understand theeffect of assessing real end-user needs on the development of the engineering PhD researchproposal through a case study. The hypothesis is that an understanding of the end users’ needs inthe early stages of research formulation will enable PhD students to devise research proposals thatare more focused on creating value by addressing the problems that are important and relevant tothe end-users, and will improve the ability of the PhD students to communicate their plans andresults to non-expert end-users. In this case study the PhD student prepared an initial researchproposal before conducting any end-user studies, and then conducted an end-user study throughface-to-face interviews, under the guidance of an interdisciplinary committee
literature,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), Vol. 6(3), pp. 254-265. DOI: 10.18404/ijemst.428182.19. Gee, J. P., 2001 "Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education," Review of Research in Education, Vol. 25(1), pp. 99-125.20. Kendall, M. R., & Procter, L. M., & Patrick, A. D. (2019, June), Assessing Methods for Developing an Engineering Identity in the Classroom Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—3211421. Hughes, B. E., & Schell, W. J., & Tallman, B., & Beigel, R., & Annand, E., & Kwapisz, M. (2019, June), Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on
% Assessment 3 6% Ecosystems 3 6% Curriculum 2 4%4 Results: Secondary Research Question4.1 CapacityAs we reviewed the articles and classified those that met the definition as Capacity, we alsocaptured the major area of focus that the intervention was targeting. As we did this, we came upwith five focus areas: Pedagogy, Assessment, Resource/Tool, Curriculum, and Ecosystems(broader interventions across Capacity) (see Table 2).Of the 51 articles, 30 (59%) of them directly measured Capacity. The majority of the articlesabout Capacity dealt with Pedagogy and Resources/Tools (e.g., Scratch, Google Blockly).4.2 Access and
across the Grainger College of Engineering.Dr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Saadeddine Shehab is currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He works with a group of under- graduate and graduate SCD scholars at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates the practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and in- formal learning environments. His research focuses on studying students’ collaborative problem-solving processes and the role of the teacher in facilitating these processes in STEM classrooms that feature the
. Analyze their lab data and write an effective final laboratory reportThe project assignment included in this course will address the first student learning objective of“demonstrate the ability to design various microfabrication processes.” The course also supportssome of the student outcomes at the program level, but the outcome of “an ability to designsystems, components, or processes meeting specified needs for broadly defined engineeringproblems appropriate to the discipline” is primarily chosen to be assessed using the projectassignment in this course. It also supports the program educational objective of “can functioneffectively in open-ended activities involving applications, design, analysis, andimplementation.”Overview of Energy
researchshows different metrics commonly used by school officials to assess the success or failure of aPENG program. A program outcome evaluation based solely on student enrollment andstudent performance metrics often leads to narrowed insights and does not center the students’voice and experiences. To date no research has articulated/investigated what constitutes aneffective PENG program that considers student learning experiences, professors’ perspectives,and academic advising department expectations. There is a need to discover characteristicsthat contribute to program performance by identifying which factors help the students achievetheir desired results. This study uses theory of change (ToC) framework to build a bridge between
,implementation, and assessment of summer STEM camps. Summer camps not only promote STEM throughengaging hands-on activities but reinforces learning and/or reducing learning losses in a student during thesummer months [14]. STEM camps have many positive attributes including but not limited to: thepromotion of STEM majors; allow for significant learning; simulate, in a hands-on manner, what careerscould look like; create new friendships and social skills; and can be made affordable with grants,scholarships, and financial assistance [14-15]. A study by Cooper et al. [16] examined the effects of summervacation on standardized achievement test scores that concluded that on average children's tests scores wereat least one month lower then when they left in
will be to continually self-assess where they are in their career development, and how to continue learning in a life-long self-directed manner. That licensure is required, but inadequate to prepare them for responsible charge and that they should fulfill the CEBOK3 first.The duty of industry to develop civil engineers for responsible charge?The practice of civil engineering is as much art as it is technical application of engineeringprinciples. Civil engineers in responsible charge have a professional duty to analyze theproblems they are tasked to address considering a multitude of factors (both technical andsocietal), to come to a preferred solution, not simply a solution that will work. Undergraduatecivil engineering
