of the full impact of thisinitiative, the early indications point to the growing interest on the part of the undergraduatestudents to seek greater involvement in technical society activities.Motivation for Engagement of Technical SocietiesTowards the middle of the 20th century, engineering education trends began to shift heavilytoward engineering science and theory with less emphasis on engineering practice andapplication. This shift in emphasis led to the growing acceptance that many engineeringgraduates were not adequately prepared for the workforce, and companies needed to spendadditional time and resources on supplemental professional development. The engineeringindustry started to recognize the deficiency in undergraduate education in
through an annual retreat and research symposium. Additionally, a more thoroughevaluation of the program will be developed to determine which program components have themost significant impact on student success.AcknowledgementsThis project was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation Scholarships inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (NSF S-STEM) program, Award No. DUE0849660.Bibliography1. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved December 2013 from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to
factors such as gender, financial situation, extracurricular activities andsocial networks, amongst others. Takahira, Goodings, & Byrnes, 1998, identify GPAs and SAT-math scores as the primary factors associated with student persistence. A model that identifiessignificant pre-college characteristics relevant for freshman engineering student success andretention is developed in Veenstra, Dey, & Herrin, 2009. The impact of different types offinancial aid on student commitment, their integration into the academic and social componentsof the institution and on college persistence is addressed in Alon, 2005, and Cabrera, Nora, &Castaneda, 1992, as well as Chen & DesJardins, 2008. Attitudes and perceptions that influenceengineering
eight months of contact with each cohort of students, and has been offered three times overthree years to different cohorts of students, with assessment tools deployed to collect data on allthree cohorts. Thus far, NAVIGATE has reached 135 women graduate students in STEM (SeeTable 1 for list of disciplines represented at NAVIGATE), with a fourth workshop completed inMarch 2022.Why Use Case Studies? 1Case studies, often used as a method of instruction in the teaching of business or law principles,involve assigning realistic scenarios to stimulate students to actively engage in analysis related tospecific topics. While case studies are widely used to
the story in place, students are required not just to focus on the technicalaspects of the challenge but also on the elements of design that may not be adequatelyemphasized in a typical project-based design course such as consideration of customer needs,team organization and planning, tabulation of student access to materials and tools, andbudgetary limitations. This ensures that the experience the students go through is engaging onmultiple levels that a professional design process requires, with the important exception that theconsequences of failure are benign. As we gather from the literature, many seniors come to theirsenior capstones technically equipped, but face difficulty in making design-decisions arisingfrom the added constraints of
especially crucial towards proper career development. The data attained fromlab assignments can remarkably improve students’ understanding of classroom concepts byallowing students to observe the strengths and weakness of various scientific theories.Compared to traditional engineering disciplines (civil, mechanical, etc.), biological engineering(BE) students have been found to have different motivations for entering the engineering field;therefore, it is paramount that the BE engineering education community capitalizes on thisdifference to address the systemically lackluster engineering student retention rate.[1] BE studentsare largely driven to the field for the opportunity to benefit society, which differs compared totraditional engineering majors
EnvironmentAbstractThe maker movement merges creative makers and advanced technologies such as the Arduinomicrocontroller and 3D printing to drive advances in manufacturing, engineering, industrialdesign, hardware technology and education. Design-build-test challenges not only provideopportunities for students to learn deeper through making, but also educate next generationengineers in practical concepts such as technical communication, teamwork, and design reviews.The incorporation of 3D printing and computer aided design (CAD) in these courses also allowsstudents to encounter the realities of the manufacturing and design processes and promotesstudent engagement. These projects not only “provide an alternative assessment method forstudents who may not excel on
