qualitativedata collection over time and across locations.SampleIn the Spring 2016 semester, 12 mechanical engineering seniors were recruited to participate in alongitudinal study of workplace learning. Mechanical engineering was selected for two keyreasons. First, the dominant industry focus of mechanical engineering makes it a useful site forexploring the school-to-work transition of new graduates. Second, ME is one of the largestengineering fields nationally and the largest department at the study university, providing anopportunity to obtain a larger and more diverse sample. Table 2 summarizes participantdemographics by race and gender. Given the potentially small number of potential participants incategories other than white male, race and gender
Director of the Space Engi- neering Institute and in 2010 she accepted a position with the Academic Affairs office of the Dwight Look College of Engineering where she oversaw outreach, recruiting, retention and enrichment programs for the college. Since 2013, she serves as the Executive Director for Industry and Nonprofit Partnerships with responsibilities to increase opportunities for undergraduates engineering students to engage in experiential learning multidisciplinary team projects. These include promoting capstone design projects sponsored by industry, developing the teaching the Engineering Projects in Community Service course, and developing curricular and co-curricular programs at the Engineering Innovation
programs tackle the science communication and broader-context issuesso important to successfully engaging undergraduate students, and still fewer draw on thegoldmine that is the workshop participants’ own personal insights, having once been menteesthemselves. In one well-designed program, Fiegel et al.20 trained graduate student mentors 1) increating and refining learning outcomes, 2) in effective teaching methods such as learning stylesand questioning techniques, 3) in project management, including communication styles, effectivemeetings, and stimulating effective feedback, and 4) in creating an environment of trust. The lastelement taught the mentors about open lines of communication, ownership of the mentoringprogram, and failures as learning
capstone design experiences(Froyd & Ohland, 2005), first year computer programming experiences (Brannan & Wankat,2005), community service learning (Coyle, Jamieson, & Oakes, 2005), active learning (Borrego,Froyd, & Hall, 2010; National Research Council, 2012; Fairweather, 2008; Handelsman et al.,2004; Seymour, 2002; Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the ResearchUniversity, 1998), and design-based learning (Puente, Van Eijck, & Jochems, 2011; Reynolds,Mehalik, Lovell, & Schunn, 2009). Most of these, however, are institutionally or individuallyenacted—the goal of the RED program is to build these efforts at a broader scale with radicallydifferent approaches which will result in disruptions in engineering and
perspectives of creativity research—internal andexternal approaches—situate creativity work from either an individual or individual-in-contextstandpoint, respectively.4 The present investigation views returners’ experience from anindividual-in-context perspective because the extent to which participants engage in engineeringpractice before and after enrolling in doctoral programs varies by individual and milieu.Amabile1 conceptualized the componential framework of creativity (CFoC) to outline factorsthat affect an individual’s engagement with the creative process. After refinement, theframework shifted away from the individual, and toward an individual-in-context stance, whicheventually became known as the CMoC.2 Ultimately, the CMoC evolved to
Paper ID #19060Institutionalizing Campus Innovation and Entrepreneurship Programmingby Optimizing a Faculty Grantmaking Process: A Case StudyVictoria Matthew, VentureWell Victoria Matthew is Senior Program Officer for Faculty Development at VentureWell, where she plays a lead role in the Pathways to Innovation Program, Epicenter’s faculty development and engagement strategy. She designs in-person and online convenings, engages experts, and curates content that fosters the Pathways faculty goals of integrating entrepreneurship and innovation into undergraduate engineering. Prior to joining VentureWell, Victoria worked for
independent data to confirm the most important outcomes. The teamcreated its own survey using our definitions to find relative importance of the fifteen outcomesdefined in Table 2. The survey was created through Qualtrics, an online survey instrument.Qualtrics provides a convenient way for participants to complete surveys on their cellular phonesor computers and on their own time. Results are automatically and anonymously submitted andcompiled [8]. The survey was distributed to industry representatives who serve as advisors orclients for engineering capstone programs at various universities. The survey asked industryrepresentatives to rank order learning outcomes required for successful and productiveemployment. Results from eighty-nine
