Paper ID #13988Pre-Engineering Education Collaborative at Four: Approaching the FinalPhasesDr. Robert V. Pieri, North Dakota State University Dr. Robert Pieri is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at North Dakota State University (NDSU) in Fargo, ND. He has many conference publications on engineering education and design. His primary interest areas include: Engineering Education, CADD, Design, Fracture Mechanics, Materials Science and Alternative Energy Options. Prior to joining NDSU, he worked for Allied-Signal Corporation and in the aircraft supply industry. Prior to his industrial experience he taught for 10 years at
381 Expanding the Community College Engineering Educational Pipeline through Collaborative Partnerships Amelito Enriquez1, Nicholas Langhoff1, Wenshen Pong2, Nilgun Ozer2, Hamid Shanasser2, Cheng Chen2, Hamid Mahmoodi2, Ed Cheng,2 Kwok-Siong Teh2, and Xiaorong Zhang2 1Cañada College, Redwood City, CA/ 2School of Engineering, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CAAbstractThe 2012 President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) report, “Engageto Excel” indicates that the United States needs to produce
2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conference Educating the Engineering Educator Moses Tefe1 and Tara Kulkarni2 1 Assistant Professor, Norwich University, Northfield VT/ 2Assistant Professor, Norwich University, Northfield VTAbstractEngineering education research largely focuses on student learning to meet industry demands,with little attention paid to faculty. An assumption is that professors get their “ training” atgraduate school. This may be true of content areas, but most graduate education occurs in largeresearch focused universities. With limited and variable training across institutions, theconsensus is that many graduates are
Reza Sanati-Mehrizy is a professor of Computer Science Department at Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. His research focuses on diverse areas such as: Database Design, Data Structures, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Computer Aided Manufacturing, Data Mining, Data Warehousing, and Machine Learning. Page 26.1183.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Nanotechnology in Engineering EducationAbstractNanotechnology is the science, engineering, and
Paper ID #12902Impact of International Collaborative Engineering Education upon the Epis-temological Development of Chinese Engineering StudentsMiss Qunqun Liu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Qunqun Liu is a graduate student at the Graduate School of Education in Shanghai Jiao Tong University. She obtained a B.S. in public administration from China Agricultural University. Her current interest focuses on the cognitive development of engineering graduate and undergraduate students, the assessment of teaching and learning in graduate education.Dr. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Assistant Professor
Paper ID #12907Is engineering education a professional activity?Dr. John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Sen. member of IEEE. he has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. he is author of Engineering Education. research and development in Curriculum and Instruction.Dr. R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by fourteen years as a faculty member at
, C., M. Cardella, J. Turns, & R. Adams (2005). Comparing Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes: An indepth followup study. Design Studies, 26, 325357. 12. Atman, C., R. Adams, S. Mosborg, M. Cardella, J. Turns, & J. Saleem (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education , 96(4). 13. Definition and Domains of Ergonomics. International Ergonomics Association (2000) , Retrieved from: http://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html 14. Coopey. E., Danahy, E., Schneider, L., (2013), InterLACE: interactive learning and collaboration environment. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion, 1114
Paper ID #12739Evaluate-and-Redesign Tasks: Using Interviews to Investigate How Elemen-tary Students Iterate (Fundamentals)Ms. Amber L. M. Kendall, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Amber Kendall is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at Tufts University, and a graduate research assistant with the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. She graduated from North Carolina State University as a Park Scholar with a BA in Physics, and spent several years teaching physics to high-school freshman. She has been working on professional development and designing elementary engineering curricula
results of SPEEDIndia's efforts in creating a new platform to enhance EE.Keywords: Engineering Education, Water, Infrastructure, Energy, Action Plans. 1.) SPEED India & IUCEE:SPEED is a global, non-profit student organization that functions as an interdisciplinary networkof engineering students who aspire to stimulate change and impact the development of EE and itseffect on society, industry, the environment and local communities. In collaboration withacademia, industry and government [1] SPEED is committed to improving EE by channeling thestudent voice and perspective. Through local and global initiatives SPEED empowers studentsand encourages the development of professional, ethical and social responsibility. Furthermore,through insight
Paper ID #14266Novel Engineering: Integrating Engineering and LiteracyMrs. Lija Yang, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Lija Yang is an Education Specialist and Curriculum Developer at the Tufts Center for Engineering Edu- cation and Outreach; she has a M.Ed. in Literacy Instruction K-12 and is a certified Reading Specialist. She has taught 1-4th grades and included engineering concepts and thinking in her curriculum. Her fo- cus is to help teachers gain confidence and experience in STEM and enable them to inspire and teach engineering to budding engineers.Dr. Merredith D Portsmore, Tufts UniversityElissa
