process to span the "valley ofdeath" separating engineering education and the engineering workplace. Courses before thiseffort could be characterized by their reliance on lecture, exams, and content mandated byABET. Future courses should be characterized by their use of project- and problem-basedlearning, rubrics measuring complex problem solving and decision making, and professionalcontent associated with real-world engineering deliverables.II. Course Redesign in the Test BedTo facilitate this change, the E2R2P team will redesign courses in a test bed, using the guidance,feedback, and collaboration of university faculty comprising a sounding board. In the test bed,engineering faculty will collaborate with instructional designers and workplace
AC 2011-1729: UNDERSTANDING THE TECHNICAL ENTREPRENEUR-SHIP LANDSCAPE IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONMary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Mary Besterfield-Sacre is an Associate Professor and Fulton C. Noss Faculty Fellow in Department of Industrial Engineering, a Center Associate for the Learning Research and Development Center, and the Director for the Engineering Education Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Edu- cation, Sloan Foundation, Engineering Information Foundation, and the NCIIA. Mary’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas innovative product
teachingcenter directors, engineering faculty, and engineering school administrators. The workshopagenda was to outline strategies for enhancing partnerships between CTLs and schools ofengineering to improve undergraduate engineering education. This poster will present insightsand strategies gained from the workshop, an overview of the discussion strands, andrecommendations and implications for policy, practice, and future research.Introduction: Purpose of WorkshopThe primary mission of the CTLs is to advance teaching excellence at their institutions whilesupporting faculty through a collaborative approach. The CTLs offer a wide array of programs,events, and services that foster innovation and translation of educational research into practice.However
for applications to engineering education. Virtual laboratories canbe classified as recreative or interactive or immersive or collaborative. The hierarchy of virtuallaboratory development is shown in Fig.1. At the bottom of the pyramid are recreativelaboratories, a term coined to indicate that modeling, simulation and visualization have beenused to recreate a physical phenomenon in the virtual domain. These laboratories or simulationsare ideally suited for demonstration of many complex physical phenomena in a qualitative sense,and would generally lack interactivity – the ability of a user to manipulate the physicalphenomenon through inputs. For example, simulation and visualization of a building collapse orthe phenomenon associated with a
learning: The Texas Distance Learning Association gave me the Outstanding Commitment to Excellence and Innovation in Distance Learning by an Individual, March 2010; The Innovations in Online Learning Conference gave me an award for being an Outstanding Visionary in the field of Distance Education, May, 2009.Maria Veronica Gonzalez, University of Texas at El PasoFrancisco Medina Page 22.501.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Digital Additive Manufacturing for Engineering Education: A Virtual Rapid Prototyping Simulator Approach
Fulbright scholar; he is a member of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), a member of ASEE Electrical and Computer Engineering Division, a member of ASEE Engineering Technology Division, a member of Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers (IEEE), and a member of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Depart- ment Heads Association (ECETDHA)Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University Aleksandr Sergeyev is currently an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School of Technology at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Aleksandr Sergeyev is earned his bachelor degree in electrical engineering in Moscow University of Electronics and Automation
AC 2011-1107: ENHANCE COMPUTER NETWORK CURRICULUM US-ING COLLABORATIVE PROJECT-BASED LEARNINGJianyu Dong, California State University, Los AngelesHuiping Guo, California State University, Los Angeles Page 22.611.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Enhance Computer Network Curriculum using Collaborative Project- based LearningAbstractIt has been widely recognized that hands-on design and implementation is one of the essentialskills that students should acquire to become qualified computer networking engineers. Toenhance the training of students’ design skills, the computer networks
AC 2011-2155: COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH: INTEGRATION OF CON-CEPTUAL LEARNING THROUGHOUT THE CORE CHEMICAL ENGI-NEERING CURRICULUMMilo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He cur- rently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.David L. Silverstein, University of Kentucky
as Senior Director of Research and Evaluation at PowerUP, a national nonprofit organization dedicated to expanding technology access and providing youth development resources for underserved youth. Schneider’s current research interests include race, class, and gender inequality in educational access and retention, in particular, issues of access, climate, and the quality of student learning in undergraduate engineering education.Ms. Maria Terrell, Cornell University Page 22.798.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Impact of Collaborative Problem-solving
ensure that the educationstudents have appropriate resources and support as they enter, and take, these courses.ConclusionThe University of St. Thomas has launched two new Engineering Education programs, oneundergraduate and one graduate, for students majoring in Education. The development of theseprograms, still in their early stages, is a collaboration between faculty from the Schools ofEngineering and Education.AcknowledgementsFunding for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation under grant DUE-0942117.Bibliography 1. Brophy, S., S. Klein, M. Portsmore, and C. Rogers. "Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms." Journal of Engineering Education, 2008: 369-387. 2. Yasar, Senay, Dale Baker, Robinson