), the transfer of these skills to isolated or collaborative PBL contexts may presentsubstantial challenges. However, beyond the issues of transfer and acquisition of thesecompetencies, there is little scholarship that explores how students may be disincentivized frombuilding appropriate individual competencies in design environments that are largely group-oriented.Purpose of the ResearchIn this paper, we will present results from an undergraduate transdisciplinary degree program inwhich students spent the first two years of their core degree experience working almostexclusively in groups, although they were expected to develop an individual set of disciplinaryinterests and competencies. The instructional strategy shifted during the first
, he developed the capstone course sequence in the newly-formed Bio- engineering department and has been responsible for teaching it since. Todd also serves as a Director for the UTDesign program, which facilitates resource sharing and corporate sponsorship of projects for all engineering disciplines at the university. He attended the Capstone Design Conference in 2014 and 2016, and is an active member of IEEE and EMBS.Prof. Margaret Garnett Smallwood, University of Texas, Dallas I am a Senior Lecturer II in the Jindal School of Management at the University of Texas at Dallas. I teach three business communication courses to undergraduate students. I have an MBA in international management and marketing from UTD and
session in order to uncover their own interpretation of their thought processesduring problem exploration. Retrospective interviews have been used in previous studiesanalyzing expert designers’ concept generation from differing perspectives,53,63 and haveprovided an improved understanding of designers’ strategies in solving engineering problems.62Participants. Participants were recruited from the Mechanical Engineering undergraduate andgraduate programs at a large Midwestern university. In the present study, we report findingsfrom a set of five participants chosen from a larger study. These five participants were chosenbased on both the quantity and the quality of the think-aloud data they provided. In addition,these five cases represent a range
in recent decades, the careful study ofliberation has not been welcomed, on par, in higher education. Across the research, teaching, andoutreach missions of the broader higher education networks worldwide, one will find greatdifficulty locating research programs, courses, or public interest programs informed by liberatorypraxis and theory, in either a formal or informal sense. However, throughout the world varioussocio-cultural, political, and economic movements stem from decolonial projects engaged in thepraxis and study of liberation, and precisely where conventional conceptions of morality andjustice have fallen short.38 The unsettling contention for scholars in industrialized nations appearsas such: whereas systems of moral community and
contributing to the overall achievements of the institutional goals.Programmatic accreditation, on the other hand, can apply to schools, departments, or programsthat are part of a larger educational institution.According to the US Department of Education, there are specific roles that accreditation isexpected to play within the educational system:7 1. Assess the quality of academic programs at institutions of higher education 2. Create a culture of continuous improvement of academic quality at colleges and universities and stimulate a general raising of standards among educational institutions 3. Involve faculty and staff comprehensively in institutional evaluation and planning 4. Establish criteria for professional certification and
to do something bigger than themselves.” On this project, focusing on“why” supports: • using research to inform instructional practices; • stimulating a socio-technical context in engineering; and • fostering motivation, inspiration, and innovation.A Y-circle is vital to departmental change as a vehicle for implementing and blending processesbased on collaborative transformation, crucial conversations [26], and essential tension [27]. AY-circle is comprised of X-team members, department faculty members, postdocs, academicadvisers and other interested staff, and undergraduate and graduate students. Participants includefuture X-team members who will learn from the experiences of current X-team members. X-teams share progress
the SVEs’ engineeringeducation pathways.ResultsParticipants described a variety of reasons for choosing engineering and expressed a diversity ofentry points into the major. As is the case with such an important decision, participants describedmultiple influences on their decision to major in engineering.Research Question # 1: What are some broader influences on the decision to major inengineering?Theme 1: Decision to major in engineering was made prior to military service (n=7)This group of participants indicated that they were already interested in engineering prior toentering the military. A self-described “late bloomer,” B1AAE performed well in science andmath during high school and took classes in drafting and architecture which he says
