generation have tended to evolve with thesechanging interests, teaching and research dedicated to the conservation of energy has remainedcomparatively static.From an analytical standpoint, many companies do not possess the in-house knowledge neededto fully assess the impact that simple energy conservation measures can have on their facilities ormanufacturing operations. This knowledge gap can often be bridged when plans for the moreefficient use of energy is correlated directly to monetary savings. Toward this end, theresponsible energy engineer must be fully adept in the appropriate engineering fundamentals andthe associated economics as well.Spurring renewed interest in the development and adoption of both new and existing energyconservation
dynamics, solids mechanics and thermodynamics). It appears thatthe best instructors using grade-based correlations can explain about 25% (0.5 squared) ofthe future grade success in follow on engineering courses.Bibliography1 C.M. Saviz, K.C. Schulz, W.J. King and R.H. Turpin, “Assessment Measures to Enhance Teaching and Curriculum Effectiveness” Proceedings of 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, T1A-7, 2001.2 National Academy of Engineering, “Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering Instruction: What Gets Measured is What Gets Improved” Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009.3 D.P. Hoyt, “Measurement of Instructional Effectiveness”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1973, pp. 367-378.4 R.A
develops habitual facility in running thesearches and tabulating the results. In addition, it is possible that some sample text strings mighthave gotten more or less source matches on Google near the end of the data collection periodcompared to the beginning of the period, not due to any fault of the researcher, but rather, due toeither more source material becoming available on the web35 or to some sources disappearingfrom the web altogether.53 It is recommended that future studies of this type incorporate a meansof checking the consistency of these types of measurements taken from Google searches overtime.ConclusionFor the engineering students whose work is examined here, it appears that the confusionregarding what and how much verbatim source
a crucial tool, reflecting the learner's understandingand competence, and ultimately guiding them towards targeted improvement and development.However, in active learning the content is usually taught for a set amount of time, and a student’saptitude is based on how much they learned in that time. Conversely, mastery learning assumes thatall students, given enough time and intervention, can eventually master the content [4], [5], [6].Learning within mastery frameworks concerns itself with identifying learning trajectories andproviding students with curriculum for gaining knowledge and skills, assessing mastery throughformative assessments, and providing feedback to help students master one set of skills beforemoving on to the next set [7
entrepreneurship.Dr. Emily Dringenberg, The Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State Uni- versity. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a M.S. in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education.Dr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically
their intentions for social impact in CS. We use these findings to suggest that CSsupport programs encourage their participants to form student-led, virtual communities forprofessional development, and engage socially-oriented individuals, respectively. Above all, weencourage facilitators of CS support programs and educational settings to remain strategic in thedesign of curriculums and environments. With an emphasis on changes in systems over students[26], [73], we believe that the field can resourcefully nurture the persistence of students ofdiverse identities, ultimately encouraging a future of equitable innovation in CS.References[1] T. Highfill and C. Surfield, “New and Revised Statistics of the U.S. Digital Economy, 2005–2020”, [Online
AC 2011-1570: PROJECT-BASED LEARNING AND DESIGN EXPERIENCESIN INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING COURSES ASSESSING AN IN-CREMENTAL INTRODUCTION OF ENGINEERING SKILLSAndrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Engineering Society of Detroit. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, director of the LTU Thermal Science Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate in Energy & Environmental Man
as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacheMs. Adrie Koehler Doctoral Student, Learning Design & TechnologyMr. Shawn Farrington, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Shawn Farrington is a Senior Lecturer in the Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University. He co-coordinates a first-year Design Thinking program and teaches several of his own sections. Shawn is also an Educa- tional Psychology Ph.D. candidate at Purdue. HisElnara Mammadova Elnara is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Technology, Leadership and Innovation program at Purdue University. She is dedicated to her research on fostering inclusivity in the curriculum and ensuring digital
in STEM[5], [10], [11]. This issue is further exacerbated by the frequently studied false dichotomy ofsocial-technical dualism in STEM, where many STEM professionals disregard and devaluesocial and political issues in favor of technical knowledge and experiences[12]. ThisSocial-Technical dichotomy leaves LGBTQ+ individuals silenced and marginalized since genderand sexuality issues—along with myriad other social issues—are seen as entirely irrelevant tothe STEM environment and curriculum [7], [13]. Faced with this climate, students must resolve their LGBTQ+ identity with a STEMprofessional identity that is implicitly and explicitly tied to heteronormativity. This resolution is acrucial but complicated and difficult process of identity
-year community college (Clark College in WA), a public polytechnic institution(Oregon Institute of Technology in OR), a branch campus of a public R1 institution (WashingtonState University Vancouver in WA), and an independently governed Catholic institution (theUniversity of Portland in OR). We included courses from three engineering disciplines (civil,electrical, and mechanical) with one general engineering curriculum. All courses are 2nd yearengineering labs, except MECH 309, which is offered in the 3rd year. CE 376 is offered in the2nd year.Table 1 provides information regarding the major of the courses being analyzed, along with thename of the course, the institution, the term and year in which it was offered, and the number of
