systems thinking for aviation and aerospaceindustries and for other complex socio-technical issues. Two course objectives are to understandhow to frame complex issues in terms of systems thinking methodologies, and to evaluateoptions and alternative solutions to complex problems.As an important component of student learning, hands-on discovery activities (HODA) are usedto illustrate CST principles and models which allows students to experience the behavior ofsystems and to better understand CST. The hands-on discovery activities are at first led by theinstructor. The students form teams and then lead the learning experiences for the class as thesemester progresses. Getting to lead a game, or being assigned to do so, engages the students onan
Lead (SQL) and their engagement ● Automated drip communications to inquiries, requiring little to no manual intervention ● Alerts to the recruiting team when a prospective student took an action on a piece of content sent by online and recording this information into the centralized system (inquiry form, advertisement, engage email, registration reminder, on-demand webinar, Virtual Open House and Tradeshows) ● Sales “stages” to understand student interest ● Appointment application to make it easy for students to schedule 1:1 time with a recruiter ● Conversion rates from Inquiry to becoming a student and MQL-SQL ● Ability to measure the effectiveness of advertising, content marketing and social media ● Clean and
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Bike-lane Traffic Impact Assessment Activity for High School Students (Work in Progress)AbstractHigh school students use the surface transportation system virtually every day and can relate totraffic congestion, travel delays, and roadway safety. Moreover, trends observed in the FederalHighway Administration driver’s license data and in the National Household Travel Survey datasuggest that the popularity of active modes of transportation, such as cycling, is continuouslyincreasing among the high school age group. In this paper, an activity is proposed to show howmathematical models can be used to assess the impact on traffic congestion of retrofitting
mystudents, but it apparently was not. However, one of the visiting educators had a Scottish accent,to which the KNU students had difficulty adjusting.) In the Department of English Languageand Literature, I had no difficulties in communicating with faculty and staff. At KNU,professors are encouraged to complete their doctorates in English-speaking countries and aregiven incentives to teach classes in English, so many of them speak English fluently.Student attitudes and work ethic: According to KNU’s Office of International Affairs, KNUstudents are typically expected to study abroad in a native-English-speaking higher-educationinstitution before graduation. Thus, many of my students used my class to prepare themselvesfor upcoming American graduate
ethics requirements inundergraduate CS and engineering programs. The past couple of years has also seen the coming together of CS educators around the issue ofthinking about and developing guidelines for the Teaching of Responsible Computing [2]. While theseare welcome developments the style of teaching ethics tends to stay at one of two extremes. A courseheavily focused on the philosophy of ethics and a course that spends a great deal of time consideringthe impacts and harms of technology, particularly for speci�ic application areas such as AI [1]. Bothapproaches are valuable in their own way, but a concern for me has been that neither of theseapproaches equips students with how to actively engage in ethics throughout their future
TeamworkEffective instructor-to-student communication Oral and written communicationsEffective student-to-instructor communication Incorporation of leading edge technologiesEffective student-to-student communicationAnytime, anyplace learningSelf-paced scheduleSimulates an in class "feel"Class sizeFeedback clear, timely, and meaningfulAdequately prepared for online courseIncorporation of leading edge technologiesSelf reported learningChallenging learning The Genesis Project, a Texas Engineering and Technical Consortium (TETC) and NationalInstruments Initiative, brings together electrical engineering programs from throughout Texas todiscuss and implement new ways to engage students early and throughout their electricalengineering experience with
interdisciplinary team that focuses on helping STEM instructors integrate writing into their courses, and that helps departments integrate writing across under- graduate curricula.Megan Mericle, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Megan Mericle is a PhD student in Writing Studies. She is a member of a research team focused on writing in STEM, where she works with faculty to develop and implement learning objectives for writing in undergraduate science and engineering courses. In her own work, she focuses on disciplinary identity as well as communication practices in citizen science.Nicole Turnipseed, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Nicole Turnipseed is a PhD candidate in the Department of English and the Center
