, and skillsengineers value and possess [7]. The development of these habits of mind and sociotechnicalthinking could influence how engineers act and perform in the workforce. Lucas and Hansenportray habits of mind as those that are “capable of development” via practice, repetition, andeffort [8]. They list six different habits of mind for engineers: systems-thinking, problem finding,visualizing, improving, creative problem-solving, and adapting, all of which value both the socialand the technical. Other research accentuates habits of mind in terms of systems thinking,innovation, adaptations and improvements, socio-cultural and ethical considerations,communication, collaboration, and sociotechnical integration [2]. Thus, the engineering habits
, vol. 22,iss. 4, pp. 53-58, 2006.[8] Badley, G., “Developing globally-competent university teachers,” Innovations in Education and TrainingInternational, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 244-253, 2000.[9] Butler, Y. G., and Lee, J., “On-task versus off-task self-assessments among Korean elementary school studentsstudying English,” Modern Language Journal, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 506-518, 2006.[10] Lee, K.S., and Carrasquillo, A., “Korean college students in the United States: perceptions of professors andstudents,” College Student Journal, vol. 40, pp. 442-456, 2006.[11] ‘Starkville, MS houses and residents,” Starkville main page. 2007. http://www.city-data.com/housing/houses-Starkville-Mississippi.html[12] “Fall 2006 unduplicated headcount enrollment – total
AC 2007-2256: ATTRACTING AND RETAINING FEMALES IN ENGINEERINGPROGRAMS: USING AN STSE APPROACHLisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey is the Lecturer, Curriculum, Teaching and Learning with the Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto. In this position, Lisa plays a central role in the continuous improvement of the design and delivery of a dynamic and complex curriculum, while facilitating the development and implementation of teaching and learning initiatives and innovations. Lisa is cross-appointed with the Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning at OISE/UT (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto). Lisa holds a Masters in
particular interest to the engineering and engineering education communities.The National Science Foundation-American Indian Higher Education Consortium (p. 3) writes: Adding diverse perspectives to the STEM research, engineering, and education community is critical to building knowledge, in part because scientists need multiple perspectives to drive innovation, solve problems, and present new ideas. Looking at the world in different ways, exploring new realms of thought, and drawing upon indigenous knowledge and ways of learning are all crucial to helping NSF stay at the cutting edge of science. Page
public policy from Carnegie Mellon University and joined the UW in 1998 after seven years on the faculty at the University of Pittsburgh. Her research centers on engineering design learning with a focus on issues of context in design. She is a fellow of AAAS and ASEE, was the 2002 recipient of the ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education, and received the 2009 UW David B. Thorud Leadership Award.Dr. Jim L. Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington Dr. Jim Borgford-Parnell is Associate Director and Instructional Consultant at the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. He taught furniture design, design drawing
) Initiative, and Singapore’snew engineering university centering on innovation and design called the Singapore University Page 23.166.6of Technology and Design (SUTD). These efforts have attempted to change or establish anengineering program where tailored design labs and/or a new curriculum are employed in aneffort to produce more industry ready graduates.16,17,18,19 On a smaller scale, the Boeing A.D.Welliver Faculty Summer Fellowship program was created to expose a small number ofcompetitively selected professors from U.S. and international universities to the key elementsand the business realities of industry.20,21 All of these efforts have
particular emphasis on issues of design context. She is a Fellow of AAAS and ASEE, was the 2002 recipient of the ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education, and received the 2009 UW David B. Thorud Leadership Award.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of mechanical engineering at Stanford University. Besides teach- ing both undergraduate and graduate design and education-related classes at Stanford University, she con- ducts research on weld and solder-connect fatigue and impact failures, fracture mechanics, applied finite element analysis, and engineering education. In addition, from 1999-2008, she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie
, or innovative solutions Simplicity The design is simple, practical, usable, reliable, maintainable, and safe, and avoiding any approaches that would introduce unnecessary complexity into the system implementation Scalability The design is sufficient to efficiently meet reasonably expectable increases in demand and/or data volume without modification Security The design incorporates elements sufficient to protect against security threats that would commonly be associates with the type of application and business described in the problem statement Overall Overall impression of the design solution Subject A was female, a junior Computer Science major who had not yet
“habits of mind”, which includesystems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication, and attention to ethicalconsiderations.7 These “habits of mind” qualities would shift perceptions of engineers fromindividuals who are solely object-oriented workers to individuals who have a strong work ethic(in collaborations and communications), are ethically responsible (globally, socially,intellectually, and technologically), are able to adapt to new trends, are innovative, and areentrepreneurial. Research in other domains such as medicine and nursing found that traits whichunderlie many of the attributes for the NAE’s idealized “Engineer of 2020” (as similarly desiredfor the medical profession) are empathy and care.8Despite NAE’s initiatives