Paper ID #18167Building Automation and IoT as a Platform for Introducing STEM Educa-tion in K-12Dr. Jay R. Porter, Texas A&M University Jay R. Porter joined the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University in 1998 and is currently the Associate Department Head for Undergraduate Studies. He re- ceived the BS degree in electrical engineering (1987), the MS degree in physics (1989), and the Ph.D. in electrical engineering (1993) from Texas A&M University. His areas of interest in research and education include product development, analog/RF electronics, instrumentation
graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:” Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and
. (2010). “Project-Oriented Capstone Design in Civil Engineering: Linkages with Industry to Enhance the Practice.” 117th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20- 23, Louisville, KY. https://peer.asee.org/16855[10] University of California-Berkeley. (2017). Civil and Environmental Engineering Undergraduate Curriculum. [Online]. http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/undergrad/curriculum[11] Cornell University. (2017). Civil Engineering Undergraduate Handbook. [Online]. http://www.cee.cornell.edu/academics/undergraduate/civil_engineering.cfm[12] North Carolina State University. (2017). Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering Undergraduate Programs. [Online]. https://www.ccee.ncsu.edu
, unfortunately, the education process in nearly allgovernment-run programs within these countries, continue to suffer from: antiquatedprograms, improper teaching methods, poor management, and lack of resources. Onthe other hand, engineering institutions in the Arab Gulf Region have, by and large,been spared. Region’s colleges (a map of the Region is shown in Figure1) have, fromthe start, “got on the right foot” and founded - what appeared to be at the time -modern engineering colleges with a decisive advantage over most of the engineeringinstitutions of the broader Arab Middle East.Engineering education in the Arab Gulf Region started, in earnest, during the early tomid sixties. Initially, colleges of engineering were founded in Riyadh, Jeddah, andlater
studentswhile also meeting the needs of the curriculum and documenting fulfillment of the learningobjectives for ABET. A pilot version of the course was first offered in the fall 2015 semester tonineteen students who transferred into the curriculum; a revised version of the course wasoffered in fall 2016 to 56 students. Although the course provided necessary direct evidence thatthe learning outcomes were met, it was unpopular with the majority of the students. It is hopedthat the paper might stimulate a broader discourse on the role of professional issues courses,versus an infusion model for teaching these topics which is likely to be more successful. Bestpractices for implementation may emerge if individuals share both successes and failures
contain global, program/curriculum-level, and project-level criteriaapplicable to engineering challenges, respectively. The iterative validation confirmed theimportance of many rubric criteria, but also revealed opportunities to add or refine criteria thatwere not adequately represented in the rubric. In addition, iterative validation supported potentialremoval or consolidation of criteria that did not seem to be broadly applicable to sustainability oracross disciplines. Since the sustainable design rubric is intended for undergraduate studentprojects, there were also categories within the frameworks deemed inappropriate for student-level projects. This paper reviews the validation process and results and presents changes to thedraft rubric
solving from his father (ran a gray iron foundry), his mother (a nurse) and grandparents (dairy farmers). He has had the great good fortune to always work with amazing people, most recently professors teaching circuits and electronics from 13 HBCU ECE programs and the faculty, staff and students of the SMART LIGHTING ERC, where he is Education Director. He was ECSE Department Head from 2001 to 2008 and served on the board of the ECE Department Heads Association from 2003 to 2008.Dr. Dianna Newman, University at Albany-SUNY Dr. Dianna Newman is a research professor in the Evaluation Consortium at the University at Al- bany/SUNY. Her major areas of study are program evaluation with an emphasis in STEM related pro
other things, these programs considered the inclusion of facultyprofessional development and the so-called ‘soft skills’ as a formal part of the doctoral training6 .Similarly, in the past decade, academic consortiums and national offices have supported the creation ofprograms aimed at training doctoral students in STEM disciplines, mostly for future teaching duties.Although such programs contribute to preparing students to assume academic or other professionalpositions, their ultimate goal is to improve the quality of undergraduate education7 .Some scholars have considered, designed, and documented initiatives that target engineering graduatestudents to help them successfully transition into faculty careers. Drawing from the general