students tofocus on in their reflections.Service learning projects, where the project centers on a user or community partner [13], are onetype of project where reflection plays an essential component of helping students consider theimpact of their designs on those who will be impacted by their work [14]. There is a tendency inengineering to focus more on the design than the people who require it [15]. This can be calledbeing thing-focused instead of people-focused [15]. Service-learning and its reflective practicethrough targeted reflection prompts helps students to resist this tendency and encourages studentsto consider the people in the project, instead of the thing (device) that they are designing.However, and fundamentally, the authors have
” problems without pre-determined solutions in the IDEAS course would increase feelings of competence which wouldlead to greater curiosity (5) than in Course X.MethodsA one-group pre-test-post-test design was used to investigate amotivation, extrinsic and intrinsicmotivation, and curiosity to see whether they were differentially impacted by engineeringundergraduates’ participation in an IDEAS studio course and a student-selected comparisoncourse, designated as Course X. IDEAS studio courses are two-credit-hour engineering electivesdesigned to foster an entrepreneurial mindset. They often include close communication withindustrial partners and a focus on issues like value, opportunity recognition, innovation, andcustomer engagement. All of the IDEAS
AC 2011-1804: EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF AN UNDERWATER ROBOTICSCOMPETITION: QUESTIONS, METHODOLOGIES AND FINDINGSCandiya Mann, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University Candiya Mann is the independent evaluator for the Marine Advanced Technology Education (MATE) Center’s National Science Foundation ATE and ITEST grants. She specializes in K-16 education and youth workforce issues and has conducted evaluations for clients including the US Department of La- bor, Washington State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, United Way, school districts, community based organizations and workforce development agencies. Ms. Mann serves on the Advisory Group for the National Science
technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research focuses on student problem-solving pro- cesses and use of worked examples, change models and evidence-based teaching practices in engineering curricula, and the role of non-cognitive and affective factors in student academic outcomes and overall success. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Thriving for Engineering Students: Definition and Proposed Conceptual FrameworkThis research paper summarizes existing research and reports regarding factors
andLearning, 41. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1990 Spring.[2] Inkelas, K. K. The tide on which all boats rise: The effects of living-learning participation onundergraduate outcomes at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: University Housing, 1999.[3] Smith, B. L.The challenge of learning communities as a growing national movement. AAC&Upeer review, 4(1), 2001, Summer/Fall.[4] Garrett, M.D., & Zabriske, M.S. The influence of living learning program participation onstudent-faculty interaction. The Journal of College and University Student Housing, 33(1), 38-44, 2004.[5] Zhao, C.M., & Kuh, G.D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and studentengagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138, 2004.[6] Kuh, G. D. High-impact
approximately 2:1,illustrating an ongoing challenge of gender diversity on the campus. Currently over 1,100 deafand hard-of-hearing (DHH) students enrich the community in unique ways, the majority enrolledwithin NTID.The 2008 NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation (IT) Catalyst award, “Establishing theFoundation for Future Organizational Reform at RIT” (EFFORT@RIT, #0811076), aimed toidentify career advancement barriers for RIT women faculty. A faculty climate survey [15]conducted as part of the project, in conjunction with objective data review and benchmarking,identified barriers in career navigation, climate, and flexibility in work/life management balance[16, 17]. The NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation project awarded in 2012
higher education leadershipbelieve those students who are able to work effectively with colleagues across national, cultural,and ethical boundaries will be more prepared and successful post-graduation. Research has shownthat international experiences, like study abroad, have a positive impact on students’ globalperspectives.5,6 Unfortunately, a variety of barriers exist (perceived and otherwise) 7-9 that makeit difficult for engineering students to engage in an international experience like study abroad.Even though the most recent data available indicates that STEM majors account for almost 26%of the number of students participating in study abroad in 2016/2017 (up from 17.5% in2006/2007), STEM majors (especially engineering) still remain
reinforcing their commitment to a successful career,and to service the communities that have supported their education. Moreover, the teamworkrequired for an efficient and engaging set of activities provides possibilities for the inclusion anddiversity of different perspectives based on their personal experiences at school. In addition, thisteam effort provides for the development of multiple skills for their professional job. However,though the benefit of this strategy is well known, most colleges promote outreach as extra-curricular activities. This paper discusses a three-year experience in the Chemical EngineeringDepartment, with the participation of 360 college students, in 70 projects, reaching over 2,000school students, as a curricular