teaching lab courses and mentored both undergraduate and graduate students interested in teaching. Her areas of expertise include qualitative and quantitative assessment, STEM curriculum development, and graduate student training. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Piloting a Flexible Deadline Policy for a First-Year Computer Programming CourseAbstractThis complete research paper details our analysis of how implementing a generous flexibledeadline policy impacted student performance across course assignments over one semester in alarge introductory computer programming course. Our goal was to help students stay on track forthe course by posting regular
potential to provide meaningful informationwithout requiring more data collection from students. This is particularly salient in times of crisiswhen contact with students may be inconsistent and when data such as survey results may bemore challenging to obtain.In this study, we analyzed social media data from Reddit towards developing an understandingof engineering students’ attitudes and focus areas around their educational experience before andduring the Covid-19 pandemic. Students’ attitudes were mainly evaluated by sentiment analysisand students’ focuses were explored through topic modeling techniques. Both sentiment analysisand topic modeling are a form of natural language processing. Sentiment analysis is a tool tostudy the feelings expressed
from originally havingfive course outcomes at its inception in AY17-2, to seven course outcomes which nest within theoverall curriculum design. As a foundational course within the program, it serves to introduce abackground in aquatic environments and the skills required to operate as scientists within thefield. Figure 1 depicts the evolution of the course outcomes nested within the EnvironmentalScience Program outcomes in the context of Bloom’s revised hierarchy of learning. In its currentEnvironmental Science Program Educational AY
, thereis a clear need to reduce this gender gap to ensure a balanced workforce. The best time to createsuch awareness is during the middle-school age [2].Since the vast majority of schools in the United State of America do not offer dedicated codingor computer science curriculum, there is a critical need for short computer science camps [3]. Ithas been demonstrated that given the right resources girls can develop a liking for computer © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35749science [4] and develop their own identity as a computer scientist [5]. Short camps may increaseknowledge and skills in computer programming [6]. There have been many
University Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Assistant Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University, and holds a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Organizational Change from the University of California, Los Angeles, as well as an M.A. in Student Development Administration from Seattle University and a B.S. in General Engineering from Gonzaga University. His research interests include teaching and learning in engineering, STEM education policy, and diversity and equity in STEM. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Social-Belonging Intervention in a Computer Science Systems CourseAbstractA brief social-belonging intervention was
Paper ID #34610Investigation on Students’ Educational Experience with HyFlexInstruction Model in Two Engineering CoursesDr. Emine Celik Foust, York College of Pennsylvania Emine Celik Foust is currently an Associate Professor at York College of Pennsylvania. In 2008, she worked as a Postdoctoral Research Associate in Mechanical Engineering Department at Johns Hopkins University. She received her Master of Science and Ph.D degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Lehigh University. Emine Celik Foust’s research interests include design and development of engineering systems using ana- lytical and experimental approaches
University of Texas at Austin and BA in Psychology from Bard College. She is currently Assistant Professor of Education and Department Chair of Core Education at Landmark College in Putney, VT. She consults as a researcher and program evaluator for STEM education programs.Dr. Michelle Batchelder Burd , Dr. Michelle Burd, is Principal/Owner of Burd’s Eye View, an independent consulting firm in Austin, TX, which conducts program evaluation for educational institutions and nonprofits. Current projects examine experiential and active learning, culturally relevant pedagogy, faculty development and systemic reform in STEM. Michelle has a B.A. in psychology with a concentration in mathematics from the University of North
1987. Hedirects the OpenDSA project, whose goal is to provide a complete online collection of interactive tutorialsfor data structures and algorithms courses. His research interests are in Digital Education, AlgorithmVisualization, Algorithm Design and Analysis, and Data Structures. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Towards Designing an Interactive System for Accelerated Learning and As- sessment in Engineering Mechanics: A First Look at the Deforms Problem Solving SystemAbstractRepeated deliberate practice has been shown to be vital to developing mastery in engineeringproblem solving. Online tutoring systems have enhanced learning experiences
Learning Impact Evalulation in the Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness at the University of Central Florida (UCF). Since 1996, she has served as the li- aison for faculty research of distributed learning and teaching effectiveness at UCF. Patsy specializes in statistics, graphics, program evaluation, and applied data analysis. She has extensive experience in re- search methods including survey development, interviewing, and conducting focus groups and frequently serves as an evaluation consultant to school districts, and industry and government organizations. She has also received funding from several government and industrial agencies including the National Science Foundation and the Alfred P. Sloan
AISES, NSBE, SHPE, and SWE; and a group project with report andpresentations. During the second freshmen semester, the NACME students meet for an houreight times during the semester. Topics include resumes, School and University resources,engineering in industry, consulting, and graduate school. Two particular helps for empoweringthe students were developed: a Check List for the detailed time management schedule10 and aCheck List for an effective resume.14At the beginning of the first semester the freshmen students are given instructions on how theirassignments and extra curricular events (such as attending an AISES, SHPE, NSBE, or SWEmeetings) can earn them points in the course. Since extra credit points can be earned, any
