Paper ID #30133Enlightened Education: Solar Engineering Design to Energize SchoolFacilitiesDr. Kenneth A. Walz, Madison Area Technical College Dr. Walz completed his Ph.D. at the University of Wisconsin, while conducting electrochemical research on lithium-ion batteries with Argonne National Laboratory and Rayovac. His studies also included re- search with the University of Rochester Center for Photo-Induced Charge Transfer. Since 2003, Dr. Walz has taught science and engineering at Madison Area Technical College, where he serves as the director of the Center for Renewable Energy Advanced Technological Education (CREATE
for funding the project and providing the opportunity for the Cal Poly Pomonaengineering students to participate is such a rewarding endeavor.References 1. Grau, A., Indri, M., LoBello, L., Sauter, T., “Industrial Robotics in Factory Automation: from the Early Stage to the Internet of Things,” 43rd IEEE Industrial Electronics Conference IECON, Japan 2017. 2. Verner, I. and Gamer, S., “Reorganizing the Industrial Robotics Laboratory for Spatial Training of Novice Engineering Students,” Proceedings International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, Florence Italy, 2015.3. Chang, G. and Stone, W., “An Effective Learning Approach for Industrial Robot Programming”, 120th ASEE Annual Conference &
&M University and an Asso- ciate Professor in the Zachry Department of Civil Engineering. His research focuses on solid mechanics and materials science. His speciality is welding physics and the fatigue and fracture behavior of struc- tural weldments under cyclic loading. Results from his research have been incorporated in national and international codes of recommended practice for buildings as well as railway and highway bridges.Dr. Carol L. Stuessy, Texas A&M University Dr. Carol Stuessy has been associated with Texas A&M Univerrsity since 1989 as a professor of science education in the Department of Teaching, Learning and Culture. Her specialties include research design using mixed methods approaches
. Page 23.844.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Development of a CCLI Course on PV Engineering AbstractA Course Curriculum Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Type I NSF proposal under the title”Development of Novel Learning Materials for Green Energy Education Centered around a PVTest Station” was awarded in August, 2010 to develop exemplary learning materials andlaboratory modules for PV engineering at the undergraduate/graduate levels. The paper discussesa preliminary version of course modules developed as of now, the laboratory facilities andexperimental projects, and assessment of its impact on students.Keywords: Photovoltaic, Renewable Energy
of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. 1956, New York: Longmans, Green.15. Riley, D., et al. Learning/assessment: A tool for assessing liberative pedagogies in engineering education. in ASEE Annual Conference. 2006. Chicago, IL, United States: American Society for Engineering Education, Chantilly, VA 20153, United States.16. Wheeler, E. and R.L. McDonald, Writing in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 89(4): p. 481-486.17. Richards, B., et al. Integrating critical thinking and writing curriculum into freshman engineering. in ASEE Annual Conference. 2001. Albuquerque, NM, United States: American Society for
Paper ID #6160Senior Project based Educational Collaboration between Physics and Electri-cal EngineeringProf. Richard W. Freeman P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy RICHARD W. FREEMAN has served as a lecturer in the U.S. Coast Guard Academy’s Electrical En- gineering Major since 2008. Prior to joining the faculty, he taught fulltime for eight years. He also worked in the Telecommunications Industry for eight years. He earned BS and PhD degrees in Computer Engineering from Iowa State University and a MBA from Southern Methodist University. He holds a Professional Engineering License in the State of Connecticut.Anthony H. Hawes
Paper ID #33987The Growth of Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Education in the 21stCenturyDr. Mousumi Roy P.E., University of Connecticut Dr. Roy earned her Doctoral degree from Columbia University, NY, MS from The Cooper Union, NY, and BS from Jadavpur University, India. She has a joint appointment in Civil and Environmental Engineering Department and Management & Engineering for Manufacturing Program (a collaboration between School of Engineering and Business) as an Assistant Professor in Residence in University of Connecticut. Her research interests include interdisciplinarity in Automation, Industry 4.0
