Paper ID #36668Measuring Change in Students’ Development of GlobalCompetency in Two Global Engineering CoursesNicholas Dang Nicholas Dang is a graduate student of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests are misconceptions and difficult concept learning, particularly in the topic areas covered by mechanical engineering.Kirsten Davis Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores the intentional design and assessment of global engineering programs, student development through experiential learning, and
Paper ID #46977WIP: Redesign of 1st Year Engineering Programs with Intentionality andUrgencyDr. Michael J McGinnis, LeTourneau University Dr. Michael J. McGinnis is the Dean of Engineering and Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University.Mr. Jeff Johnson, LeTourneau University Jeff Johnson is an Assistant Professor at LeTourneau University. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology from LeTourneau in 1994 then proceeded to spend 16 years in industry focusing on machine and civil design as well as project managem ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP
include Engineering Education, Culturally Relevant Pedagogy, and Socioscientific issues (SSIs) in the Engineering field. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Education and Culturally Relevant Pedagogy in Middle School: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature María Pérez-Piza The University of Texas at El PasoIntroductionEngineering is a field that has significant impacts on daily life. For instance, engineering is usedin water supply distribution, medicine, and manufacturing [1]. Engineers' roles are essential inthe water supply process, designing sanitization systems for springs, cities, towns, andagriculture
University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and a M.S. degree in manufacturing management from Kettering University. After a career in engineering, she com- pleted a master’s degree in education from Michigan State University and began fieldwork as a teacher. She gained full certification as a mathematics public school teacher and administrator in Massachusetts and Texas. Later, Araceli completed a PhD in Engineering Education from Tufts University while em- ployed at the Museum of Science in Boston, as the first lead curriculum developer of the Engineering is Elementary curriculum that integrates science, engineering and literacy for elementary students. In 2013, she was named Director of the Texas State University LBJ Institute
of Aviation and Transportation Technology at Purdue University with Dr. Mary E. Johnson.Dr. Mary E. Johnson Ph.D., Purdue Polytechnic Institute Mary E. Johnson earned her BS, MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington. After 5 years in aerospace manufacturing, Dr. Johnson joined the Automation & Robotics Research Institute in Fort Worth and was program manager for applied research programs. Fourteen years later, she was an Industrial Engineering assistant professor at Texas A&M - Commerce before joining the Aviation Technology department at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana in 2007 as an Associate Professor. She is a Co-PI on the FAA Center of Excellence for
organizer)10. “Creating Pathways to Stackable Credentials in Robotics by Manufacturing a Community College andUniversity Partnership – Year Two Progress”, M.Kinney, M. Highum, A. Sergeyev, S. Kuhl, Proceedings of ASEE,Paper # 19192, 2017.11. “Enhancing Industrial Robotics Education with Open-Source Software”, Hooker, J. B., Druschke, M. V., Kuhl,S. A., Sergeyev, A., Parmar, S., Kinney, M., Alaraje,, N., Highum, M, Proceedings of ASEE, Paper 19023, 2017(also presented)12. “Revamping Robotics Education to Meet 21st Century Workforce Needs – Year 2 Progress”, A. Sergeyev, N.Alaraje, S. Kuhl, M.Kinney, Proceedings of ASEE, Paper # 17889, 201713. “Promoting Industrial Robotics Education by Curriculum, Robotic Simulation Software, and Advanced
curriculum in earthquake engineering and spatial visualization. In 2016 Lelli co-founded eGrove Education, Inc. an educational software company focused on teaching sketching and spatial visualization skills.Nathan Delson (Professor) Nathan Delson is a Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. His research interests include robotics, biomedical devices, and engineering education. He teaches introductory design, mechanics, mechatronics, capstone design, medical devices, and product design & entrepreneurship. His interests in design education includes increasing student motivation, teamwork, hands-on projects, and integration of theory into design projects. In 1999 he co- founded Coactive Drive
