Session 2793 Introduction to MATLAB Using a Theoretical Mechanics Study-Case Raluca Rosca, Sanda Cleja-Tigoiu Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Florida/ Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of BucharestAbstractThe paper describes a 5 weeks module of a 3 credits Advanced Mechanics of Materials classtaught in the Fall 2002 semester at University of Bucharest. The module realized an introductionto the plotting, matrix computation and scientific algebra capabilities of the software MATLAB
Session 2478 Computer Models Using Spreadsheets to Study Heat Engine Thermodynamics Kenneth L. Tuttle U.S. Naval AcademyABSTRACTMarine Power Systems is the second term of a two term course in thermodynamics at the U.S.Naval Academy. This is an applied thermodynamics course and is taught by the MarineEngineering faculty. One of the primary objectives of this thermodynamics course is to teach thethermodynamics of heat engines. Marine Power Systems takes the study of Heat Engine Cyclesbeyond the first step, introduction of how to work the Heat
Session: USING INNOVATIVE THEMES TO INCREASE INTEREST IN K-12 STEM STUDIES Wendy Otoupal-Hylton and Pete Hylton Department of Engineering Technology Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis wotoupal@iupui.edu AbstractAcademic institutions are finding that creating and maintaining a student’s interest in Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) during the secondary school years is criticallyimportant. Combined experience from an engineering career and a teaching career has led to the
for corporate placement of student graduates,research funding or collaboration, design project opportunities, financial support and curricularadvice. These goals form a solid foundation for the industry-academic partnership. However, tomove to the level of a “strategic partnership,” a deeper commitment on both sides and longer-term thinking are required. If both the University and the corporate partner are committed,ABET related issues naturally arise. After all, the new EC 2000 criteria are based on outcomes,require dialogue with constituents, and call for data reporting on student performance in theworkplace. Although ultimately the burden of responsibility for accreditation falls to the
AC 2011-111: DISK BRAKE DESIGN CASE STUDY IMPLEMENTATIONMETHOD AND STUDENT SURVEY RESULTSOscar G Nespoli, University of Waterloo Oscar Nespoli is a Lecturer in Engineering and Mechanical Design and Director of Curriculum Devel- opment in the Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering at the University of Waterloo (Waterloo). Oscar joined Waterloo following a 23 year career in research, engineering and management practice in industry and government. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of engineering design methodologies, design practice, engineering education and high performance, lightweight, com- posite materials design. Oscar is passionate about teaching engineering and, as part of his
“HOW STUDENTS LEARN” A Study in the Field of “Individual Behavior” By Prof. Alfred A. Scalza, P.E. Farmingdale State College Department of Architecture and Construction ManagementAbstractAlthough the definition of learning and the theories of “how students learn” have beenthoroughly studied, a new field has arisen in the study of “individual behavior” and how studentswho seem the same academically actually come to the first day of class with far differingpersonal credentials. Does “college ready” mean academically or should it also include sociallyand emotionally? All the students in their first day as freshmen
“HOW STUDENTS LEARN” A Study in the Field of “Individual Behavior” By Prof. Alfred A. Scalza, P.E. Farmingdale State College Department of Architecture and Construction ManagementAbstractAlthough the definition of learning and the theories of “how students learn” have beenthoroughly studied, a new field has arisen in the study of “individual behavior” and how studentswho seem the same academically actually come to the first day of class with far differingpersonal credentials. Does “college ready” mean academically or should it also include sociallyand emotionally? All the students in their first day as freshmen
Paper ID #31046Performance Balanced Team Formation for Group Study and Design ProjectsDr. Amir Karimi P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kentucky in 1982. His teaching and research interests are in thermal sciences. He has served as the Chair of Mechanical Engineering (1987 to 1992 and September 1998 to January of 2003), College of Engineering Associate Dean of Academic Affairs (Jan. 2003
Paper ID #36463Reading Between the Data Points: Analysis of the VSFSInternship Recruitment Process and Its Implications forEngineering Student ApplicantsJeongjin Park GeorgiaTech Master student studying Computational Science &EngineeringLisa Bosman (Faculty) Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, interdisciplinary education, and faculty professional development. Learn more here: www.iAgree.orgBhavana Kotla (PhD Candidate) PhD Candidate in Technology (Entrepreneurship Education
the impact of online activities on mechanics self-efficacy and achievement.Dr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2003 Dr. Sheppard was named co-principal investigator
Paper ID #19218The Journey to One: Teachers’ Transformation in Multidisciplinary Cooper-ation on Engineering EducationDr. Mei-Mei Song, Tamkang University Mei-Mei Song is an Assistant Professor in the Graduate Institute of Futures Studies and the Director of the Center for Futures Intelligence and Research (C-FAR) at Tamkang University in Taiwan. Dr. Song’s teaching and research interests are in futures thinking, futures education, and engineering education. She earned her M.A. and Ed.D. from Teachers College, Columbia University and is a fellow of World Futures Studies Federation (WFSF).Prof. Shang-Hsien Hsieh, National
fields.Dr. Raul San Martin Rivadulla, Graduate Education He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the Federal University of Bahia (1980). Grad- uate studies at the University of Manchester, UK (1990), master’s degree in chemical engineering from Page 26.1186.1 the Federal University of Bahia (2006), and a PhD in chemical engineering at UFBA (2013) where he developed his thesis on Nanotechnology. Worked in the Camac¸ari Petrochemical site for 16 years, work- ing in the areas of process control, technical assistance, product development and new applications for processes of transformation. He is