. Page 26.141.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Accessibility, Usability, and Universal Design in Online Engineering EducationiAbstractAccessibility and usability have been fundamental concerns for instructional designs inonline engineering education. With the prevalence of online professional developmentand course management systems (CMS), the delivery of accessible and user-friendlycourse materials become crucial to a successful online program. Government entities,including public universities like UW-Madison, are legally bounded by the regulations ofSection 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requiring all web content is within reach of allusers. Universal
. and world, the next generation of engineers will need a set ofknowledge, skills, and attitudes that is sufficiently strong technically and broad enough regardingnon-technical understanding of social, economic, and political systems. Creativity, or the abilityto see the world anew, making the strange familiar and the familiar strange, can help infuse asense of purpose in education and help students learn to appreciate and work within the BigPicture.To remain competitive with international institutions and engineers, U.S. colleges anduniversities must foster creativity in their faculty and students. The next generation of engineerswill require a creative outlook to approach technical problems in new ways. Incorporatingcreativity into student
, US engineering schools generally provide no unrestrictedlaboratory courses suitable for a broad range of majors, in contrast to our sister scientificdisciplines of physics, chemistry, and biology. This paper attempts redress of that lack,through the utilization of our engineering device laboratory to provide cross-collegecollaborations through co-teaching or supplementation of existing courses taught in threeNCSU colleges: Colleges of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHASS), Education andPsychology (CEP), and Design. The collective set of students to be impacted includes (i)engineers in foreign language courses, (ii) pre-service technology education studentsseeking K-12 teaching degrees, (iii) in-service technology education for practicing K
Security Studies MA at Johns Hopkins University. Dr. Larkin is a researcher, academic and policy adviser in Ireland. He was previously Parliamentary Assistant and Chief of Staff to Senator Sean Barrett (I) of the Irish Senate. Dr. Larkin has had visiting posts at the Institute of Public Administration (Dublin), NUI Maynooth, Cardiff Metropolitan University and ESC Toulouse. He has been awarded funding from the EU FP7 programme, the Irish Research Council/Science Foundation Ireland, the Higher Education Authority as well as private and internal funding. Dr. Larkin’s principal research focus is on public policy and the impact of multilateral bailouts on European countries. Dr. Larkin has a B.A.(Mod.) and Ph.D. in
Stanford University in the Fall of 2023Mr. Benjamin C. Beiter, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Mechanical Engineering PhD Student at Virginia Tech. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Game Over: Reframing Ethical Decision Making through Failure for Engineering Education* Alice Fox1 and Benjamin Beiter2I. I NTRODUCTION “Arise now, ye Tarnished. Ye dead, who yet live. . . .”In this paper, we introduce failure as we define it and how it is currently approached in engi-neering. We present the current state of the art in teaching engineering
systematic literature review,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 6, no. 1. Springer, Dec. 01, 2019. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.[9] B. Ortega-Ruipérez and M. Lázaro Alcalde, “Teachers’ perception about the difficulty and use of programming and robotics in the classroom,” Interactive Learning Environments, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2061007.[10] A. G. Arı and G. Meço, “A new application in biology education: Development and implementation of arduino-supported stem activities,” Biology (Basel), vol. 10, no. 6, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/biology10060506.[11] A. I. Yasin, E. C. Prima, and H. Sholihin, “Learning Electricity using Arduino-Android based Game to Improve STEM Literacy
Framework for Implementing Quality K-12 Engineering EducationSTEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) integration at the K-12 level isgaining national and international attention. Many U.S. national documents have laid thefoundation for the connections between the disciplines1, 2. Engineering can be considered theintegrator in STEM integration. However, there is not a clear definition or a well-establishedtradition of what constitutes a quality engineering education at the K-12 level3. At the collegelevel, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology4 (ABET) has guided thedevelopment of engineering programs through its accreditation process, but there is no similarprocess at the K-12 level
Motion with Stop-Action Animations. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(5), p. 861-867.[26] Jeffers A. T., Safferman A. G., Safferman S. I. (2004). Understanding K-12 Engineering Outreach Programs. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(2), p. 95-108. Page 13.960.10
