.” “My project group consisted of two senior biomedical engineering students in addition to myself, a senior mechanical engineering student. Due to each of our skills and interests, we decided to work on developing a physical therapy device.” 2. For some students, the project tied in directly with their major and for other students, the project did not relate to their major at all. “Some of the students did not gain experience in their particular major (specifically the biomedical engineers) due to the nature of the project.” “This course introduced me to a new branch of electrical engineering: medical devices. I have found my foray into this field to be extremely fascinating, particularly because of
requiredcourses in the curriculum with the exception of general studies, mathematics, and sciencecourses. The questions were initially reviewed by faculty at two neighboring institutions.Course/Subject Area No. of QuestionsConstruction Materials 10Concrete and Asphalt Technology 5Surveying 10Engineering Mechanics 10Strength of Materials 5Mechanical and Electrical Systems
sustainability considerations during planning and design:framework of processes for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. and Mgt. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000566.[35] Vesilind, P. A., and Gunn, A. S. (1998). Engineering, ethics, and the environment. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, U.K.[36] Walline, D. L. (2014). “Prevention through design: proven solutions from the field.” Professional Safety2014(11): 43-49.[37] Weinstein, M., J. Gambatese, et al. (2005). “Can design improve construction safety?: Assessing the Impact ofa Collaborative Safety-in-Design Process.” J. Constr. Eng. and Mgt 131(10): 1125-1134.[38] USGBC. Downloaded from www.usgbc.org/credits/preventionthroughdesign.
of these changes beyond courses participating in the original SIIP project. Wecontinue to keep track of students’ perception of the computational curriculum withinparticipating courses. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of the computational exposure onstudents’ perspective in research and during job search. Finally, we collect and analyze feedbackfrom department faculty regarding their experience with teaching techniques involvingcomputation.2 IntroductionA computational approach has become an indispensable tool in materials science research andrelated industry. In addition to the research interest, the 2009 survey by Thornton et al. [1] andthe followup 2018 survey by Enrique et al. [2] showed that employers of MSE students, such
theimpact of self-guided final projects. Farah et al. [9] similarly address the needs of non-STEMmajors by presenting work developing computational thinking via a single web application. Thisapproach requires no software installation and minimizes the challenges of working withmultiple applications including integrated design environments, digital education platforms, andfile system management.This paper presents a course building upon student competency in computational thinkingacquired during prerequisite work. These students expand their learning and expertise tointegrate various applications and technology stacks through robotics. Developing the ability tointegrate contributes to both student satisfaction and professional competency.Robot
engagement, shop fabrication, quantitytakeoff, cost estimation, and 4D scheduling. Kang et. al2, empirically applied BIM to acommercial building construction project and demonstrated how general contractors improvedtheir productivity in construction by detecting clashes between the building’s structuralcomponents and the MEP (Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing) system before constructionstarts. Project participants who detected clashes during pre-construction coordination meetingswere able to fix the problems proactively and it reduced the change orders during construction.The project team was also able to use more pre-fabricated modules and saved time.Some advanced contractors combine 3D model and construction schedule to visualize
foundationalengineering concepts and EML [9]. In particular, incorporating entrepreneurship and businessconcepts together with a design experience when training lower division engineering studentscan lead to higher retention rates and GPAs [10].Emphasizing the EM concept of curiosity among first year engineering students may be welltimed [11]. Design projects at this stage enable students to explore their creativity and practicetheir engineering skills early in the curriculum [12]. Additionally, reflective practice activitiesrevealed that first year engineering students resonated most with the concept of curiosity whenreflecting on themselves as learners, relating it most frequently as a motivator of their learning,part of their learning identity, and a path to
Page 14.1205.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 THE EFFECT OF IMPROVEMENTS IN SOPHOMORE DESIGN INSTRUCTION ON PERFORMANCE IN SUBSEQUENT COURSE OFFERINGSAbstractThe chemical engineering curriculum at Rowan University includes a team-taught,multidisciplinary sophomore course sequence called Sophomore Engineering Clinic I and II,intended to teach engineering design and technical communication. Prior to 2005, SophomoreClinic I featured a semester-long design project. The faculty team made substantial changes tothe course in the Fall of 2005 to address various shortcomings in student achievement of thecourse goals. The new course design featured a 4-week project intended to introduce students tothe
