxiety
. Page 25.638.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Finite Element Analysis Learning Modules for an Undergraduate Heat Transfer Course: Implementation and AssessmentAbstractCommercial finite element packages are widely used in industry thereby making exposure to thisanalysis and optimization tool an important component of undergraduate engineering education.Finite element theory and application has often been the focus of a graduate-level course inengineering programs, however industry demands are requiring B.S. engineering graduates tohave skill in applying this essential analysis and design technique. To meet this need, finiteelement analysis (FEA) learning modules have been
). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017AbstractThis evidence-based practice presentation discusses the teaching of an infographics assignmentto first-year technology majors at a large research institution. Infographics can be powerful andsuccessful methods of presenting large, complex data sets to general audiences, and the growingimportance of visual communication has been documented. With a goal of improving ourinstruction and assessment of visual communication skills, we compare infographics designedand produced by freshman students during Fall 2015 with those produced by Fall 2016 freshmanstudents in the same introductory design course, and investigate whether freshman students’abilities to communicate graphically change or
the collection andanalysis of locally relevant data. It is an approach and orientation to data collection that can beused for a variety of purposes; for example, for exploratory or formative research, for programassessment or needs assessment, as a rapid response tool, or for program evaluation.” [8] Likelong-term ethnographic research design, it includes data that is usually coded and triangulated,as in this study. Aligned with Sangaramoorthy and Kroeger [8], this study is part of ourformative assessment of a three-year project and serves as an evaluative framework by whichto continue to improve our workshops in culturally sustainable and relevant ways.Richard Shavelson and Lisa Towne [9] from the Committee on Scientific Principles for
to I/O pins, and a small prototyping area. There is Page 14.1145.3also a header that can be used for PICKit1 daughter boards or other purposes. The stock board isshown in Figure 2. The software bundled with the kit includes the MPLAB IDE and the Figure 2. Stock PICKit1 Development BoardPICKit1 flash programmer software. The MPLAB IDE contains an assembler, debugger, andsimulator for Microchip microcontrollers. The PICKit1 software permits programming devicessupported by the PICKit1 board and also allows controlling power to the board.The target microcontroller used in this course was the 14-pin 16F676 which offered
Paper ID #22548Introduction and Assessment of i-Newton for the Engaged Learning of Engi-neering DynamicsMs. Rachel Vitali, University of Michigan Rachel Vitali is a doctoral candidate in the Mechanical Engineering department at the University of Michi- gan, where she also received her B.S.E. in 2015 and M.S.E. in 2017. Her research interests include computational and analytical dynamics with applications to wearable sensing technology for analysis of human motion in addition to incorporating technology into undergraduate courses for engaged learning.Dr. Noel C. Perkins, University of Michigan Noel Perkins is the Donald T