education.4.2 Program Sustainability Page 22.1444.11Like any development project, sustainability is rooted in capacity building that is resourceappropriate and culturally focused. In this case, the project provides three years to catalyze thecreation of much-needed resources: expert wisdom made available to all, easy-to-use andeffective tools, and learning communities both real and virtual. Knowledge, skills, attitudes andidentity embody all cultures; and this project will assemble those most needed for an LTS cultureto flourish within engineering education. Once established, the LTS faculty community willexpand the effort through collaborative
, and interest in engineering education.2. MotivationLearning Through Service (LTS) is an amalgamation of various pedagogical methods, includingservice learning, community-service, and problem-based learning, among others. Thedistinguishing schema of LTS is its intentional design to incorporate service as a means to meetacademic learning objectives. Additionally, the project-based element, connected to acommunity’s need, can serve as the primary motivator for student and faculty participation 49, 50. Page 22.979.3The community projects also provide a rich socio-cultural context that has been found tostimulate the process of collaborative
Foundation under GrantDUE-0939823. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1 Pimmel, Russ and Sheryl Sorby, “Writing Proposals to Meet NSF’s Expectations,” Workshop at 2008 ASEE Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22, 2008.2 Olds, Bar: Evolution, Approaches, and Future Collaborations, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94,No. 1, pp. 13-25 (2005)3 National Research Council, Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, Scientific Research in Education, Richard Shevelson and Lisa Towne, Editors, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2002)4 National Research Council
implementing them withinindividual courses, especially in institutions with limited resources and high teaching loads.Faculty, rightly, are reluctant to use untested new methods or modules in their own classrooms.The research and development work that is to be completed during this project is designed to Page 22.1464.3lower those barriers in basic materials engineering education, and it will make it possible formany others to transform their individual courses and the approach is conceptually portable toother disciplines. Since only one device ($229) is needed per collaborative group, the equipmentcost is modest since the devices are available on a
increased dissemination and diversification ofexisting active, hands on learning is needed.With the aim of progressing the engineering education paradigm shift of active, hands oneducation a teaching method that incorporates elements of Collaborative, Hands on, Active andProblem based Learning known as CHAPL has been developed for use in engineering courses13.The CHAPL teaching method allows students to actively participate in their own education byliterally getting out of their seats, forming teams, and working together on small scale desktoplearning modules (DLMs, see figure 1) to examine class specific phenomena and equipment. TheCHAPL pedagogy is collaborative because students form teams to tackle problems given to themat the beginning of class
AC 2011-836: SMARTER TEAMWORK: SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT,ASSESSMENT, RESEARCH, TRAINING, EDUCATION, AND REMEDIA-TION FOR TEAMWORKMatthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has de- grees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $11.4 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received the William Elgin Wickenden Award for the Best Paper in the Journal of Engineering
present future plans.† This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underInnovations in Engineering Education, Curriculum, and Infrastructure (IEECI) Grant No.093510. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material Page 22.573.2are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation (NSF).VESLL: Virtual Engineering ExperienceVESLL is establishing an online interactive learning environment designed to introduce studentsto engineering concepts through visualization and collaborative problem solving. Our long-termvision is to create a
and implementing fresh pedagogical approaches to engineering education. He is currently teaching courses in Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, and continuing his research in Manufacturing Systems.Celestine Chukwuemeka Aguwa, Wayne State University Dr. Aguwa has been at Wayne State University as a Visiting Assistant Professor teaching graduate courses in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. His core research focuses on applying traditional engineer- ing concepts to healthcare product design and manufacturing. He is currently working on several research projects under healthcare design technology. He is also in collaboration with other faculty working on NSF sponsored research on curriculum development
more budget crises looming, programs like Cañada College’s ONE-STEP are needed tohelp strengthen community college engineering programs. The Summer Engineering TeachingInstitute has the potential to serve as an effective model of facilitating broad adoption ofinnovative instructional pedagogies that are based on research while the Joint EngineeringProgram may serve as a model for future institutional collaborations not only in engineering butin other disciplines as well.AcknowledgementsThis project was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation through theInnovations in Engineering Education and Curricular Infrastructure (IEECI) program, Award No.EEC 1032660
efficiency of integrating software projects into courses.AcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation Division of UndergraduateEducation (DUE) Course Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Program and theEngineering Education and Centers (EEC) Innovations in Engineering Education, Curriculumand Infrastructure (IEECI) Program under grants DUE-0837661, DUE-1022958 and EEC-0935145. This research is also supported through a software grant from Parametric TechnologyCorporation (PTC). The authors would also like to thank their collaborators, Ann Shoplik andPamela Piskurich of the Carnegie Mellon C-MITES program, Jack Zhou of Drexel University,Nathan Klingbeil of Wright State University, Glenn Beltz of the University