board (or similar basic processor board) along with acollection of sensors. The kits are available to be checked out to students, especially those whoare participating in remote learning. The IoT-based lab topics include an introduction to IoTtechnology, connecting and reading data from sensors and logging it to a website, and remoteaccess/control to an IoT enabled device via the internet. Utilizing the IoT learning kits, theseexercises keep students engaged and involved with hands-on learning. Through this introductionto and experience with applications utilizing IoT devices and technology, students will gain a betterunderstanding of and have the opportunity to integrate IoT technology in their senior capstonedesign
presented with lessons on conceptual design based on material from Ulrichand Eppinger (Chapter 4: Identifying Customer Needs, Chapter 5: Product Specifications,Chapter 6: Concept Development, and Chapter 7: Concept Selection). 9 These materials werereinforced through in-class examples and required as part of their design projects. Student teamswere required to develop a minimum of 5 concepts that were communicated through annotatedsketches. Through the design projects, and smaller design activities, students had opportunitiesto engage in all major phases of engineering design including problem analysis, conceptualdesign, embodiment design, and detail design. During the conceptual design phase, studentsused the different tools available to express
Paper ID #18125Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into First-Year Engineer-ing Course:: Results of a National SurveyDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the ABET assessment coordinator for her department since 2008. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice
more pervasive and invasive in society, the need forengineers and computer professionals to possess a set of moral principles to the application oftheir labor has only become more and more important. This need appears almost universallyendorsed given the myriad of ethical codes promulgated by professional organizations in thesedomains (e.g. [1, 2, 3]). ABET specifies that it “expects [evaluators] to behave in a professionaland ethical manner” and lists “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities” asa required Student Outcome of accredited programs [4, 5]. The American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) has long held and succinctly insists that “because engineeringhas a large and growing impact on society, engineers
Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills, vol. 57, no. 3. Springer Netherlands, 2016.[5] B. A. Burt, D. D. Carpenter, C. J. Finelli, and T. S. Harding, “Outcomes of engaging engineering undergraduates in co-curricular experiences.”[6] L. C. Strauss and P. T. Terenzini, “The Effects of Students’ In- and Out-of-Class Experiences on their Analytical and Group Skills: A Study of Engineering Education,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 967–992, Dec. 2007.[7] A. L. Miller, L. M. Rocconi, and A. D. Dumford, “Focus on the finish line: does high- impact practice participation influence career plans and early job attainment?,” High. Educ., vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 489–506, 2018.[8] S
participation in the process by the student2, 3. There is increasing awareness among theacademic community that this style of teaching often times does not meet the learning styles ofmany students, so students tend to pick and select what to process and ignore the rest. Theresulting effect is that some of the material is not learned. However, research shows that ateaching style, which embraces a variety of techniques to meet the learning styles of moststudents, is the one that makes the most impact on student outcomes1.This realization has led researchers to explore more hands-on variations to the traditionalteaching style. In some of these research studies, student performance is compared acrossdifferent classroom environments or under different
agents of the social norms that privilegewhite students in engineering classrooms and organizations. In a study of African-Americanmale experiences on multiracial student engineering teams, Cross and colleagues found that thesocial norms of the engineering community decreased African-American students’ sense ofbelonging.18 Contributing factors included but were not limited to indifferent faculty interactions.The authors recommended that multiracial team projects should be monitored carefully byfaculty to ensure positive experiences of all team members.A study of Asian and Asian-American students in engineering showed that many students facedstereotypes from peers and faculty that detrimentally impacted their education, including that ofbeing the
effect of socio-psychological workshops on the process of first- year students’ adaptation Introduction: In the constantly changing modern world, mobility of population isgrowing and, as a consequence, the number of young people willing to receive an educationoutside their region or country is increasing. This tendency is backed by 48 countriesmembers of Bologna process which aims to support student mobility 11,22. This is particularlyimportant for students of engineering specialties, as engineering is one of the professionalfields free of cultural and social impact. Nevertheless, training outside of their region orcountry means leaving one’s comfort zone and implies adaptation to new life a conditions