domestic undergraduate students in focus in the United States higher education institutions. In addition, Mr. Halkiyo is interested in broadening the participation of engineering edu- cation in Ethiopian universities to increase the diversity, inclusivity, equity, and quality of Engineering Education. He studies how different student groups such as women and men, rich and poor, students from rural and urban, and technologically literate and less literate can have quality and equitable learning experiences and thrive in their performances. In doing so, he focuses on engineering education policies and practices in teaching and learning processes, assessments, laboratories, and practical internships. Mr. Halkiyo has been
(described as more like “coaching” than following a traditionalinstructor-student relationship). Olin is widely recognized for integrated education connectingSTEM expertise with a wide range of social and creative disciplinary perspectives, includinghistory, anthropology, design, and the arts.Another interviewee reflected on the need for diverse expertise to adequately represent “both”sides of the sociotechnical: The biggest practical aspect to it is that you have to have experts in both areas informing not only the curricular development, but then the teaching, the assessments…. It requires a team, sometimes of more than two people. For all of [our instructional interventions] we had two people that were developing them, but
Engineering Education and Future Professoriate and from USFQ in Structures for Construction Professionals. MiguelAndres’s research includes Architectural and Civil Engineering Project Management, Sustainable and Resilient Urban Infrastructure, and the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but the social awareness and agency to address global humanitarian, environmental, and social justice challenges. For him, social justice is a concept that should always be involved in discussions on infrastructure. Related to STEM education, Miguel Andres develops disruptive pedagogies for STEM courses as a tool for innovation, and assessing engineering students’ agency to address climate
availability of broccoli microgreens. Consumerswill complete an anonymous five-question Qualtrics survey on their knowledge, consumption ofmicrogreens, and zip code. A visual assessment of the grocery stores using the NutritionEnvironment Measures Survey in Stores (NEMS-S) will rate the nutrition environments of thecommunities. Using Qualtrics, the student proposed to distribute a short survey with thefollowing questions to the university campus: 1) What are broccoli microgreens? 2) How oftendo you consume them? 3) Are you aware of their health benefits? 4) Are they accessible at yourlocal grocery store? and 5) What is your zip code? This student acknowledged the importance ofobtaining institutional approval to conduct research before collecting human
is a past President of WEPAN. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 GRADS (GRaduate & Advance Degree Students) Mentoring Groups: Building a supportive community for Hispanic graduate students in STEMBackground/MotivationResearch shows the importance of mentoring for student success, and this is particularlyimportant for graduate students in engineering [1]. However, most graduate students do not havea mentorship relationship outside of their faculty advisor and many times this relationship mightnot go beyond academics [2]. Results from a recent Needs Assessment conducted by Society ofHispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE) during 2021-2022 shows that approximately 25% ofpredominantly Hispanic
–Whitney test by gendergoals? options describing the situation and nationality (match btw career and goals)Assess the significance of a doctoral Categorical variable with Logistic regression (all the sixdegree in working life through the options yes/no/I do not know → statements) with gender andfollowing statements. 6 binary variables (yes/no) for nationalityHaving a doctoral degree has given me: all the six statements• a higher salary• more demanding job assignments• more meaningful job assignments• better status at my place of work• a job with new employer• a better position in the
Paper ID #40129Growing and Mentoring Your Research GroupDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Dr. Gehringer is a professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engi- neering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of feedback to students.Dr. Matthias F. Stallmann, North Carolina State University, Raleigh ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Growing and Mentoring Your Research Group