supplement LawrenceTechnological University’s growing academic engineering curriculum in the field of AlternativeEnergy. We have found that such demonstration grants provide invaluable real-worldeducational enrichment opportunities for engineering students if the projects are managedappropriately, implemented within the skill sets of the students involved, and address the timeconstraints of the academic calendar year. The obvious benefits to students include keyengineering activities such as the proper definition of a project and its scope, systems design,hardware and equipment procurement, installation, safety checks and trouble shooting, systemvalidation and commissioning. Several other broader educational benefits to students includecross
., Jamieson, L, and Oakes, W. EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service. InternationalJournal of Engineering Education. Vol. 21, No. 1, 2005.11. Lamancusa, J., Jorgensen, J., Zayas-Castro, J., Ratner, J. The Learning Factory- A new approach to integratingdesign and manufacturing into engineering curricula. American Society for Engineering Conference Proceedings.1995.12. Bloom, B. S., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. DavidMcKay Co. Inc. 1956.13. Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and CurriculumDevelopment. 2005.14. Teach Engineering: Resources for K-12. http://www.teachengineering.com/submit_curricula.php15. “Academic standards for science and technology
legos to interest high school students and improve k12 stem education," Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003. 33rd Annual , vol.2, no., pp. F3A_6- F3A_10, 5-8, 2003.18. B. Barker and J.Ansorge, "Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment, Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39(3), 229–243, 2007.19. Nourbakhsh, I., Crowley, K., Bhave, A., hamner, E., Hsium, T., Perez-Bergquist, A., Richards, S., & Wilkinson, K., "The robotic autonomy mobile robots course: Robot design, curriculum design, and educational assessment", Autonomous Robots, 18(1), 103–127, 2005.20. Beer, R. D., Chiel, h. J., & Drushel, R., "Using robotics to teach science and engineering
Transfer in the Earth System 2) Life Science-Energy and Living Things 3) Physical Sciences a) Properties of Matter b) Elements, Compounds, and Mixtures c) Heat Energy 4) Technology/Engineering a) Materials, Tools, and Machines b) Engineering Design c) Communication Technologies d) Manufacturing Technologies e) Transportation Technologies Page 9.1116.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004
cell cyclingtest methods presented an ongoing need to extensively train and educate the students in theelectrochemistry theory, related laboratory techniques and safety requirements. Since the initiation of this project the authors have had numerous informal conversationswith faculty at other academic institutions, as well as Li-ion cell and battery manufacturers,automotive battery suppliers, and electric vehicle manufacturers. From these conversations itbecame evident there is a serious shortage of knowledgeable, and trained engineering talent inthe entire Li-ion battery process ranging from pure research, through cell manufacturing, tobattery pack and module assembly, and ultimately to end user applications. Frequently theseother
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Webpage from Group 13: Hi! My name is Hybrid Hank! Although I may look like a regular cartoon, my complex interworkings are much different than the normal cartoon. I share some of the same attributes that operate some of the state-of-the-art hybrid electric vehicles of today. I run from a combination of internal combustion engine and an electric motor. Since many of you are approaching the age at which you will drive, why don't we pick out a car, you can see yourself at the age of 16 and learn about how hybrid vehicles and my body work."Survey and Project FindingsThe surveys were collected, and that data was
joinedto work within those specific areas. Additionally, they both heard about CEDC before coming toClemson and decided to pursue their education at the university so they could participate in theprogram. “I chose to participate in CEDC because I had like a passion for both the French language and also helping people through engineering. So, I saw that CEDC’s work in Haiti gave me the chance to combine my passion and do some really awesome and meaningful work. I actually saw that when I was trying to decide where to go to college…One of the little things like about that really stuck out to me. It's like, okay, like, this is where I meant to be, because they have this really specific thing
ABET include safety aspart of the accreditation criteria [4]. The 2016-2017 ABET general engineering student outcomerelated to safety is “(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds within realistic constraints such as …, health and safety [emphasis added],manufacturability, and sustainability” [emphasis added] [5]. In 2011, ABET explicitly added thefollowing safety details to the program criteria for chemical engineering: “The curriculum mustinclude the engineering application of these basic sciences to the design, analysis, and control ofchemical, physical, and/or biological processes, including the hazards associated with theseprocesses” [emphasis added] [5].Despite the development of these specific
