). Currently, the mechanical engineering major requires introductorymechanical engineering topics (e.g., statics, mechanics of materials, dynamics) as well as upper-division thermoscience and mechanical design courses. Based on student and alumni surveys aswell as faculty feedback, the BSME is being redesigned to offer topic concentrations in order toprovide students with increased flexibility and choice within their major.The mechanical engineering department at this university administers undergraduate majors inthree areas – the BSME and two additional general engineering majors with an emphasis inbiomechanical (BS-Engineering, Biomechanical; referred to as BSBME or BME) and design(BS-Engineering, Design referred to as BS-Design). Together, these
Paper ID #14870Cross-sectional Survey Study of Undergraduate Engineering IdentityAlexis Prybutok, The University of Texas, Austin Alexis Prybutok earned a B.S. in both chemical engineering and biochemistry from The University of Texas at Austin in May of 2015. She has been working with Dr. Maura Borrego’s group to conduct research in engineering education primarily on the subject of engineering identity.Anita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin Anita Patrick is a STEM Education doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and College of Liberal Arts at UT Austin’s
decisions. Mostparticipants envisioned themselves going back to their home country to work followingtheir studies. They planned to work in manufacturing, oil and gas, or utility companies.Most anticipated balancing work, marriage, and motherhood in the future, and planned tolive with their parents until marrying.What has the phenomenon of learning engineering been like for these women?All engineering students in this honours (four-year) Bachelor of Engineering program takethe same first year classes. This common core provides a sample of the three major streamsof engineering available for specialization: (1) civil and structural; (2) electrical andelectronics; and (3) mechanical and manufacturing. At the end of the first year, aftercompleting basic
field of vision (Dye, Baril, & Bavelier, 2007). This finding suggeststhat in presentation or panel settings where deaf viewers already redirect their gaze to various focalpoints, extra movement or changes detected in their peripheral view further compromises their attentionon the current discussion, compared with hearing viewers’ attention.Laboratory AccessibilityLaboratory environments can be very challenging because there are often obstacles blocking sightlines,reducing access to information. These obstacles should be removed or negotiated if possible. Anotherissue is that laboratory instructors often point to laboratory equipment and materials as they speak.However, due to the lag of interpretation or the split attention between the real
Paper ID #15322First Generation Students Identification with and Feelings of Belongingnessin EngineeringHank Boone, University of Nevada, Reno Hank Boone is a Graduate Research Assistant and Masters Student at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on First Generation engineering college students’ engineering identity, belonging- ness, and how they perceive their college experience.He is also on a National Science Foundation project looking at non-normative engineering students and how they may have differing paths to success. His education includes a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Nevada
Paper ID #15028A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering IdentityAnita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin Anita Patrick is a STEM Education doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and College of Liberal Arts at UT Austin’s Population Research Center. She received her BS in Bioengineering from Clemson University where she tutored undergraduate mathemat- ics and science courses, and mentored undergraduate engineering majors. Prior to coming to UT, she independently tutored K12 and undergraduate mathematics and science. Her research interests include
higher education, to considerdiverse student perspectives more substantially. Additional strands of qualitative research whichfocus on cultural and interactional analysis have looked at higher education as a social system,looking at ways that the interactions and cultures of classrooms and institutions work (oftenunintentionally) to create problems for students (in K-12 science: Carlone10; in K-12 math:Esmonde11; Gresalfi et al.12; in undergraduate engineering: O’Connor et al.13; Tonso14,15). In thissmaller body of work, we gain insight into mechanisms which create the problem of strugglingstudents. While we see all of these research strands as coming from a place of caring abouteducational problems and we recognize their practical
Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technol- ogy’s Center for Environmental Sensing and Modeling (CENSAM). Dr. Dusek received his Ph.D. from MIT in Mechanical and Ocean Engineering, an M.S. in Ocean Engineering from MIT and a B.S. from Florida Atlantic University in Ocean Engineering as well.Dr. Daniela Faas, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Dr. Daniela Faas is a senior lecturer in Mechanical Engineering and the director of design and fabriation operations at Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering. Prior to joining Olin College, Dr. Faas was the senior preceptor in design instruction at the John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Science at Harvard University. Dr. Faas was a Shapiro postdoctoral
of Notre Dame. Her B.S. is in Marine Systems Engineering from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. Her primary teaching responsibilities are in the solid mechanics and materials areas, including biomaterials. She was awarded the 2012 ASEE NCS Outstanding Teacher Award, 2013 Gannon University Distinguished Faculty Award and 2013-2014 Gannon University Faculty Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Vernaza does research in the area of alternative fuels (biodiesel), engineering education (active learning techniques), and high-strain deformation of materials. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM and ADVANCE-PAID grants. Dr. Vernaza has been a member of the ASEE NCS Board since 2013 holding vice-chair (2015-16) and