References [1] A. Adham et al., "A GIS-based approach for identifying potential sites for harvestingrainwater in the Western Desert of Iraq," International Soil and Water ConservationResearch, vol. 6, (4), pp. 297-304, 2018.Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209563391830114X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.07.003. [2] K. S. Balkhair and K. Ur Rahman, "Development and assessment of rainwaterharvesting suitability map using analytical hierarchy process, GIS and RS techniques," GeocartoInt., vol. 36, (4), pp. 421-448, 2021.Available: https://utep.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=148626975&site=ehost-live&scope=site. DOI: 10.1080
Management’s intranet site, regarding first time incollege (FTIC) student graduation rates; (c) conducting 75 surveys to undergraduate students atFIU, one of the largest MSIs in the U.S., to assess degree completion, students’ motivation tocomplete their degree on time, and the academic resources that could help them achieve thisgoal; and (d) proposing strategies that could be implemented at educational institutions to helpstudents complete their degree within four years.This study utilized a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design to collect and analyze bothquantitative and qualitative data from students. The administered survey included a demographicsection and a total of five questions. The first two questions were intended to identify if
created withcare guided by considerations from multiple disciplines. For example, designing IAUs mayinvolve the input from: • a domain expert for relevance, • a graphic designer for creating digital artifacts and with appropriate orientation and lighting, • a pedagogy expert for the sequence of operations and duration, • a psychology expert for issues related to attention and focus, • an expert camera person to create a professional images and videos, • a sociologist to account for access, diversity, and inclusivity issues, • a learning evaluator to assess effectiveness, • an engineer to create CAD models, and • business process owners to integrate the training into larger processes.Clearly, such a
Researchers and Academic EntrepreneursGalati et al. (2020) proposed several different theoretical approaches for exploring thesensemaking processes of academic researchers engaged in commercialization activity includingself-determination theory and social identity theory. These are based on the identity perspective(Gruber & MacMillan, 2017), which assesses entrepreneurial behavior in a way that is differentfrom “views embedded in economic rationality” (Gilati, p. 1480). The identity perspectiveclaims two things: 1) that individuals behave in ways that they consider appropriate forthemselves in a specific context, and 2) that human beings have a fundamental need for self-definition and for finding their own place in society (Gilati). While these
informed decisions about their academic activities. With the increasingavailability of data, the exploration of student performance prediction has become moresophisticated and has gained momentum in recent years.All the data used in this study was extracted from the Canvas Learning Management System.Learning Management Systems (LMS's) which are widely used by higher-education institutionsare an important source of student-related data. They provide a convenient and important way todeliver learning materials to students. They also are the places where most of the coursediscussions, student-instructor interactions, and assessments take place. Conveniently they keepan extensive record of all such activities and make that data available using
work quite reliably when run from the instructor’s computer withthe students participating using their own computers.With the return to the classroom, the need to offer courses at both sites remained. Also, the needto bring students from both campuses into a single section remained, both to meet universityclass size requirements and to have one instructor teach both sections without requiring teachingoverloads. Experience gained through several terms and with different courses, includingcourses teaching computer software, has resulted in a successful model of operation. This paperwill share experiences to date and will address benefits in the areas of enrollment, retention, andfaculty workload. Assessment and evaluation based on class work
in-person learning overthree academic terms. The courses selected are Introduction to Robotics and Introduction toRobotics Laboratory for EET and Strength of Materials and Strength of Materials Laboratory forCET. A total of 47 students (20 from EET and 27 from CET) academic performances weremeasured in those two courses. The effects of student background variables (race, financialbackground, ease of using, and availability of the internet) and course-related variables (difficultylevel of the course, available course-related resources on Canvas, lab-based vs. lecture-basedcourse) on student success were explored through student surveys. To measure students'performance, the academic grades they received in the courses were used. To assess
Delaware, where he teaches courses in mechanics, structural analysis, and structural design. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Promoting Student Learning and Teaching in the Virtual Environment and In- PersonAbstractThe objective of the study is to evaluate formative assessments used to engage and supportstudent learning in both the virtual and in-person learning environment in 2020 and 2021 for anundergraduate structural analysis class. In both the virtual and in-person learning environment,active learning and student engagement opportunities were created via a flipped classroom,which included breakout