, such as the electrical engineering capstone course where all students participatein a service-learning assistive technology project. They have also integrated service-learning into engineering science courses with project work that varies in size and scopeas a function of the curricular constraints for the respective courses. This approach, at acollege level engages community partners with the support structure at the college leveland reduces the overhead that many faculty encounter starting their own projects.The SLICE project objectives are stated as: ≠ Integrate service-learning into the engineering curriculum at UML so that everystudent is exposed to service-learning in every semester of their experience in everydepartment at UML
developing their design. Furthermore, in traditionaleducational models many students fail to see the connection among the “fun” subjects, creativityand STEM. An innovation-based curriculum allows students to bridge this gap which could leadto enhanced interest in STEM subjects. In one study, Baker, et al found the applied andintegrative aspects of engineering design to enhance student learning and to increasestandardized test scores.22 This may be due to the fact that engineering design and innovationpromotes learning through inquiry, provides an opportunity for structured problem solving and iswell suited to team based learning. When done in a classroom setting, the students have theadded benefit of learning by observing other teams’ projects. This
hands-onplatform from which to teach both areas of control can be found in the process controlindustry—the programmable logic controller (PLC).A few industrial, chemical, and electrical engineering as well as various technology programshave included some introduction to PLCs into their programs, where they are often presented aspart of a laboratory course. However, several programs have begun offering courses dedicated tolearning and applying PLCs. In contrast, very few mechanical engineering programs offer anyexposure to PLCs throughout the curriculum. 14,25 Yet, they remain the most common and usefulcomponent in controlling manufacturing processes and machinery. Mechanical engineers need tounderstand how issues of control can affect their
space.The aim of the new makerspace was to encourage innovation and entrepreneurship by engagingstudents in both formal and informal multidisciplinary design projects. In the long term, the goalis to integrate the space into all levels of the engineering curriculum and encourage project-basedlearning. The university has a strong entrepreneurial center with ongoing programs as well asseveral incubators. The new space was designed to supplement the current innovation andentrepreneurship options available to students and student startups by providing prototypingequipment. A mixed method approach (a survey combined with ethnographic observations andinterviews) was used to analyze student use and perception of the new space. Of particularinterest was
in the design, fabrication, and refinement of these experiments.References1. Hargrove, J. B., "Curriculum, Equipment and Student Project Outcomes for Mechatronics Education in the Core Mechanical Engineering Program at Kettering University", Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 343-356, February 2002.2. Hsu, T., "Undergraduate Curriculum Development in Mechatronic Systems Engineering", proceedings of the ABET Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, pp. 140-147, 1996.3. Auslander, D., "What is Mechatronics", IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 1, no. 1, 1996.4. Ume, I. C., Kita, A., Liu, S., and Skinner, S., "Graduate Mechatronics Course in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech", Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 323-335
Paper ID #15447MAKER: A Maker Space Smart Badging SystemJulie DarwinMr. Joseph Patrick Kale, Bucknell UniversityProf. Michael S. Thompson, Bucknell University Prof. Thompson is an associate professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Bucknell University, in Lewisburg, PA. While his teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer engineering electives, and senior design, his focus in the classroom is to ignite passion in his students for engineering and design through his own enthusiasm, open-ended student-selected projects, and connecting engineering to the world around
involving not just an engineering faculty member, but also acurrent engineering student and an engineer currently practicing in industry.Case StudiesSottile (2024) collects a recent review of literature on case study pedagogy on engineering ethicseducation, highlights of which are presented here. It should be noted that “[c]ase studies areconsidered to be the most popular method to teach engineering ethics” (Martin, Conlon, &Bowe, p. 47). Harris et al. (1996) decades ago called for more holistic treatments of engineeringethics education, going so far as to make the case for engineering curricula to consider ethicalissues as often as possible, both within the formal curriculum but also via extracurricularopportunities. Harris et al. (1996) also