curricula.5 Some of these implementations, and several not listed by Splitt, aredescribed in detail in Unfinished Design: The Humanities and Social Sciences in UndergraduateEngineering Education, Chapter Three. Highly innovative and ambitious programs of varioustypes and differing philosophies have been instituted at Auburn University, the University ofVirginia, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Colorado School of Mines, Dartmouth College,Stanford University, the University of Florida, Harvey Mudd College, California StatePolytechnic, the University of Illinois, the University of Rochester, MIT, and Calvin College.Several of the institutions on this list have implemented especially relevant programs or policiesto the topic of the present paper.The
, Large language models, Artificial intelligence, Machinelearning, Project-based learning, Teamwork, Technology in the classroom IntroductionIn every generation, software engineering education must adapt to technological innovations. Inour generation, we must respond to large language models (LLMs). LLMs are machine learningmodels (typically with billions of parameters) that are trained on vast amounts of data [1]. Theyare known for their ability to generate human-like text and can be used in a variety of tasks suchas code synthesis, conditional text generation, and mathematical reasoning [1], [2]. Due to theirstrong performance on a variety of tasks, LLMs have found diverse uses in both academia
can directly impact students’ lives and communities to inform the direction of the unit plan. It is his hope that these and the future curricula he will work on will help to include and empower more diverse students to see themselves in the fields of science and engineering, as well as see themselves as advocates for change and innovation in their communities. Aaron Richardson is a trained horticulturist with fifteen years of experience in the field dating back to his time in the National FFA Youth Organization, and has gone on to acquire Bachelor’s degrees in Horticulture, Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, and Biology Education from the University of Connecticut (UConn). Aaron is currently a Master’s student
visual-spa�al thinking and intui�ve insights andvisualiza�on abili�es (Chrysochoou et al., 2022; Hours et al., 2022; Kouo et al., 2021; Taylor et al., 2019).Unique Barriers to Neuro-inclusion in Engineering Education CultureThe culture of engineering educa�on presents a unique set of challenges and barriers to neuro-inclusionbut also opportuni�es, which if addressed and seized, may benefit the engineering professions andindustry as they seek innovators and those with specialized skills and abili�es (Grandin, 2022; Taylor etal., 2019; Weinbaum et al., 2023). However, there is a need for increased awareness and training amongthe engineering educa�on community and professionals to transform the culture of engineering towardneuro-inclusion and a par
classrooms and can situate engineering as an equity-centered endeavor that canprovide greater access and inclusion for students who have been historically marginalized intraditional, Western-oriented science and engineering education, increasing opportunities forconnection, creativity, and innovation that may have been absent in traditional STEM classrooms.Effectively teaching engineering within a culturally relevant framework [1] has the potential toincrease student engagement, outcomes, and representation within STEM, particularly for studentswho have not historically viewed science and engineering as relevant to their lives or as an area inwhich they can engage. Yet many teachers, particularly those in the elementary grades, lacktraining and self
on what to provide to theirstudents can help ensure disabled students do not get left behind in the classroom and are giventhe care and attention they deserve during their academic journey. There exist many tools for visualand auditory impairments, but they should be studied for potential innovations that can makelearning a smoother process for the students. When it comes to physical and mental disabilities,there needs to be a more specific standard and more customization and options for students tochoose from.Practice ImplicationsWhen designing the inclusive classroom, these factors should be kept in mind: 1. Technology is a tool, not a hindrance, to the UDL philosophy. Provide your students with all available resources. 2. Try to
AC 2011-2401: USING PERFORMANCE MODELING AS A VEHICLEFOR RE-INTEGRATIONJacob Dunn, University of Idaho Integrated Design Lab - Boise Jacob Dunn recently graduated with his Masters of Architecture from the University of Idaho with the AIA Henry Adams Medal of Honor. At the university, Jacob was highly involved with student organizations such as the AIAS and Focus the Nation. During his education, Jacob spent a summer abroad in Italy to study architecture and also worked at the ARUP branch in London for 7 months in the Foresight + Innovation and Incubation department. Currently, Jacob is a research assistant at the Integrated Design Lab in Boise, where he deals with building simulation and develops passive design
states.PLTW explicitly strives to integrate students’ college preparatory and technical educationprograms of study11. As PLTW states in their marketing materials: “The combination oftraditional math and science courses with innovative Pathway To Engineering courses preparesstudents for college majors in engineering and E/T fields and offers them the opportunity to earncollege credit while still in high school”12 . Indeed, the NRC report, Rising Above the GatheringStorm13 explicitly identifies PLTW as a model curriculum for providing the kind of rigorous K-12 materials needed to improve math and science learning and increase America’s technologicaltalent pool. Given the broad market penetration, affiliation with institutions of higher education