outcomesaddressed include the following: 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives This paper will look at key issues of the report as they are presented by NCSEA and fromthe perspective of engineering educators. The conclusion of this paper proposes a “short course”or workshop outline in order to facilitate implementation in a curriculum at a small scale. It willcover SE3 topics relating to management and organizational leadership and consider theirapplicability to students in both engineering management and
different knowledge levels and to engage diverse audiences—ranging from peers with similar backgrounds to novices unfamiliar with the research area. This skill not only proved invaluable for communicating within the team and disseminating progress outside the project, but also enhanced the student’s overall ability to convey complex ideas in an accessible and impactful way.During and immediately after the project, the student received multiple awards for their research,presentation skills, and also technical abilities. These successes along with a newly enhancedskill to clearly explain his ideas led to several job offers before graduation. Notably, in one jobinterview, the student had to describe complex computer science
Computer Education, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 53-63 (Winter 2010). 6. M. Butler, and R. Zerr, ―The Use of Online Homework Systems to Enhance Out-of-Class Student Engagement,‖ The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, Vol.12, No.2, pp. 51- 58 (2005). 7. B. Gutarts and F. Bains, ―Does Mandatory Homework Have a Positive Effect on Student Achievement for College Students Studying Calculus?‖ Mathematics and Computer Education, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 232- 244 (Fall 2010). 8. S. Hauk and A. Segalla, ―Student Perceptions of the Web-Based Homework Program WeBWorK in Moderate Enrollment College Algebra Classes,‖ The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, Vol
curriculum change happened across alldegree awarding universities had a common set of goals: to provide the students with broaderacademic experience by putting greater attention to non-academic learning components andextra-curricular experience; to focus on all-round development of students; to promoteenhanced linkage to the workplace; to enhance opportunities for further studies abroad; toproduce graduates capable of succeeding in the global knowledge economy and able to meetsociety’s rapidly changing needs. With the additional year to the degree programmes, ascompared to the previous 3-year undergraduate curriculum, students got more opportunitiesfor generic skill development and engage in more experiential learning components such asinternship
UniversityZulima Guilarte Rhodes, Wright State UniversityMrs. Jannet Chermi Anders c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017The predictive quality of high school grade point average on the outcomes ofunderprepared students in a first-year engineering mathematics intervention course: How motivation and effort correlate to student success.AbstractPrevious research on the impact of a mathematics intervention course on engineering studentsrevealed a strong correlation between students’ high school grade point averages (HS GPA),academic conscientiousness and motivation. Further analysis revealed a better than expectedgraduation rate after this intervention course for students with higher than average HS GPAs, evenfor
support was provided to 20 incoming freshmen, and four students with juniorstanding for the fall 2008 cohort. Two freshmen were added in spring 2009 to replace those wholeft the program that semester. The fall 2009 cohort consisted of eight incoming freshmen andfive students with upper level standing. The scholars program demographics support the targetedunder-represented students.Retention of students in engineering is a primary goal of the project, and of all 22 students whowere part of the S-STEM 2008 freshmen cohort, only four changed majors, three in a STEMdiscipline and one in mass communication. One student who continued in engineeringtransferred to a smaller university at the end of the fall 2008 semester. This yields a first
effect on students’ achievement2, 3. It also has a positive impact beyondquantitative measures of academic outcomes, such as changes in students’ thinking, intellectualdevelopment, and personal growth4. The course designers therefore placed emphasis not only onthe provision of a solid theoretical foundation, but also on the extension of the theory to practice,and on teamwork and communication skills. Real-time experiments in servo-motor control,demonstrations (fuzzy logic and optimal control of a 3D helicopter simulator), realistic design,testing, and implementation using advanced computer simulations (MATLAB and Simulink5)became an integral part of the course in and outside of the classroom6, 7.Non-technical skills became a larger part of
support the needs of theincoming transfer students and students engaged in co-op and internship programs,we decided to develop a distance learning hands-on laboratory course, anopportunity that is possible due to the flexible platform offered by LiaB. Lectures oneach experiment and other supplemental learning materials have been developed,used in the on-campus course during Spring 2010, and converted to Powerpointslides with embedded audio for use in the on-line course. A key component to theon-campus laboratory course is regular one-on-one interactions between eachstudent and the course instructor or graduate teaching assistant (GTA). Hence,‘face-to-face’ communication was immediately identified as a critical requirementfor the success of the on