conferences. He served as a vice chair of the ASME IMECE technical committee on Composites and Heterogeneous Materials and currently serving as a Chair. He is the faculty advisor of the Sooner Powered Vehicle (SPV) Challenge team at the University of Oklahoma. Dr. Saha has won numerous awards including Best Paper Award, Junior Faculty Research award, Faculty Performance Award for Research, Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award, and Special Doctoral Research Assistantship Award.Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma Dr. Zahed Siddique is currently working as an Associate Professor at the School of Aerospace and Me- chanical Engineering of University of Oklahoma. His research interest in Engineering Education are in
, and a visit by AWC STEM students to ASU (also to theUniversity of Arizona (UA) and Northern Arizona University (NAU)) for exploring engineeringdisciplines and transfer logistics. AWC experienced improved participation by their AECEngineering Advisory Committee. Additional related activities include: bringing a 4-yearBachelor program in engineering to Yuma (AWC-UA BSSE), initiating engineering education atmiddle and high schools, and increasing the number of engineering internshipassignments/projects in/around Yuma.For Central College, by far, the campus visits to and from ASU have been excellent andcontinuously improving. The collaboration between community colleges has also been useful aswe share our best practices.Cochise College reports
Engineering Technology at Eastern New Mexico University. He also serves as ABET/TAC pro- gram evaluator for electronics and computer engineering technology programs. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Columbia. Before starting Ph.D. work, he worked three years as a project engineer. Page 22.536.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Effective Practices in Multidisciplinary TeamworkAbstractThis article presents the content of a one-credit course that provides students with skills in jobinterviewing, team-work, learning
ofeffective teaching tool to effectively teach context-rich case-based engineering cases. Since thisis an ongoing research project, the final results of the hypothesis tests are not available yet.Introduction Page 22.355.2Multidisciplinary collaborations, uncertainty, and conflicting requirements are common inmodern engineering systems as the domains for engineering applications continue to rapidly expand. A growing concern with current engineering education is the disconnection between thescience-based engineering curriculum and current industry practices. In a typical engineeringclass, subject and
education, approached from the perspective of Human Constructivism. She has been involved in collabo- rative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, seismology, and chemical engineer- ing.Ronald L. Miller, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Ronald L. Miller is professor of chemical engineering and Director of the Center for Engineering Ed- ucation at the Colorado School of Mines where he has taught chemical engineering and interdisciplinary courses and conducted engineering education research for the past 25 years. Dr. Miller has received three university-wide teaching awards and has held a Jenni teaching fellowship at CSM. He has received grant awards for education research from the National Science
AC 2011-1996: DESIGN OF PROBLEM SOLVING ENVIRONMENT FORAUTOMATED SYSTEM INTEGRATION EDUCATIONSheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano man- ufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of
, report thatboth faculty and students are satisfied with their online education experiences, and thatconstructivists approaches to education are effective online.This new model will be a major step toward using distance engineering education to achieve thevision of Bourne et al.4, “…many of the issues raised because of tradition can be solved throughcollaboration among institutions to create a strong national shared engineering curriculumenabled by online methods…(online education) may well play a remarkable role in bringingtogether the work of colleges and universities across the United States (and eventually across theworld). Such collaboration will ultimately provide more choice and diversity of opportunity tolearners with lower costs. For
, Journal of Engineering Education, European Journal of En- gineering Education and Technovation. She is a member of IIE, ASME, and ASEE. She is also a National Research Council-US AFRL Summer Faculty Fellow for the Human Effectiveness Directorate (2002- 2004), an invited participant of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers in Engineering Education Symposium (2009), and a Fulbright Scholar to Ireland (2010).Linda C. Schmidt, University of Maryland, College Park Linda C. Schmidt is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Maryland. Dr. Schmidt’s research interests are in understanding the process by which early stage, engineering design tasks are successfully
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Virtual and Remote Functionality Development for Undergraduate LabAbstract: A particular challenge for online education in engineering is how to extend the traditionalhands-on laboratories over the Internet. Especially for Engineering Technology department, itslecture courses are always accompanied by corresponding laboratory sessions, in which hands-onexperiments allow students to experience the nature of science and engineering, observe dynamicphenomena, test hypotheses, learn from mistakes, and reach conclusions. Generally onlinelaboratories can be categorized in two approaches: the virtual laboratory allows students to logon a simulated environment residing on the server; the
. Page 22.641.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Establishment of an Integrated Learning Environment for Advanced Energy Storage Systems: Supporting the Sustainable Energy DevelopmentAbstractThere is a great need of electrical energy storage for the effective commercialization ofrenewable energy resources, load-leveling, and transportation electrification. The steadilyincreasing capacity of generating power from renewables and production of electric drivevehicles by the industry coupled with the specialized set of skills required to accommodate theenergy storage systems in both the stationary and transportation sectors, have created an urgentand continuous demand for more knowledgeable energy