intention of the UVP TMP team of the Keck Graduate Institute was to investigate businessdevelopment topics and aid in the biological testing of the instrument. Business topics includedmarket research, product development, competitive intelligence, intellectual property andmarketing strategies. The market environment and relevant competitor information will aid inthe design of the device and product positioning in the marketplace. In addition to the businesscomponent, the team emphasized the experimental side of the in vivo imaging component.Specific responsibilities of the TMP team included:• Analyzing current in vivo technology and applications;• Identifying market segments and target markets for the device;• Evaluating the competitive
Engineering Program Advocates (NAMEPA) list servesrequesting members disseminate our message to their students.Prior research has shown that many URM students lack knowledge about the admissions processto doctoral programs, have an interest in building social support networks in graduate school andbelieve faculty are important in recruitment2. Another study indicated successful REU programsshould address the needs of all the stakeholders and provide meaningful research andcommunicate what is involved, and provide information about selecting a graduate program,leadership, and a supportive community3. Participation in a research experience has been shownto positively influence an undergraduate student’s decision to pursue an advanced degree4
1649 Session Promoting Faculty Development with ASEE/NASA Fellowship Programs - Parametric Study of Laser Beam Cutting (LBC) Processes – A Case Study Alok K. Verma, Gary R. Crossman Department of Engineering Technology Old Dominion University Carl J. Voglewede, Thomas J. Burns Technology Development and Integration Branch NASA Langley Research CenterAbstract American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and National Aeronautics and
at Texas A&M University . She has been in this position since July 2012. In this position she is responsible for interna- tionalizing the research and education activities of the Dwight Look College of Engineering. Under her leadership the college has significantly increased the number of students studying abroad, established new models of study abroad including co-op and research abroad and established meaningful connection for research and attraction of funded international graduate students. Maria started working at Texas A&M in 2005 as Assistant Director for Latin American Programs and in 2009 she was promoted to Program Manager for South America in the same office. During her time at the Office for
of Chemical Engineeringat Louisiana State University (LSU). The authors noticed in recent years that many undergraduatestudents avoid enrolling in graduate school because they believe the only path for someone with aPh.D. in engineering is as a faculty member. To address this limitation, the authors have developeda 10-week program that couples traditional research-related activities with training inentrepreneurship. The concept was to show students how both fundamental and applied researchcan lead to start-up companies, patents, and industrial partnerships. Additionally, in the part of thecountry where LSU is located, there are numerous small universities and colleges that do not offerresearch programs for undergraduates, so this REU site is
provided a sense of community and place to receive advice to address these and other challenges. We found that the proposed collaborative qualitative research methodology was useful for not only exploring the experiences of new faculty, but also supporting the development of EERs. Introduction As the demands and expectations for faculty increase, many institutional leaders and future faculty question whether the typical graduate school model provides the necessary training for an academic career [1]–[4]. Prior studies suggest that graduate education provides students with anticipatory socialization of the role of a
students' interaction with their faculty mentors and graduate studentsand their active engagement in research activities. To date, course observations were conducted during the Fallsemester, and they all revealed strong student engagement in course activities. All faculty followed the ARG modeland demonstrated proficient use of active student engagement. 5. Reflections and ConclusionNumerous studies have linked undergraduate students' academic performance and retention in engineering fields toself-efficacy [15, 16]. Bandura has defined four sources from which efficacy beliefs are developed: masteryexperiences, vicarious experiences, social persuasions, and physiological states. Self-efficacy beliefs
Paper ID #29095Longitudinal Study to Develop and Evaluate the Impacts of a”Transformational” Undergraduate ECE Design Program: Study ResultsandBest Practices ReportDr. Rachael E Cate, Oregon State University Rachael Cate: Dr. Rachael Cate received her MA in rhetoric and composition from Oregon State Univer- sity in 2011 and her Ph.D. in Higher Education Leadership and Research from Oregon State University in 2016. She joined the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Oregon State University as a member of the professional faculty in 2016. In this role, she provides engineering communications
gavehim the confidence to begin the process now rather than at some point in the future.Students in this course sequence that graduate with a microEP graduate degree are part of a tenyear longitudinal study supported by the University of Arkansas NSF Integrative GraduateEducation and Research Training (IGERT) grant that began in 1999. As part of this longitudinalstudy, the microEP alumni and their supervisors will participate in annual surveys of performance. Included in this survey will be questions to the alumni on the usefulness of the knowledge gainedin different courses in their graduate curricula. This will provide us with the data necessary to