Paper ID #11874Changing Creativity through Engineering Education and Bio-Inspired De-signMr. Fabien R DurandJin Woo Kim, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDorian HenaoMs. Joanna Tsenn, Texas A&M University Joanna Tsenn is a Ph.D. student studying Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University, with an anticipated graduation date of August 2015. She received her B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2010. Her research interests include bioinspired design and engineering design methodology. Her dissertation topic relates to the development of a text mining tool to automatically
technical studies, CSM iscognizant of the historical male-domination of the science and engineering professions 7,8,9.Some research has shown that limited diversity enhances team performance, while no diversityor substantial diversity can actually hinder team performance 6. Hence, in 1999 aninterdisciplinary research team began studying the mixed-gender decision-making processes ofstudent teams enrolled in EPICS. Once that was completed, a second phase focusing on Page 7.698.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for
his theory that thought development is determined by language. He believed thatlanguage/speech, which later becomes internalized thought, involves the agency of other people Page 7.5.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 1615and is mediated by community and culture. Consequently, the emphasis in learning is on the useof communication where students construct knowledge based on interactions with
inside of an implicit or solidbody), while the blue and red colors indicate negative values (outward from the surface of thesolid body). Fields can be imported to nTop to change geometry characteristics and features.Lattice structures can vary in thickness, distance, and density according to scalar fields.Figure 2. Field viewer illustration of nTop function. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceUnfortunately, at the time of writing, nTop’s internal heat transfer simulation capabilities arelimited to simple conduction analyses, and it cannot model fluid flow. For problems in which thephysics cannot be sufficiently modeled by the FEA
Paper ID #16272Integration of General Education into the Senior Capstone Class in Engineer-ingDr. Patricia R Backer, San Jose State University Dr. Backer been a faculty at SJSU since 1990 and held positions as an assistant professor, associate professor, professor, department chair, and director. Since coming to San Jose State University in 1990, I have been involved in the General Education program. Currently, Dr. Backer serves as the PI for two SJSU grants: the AANAPISI grant and the Title III Strengthening grant both from the U.S. Department of Education.Dr. Laura E Sullivan-Green, San Jose State University Dr
available project-based teaching/learning initiatives inengineering education and how the UCCRP differs from all of these. Over the years, many pedagogical activities, which fall under the umbrella of project-basedlearning, have been developed and successfully implemented in many higher education institutions.These project-based learning initiatives can be classified into five categories. The first category en-compasses courses offered early in the curriculum, such as the I-Series at the University of Maryland,SUMMER 2020 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 5 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Undergraduate Cross-Class
Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management. Off campus, he is a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Fellow, Senior Fellow of IEEE, NSF Pathways to Innovation Faculty Fellow, past chair of the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Di- vision, current chair of the ASEE Interdivisional Committee, past co-editor of the Morgan and Claypool Biomedical Engineering Book Series, Media Director for BigBeacon and serves on several national and international boards. He has been recognized with several awards including two National Biomedical Engineering Teaching Awards, The national KEEN outstanding faculty award, and has been nominated twice for the CASE US Professor of the Year. Joe is the
Journal of Educational Thought 29, 2 (1995).5. M. Borrego and L.K. Newswander, The Review of Higher Education 34, 61 (2010).6. P. Stock and R.J. Burton, Sustainability 3, 1090 (2011).7. National Science Foundation, Introduction to the IGERT Program, WWW Document, (https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/igert/intro.jsp).8. V.B. Mansilla, E.D. Duraisingh, C.R. Wolfe, and C. Haynes, The Journal of Higher Education 80, 334 (2009).9. V.B. Mansilla and E.D. Duraisingh, The Journal of Higher Education 78, 215 (2007).10. L.R. Lattuca, D. Knight, and I. Bergom. International Journal of Engineering Education 29, 3 (2013).11. D. Fowler, R. Arroyave, J. Ross, R. Malak, and S. Banerjee. Looking Outwards from the “Central Science”: An Interdisciplinary