situations 9. These are exactly the type of skills that would bevaluable in an innovative and dynamic MBE. Fisher and Peterson propose four main dimensionsof adaptive expertise: multiple perspective, metacognition, goals and beliefs, and epistemology10 .There has been a call to introduce more educational exercises that promote both efficiency andinnovation; namely, the type of exercises that would promote adaptive expertise. Contextualexercises have been shown to have a positive impact on students’ cognitive and affectivedomains 11. Students learn more effectively when they engage in activities that have personalmeaning; with respect to CAD education, this may mean modeling objects connected to daily lifeor personal interest. There is currently a
cognitive engagementare: Authenticity – relating with real life; Inquiry – collecting, analyzing, interpreting data;Collaboration – team work; and Technology. Thus, engaging online learners brings in addedchallenges which primarily center around communication and accessibility of content [12], [13].This paper provides experiences of implementing strategies for effective engagement in a remotelearning environment that were primarily designed for a flipped classroom. Challenges duringCOVID-19 pandemic with the remote instructions are discussed. This paper also provides resultsof the impact of the approach on students’ engagement and motivation.MethodThe strategies to engage students in a remote learning environment were implemented in severallower
learning opportunities for Rose-Hulman students. Williams’ publications on assessment, engineering and professional communication, and tablet PCs have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education and IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, among others. She has been awarded grants from Microsoft, HP, the Engineering Communication Foundation, the Kern Family Foundation, and National Science Foundation. Currently she supports the work of the Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF RED) grant recipients. She has received numerous awards including the 2015 Schlesinger Award (IEEE Professional Communication Society) and 2010 Sterling Olmsted Award (ASEE Liberal Education Division
Information on Student Reactions to Reflection Activities AbstractReflection and reflection activities are potentially valuable components of the instructionalexperiences educators design in order to support student learning. Published scholarship containsmany allusions to students having reactions to reflection activities, but the nature of thesereactions are rarely engaged in depth. In this work, we focus on four complications we haveencountered while developing a survey to explore student reactions to reflection activities:complex reactions within a single student, complex patterns of reactions between students,students being differentially aware of their reactions to reflection, and students
Session 2147 Project LIVE: A Classroom for Students on the Go J. R. Porter, J. A. Morgan, and J.A. Ochoa Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843Abstract The classical lecture environment represents one of the most important opportunities todirectly interact with students, allowing professors to leverage an array of communication andteaching techniques and to be immediately responsive to students’ questions. However, during alecture students must absorb considerable amounts of new information
changes at all levelsof education in serving such diverse students, particularly in the classroom. Speaking to theSTEM fields specifically, Garvin-Hudson & Jackson [17] emphasized that the increasingdiversity in today’s schools also makes it imperative that science classrooms adjust to meet theireducational needs. STEM fields are expected to have considerable growth that will impact theeconomy. Despite demands by stakeholders and federal investment to diversify studentpopulations entering STEM fields, reaching and engaging students from marginalizedcommunities continues to be challenging. Part of the problem in engineering education is thefocus on attracting diverse students and the lack of focus on retaining and making engineeringprograms
communities. In the associated lab, students would build on the previousweek’s audio processing topic and implement a MATLAB model of the cochlear implantultimately allowing them to process audio and listen to an approximation of what a user of theimplant would hear. 3.2 Data Collection 3.2.1 Contemporary Issue Report assignment and InterventionIn the assignment students wrote a research paper in which they were to: a) Investigate and describe a contemporary issue related to electrical and computer engineering or computer science, b) Discuss the issue in terms of problem, possible solutions, and trade-offs, and c) Discuss any ethical issues or societal impacts of the issue or solutions. Students were provided with a handout