for afew individuals, but to promote a more inclusive environment in which all can thrive and grow.Deafness is low incidence and deaf individuals are thinly dispersed. This has several subtleimplications -- for example, more than half of all deaf students have no classmates with similarchallenges. Without appropriate support accommodations to facilitate inclusion by peers or toencourage interaction or group communication, they face participation barriers in informal socialand formal learning communities.Deaf and hard of hearing students will benefit from knowledgeable teachers who understand howto adapt materials that assume visual relationships by recasting the materials in neutral terms.However, deaf and hard of hearing students are likely
weight of commodity[4]. The average savings ofbarge transportation over other modes is about $9.00 per ton[3].Multiple natural and man-made events can lead to the disruptions of the Mississippi River suchas ice, droughts, or floods that can cause non-navigable water levels and earthquakes or terroristattacks that can destroy the infrastructure of the navigation system[5]. Other possible disruptioncauses include vessel allision or collision and mechanical vessel problems. In 2012, theMississippi River suffered a record-breaking low water level and was very close to beingcompletely shut down. Disruptions on the inland waterway system can have widespreadeconomic and societal impacts, and their consequences can be significant. For instance, the
well as psychology in engineering education. She plans to enter the workforce following graduation to pursue engineering planning.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. She is currently a Program Director at the National Science Foundation in the Divi- sion of Undergraduate Education. Her expertise and interests focus on diversity and inclusion, engineer identity, PBL, innovative learning-centered pedagogies, assessment of student learning, engineering de- sign, capstone design, etc. She also conducts research in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and sustainable energy technologies. She holds
Association of Kentucky. He also served a 10-year term as a member of the National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standards (NIMAS) Board for the US Department of Education. Mr. Noble has also been active in the public policy arena, and was the primary originating drafter of two important Kentucky laws relating to education for people with disabilities, the Accessible Textbook Act of 2002, and the Kentucky Postsecondary Textbook Accessibility Act of 2003.Dr. Matthew F. Ragland, Auburn University at Montgomery Dr. Ragland is the Associate Provost for Graduate Studies and Faculty Services at Auburn University at Montgomery and a Professor of Mathematics. He has a number of research publications in the field of Group
Paper ID #17465Interdisciplinary Seminar Series: Increasing Awareness for Research, Recog-nition of the University, and Professional Development OpportunitiesDr. Jamie J Newman, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Jamie Newman is an Assistant Professor in Biological Sciences at Louisiana Tech University. Dr. Newman completed her BA in Biology at Amherst College and her PhD in Biology at MIT. Dr. Newman’s research focuses on understanding mechanisms that regulate cell state using stem cells as a model for studying cell behavior. In addition to the lab’s focus on basic biology, the use of stem cells has led to collaborations
empathetic, social topics rather than the more analytical areaslike physics, computer and mechanical engineering.4 This is problematic since physics, forexample, is considered a gateway to engineering.5 Although armed with this knowledge of whatgirls prefer, little has changed in the numbers of females who stay in STEM. Additionally, thefocus on analytical areas and the exclusion of empathetic areas of focus is what partly definesengineering as a limiting culture.6,7 How do we begin to change the culture and perception ofengineering toward one that is inclusive and empathetic?Many researchers are studying what might influence a change to the multi-layered intersectionsof STEM careers, classrooms, content, and culture with complex constructs like
initiatives would continue throughout both of their terms. Their 2 year goals have beento:• highlight more dimensions of diversity (inclusion and equity) by proposing a new committee name (Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) to better reflect the values of the diversity statement;• maintain all current initiatives (paper program, conference pavilion or booth, ASEE Best Diversity Paper, Student Essay/Video Competition, etc.);• develop operational procedures to ensure a more sustainable organization structure;• align sub-committee activities and new initiatives with the ASEE Diversity Committee Strategic Plan;• create a formal reporting mechanism for Strategic Plan reporting;• align the ASEE Diversity Committee Strategic Plan
Paper ID #20467Fostering an Asset Mindset to Broaden Participation through the Transfor-mation of an Engineering Diversity ProgramDr. Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder Beverly Louie is the Director for Teaching and Learning Initiatives in the Broadening Opportunities through the Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in The University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemical engineering from CU, and a D.Phil. in mechanical engineering from the University of Oxford, England. Louie’s research inter- ests are in the areas of engineering student
from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, studying mechanochemical reactions of a spiropy- ran mechanophore in polymeric materials under shear loading. She is currently an Assistant Professor c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #18910in the Mechanical Engineering department at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology whereher research interests include novel manufacturing and characterization techniques of polymer and com-posite structures and the incorporation of multifunctionality by inducing desired responses to mechanicalloading. c American Society