- tion, service-learning and community engagement. Dr. Luo is a LEED AP BD+C and a CM-BIM holder. Page 26.1043.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Investigating the Synergies of Sustainability and Building Information Modeling through Collaborative Project-based LearningAbstractThe construction industry is undergoing fundamental transformation due toeconomic, social, and environmental development. Highlights of emerging trendsinclude the prevalence of green building practices and a wide adoption of newinformation technology (IT) such as building
Paper ID #11126Civic Engagement as a Component of Engineering EducationDr. Shoba Krishnan, Santa Clara University Dr. Shoba Krishnan is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Santa Clara University. She has a strong interest in engineering education, and is involved in several community based activities to increase the participation of underrepresented groups in engineering. She collaborates with non-profits that are in need for technical expertise and with K-8 schools in need of STEM programs. She helped es- tablish the IDEAS (Interdisciplinary Design Engineering And Service) program and developed the course
Paper ID #11309Exploring Military Veteran Students’ Pathways in Engineering EducationDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and
India.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and re- flective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice
2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conference Integration of Software in Structural Engineering Education Michael J. Davidson1, P.E Wentworth Institute of TechnologyAbstractIn the work place today, software is typically used by the structural engineer to analyze anddesign most elements of a structure. There is a wide variety of software available to thestructural engineer, allowing the engineer to analyze and design micro, macro and even allelements of a structure. In fact, it is common today for consulting firms and contractors to usemulti-discipline software that inputs the project, including
, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, Australia. From 2003 to 2005, she was a Research Assistant with the collaboration project between Andalas University and Padang Cement In- donesia (now Cement of Indonesia). From 2005 to 2010, she was a Lecturer and a Program Coordinator with the Ekasakti University, Padang, Indonesia. Her research interest includes systems thinking, systems engineering, engineering education, project management, production, logistic and inventory system. She was a recipient of Australian Award Scholarship during her master degree and Indonesia DGHE Scholar- ship during her PhD degree
Reflection in Engineering Education(CPREE), a collaboration of twelve educational institutions.References 1. Castellanos, Mariajosel and Joshua A Enszer. "Promoting Metacognition through Reflection Exercises in a Thermodynamics Course." ASEE Annual Conference. Atlanta: American Society of Engineering Education , 2013. 2. Davis, Denny, et al. "Assessing Design and Reflective Practice in Capstone Engineering Design Courses." ASEE Annual Conference. American Society of Engineering Education , 2009. 3. Austin, Darnell. "Lessons Learned from Capstone Projects." ASEE Annual Conference. American Society of Engineering Education , 2004. 4. Turns, Jennifer A, et al. "Integrating Reflection into Engineering
advancemanufacturing concepts - the quick transfer of science and technology into manufacturedproducts and processes - into practice. The venue for the global cooperation utilizes the highlyeffective academic-industry collaboration establishes under the Partnership for the Advancementof Collaborative Engineering Education (PACE). PACE is a partnership between GeneralMotors, Siemens PLM Software, Autodesk, Hewlett Packard and Oracle to support strategicallyselected academic institutions worldwide to close the gap between engineering education andpractice.Under the PACE program, partner academic institutions are invited to participate in multi-yearreal-world projects through a global team-based competition. Student participation spans thedesign, engineering
the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) through research: Engineering. Retrieved from https://narst.org/ngsspapers/engineering.cfm. 3) Robelen, E. W. (2013). Elementary students tackling windmills. Education Week, 32(26), 19. 4) Lehman, J. D., Kim, W., & Harris, C. (2014). Collaborations in a community of practice working to integrate engineering design in elementary science education. Journal of STEM Education : Innovations and Research, 15(3), 21. 5) Hynes, M. & Swenson, J. (2013). The Humanistic Side of Engineering: Considering Social Science and Humanities Dimensions of Engineering in Education and Research. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 3(2), 31–42. 6) Yaşar, Ş
Paper ID #12830Video Based, Game Integrated Concept Tutors – Effectiveness in FreshmanCoursesDr. Eliza A Banu, Auburn University Dr. Eliza Banu has a Bachelors degree in Electrical Engineering from Polytechnic University of Bucharest and completed her Ph.D. program in Mechanical Engineering at Auburn University in 2014. Dr. Banu’s research interests are in the dynamics of impact of rigid bodies and human with granular matter as well as developing innovative instructional materials. She has been working with LITEE (Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineering Education) at Auburn University since 2010.Mr. Sai
. Page 26.141.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Accessibility, Usability, and Universal Design in Online Engineering EducationiAbstractAccessibility and usability have been fundamental concerns for instructional designs inonline engineering education. With the prevalence of online professional developmentand course management systems (CMS), the delivery of accessible and user-friendlycourse materials become crucial to a successful online program. Government entities,including public universities like UW-Madison, are legally bounded by the regulations ofSection 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requiring all web content is within reach of allusers. Universal