engineering students primarily and areembedded within the engineering curriculum, while others are campus-wide and target studentsin a wide variety of majors. Programs can also vary in terms of how they define their desiredoutcomes; some focus on generating a general awareness of entrepreneurship as a potentialcareer path, while others focus on developing innovative products and/or new business modelsand ventures. Some engineering schools, rather than offer a stand-alone course inentrepreneurship, integrate entrepreneurship throughout the engineering curriculum. Oneexample is Olin College which offers an integrated approach, whereby “entrepreneurship isinterwoven with mainstream engineering disciplines” (Fredholm et al., 2002).Entrepreneurship
project area, brainstorming to generate ideas,and choosing a subset of ideas to propose to the client. As part of the model project the studentsindividually produced several pieces of writing such as a memo to their supervisor and a shortproposal letter to the client.The students were then given existing products to analyze using the methods of decompositionand evaluation taught in the lectures. They look at the function and form of the items and howthe items use energy. The students this year analyzed an electric versus a hand-driven eggbeater.With a basic introduction to gearing, the students are able to “discover” that the gearing in theelectric beater reduces the speed and increases the torque from the motor to the beaters.However, the
Integration of Capstone Design Experience with the International Exchange ProgramThis work presents an overview of our recent efforts introducing international aspects into thesenior capstone design curriculum. Partly based on our previous experience, we proposed andreceived funding for the integration of international design project collaboration into aninternational exchange program between U.S. and Brazil funded by the U.S. Department ofEducation’s Fund for the Improvement for Post-Secondary Education (FIPSE) and theCoordination for Graduate Studies of the Brazilian Ministry of Education (CAPES). Theproposal involves four universities, two from U.S. and two from Brazil and encompasses twomain research areas in aerospace
within sustainableengineering and renewable energy technologies can readily involve electrical, mechanical,computer, civil, and chemical engineering aspects while still being accessible to undergraduatestudents. A natural and efficient way of teaching and embedding renewable energy technologiesinto curriculum is the problem-oriented and project-based learning approach1-15Engineering and engineering technology programs must offer a relevant and validatedcurriculum that prepares students for post-graduation success3,4. Courses that cover traditionalsubject matter in mathematics, sciences, materials, engineering sciences, economics and relatedtopics provide the foundation of knowledge upon which specific skill sets are added dependingon emphasis
engineer’s ability to integrate theconstituent fields within mechatronics is difficult to overstate. In a series of papers on “TheFuture of Engineering Education,” Richard Felder, et. al., discuss several areas of needed changein engineering education. Among them is a call for increased emphasis on multidisciplinaryprojects and programs: “All authentic problems and all viable solutions today aremultidisciplinary and, therefore, engineers must be skilled and educated at working effectivelywith and in other disciplines...”3. There has been wide current public interest in mechatronics, as evidenced by the responseto the recent “Great Race” sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency(DARPA). For several weeks, articles appeared
project due to the fact it made us use all of our knowledge learned throughout the course. Describe what you would do to improve the course, lecture, lab, and final project. I would make the class much less based only on excel. Due to everything being on excel, I felt like I was more focused on how to link things on excel and how to do things the way that it was set up on excel. I think it should be more focused on the concepts and actual understanding rather than trying to figure out how to follow new excel setups every week. If I were to improve on anything in the course, I would move Masonry near the end of the course time and move HVAC, Plumbing, and Electrical near the beginning of the course. I feel as though the masonry is really important
the cornerstone of providing internships and capstone projects thatenhance outside classroom experiences for students. For example, one professional facultyshared an example of such a partnership: “We are partnering with small communities to do ITService assessments as part of our capstone. We also have industry partners that provideinternships.” In addition, industry partners also engaged with students and faculty throughplanned guest lectures to supplement core content and curriculum. Faculty also expressedconcern as key faculty who had led industry-wide engagement were retiring, which was likely toput industry engagement at risk.On the other hand, tenure-stream faculty who were yet to achieve tenure shared somewhatdifferent perceptions of