on innovative ways to cultivate and evaluate supportive teaching and learning networks in engineering departments and colleges. He received his doctoral degree in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where he was a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. His dissertation studied the teaching practices of engineering instructors during game-based learning activities, and how these practices affected student motivation.Dr. Aileen Reid, University of North Carolina, Greensboro Dr. Reid’s research applies culturally responsive frameworks to evaluation and measurement to shape educational research and policy and respond to societal challenges. This work is centered on social justice, access, diversity
graduate students to thethought processes involved in human disease research and its translation into therapy byproviding an overview of disease processes, how they are treated, how basic biological science isused to develop those treatments, and the role of various stakeholders in the translationalresearch pipeline. At the end of this course, the student should understand the medical rationalefor studying basic pathomechanisms and how to utilize that rationale to design studies and grantproposals. For the final project of the course, students are provided with examples of recentdiscoveries based on a basic science article published within the past three years and asked todescribe how to take that discovery to clinical application.Elective courses
was belongingness in the Summer 2022REU program experienced differently by women and men identifying students? (2) How didmentor and peer interactions impact feelings of belongingness among women-identifyingstudents?MethodsResearcher Positionality Though many have played a role in the development of the Summer 2022 REU program,the positionality of the two-lead authors, who took the main role in creating and analyzing theresults for this study, will be discussed in detail. The two-lead authors consisted of two-graduate students at a large, R1 university. Bothresearchers are first-generation college students. The first author identifies as a White woman,and the second author as a Chicano man. The woman researcher has a background
in this study—and this hasbeen identified as a gap in the literature (Montoya et al. 2021). Future evaluations ofinternational research experiences for students should also include an assessment of theimpact of the project on members of the host communities.CONCLUSIONSIn summary, we assessed the impact of six-week interdisciplinary summer researchexperiences in Brazil on the research efficacy and career motivation of US undergraduateand graduate students from diverse backgrounds. Participants reported increases in theirresearch self-efficacy, their motivation to use technology, and their intentions to pursuesustainability-related careers. The research experiences had less of an effect on theparticipants’ professional identities, their
studying towards a PhD in Educational Policy Studies at Georgia State University.Mr. R. Christian Ford, Georgia Institute of TechnologyWhitney L Nelson ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work-in-Progress: Development of a Morehouse College/Georgia Tech Collaborative to Increase African American Semiconductor Manufacturing Researchers Laura Sams Haynes School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, USA Kinnis Gosha
environmental consultant prior to being employed by the Center in 2004.Andrew N.S. Ernest, Western Kentucky UniversityJoseph L. Gutenson, Center for Water Resource Studies - Western Kentucky University Joseph Gutenson has been an employee at the Center for Water Resource Studies for over two years. His duties have varied but most of his time is devoted to research and field work. He is proficient in ArcGIS, creating maps for a variety of purposes. In addition, he has been a contributor to the WTI program, assisting in research endeavors, curriculum development, and student advising. Joseph graduated Magna cum Laude from Western Kentucky University with a Bachelor of Science in Geography and plans to begin pursuit of his
-REU Case StatementName: Date:Case statement You are a graduate student in a chemical engineering lab at [institution name]. Yourfaculty advisor has asked you to come up with a unique research project. The goal is that you’llindependently design and conduct the research study, eventually submitting a paper about it for aconference. Think through what you would do to execute the research project. What do you need todo and what decisions would you make? If it helps you to answer, you can situate the projectwithin any context in chemical engineering (or another engineering discipline). Construct and write down your plan for the research project on the
the first three summers of the program by URM status.Over 50% of the Summer 2015 and Summer 2016 participants graduated by Fall 2018. Summer2016 had a high sophomore and first year transfer student participation rate, which is why it hasa high graduation rate. Of the students still enrolled at CSUB, almost all are still pursuing aSTEM major and are enrolled in appropriate courses for their STEM major in Spring 2019. Onestudent switched majors to Criminal Justice.Findings from Paired Pre- and Post-SurveysPre-surveys and post-surveys were administered to the participants with paired Likert-scalequestions about their attitudes towards STEM careers and research and their interest in their fieldof study. While 97 participants completed the post
isessential to move forward. Studies reported that the organizational structures of computer scienceand engineering programs could reinforce biases towards first-generation women, create hostileclassroom environments and harmful stereotypes upholding institutional racism and sexism, offersignificantly fewer interactions with instructors than men and continuing-generation women, andunsupportive and discouraging environments. Most undergraduate engineering and ComputerScience (CS) students only start working on research-based engineering projects through theSenior Design Project in their senior year. Although the students may take elective research-basedcourses - usually graduate-level - in their senior year, the classroom environments do not create