]. Likewise, engineeringidentity can have a direct impact on a student’s sense of belonging and persistence of effort, withbelonging acting as a mediator. Earlier research on an individual’s sense of belonging inengineering revealed positive correlations with their psychological sense of community,technical competence, and feelings of being socially at ease [5]. Within the engineeringundergraduate classroom, the direct effects of faculty and peer interaction have been shown tosignificantly increase students’ sense of academic belonging, with peer interaction having thegreatest impact [6].Pedagogical approaches such as active and cooperative learning can also positively impactstudents’ sense of belonging in the classroom [7]. Active learning
Paper ID #49549Visualizing and Identifying Patterns of Student Flow Through UndergraduateEngineering ProgramsDr. Bonnie S. Boardman, The University of Texas at Arlington Bonnie Boardman is the Undergraduate Program Director and a Professor of Instruction in the Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department at The University of Texas at Arlington. Her primary research interests are in the engineering education and resource planning disciplines. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 1
non-technical factors. Historical, political, environmental, economical, budgetary, and climatic factors are as equally important in the design of structures.2. Public scrutiny and perception of complex projects can significantly alter the initially envisioned design and may result in significant changes to accommodate conflicting viewpoints.3. The approach of researching the history of structures, then virtually building them on an advanced software platform is practical and useful in developing appreciation for the effort invested in addressing various design and planning aspects of a given project.4. SolidWorks is a powerful tool that can help create realistic models of structural parts and assemblies. Its use in
teaching practices, allows for maximization of learning.This concept thus implies that an individual is more likely to be successful in synthesizinginformation if the modality of its delivery matches their individual learning style. While theunivariate classification of individuals based on learning styles remains a debated topic inpedagogical communities, there is evidence to suggest that the VARK modalities may be used asan aid to deliver learning outcome specific content in multi-disciplinary contexts, such as anengineering design classroom.Overview of Research Objectives and MethodologyThe broad aim of this project was to understand the relationship between individual studentlearning style and the study habits employed and course materials
maintenance hubs could facilitate large-scale testing un- This study aims to: der real-world conditions. • Joint Research Initiatives: Collaborative projects could • Design and construct a 1000-watt inverter generator using explore higher-capacity systems or incorporate cutting- readily available materials [9], [11]. edge technologies, such as smart monitoring and AI- • Provide stable and clean AC power output suitable for
, exposing students to the standards, demands, and expectations of theconstruction and architecture industries.In February 2024, students from our institution participated in the NAHB Student DesignCompetition in two categories for the first time, achieving commendable success by winning twotrophies. This accomplishment highlighted not only the students' technical expertise but also theirability to work collaboratively, solve problems creatively, and communicate effectively. As partof this initiative, a comprehensive survey was conducted to evaluate the educational andprofessional impacts of this experience on the participating students.The primary objective of this paper is to analyze the results of this survey, shedding light on howparticipating
and the Role of Student OrganizationsAbstractThe key factors that motivate young women to pursue engineering careers should be recognizedand integrated across the educational system, from K-12 through graduate-level programs.Focusing on motivating factors highlights a fundamental shift from focusing on the obstacles thatyoung women face to emphasizing the positive influences that foster interest and confidence inchoosing to study engineering and enter engineering career fields. Current research in this areahighlights seven specific factors which are positive influences that can be developed throughinformal learning experiences, such as clubs or enrichment activities. Research shows that youngwomen who choose and stay in engineering [1, 2
Paper ID #37544Experiences of students supported by an NSF S-STEM grantin a Robotics and Mechatronic Systems Engineering programShuvra Das (Professor) Dr. Shuvra Das started working at University of Detroit Mercy in January 1994 and is currently Professor of Mechanical Engineering. Over this time, he served in a variety of administrative roles such as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair, Associate Dean for Research and Outreach, and Director of International Programs in the college of Engineering and Science. He has an undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
; Mazzurco,2014; also see National Research Council, 1999).A small group of faculty and staff at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder) hasadopted a functional rather than an essentialist definition. For them, a global engineer is someonewho practices engineering in the following way: 1. with forethought of its far-reaching consequences, both physical and social; 2. with an appreciation of international colleagues and/or in international offices; and 3. with cultural sensitivity, so that personal interactions are both pleasant and effective.People who practice this kind of engineering must have tremendous personal and intellectualflexibility. In order to consider (1) the far-reaching consequences of their actions, they must stepout of
Paper ID #12396Impact of Narrative, Character Creation, and Game Mechanics on StudentEngagement in a Game-Based Chemical Engineering Laboratory CourseMr. Daniel D. Anastasio, University of Connecticut Daniel Anastasio received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009. He is pursuing a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering at the University of Connecticut while acting as a co- instructor for the chemical engineering capstone laboratory and the first-year foundations of engineering course. His research interests include osmotically driven membrane separations and engineering peda- gogy.Dr. Aravind