voluntary organization Engineers Without Borders (USA), for example, promotes ethicaland sustainable engineering solutions that protect human dignity and respect for theenvironment. Similarly, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) urges that“Engineering students should learn about sustainable development and sustainability in thegeneral education component of the curriculum as they are preparing for the major designexperience. (ASEE, n.d., p. 1.)” Sustainability hinges in part on the ability of faculty to understand and shape students’attitudes and behaviors towards sustainability (Misseyanni et al., 2020, p. 173). The Universityof Connecticut (UConn) has pioneered in developing a curriculum that equips engineeringstudents
relations with the IEEE Mohawk Valley section. He is a Senior Member of IEEE and a member of ASEE.Robert C Decker, Mohawk Valley Community College Mr. Robert C. Decker is a Professor in the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics at Mohawk Valley Community College in Utica, NY where he instructs courses in the Electrical Engineering Technology program. His collaborative efforts include curriculum and materials development in highly automated technology and nanotechnology education. He is a member of IEEE. Page 15.752.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010
suggestions from students and professors who use the system. Page 25.457.6 5. Extend the ViTAS application to other curriculums such as general chemistry, biology, and upper level courses at TAMIU. Table 4. Target courses for ViTAS application [Lin et al.[18]] Course Number Course Title College Year ENGR 1201 Foundation of Engineering Freshman MATH 1314 College Algebra Freshman MATH 1324 Business Math I Freshman PHYS 1301
-methods design stems fromthe need to capture both the breadth (quantitative data) and depth (qualitative insights) of users'experiences with the platform. The quantitative data from surveys provide measurable outcomes,while the qualitative data from interviews and focus groups allow for a deeper understanding ofthe students' and instructors' lived experiences and perceptions.3.1 Study 1: Capstone Design ProjectsThe first case study was conducted within the context of capstone design projects at a Canadianengineering institution. These projects span the final three semesters of the undergraduateengineering curriculum, where teams of 5–8 students address a self-selected engineering problemthrough a structured design process. During the first
professionally in mechanicaland thermal systems (Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020 – 2021 | ABET, n.d.).Mechanical engineering curricula have been studied in many ways. These curricular research efforts areprimarily interested in improving mechanical engineering programs to prepare students for the modern age.For example, Incropera & Fox implemented more open-ended problem-solving opportunities for students,and developed increased exposure to design and communications skills. (Incropera & Fox, 1996). Theyprovided an overview of the revision of the mechanical engineering curriculum at Purdue University, outlinedtheir implementation, and described several lessons learned from the process. Sorby et al. investigated theintegration
(CSM) offers a design-oriented,interdisciplinary, accredited non-traditional undergraduate program in engineering withspecialization in a branch of civil, electrical, environmental, or mechanical engineering. In theDivision, we have a tradition of innovation with respect to interdisciplinary curriculum, a Page 9.616.1young and dynamic faculty (currently five NSF Career awardees), and relative freedom from Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for EngineeringState control on credit allocations. This provides us with
involves the design, testand construction of a solution to an industrial sponsored problem. In their SeniorCapstone Experience the students will also be working in teams. As taught by the author, the ten weeks of laboratory experience focus on thecompletion of two team-based projects: one involving the design, building and testing ofa small electric-powered machine and the other a “paper” design of a complex systemrequiring the integration of sub-systems designed by different teams. The use of teams isconsidered essential not only to the successful solution of the problem at hand, but to givestudents experience working on teams to create successful designs. It is widelyrecognized that teaming skills and experience are desired by the
exist that will be further refinedwhat works and what does not in both internal and external collaborations.Experimental Centric Based Engineering Curriculum for HBCUsIn Fall 2013, Howard University, in collaboration with the 12 HBCUs listed above, receivedfunding for the NSF ECP project. The project had the significant outcome to create an “HBCUEngineering Network” that is focused on the development, implementation, and expansion of anExperimental Centric-based instructional Pedagogy in engineering curricula used in theseHBCUs.The project started during the 2013-2014 academic year by implementing a hands-on approachthat introduced concepts related to circuit analysis and experiment design to selected ECE. Bythe end of 2016 over 100 curriculum