Page 11.356.13design course (2361). It is now up to the faculty to develop and implement the necessaryassessment instruments in the twelve courses. Table 8: Initial Outcomes vs. Course Matrix OUTCOMES* # of Courses a b c d e f g h i j k outcomes 1100 4 2334 4.24 4.17
is within the College of Engineering and NaturalSciences at The University of Tulsa, so my observations are relevant with respect to calculus forengineering students.Much has stayed the same, but the use of technology, student demographics, studentacademic/social support, the curriculum, and the way calculus is taught are some things that havechanged, comparing my calculus experiences from 1967 to those of my students in 2016. Not allthe changes appear to be for the better, and there are tradeoffs. The discussion focuses primarilyon anecdotal examples, although some statistical data are included.1. IntroductionThere are studies on the teaching of calculus at the university level that give detailed histories ofthe pedagogical changes over the
motorsports sector after he obtains his M.Sc.Mr. Daniel Reifer, Joanneum University of Applied Sciences Daniel Reifer is currently studying for a B.Sc. degree in Automotive Engineering at the Joanneum Uni- versity of Applied Sciences in Graz, Austria. He joined the Formula Student racing team of his University to improve his practical skills and gained work experience as a technician in the automotive sector. On completion of his studies, he intends to pursue a career in the automotive and motorsport sector.Mr. Christian J. Steinmann, Christian Steinmann has an engineer degree in mathematics from the Technical University Graz, where he focused on software quality and software development process assessment and improvement. He
engineering education and computer science at Virginia Tech. She holds a doctorate in education from Queen’s University Belfast, and her research interests in- clude mathematics education, assessment, computational thinking, STEM education, and access to STEM opportunities for underrepresented groups. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #26505Mr. Timothy Kinoshita, Virginia Tech Timothy Kinoshita is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include graduate education, curriculum development, faculty development, global
, astronomy, botany,paleontology and cartography. The scope and depth of his interests were withoutprecedent in recorded history. Thus, he is widely considered one of the most diverselytalented individuals ever to have lived.Based on these two examples, it seems there is some connection between artsinstruction and creativity. At least many Chinese parents believe this connectionexists. Nowadays more and more Chinese parents are sending their children to arttrainings. They do not expect their children to be artists when they grow up, but theydo believe that art could help the children develop a creativity mindset for their future.Given widespread participation in arts, it is natural to ask if the arts instruction couldcultivate creativity of human
lab and met faculty and graduate students in the department. The programculminated in a Hackathon where teams of up to five students developed an application of theirchoosing and then presented their product to other students and three judges (the professorleading the program, a teaching assistant, and the institution’s chief software engineer). Havingannounced the Hackathon at the end of the day prior to the competition, the lead professor notedthat students had – without prompting – self-selected their own teams by the start of the nextsession that essentially divided students into all-male teams and teams of women with one malestudent. Interestingly, the two teams of mostly women took first and second place, the latter ofwhich consisted of
BS in Civil Engineering from the United States Military Academy and MS and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Michigan.Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is an associate professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. He has additional appointments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on community engagement, service-based projects and using an entrepreneurial mindset to further engineering education innovations. He also does research on the development of reuse strategies for waste materials.Dr. Tanya Kunberger
development program. She has been the President of the Technical Editor Board for the ASEE Computers in Education Journal since 2012. She is a member of ASEE, IEEE, NSBE, and Eta Kappa Nu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Design of a Modular Educational Robotics Platform for Multidisciplinary EducationAbstractMobile robotics is inherently a multidisciplinary field due to the interaction of hardware, software,and electronics to create a machine that can sense its environment and then autonomously navigatein the world to achieve some goal or task. Due to its interdisciplinary nature, courses on mobilerobotics draw students from various disciplines
construction management. Dr. Orndoff has more than ten years of engineering field experience. Her application-based engineering research incorporates sustainability, policy, legal issues, economics, decision-making, planning as well as public administration, policy, finance, and their stakeholders. She is active in engineering leadership and management practice issues. She has also served on several professional committees, including the American Society of Civil Engineers, the NSF Transportation Research Board, American Society of En- gineering Educators and economic development initiatives.Dr. Elizabeth W. Schott, Florida Southwestern State College Dr. Elizabeth Schott received a PhD in Industrial Engineering and a MS in
existing within a ‘black box’ – seeminglyuntouched and unengaged with feminist theories and social science research on gender that hasbeen developed since the 1980s [6]. She put forth that the binary language and framing of“Women in Science, Technology, and Engineering” efforts to be working against its intendedgoal: “While purporting to liberate girls and women from gender stereotypes and promoting their equality in SET, initiatives which mobilize ‘Women in SET’ discourse may actually be engaged in processes of regulation which reinforce those stereotypes and construct girls/women and SET in such a way as to make it difficult for girls and women to understand themselves as being capable SET students and future