AC 2008-407: INTEGRATION OF ELECTROMAGNETICS (EM) ANDELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC) INTO ELECTRICALENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMKin Moy, Youngstown State University Mr. Kin P. Moy is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology of Youngstown State University in Youngstown, Ohio. He holds BSEE and MSEE degrees in Electrical Engineering from Youngstown State University. He was an Adjunct Faculty in Electrical Engineering Department since 1975. Prior to joining YSU, he spent 32 years in General Motors Corporation & Delphi Corporation, retiring in 2005. He was an EMC engineering manager and department head of research laboratories at Delphi Packard Electric
60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time , t, (Years) Figure 2: Nominal System Response Using K Values from Table 1 Inputs are Ni = 3,500,000 students and Nreq = 72,000 B.S. degreesThe initial system output, at about 50,000 B.S. degrees, is artificial because of the initializationprocess involving the required system
Paper ID #45838Incorporating Narrative Non-Fiction Reading into an Aerospace EngineeringCourseDr. Matthew Kuester, University of Mary Hardin-Baylor Dr. Kuester is an Assistant Professor at the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor in the Computer Science, Engineering, and Physics Department. His research interests include renewable energy, aerodynamics, fluid mechanics, and engineering pedagogy.Maria Smith, University of Mary Hardin-Baylor Maria Smith has been the Electronic Resources Librarian at Townsend Memorial Library at the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor since 2023. She is the library liaison to the Computer Science
programs that these objectives are laid out by ABET and are to beassessed each year. According to an article published in 2020, a senior adjunct director at ABETdescribed that program educational objectives differ from student outcomes in four ways: a) degreeof specificity, b) role of constituents, c) purpose of assessment, and d) cycles of data collection[7]. It is considered that these objectives as being attained by graduates a few years aftergraduation. It can be very helpful for departments to map all of the curricula to their programeducational objectives to improve awareness among the stakeholders.From initial research and job data gathered to study the state of the manufacturing industry in Ohiostate, the steering committee determined a
facilitating constructivist learningexperiences. They conclude that LEGO robotics-themed projects successfully engageengineering undergraduates in “complex robotics problems” and demonstrate the capacity ofLEGO Mindstorms for “developing students as independent thinkers. . . [who] continuallychallenge their own knowledge and that of their peers” [1].The research of Danahy and his colleagues highlights the capacity of LEGO products to facilitateconstructivist learning experiences in engineering classrooms. Working with LEGO products insuch contexts, however, has been largely restricted to developing technical engineeringproficiencies in robotics and computer programming. In designing the LEGO course for adepartment of Engineering and Society, I aimed
Paper ID #19019Let’s Break Stuff! A Refit of the Mechanics Sequence of Courses to InspireStudent InquiryLt. Col. Jakob C Bruhl P.E., U.S. Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel Jakob Bruhl is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology, M.S. Degrees from the University of Missouri at Rolla and the University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign, and Ph.D. from Purdue University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His research interests include resilient
AC 2007-463: INTRODUCING MULTIDISCIPLINARY NOVEL CONTENTTHROUGH LABORATORY EXERCISES ON REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONSRobi Polikar, Rowan University ROBI POLIKAR is an Associate Professor with the Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ. His research interests include signal processing, pattern recognition and computational intelligence. He teaches wavelet theory, pattern recognition, neural networks and biomedical systems at Rowan. He is a member of IEEE and ASEE, as well as Tau Beta Pi and Eta Kappa Nu.Ravi Ramachandran, Rowan University RAVI RAMACHANDRAN is a Professor with the Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ. His
face the challenges of a sustainable approach to automobiles and itsassociated energy infrastructure. The initial efforts of interested students began by recycling a 1974 Volkswagen Beetle into afuel neutral series hybrid 7. The modular nature of the students’ design, as depicted in Figure 1,provides future students the flexibility to enhance efficiency by replacing the current dieselgenerator with a fuel cell, additional battery bank, or any power plant that provides the mostsustainable solution. Moreover, sustainability is further evident by using 100% biodiesel fuelcreated from on campus dining services waste cooking oil. This fuel is created by a BiodieselInitiative run through the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department at the
instruction. In twodifferently administered tests, scores from the four month tests dropped an average of 18% onquestions of recognition, recall, comprehension and mental skills. At eleven months, the testaverage dropped 22% from the initial test. The additional drop-off between four and elevenmonths was just 4%, indicating that most of the retention loss occurs quickly. In another study,attendees of a clinical research orientation seminar were tested on the content of the programfollowing completion and again after four months had passed. The attendees were divided intosubsets of those who had used the knowledge or skills during the interim and those who had not.Predictably, those who had employed the content of the seminar and tests outperformed
rubric analysis, if an average score falls below 2.5, the corresponding measure is flagged, aninstructor review is triggered, the continuous improvement effort (CIE) report is completed bythe instructor and submitted to the program coordinator, improvements are implemented the nextcourse offering, and the outcome is again measured. The CIE report identifies the triggeredbenchmark, the related program-level outcome, and the proposed plan of action to raise futureratings If the measure falls below the benchmark for three successive course offerings, a CETfaculty-wide review is initiated leading to a documented improvement strategy. In the exampleof TCET 3142 (Table 4), four rubric score averages fell below the benchmark. The courseinstructor