improve students’ self-efficacy.H4: Using PBL will significantly improve students’ teamwork.H5: Using PBL will significantly improve students’ communication skills.5. Methodology Two questionnaires were used to evaluate students’ feedback on the PBL method. Eachevaluation consisted of 23 bipolar descriptors (items). The students were asked to evaluate theeffectiveness of the case study on a 5-point Likert scale (1 indicating an extremely negativerating and 5 an extremely positive rating). Since there were a total of 23 questionnaire items,items were mapped to the constructs based on information provided by LITEE at Auburn Page
context.Previous studies have demonstrated that well-planned, student-centered, active, learning modulescan enhance problem-solving abilities, improve academic achievement and create more positiveattitudes toward learning.1-3 Many of these studies have focused on activities such as groupproblem solving, interpreting data or evidence, or engaging in practices of the field. Traditionallytopics in a mechanics/biomechanics course are introduced using derivations with subsequentassignments using the results of these often non-intuitive mathematical procedures. However,few studies have looked at the use of hands-on activities to replace or supplement mathematicalderivations in an effort to connect physical concepts with mathematical equations. Therefore
university students as depicted by data from the National Center of EducationStatistics [4].In doctoral programs, the focus is always on research capabilities (particularly at R1 institutions),but professional skills are the elements that separate those who maintain successful academiccareers, and those who are not retained. While many will argue there are challenges faced byanyone, regardless of the representation, it is important to recognize that there are additionalfactors/challenges faced by graduate students of color who are qualified to pursue theseendeavors.Contributing Factors (in addition to competitiveness that may result in small URM pools): 1. Lack of community/sense of belonging/validation of experiences. Academic identity for
Paper ID #16242Observing and Measuring Interest Development Among High School Stu-dents in an Out-of-School Robotics CompetitionJoseph E. Michaelis, University of Wisconsin - Madison Joseph E Michaelis is a Ph.D. student in Educational Psychology in the Learning Sciences area at the University of Wisconsin - Madison. His research involves studying interest in STEM education, focusing on the impact of learning environments, feedback, and influence of social constructs and identities. This research includes developing inclusive learning environments that promote interest in pursuing STEM fields as a career to a broad range
professional lives. How do students acquire the skillsneeded to tackle these problems? The authors hypothesize that placing engineering challenges andsolutions in a classroom context while emphasizing social engagement and impact facilitates thedevelopment of engineering students as moral agents who understand the consequences of theirdecisions. Thus, a collaboration of investigators from the grantee universities are investigatinghow game-based educational interventions with strongly situated components influence early-curriculum engineering students' ethical awareness and decision making.This paper offers an overview of the progress to date of this three year, NSF ImprovingUndergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) grant that aims to (1) characterize the
turbomachinery instabilities, for which he received NASA Performance Cash awards. Dr. Richard is involved in tutoring, mentoring, and outreach and teaches first-year introductory engineering, fluid mechanics, and space plasma propulsion. He has authored/co-authored 45+ peer-reviewed journal and conference papers.Janie M Moore (Assistant Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress of an initial phase of a research study of data on student performance impacted from modifying a first-year/semester engineering core course during a global pandemic
nanotechnology through Theme Learning Communities(TLCs). In the first semester to form TLC, a cohort of 25 students are concurrently enrolled bythe IUPUI Registrar to introductory courses in engineering, Introduction to Engineering (ENGR196), Introduction to Engineering Profession (ENGR 195), and Fundamentals of SpeechCommunications (COMM R110) linked with the theme of nanotechnology (shown in Table I). Page 23.691.4The high quality delivery of the IUPUI’s TLC programs has a great impact on the developednanotechnology track. IUPUI’s TLC program was awarded the 2008 Outstanding StudentRetention Program Award by the Educational Policy Institute.TABLE I: An