) is an apprenticeship/partnershipprogram between Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education and the Rose-HulmanInstitute of Technology (RHIT) that provides graduate students in engineering education anopportunity to connect and collaborate with practicing engineering educators. We believe thatthe REEFE experience not only enhances engineering education graduate students’ professionaldevelopment, but also enhances the engineering education research-practice cycle1. To this end,the program is intended to provide graduate student participants the chance to utilize theirengineering education expertise while experiencing the day-to-day activities associated withbeing a faculty member. The program also encourages existing faculty members
,hydroelectric and atomic power engineering, space exploration and so on. Russianengineering has long lasting traditions, creativity,and inventive enthusiasmtogetherwith excellent educational programs, talented faculty, scientists, and engineers. Russian engineering education traditions are: Integrated academics and research; Technical universities put emphasis on collaboration between scientific researchers and faculty, where high ranked and experienced scientists share their practical knowledge with future engineers through lectures and seminars, and faculty members are encouraged to participate in research activity in the field of their expertise. Such educational approach creates environment for a
education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. Page 26.253.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessing the Spectrum of International Undergraduate Engineering Educational ExperiencesAbstractThe National Academy of Engineering together with a growing number of engineering educationresearchers have underscored the need for U.S. engineering graduates to be capable ofeffectively collaborating across national boundaries as they “encounter worlds of
learning resources and modes), employer-relevant and practical (project- based learning) than traditional engineering programs at a lower price point. 7. Employing faculty who are a smart blend of engineers + educators, who explore innovative teaching, and are mentors.The GalvanizeU/UNH Academic Model and Pedagogy GalvanizeU/UNH’s program places hands-on, collaborative, project-based learning at thecenter of education. Emphasizing real world experience, communication, leadership andentrepreneurship, it offers a diverse body of students the opportunity to experience data scienceas an engaging and collaborative profession, pairing technical training with 21st centuryprofessional skills. A priority goal of GalvanizeU/UNH is to
an ongoing collaborative action research project that aims to develop a tool for assessingengineering students’ development of WSP literacy. Specifically, we provide a matrix of 22concrete ILOs for WSP literacy, as well as two different approaches to assessing (some of) themin engineering education. We expect that engineering educators will find these ILOs andassessment strategies valuable for adopting a constructive alignment approach for WSP literacyin their teaching.Study overviewThe study reported on in this paper is a collaborative action research project in which theresearchers have worked together with different groups of interested engineering educators tomake sense of previous empirical research about engineering students
the field could serve to identify if ascholarly discourse community on the practice has begun to emerge. The diversity ofdisciplinary homes of the scholars who engage in engineering education research mightresult in lower degrees of scholarly communication and collaboration across an area ofstudy8. Developing a map of the field of blended learning in engineering education couldidentify future directions for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. This map couldalso help to identify emerging disciplinary fractures.Defining blended learningBlended learning and instruction are ill-defined in research studies9 . Many scholars haveattempted to synthesize the literature on blended learning and instruction to identify abroadly used
Paper ID #12218Recruitment & Retention Efforts in Engineering Education: A Proposed Strat-egy for BenchmarkingMr. Walter Curtis Lee Jr., Virginia Tech Walter Lee is a PhD candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where he also serves as a program assistant for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity. His re- search interests include student retention & recruitment, diversity, motivation and first-year experiences in engineering. Mr. Lee received an NSF-GRFP award in Spring 2012 focusing on how student support centers impact the experience of undergraduate engineering
Paper ID #11113Discussions of Engineering Education Learning Advances among WorkingEngineering FacultyProf. Byron G. Garry, South Dakota State University BYRON GARRY is an Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Coordinator in the Department of Construction & Operations Management in the College of Engineering at South Dakota State University. He has been a member of ASEE since 1998. As SDSU ASEE Campus Rep., his goal is to help fellow College of Engineering faculty to be reflective teachers.Dr. Suzette R Burckhard, South Dakota State University Dr. Burckhard earned a BS in Engineering Physics, a BS in Civil
Kirchhoff’s voltage lawis always true despite its obvious violation of Faraday’s law of induced EMF. The danger of thispremature specialization of engineering education becomes apparent when engineers from onediscipline work in teams with engineers from other disciplines and find they have no commonunderstanding of problems outside of their own engineering discipline. 2The authors have collaborated in teaching an advanced survey course on the physical sciencefoundations of engineering to graduate engineering students in an engineering leadershipprogram. The elevator speech on why such a course is needed goes as follows: 1) mostengineering students take all of their basic science courses during their Freshman year, 2) mostof them don’t like those