2006-2432: “ENGINEERING IN HEALTH CARE” MULTIMEDIA CURRICULUMFOR HIGH SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONSara Titus, University of Maryland-Baltimore County Sara Titus is a graduate student in the Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department at UMBC. She received her Bachelors degree from UMBC in May 2005.John Raczek, University of Maryland-College Park JOHN W. RACZEK is a Web Developer in the Office of Medical Education at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. His work focuses on developing software systems for education with an emphasis on simulation.Bruce Jarrell, University of Maryland School of Medicine BRUCE JARRELL is Senior Associate Dean and Professor of Surgery at the University of
Engaging Future Engineers.” Journal of Engineering Education 100: 48–88.3. National Academy of Engineering. (2004).The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.4. Roeser, S. (Ed.) (2010). Emotions and Risky Technologies. Dordrecht: Springer.5. Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development 16:133– 145.6. Alpay, E. (2011
engineeringdisciplines. Clearly, the divergent inquiry in design thinking is neither recognized nor included inmost engineering curricula. I think the time is right to introduce the iterative divergent-convergent process(s) in order to develop better pedagogical approaches to engineering design.Focusing on Design-Related Education: Recently, designers, throughout the world, havehelped develop an increasingly complex “built” environment that includes some major large-scale engineering projects. Simultaneously, designers have been pushing the envelope atrelatively fast rate making products, systems and engineering projects increasingly complex asthey strive to improve reliability and increase service-life by increasing number of componentsand their
teachers’beliefs and practices over nearly five decades, as well as related evidence of “engineeringeducation” efforts from the Technology Education community, to see if the trends in TechnologyEducation over the past decades speak “favorably” (or not) with regard to TechnologyEducation’s role in future efforts to implement engineering in K-12 education. Generallyspeaking, I think the findings from our review describe the changing ideas of Technologyeducators with regard to the nature of Technology Education content and curriculum thatposition the field to play an important role in what some (e.g., the NAEP, and the ITEEA) areincreasingly referring to as “technology and engineering literacy for all.”The juxtaposition of these four studies allowed us to
ofEngineering School administrators (Deans, Associate Deans, Department Heads), faculty (allranks and disciplines), and staff. Associate Deans, faculty and staff were selected who haddemonstrated interest in curriculum and/or engineering education (previous participation inannual ASEE conferences and/or ASEE Global Colloquia, education committees of professionalsocieties, involvement in ABET, or other education-related activities such as diversity programs,service learning, etc.). Invitations were sent to 3,083 individuals of which 673 (22%) were fromforeign Universities. 204 individuals responded, representing 135 universities of which 97 are inthe US and Puerto Rico and 38 (28%) are international universities. Just over half of therespondents (111
Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Chicago, IL.4. Barrett, D. & Usselman, M. (2005). Experience to Impact: A Comparison of Models of University-Based Summer Internships for High School Teachers. Annual Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Portland, OR.5. Silverstein, S., Dubner, J., Miller, J., Glied, S. & Loike, J. (2009). Teachers' Participation in Research Programs Improves Their Students' Achievement in Science. Science, Vol. 326. P. 440-442.6. Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (2012). Georgia Intern Fellowships for Teachers. https://www.ceismc.gatech.edu/gift/7. Farrell, A. M. (March, 1992). What Teachers Can Learn from
put it beyond the reachof anyone who isn’t very wealthy?”, “How can I balance my obligations to society when theyseem to conflict with the interests of the company funding my project?”. Consequently,education, when designed to prepare students for the real world must also prepare them todevelop their social awareness and abilities and acquire a clear sense of professional values inorder to develop and to sustain successful, healthy relationships with those with whom they workand with those they seek to serve. Unfortunately, such “soft skills” are often given short shrift in the undergraduate curriculum[3]. As a 2015 study by Garibay suggests, it seems that within engineering and related fields, thisstrong focus on technical knowledge, and