learning requires students to take part in“pre-planned” learning-related activities, believed to spark and stimulate their learning, whilein the classroom.(17) These activities would include: reading, writing, solving problems,answering questions, participating in a discussion, etc.; and most important, students must beengaged in thinking tasks while actively involved. It is generally understood that duringactive learning, less emphasis is placed on transmission of information and more ondeveloping students’ skills. Additionally, during an active learning cycle, emphasis is placedon students’ exploration of their own abilities, including: their thinking process, their valuesystem, their intellect, and their courage to express themselves orally and
industry. The program targets students in grades 9-11 and provides an excellent opportunity for CSU to utilize the talents and experience of itsfaculty and in cultivating a secondary school population, mainly from Ohio, that has the potentialto become future undergraduates, especially in the Science Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) areas.The STI consists of an academic program, a learning skills enhancement program, an eveningprogram and a sports/recreation program. Participants in the STI are exposed to all forms oftransportation and introduced to the transportation related mathematics, physics and engineering.Academic activities include building and testing of model scale bridges, airplanes and boats. Theacademic curriculum includes
Rate High (over 80%) -- Bucknell, Dartmouth, Harvey Mudd, Olin, Tufts Medium (50% to 80%) -- Ohio State, Rose-Hulman, Stanford, USD, WPI Low (under 50%) -- ASU, Oregon State, Purdue, Rowan, U. Texas-EP, W. KentuckyThe groupings for “High,” “Medium,” and “Low” were selected arbitrarily but do provide anindication of the range of institutions involved in the workshop. Examples of the full range ofdata are shown in Fig. 1. Figure 1(a) gives an indication of the overall size of the undergraduateengineering program at each of the participating institutions, with Arizona State Universityhaving the largest total number of engineering undergraduates with 11,572 (#1 in the countryaccording to [19]) and Olin College of Engineering having the
professional firm. The conclusion of the workshop is a public show of student work;parents are invited to learn about what their student has accomplished in the program.Interdisciplinary MethodologyThe theoretical assumptions and operational methodology for the Discover Architectureworkshop can be summarized by the following: an emphasis on hands-on project-based learning,problem-solving, tactile and digital skills building, and peer learning alongside professionalmentoring. The academic content of the program consists of short presentations followed byinteractive experiences to stimulate the participants’ curiosity and interest in a myriad of issuessurrounding the creation of architecture. A joint design project with Architecture and
important for undergraduate engineering programs to integrate cross-disciplinary learningactivities into the curriculum. Moreover, the emergence of “big data” across many engineering disciplines has led to the need for training and education related to the collection,management, and analysis of “big data”. We develop an interdisciplinary, active learning module for First-Year Engineering (FYE) programs that combines content from civil, electrical, andcomputer engineering while also familiarizing students with “big data” science. In this learning module, students compare and contrast the challenges of gathering comprehensive and qualitytransportation data through advanced technologies and traditional approaches. Students develop basic computer code
Learning in Library Instruction," presented at the ACRL 2015, 2015.[13] M. C. Linn, E. Palmer, A. Baranger, E. Gerard, and E. Stone, "Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities," Science, vol. 347, February 6, 2015 2015.[14] A. C. Barnhart and A. Stanfield, "Bridging the information literacy gap: library participation in summer transition programs," Reference Services Review, vol. 41, pp. 201-218, 2013.[15] S. Bebbington and A. Vellino, "Can playing Minecraft improve teenagers' information literacy?," Journal of Information Literacy, vol. 9, pp. 6-26, 12// 2015.[16] J. Beheshti, "Teens, virtual environments and information literacy," Bulletin of the American Society for Information
(NSF) Experimental Program to Stimulate CompetitiveResearch (EPSCoR) program. The program teaches UAS technology at rural Alaska high schools, andprimarily focuses upon mapping and monitoring near native villages. The term “blanket toss” comesfrom an Eskimo tradition of tossing a hunter into the air to scout distant game. Like the person beingtossed, a UAS provides a higher, broader perspective of their community.The Blanket Toss STEM program began in the spring of 2014 with $750,000 in funding spanning threeyears. Students from the native villages attend Upward Bound classes at the UAF campus during thesummer and learn to operate UAS at the Poker Flat Research Range. During the academic year,students take part in UAS-centered learning
Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:” Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Corporation