Western Carolina University. Dr. Burbank is active with IEEE, SME, and TAC of ABET, and strives to bring practical engineering activities into the classroom. His current project is the development of a photonics program within the Electrical Engineering curriculum. Page 11.626.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Exporting America: First Technologies, Then Engineering Management Skills, What’s Next? - A Case Study from an Engineering Education PerspectiveAbstractThis paper presents the results of our research on the process of exportation from anengineering education
. Page 22.777.3to have passed 5 or more „O‟ levels. The „Oxbridge‟ Universities could demand 3 grade A‟s at„A‟ level. The „A‟ level examination was considered to be at least the equivalent of the first of afour year programme in the United States and other countries offering similar courses. It was theA level that the Thatcher government called the „gold standard‟ of English education. The “sixthform” was called the jewel in the crown of secondary education. “Form” is the British term forthe American “grade.” “ Its curriculum and, especially, its method of work, provide a bridgebetween the relatively set classroom instruction of the „main school course‟ and thespecialization and independent study demanded in the university.” So wrote Payne
should be a watershed change to include curricula reform, process reform,and faculty reward reform. Whereas existing faculty reward systems are excellent for research-oriented faculty, they are insufficient for professionally oriented, core faculty at the nation’sschools of engineering and technology. As Wulf pointes out: “In engineering education I think we have an additional problem, and that’s the one I want to emphasize. Recall, my definition of engineering is “design under constraint”. I believe that it’s a synthetic, highly creative activity. Can you think of any other creative field on campus where the faculty are not expected to practice/perform? Art, music, drama? Even if you won’t buy that engineering is creative in the
interpret data c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g) an ability to communicate effectively h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global economic, environmental and societal context i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j) a knowledge of
development of innovative manufacturing processes, new processes of biomass utilization in the plastic industry, and models and algorithms for system optimization in agriculture, industry, and service areas. Page 24.1061.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 “Rounding-up the Industrial Engineering Educational Profile in a Industry-University Partnership.”ABSTRACTThis paper details the creation and implementation of a pioneering industry-universitypartnership that recognizes the pedagogical value of learning experiences beyond a formalcurriculum
are Computer Aided Design, Industrial Automa- tion, and his research Interests are globalized engineering/technology education, engineering technology innovative curriculum development, outcome assessments, and refining program accreditation procedures.Dr. Mauricio Torres, Northern Kentucky University Dr. Torres received a B.S. in Business Administration from City University of Sao Caetano do Sul, B.S. in Mechanical Industrial Engineering from Braz Cubas University, Brazil, M.S. in Engineering Manage- ment and Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Florida International University. He has over 30 years of experience in heavy machinery manufacturing industry and currently he holds the position of Assistant
. Wang and M. Burris, "Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment," Health Education Behavior, vol. 24, pp. 369-387, 1997.[33] L. Bosman and K. Shirey, "Using Bio-Inspired Design and STEAM to Teach the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2022.[34] K. Tantawi, V. Martino, I. Fidan, G. Chitiyo and K. Birch, "ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING DRONES FOR SMART MANUFACTURING EDUCATION," Journal of Advanced Technological Education , vol. 1, no. 2, 2022.[35] K. Tantawi, I. Fidan, G. Chitiyo and M. Cossette, "Offering Hands-on Manufacturing Workshops Through Distance Learning," in ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual, 2021.[36] K. Tantawi, O. Tantawi, L
(PBL) within the curriculum of the automotive engineeringdepartment at Clemson University in collaboration with the transportation designdepartment at Art Center College of Design (ACCD).The program, called Deep Orange, is focused on developing and producing innovative newvehicle concepts and is driven entirely by graduate automotive engineering andtransportation design students as part of their education in collaboration with industrypartners. The paper discusses and demonstrates the methodology followed to translate PBLcomponents within the educational context as well as the process the students need tofollow. During this process, the students start with translating the grand challenge (definedby the sponsoring industry partners) into
realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability” involves some of those professional skills. While theseABET outcomes can be met through engineering education [17] or even co-curricular activities[18], they are fertile ground for integration of general education objectives. In 2008, 7 of the 11required outcomes were either met or enhanced by general education [2]. Currently, the original11 outcomes in Criterion 3 have condensed into 7 outcomes. Of those, 5 can be selected for atleast partial completion through the general education curriculum as they are directly derivedfrom the previous outcomes. Those are: (2) an ability to apply engineering design to producesolutions
thinking in engineering curricula, aiming to better equip future engineers with creative problem-solving skills.Prof. Wei Liu, King’s College London Dr Wei Liu is Professor of Design Engineering and Innovation at King’s College London with extensive teaching and research experience across design, engineering and management.Claire Lucas ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Implementation and Impact of Design thinking in Higher Engineering Education: A Study of UK PracticesAbstract:This study investigated undergraduate engineering education across 61 institutions inthe United Kingdom, focusing on the integration of design elements within teachingmethods and curriculum
Academic Awards for Teaching Excellency, and is recognised as a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA) in the UK. Wei has rich experience of conducting interdisciplinary research, and has obtained over £1.3 million re- search grants from EPSRC, NSFC and other prestigious funding bodies. She won Best Paper Awards from Product Development and Management Association (PDMA) Conference and British Academy of Man- agement (BAM) Conference. Her research outputs have been published in the leading design, advanced manufacturing and innovation management journals including The Design Journal, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 3D printing and Additive Manufacturing, and R&D Management. Wei also has professional
Paper ID #10910Capturing evidence of metacognitive awareness of pre-service STEM educa-tors’ using ’codifying’ of thinking through eportfolios (Research-to-Practice)– Strand: OtherMr. Patrick Rowsome, University of LimerickDr. Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Diarmaid is a Lecturer in Technology Teacher Education at the University of Limerick. His research interests are in the areas of freehand sketching, cognition and spatial visualization. He is currently Director of Membership of the Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD).Dr. Seamus Gordon, University of Limerick Head of Department Design and Manufacturing
Institute for Systems Research. Prof. Sochol directs the Bioinspired Advanced Manufacturing (BAM) Laboratory, which pioneers micro/nanoscale additive manufacturing or “3D Printing” approaches to solve mechanically and physically complex challenges, with an emphasis on biomedical applications. Prof. Sochol has developed and teaches two courses: (i) a dual undergraduate-graduate-level “Additive Manufacturing” course, and (ii) an undergraduate-level course, entitled “The Legend of Zelda: A Link to Machine Design”. Prof. Sochol received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University in 2006, and both his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, in 2009 and
beyond. Four essential learning areas for ENI-SE emerged: Mastery by Doing,Real-world Connectivity, Interdisciplinary Exposure, and Supportive Learning Environment.We discuss how these areas were realized in ME310 and provide examples from otherengineering courses. Furthermore, we hypothesize how features of these four areas might beadapted or adopted more broadly in the engineering curriculum. These findings not onlyhighlight the overlap between entrepreneurship and innovation in engineering education butalso offer a blueprint for integrating these key pedagogical practices into existing curriculardesigns, equipping students to become creators, drivers, and forerunners of novel ideas andchange.Keywords: Embracing New Ideas, Self-Efficacy
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004.[12] G. Goldschmidt, H. Hochman, and I. Dafni, "The design studio "crit": Teacher-student communication," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 24, pp. 285-302, 2010.[13] D. A. Schön, The Design Studio An Exploration of its Traditions and Potentials. London: RIBA Publications for RIBA Building Industry Trust 1985.[14] B. Hokanson, "The Design Critique as a Model for Distributed Learning," The next generation of distance education: unconstrained learning, L. Moller and J. B. Huett, Eds., Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012, pp. 71-83.[15] W. J. Popham, Classroom Assessment: What Teachers