, her research efforts have focused on the development and mechanical evaluation of medical and rehabilitation devices, particularly orthopaedic, neurosurgical, and pediatric devices. She teaches courses in design, biomechanics, and mechanics at University of Delaware and is heavily involved in K12 engineering edu- cation efforts at the local, state, and national levels.Prof. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware Dr. Joshua Enszer is an assistant professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and mathematical
totalityof the college environment as the “climate”, a term that attempts to capture the classroom, lab,resources and extracurricular contextual factors that may influence students’ decisions to remainin the college or transfer to other majors, institutions or out of post-secondary education6. Thepresent study falls within this line of inquiry, and aims to demonstrate that repeated measures ofcollege climate are an important mechanism for engineering colleges to monitor the impact ofeducational environment on students and make adjustments to promote student retention.College Climate Research The application of the term “climate” to organizations grew from an industrial andorganizational research framework and provides a holistic perspective
5.5% Asian-Pacific Islander 34 19% Native American or Alaska Native 1 0.5% 2 or more 13 7% Prefer not to answer 3 2%Table 4. Self-reported academic major of study participants Reported Major # of Respondents % of Respondents Chemical Engineering 14 7.7% Biological Systems Engineering 12 6.6% Computer Science 5 2.7% Mechanical Engineering 36 19.8% Computer Engineering 11 6.0% Materials
4 0 0 0 Computer Science 0 0 4 0 Chemical Engineering 0 0 4 2 Electrical Engineering 5 8 4 2 General Engineering 0 0 0 1 Mechanical Engineering 7 0 1 1 TOTAL 16 9 13 7 Year of Graduation (First Degree) 15 8 1 3 1998-2005
Paper ID #22667Native Hawaiians in Engineering: A Path to the ProfessoriateDr. Thanh Truc Thi Nguyen, University of Hawai’i at Mnoa Nguyen is a learning technologies faculty member at the Curriculum Research & Development Group in the College of Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa. Her work in organizational change and tech- nology is grounded in inquiry science, communities of practice, TPACK, and most recently improvement science.Dr. Oceana Puananilei Francis, University of Hawai’i at MnoaDr. Scott F. Miller, University of Hawai’i at Mnoa Scott Miller is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the
interpreted, thus impacting whether female faculty decided to use thesepolicies or participate in programs. While many women faculty encountered various challengesin their careers (i.e. work/family conflict, gender bias), this paper will describe the policies,programs, and career strategies that positively impacted the careers of women faculty, includinginformal and formal mentoring, leadership opportunities, and the importance of recruiting notonly a “critical mass” of women, but also establishing a mechanism to bring women togetherwithin the engineering schools. The purpose of this study was to uncover how tenured (associate and full professors)women faculty in academic engineering programs overcame various challenges to be successfulin their
Open Social connections Own Initiative Other How does your team 77% (89) 19% (22) N/A 4% (5) recruit? (n=116) How were you 44% (39) 25% (22) 31% (28) recruited? (n=89)Recruiting is further limited by strong disciplinary borders surrounding team membership.Teams are often dominated by students from engineering and a particular engineering discipline.Ninety-two percent (n=71) of our survey respondents are engineering students and 78% (n=55)of those engineering students are majoring in mechanical engineering.Entry barriers are also built by an inability of teams to effectively provide meaningful ways towelcome interested students into the teams. These issues
Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey teaches courses and conducts re- search related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey is the Principal Investi- gator (PI) for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant. The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to
Paper ID #15411Connectivity at RIT - Developing & Delivering an Effective Professional De-velopment Workshop Series for Women Faculty in STEMProf. Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Dell is an associate professor in the Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology department at RIT. She serves as the Faculty Associate to the Provost for Women Faculty and is co-PI for RIT’s NSF ADVANCE project. Her research interests include: characterization of biodegradable plastics and environmental consideration in materials selection for production design, the impact of technology paired
Paper ID #15160Listening and NegotiationDr. Janet Callahan, Boise State University Janet Callahan is Professor and Chair of Materials Science and Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Callahan received her Ph.D. in Materials Science, her M.S. in Metallurgy, and her B.S. in Chemical En- gineering from the University of Connecticut. Her research interests include institutional change, women in engineering, mathematics, and materials science and engineering.Dr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is an Associate Professor and Fulton C. Noss Faculty Fellow in Industrial
Paper ID #18928Institutional Mentoring to Incite a Revolution through NSF’s RED ProgramDr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord
survey group, structural analysis, structural design, statics,and fluid mechanics tended to be popular, whereas thermodynamics, statistics, and economicswere less popular. (However, this result should be interpreted lightly as our survey reached morestructures-oriented students.) The primary reasons given for liking or disliking a course related tothe professor, and the professor’s teaching style or method of presenting material, as well as thethe students personal interest in the subject matter and material. There are no differences in thereasons given for liking or disliking a course between men, women, and minorities. Table 4. What factor(s) led you to pursue studies in civil, architectural or structural engineering? Italics indicates thetop