(Professor)Benny Mart Hiwatig Benny Mart Hiwatig is a PhD candidate in the STEM Education program at the University of Minnesota. He earned his bachelor's degree in Secondary Education and took master's coursework in Chemistry Education in the Philippines, where he also taught high school chemistry. He is currently involved in a research project that aims to develop an observation protocol for STEM lessons and relevant training materials that are directed at improving the quality of STEM instruction in K-12 spaces. His primary research interests include assessment of student learning in STEM contexts, exploration of how integrated STEM is enacted in the secondary level (especially in chemistry classes), and assessment and
is identified and clarified. After the issue is apparent, theyare asked why a decision is necessary to proceed. Next, they are asked to consider thealternatives of each choice that is available, assess the potential consequences of each alternativeand assess the likelihood and adversity of each consequence. Next, the user is asked whethereach alternative complies with laws, policies, standards of conduct, etc. Then, the users mustconsider the ethical considerations associated with each of the alternatives, and each of theirconsequences. Finally, the students must make a decision and follow up by evaluating theeffectiveness of the decision. Many frameworks do not include a follow-up step after thedecisions have been made and implemented, but
Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She is also the Director for the Engineering Plus program, which is in the process of being renamed to Integrated Design Engineering. Bielefeldt also serves as the co-director for the Engineering Education and AI-Augmented Learning Integrated Research Theme (IRT) at CU. She has been a faculty member at CU since 1996, serving in various roles including Faculty Director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program (2014-2017), Director of the Environmental Engineering program (2006-2010), and ABET Assessment Coordinator for the CEAE Department (2008-2018
to gatherinformation on STEM experiences and attitudes of National Science Foundation PrincipalInvestigators (NSF PIs) and STEM professionals (e.g., [16], [17]). The survey has beenconducted every few years with new cohorts. As we updated the survey for the newest round ofdata collection, we took the opportunity to ask participants about their experiences during theCOVID-19 pandemic. The research team brainstormed a set of questions to assess the effects ofthe COVID-19 pandemic on STEM professionals, primarily focusing on how it impacted theirresearch and work/home life. Rather than add these items to the next round of the larger survey,we decided to treat this data collection point as a separate survey, soliciting participation
faculty, and Z-scores were used to calculate an overall score. Blinded assessment has been shown to reduceimplicit bias against women and other underrepresented groups [12], [13].Determining the critical skills or attributes for research that would be the basis of the candidateassessment was a multi-step process. First, we completed a literature review to assess whatfactors are associated with success in graduate school (as a proxy for research success). Thisrevealed a very limited range of factors used in graduate school admission and research –typically GPA, standardized test scores, and reference letters. All of these factors can beimpacted by systemic inequity: for example, some students may not feel as comfortableapproaching referees because
, understand, and assess the quality/uncertainty in 3D geospatial datasets. His research develops new methods and techniques to enhance functionality of 3D geospatial data and models. In addition, recent research interests include utilizing 3D data for creating realistic environments in immersive virtual reality, as well as the application of virtual reality in engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Understanding how students view Surveying Engineering at Penn State University andupdating their self-beliefsThis is an evidence-based practice paper related to Surveying Engineering. SurveyingEngineering, sometimes referred with the modern term “Geomatics”, is an essential field
President RickFedrizzi for related work. * Disney-Inspired Star Wars Pod Racing Theme Park ride with MOOG for thedevelopment of a VR plus 6DoF Motion Platform, cited as being the first successful combination of VRand a 6DoF motion platformsDavid is also dedicated to STEM and particularly engineering education R&D since even his early ca-reer with publications in journals such as the International Journal of Engineering Education—ActiveLearning Special Edition and being the key developer of the broader impacts on grants like the NSFExpeditions in Computing Grant on Computational Sustainability. Stemming from his involvement inthe Obama CS4ALL initiative, David also developed a means of assessing computer science educationalprograms against the