of the program toward becoming physicians. At the end of the program,the Scholars were 90% ± 6 certain of becoming physicians (no significant change from thebeginning, p=0.4), and 81% ± 5 certain of becoming engineers (p=0.05). The effect size forincreasing interest in becoming an engineer was large (Cohen’s d=1.1). This is most easilydescribed as the program promoting the development of Clinician Engineers.We also asked participants to estimate the impact of the immersion experience on the abilitydimension of their engineering design self-efficacy – a measure of students’ self-perceived abilityto engage in nine different engineering tasks [10], to which we added “document technicalmatters,” “learn new things,” and “empathize.” There were
Page 22.602.6community focused experience potentially 6 impacts overall global preparedness due to the exposure that individuals encounter when time isspent residing in and participating in efforts within other countries. This is supported by theliterature on international education in university settings. Figure 3: International Community Service Figure 4 (below) further describes the sample in terms of the percentages of students that have been involved in international studies
address the equitability of peer-facilitated workshops by developing a virtual(asynchronous), open-access workshop experience.Additionally, students continue to have a reliance on virtual material to support their learningprocess which provides the flexibility and access to support various student schedules and needs[4]. Students have benefited from various material deliveries and have a higher level of fluencywith such support compared to previous student cohorts. However, asynchronous videostypically are rigid in the material they cover and not interactive. They rarely provideopportunities for engagement and community building that is foundational to peer-facilitatedworkshops [3]. Hence, this work seeks to develop asynchronous material that can
communication skills as one of the desired outcomes of engineering education (ABET,2018). However, the need to improve future engineers’ performance as communicators continuesto be a topic of concern. While engineering students have been exposed to different opportunitiesto become proficient communicators in academic settings, employers and executives still conveythe need for novice engineers to have better communication skills, which suggests that thecommunication currently learned in academia is not necessarily the same used on the job(Norback, Leeds, & Kulkarni, 2010). From industry’s perspective, communication skills ofengineering graduates tend to be weak, even though engineering departments have workedspecifically at improving communication
that their experience at LATTICE thus far will help them be better mentors and senior faculty members.• The Mentoring Circles help build community, provide needed support, and allow participants to hold themselves accountable. Participants view the Mentoring Circles as a valuable source of strategies to address career issues they are facing.• Within several months of participation, participants perceive that the LATTICE program is having a positive impact on their self-confidence and ability to pro- actively engage in career-building behaviors, such as asking for resources, seeking advice, and starting collaborations. Participants self-reported significant improvements in both self-efficacy and networking activity
students can to readily becomedisenfranchised. As Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson has noted, “…we have to meet the students wherethey are: we have to give them personal attention. Programs that are structured this way see thevalue of personal attention at every stage of higher education and are committed to meetingstudents’ individual learning needs, which includes mentoring and tutoring”22 (p. 24).With suchsupport immediately available, problems in transitioning (housing, financial aid, courseselection, building study networks, etc.) and feelings of isolation30 will be addressed quickly.Town-gown makerspace initiativeUniversities have a large impact on the surrounding communities. A report released last year bythe UMass Donahue Institute estimates that
was to introduce a large percentage of faculty (e.g. ~30% of STEMFaculty) at two different institutions to some of the latest educational research and relatedpedagogical methods in an effort to create a lasting positive change in student learning. In orderto attract faculty and produce sustained positive impact on pedagogy, a proven and adaptablepedagogical approach was needed. It would be difficult to engage a large group of facultywithout sufficient evidence that the method would produce positive results in their courses. The Page 22.113.3selected pedagogical approach was Challenge Based Instruction (CBI) based on the principles of“How
, and a BA in Sociology from Smith College.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Roberta Rincon is the Senior Manager of Research with the Society of Women Engineers, where she oversees the organization’s research activities around issues impacting girls and women from ele- mentary through college and into the engineering workforce. Before joining SWE, Roberta was a Senior Research and Policy Analyst at The University of Texas System, where she focused on student success and faculty teaching and research award programs across nine academic institutions. Roberta received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, an MBA and an M.S. in Information Management from Arizona