economy.However, along with the benefits of globalization, come the challenges of leading in a globalenvironment. Besides the obvious issue of time differences, there are several other barriersprevalent in a global team, especially during the initial phase of it. These include communicationdifferences, cultural differences, different expertise levels, different work styles and schedules,and most importantly, trust issues. It is these barriers that commonly form the ice in a globalteam and can create a very challenging management experience. As a leader of a globalengineering team, it is not only essential to break this ice immediately after the team is formedbut even more important to lead the team in a manner such that it prevents the ice from
positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox also spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Soci- ety of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall
Paper ID #37921A Cultural Approach to Teaching Teamwork inUndergraduate Engineering CoursesJoanna G Burchfield Dr. Joanna Burchfield is an Assistant Professor of Communication for the College of Engineering at the University of South Florida. Her current research interests focus on the links between interpersonal and intercultural communication competency and undergraduate engineering students’ professional proficiencies and professional identity development. Specifically, Burchfield’s research explores how the application of an interpersonal communication based curriculum impacts undergraduate engineering
Paper ID #36737I Think We Should Break Up...Class, That IsMatthew Swenty (Dr.) Dr. Swenty obtained his bachelor's and master's degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He returned to school to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by re-search work at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridges. He is currently a professor of civil engineering and the Jackson-Hope Chair in Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute. He teaches engineering mechanics and structural
grant project teams in planning and development, through external eval- uation, and as publication support. Most of his work is on STEM education and advancement projects and completed for Minority-Serving Institutions. He also conducts research regarding higher education focused on the needs and interests of underserved populations and advancing understanding of Minority- Serving Institutions.Dr. Breanna Michelle Weir Bailey P.E., Texas A&M University - Kingsville I am a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas. I have been employed at Texas A&M University-Kingsville since 2006. I currently serve as Chair of the Department of Civil and Architec- tural Engineering.Dr. David Hicks, Texas A&M
instrument was adapted from “AssessingGeneral Education: A Questionnaire to Initiate Campus Conversation” by Jack Meacham anddistributed by the American Association of Colleges and Universities. The last question in thesurvey asked faculty to rank the quality of the general education program on a scale from 1 to 5,where 1 was associated with the statement, “Our general education program satisfies the minimalaccreditation requirements.” The score of 5 was associated with the statement, “Our generaleducation program surpasses in quality those of our peer institutions.” With 40 % of the facultyresponding (and 61% of the respondents from the college of arts and sciences), the meanresponse to this question of quality was 2.9, the median was 3.0 and the
instructor as to which project rank at the top and the bottom.While working with a team of researchers on a grant proposal, a discussion came about amongseveral colleagues on how to model experiments in creativity. The working hypothesis that wasused stated the following: individuals are more creative than groups even though groups couldgenerate many more ideas by brainstorming. The primary goal of group brainstorming is togenerate a wide variety of ideas but people often refrain from acting on them. They think theirideas are too strange or unrealistic and they fear negative reactions from other group members(Diehl & Stroebe, 1987; Osborne, 1957). Individuals on the other hand can explore creativeconnections and combinations beyond the normative
Paper ID #30388Diversity and Inclusion in Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering EducationDr. Christopher Pannier, University of Michigan-Dearborn Christopher Pannier is an assistant professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan- Dearborn. His research is in the application of control theory to additive and other advanced manufactur- ing processes to improve performance, reliability, and sustainability. He received a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and a BS in Nuclear Engineering from Texas A&M University.Dr. Carlotta A Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of
in 1965. Served as Founding Chairman of Systems Engineering, Associate Dean of Engineering, and then as University Dean of Research over a period of 12 years. He received the Lohmann Medal from Oklahoma State for Outstanding Contributions to ISE Education and Research (1992) and the Armitage Medal for Outstanding Contributions to Logistics Engineering Literature (2004); the Holtzman Distinguished Educator Award from the Institute of Industrial Engineers (1990); both the Grant and Wellington Awards from ASEE and IIE; and the Pioneer Award from the International Council on Systems Engineering (2000). He is Founder (2005) and President of the Omega Alpha Association: the Systems Engineering Honor Society and was
Paper ID #11693Development of Entrepreneurial Attitudes Assessment Instrument for Fresh-man StudentsMr. Todd Mathew Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette Todd is a PhD Student in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on en- trepreneurship education and entrepreneurship education as a component of modern engineering educa- tion efforts.Prof. Genisson Silva Coutinho, Purdue University, West Lafayette Genisson Silva Coutinho is a Ph.D. student at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is a CAPES grantee and also professor in the Department of Mechanical and