. 2nd ed. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.5 Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. 10th ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons (p. 83).6 Blanchard, B. S. & Fabrycky, W. J. (2011). Systems Engineering and Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall (p. 34).7 Dessler, G. (2011). Human Resource Management. 12th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall (p. 22).8 Seaman, D. F. & Fellenz, R. A. (1989). Effective Strategies for Teaching Adults. Columbus, OH.: Merrill Publishing (p. 8).9 Kasworm, C., Rose, A. & Ross-Gordon, J. (2010). Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education. 2010 ed. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage
Paper ID #5971Faculty Development Through Industrial InternshipDr. Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University, San Marcos Vedaraman Sriraman is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Texas State University- San Marcos. In the past, he has served as the Manufacturing Engineering program coordinator, Chair of the Department of Engineering Technology and Assistant Dean in the College of Science at Texas State University. He has received several gramts form the NSF and SME-EF to initiate new curriculum and laboratories. Dr. Sriraman has received several teaching awards and has served as the faculty advisor to
to $500,000 In 2019.” [Online]. Available: https://cybersecurityventures.com/career-news/. [Accessed: 18-Dec-2019].[11] “Cybersecurity is heading into a recruitment crisis: Here’s how we fix the problem | ZDNet.” [Online]. Available: https://www.zdnet.com/article/cybersecurity-is-heading-into- a-recruitment-crisis-heres-how-we-fix-the-problem/. [Accessed: 26-Nov-2019].[12] “State of Cybersecurity 2019 Part 1: Current Trends in Workforce Development,” 2019.[13] B. Nelson, “Computer science: Hacking into the cyberworld,” Nature, vol. 506, no. 7489, pp. 517–519, Feb. 2014.[14] “2018 State of Computer Science Education Policy and Implementation Advocacy Coalition.”[15] “Only 3 Percent Of U.S. Bachelor’s Degree Grads Have
their organizations to more fully embrace lean project management approaches.As part of the end-of-course evaluation students are asked: • To self-rate their achievement of specific learning goals for the course; • To rate the quality of various elements of the course (e.g., readings, web conferences, individual assignments, discussion forums, quality of interactions with faculty, responses to requests for help); • To identify the most valuable and least valuable lessons; • To suggest at least one improvement for the course; • To rate and comment on their team project experience; and • To rate the usefulness of what they learned in the course to (a) their current responsibilities or job, and (b
strategiesand pedagogical practice. We presume that courses in which “active learning” andother interactive learning activities are being supported with the tools availableoverall create a learning environment that is more engaging for learners. We furtherassume then that the use of these tools in the TEL project courses suggests the surgeteam has been successful in influencing faculty to use these tools. Faculty(Attachment B) and student (Attachment C) surveys and focus groups wereconducted to gather evidence to support or refute these assumptions.Technology Use and DevelopmentThe state of e-Learning within the College of Engineering (CoE) and other science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines at the University ofWisconsin
internal expenses and the remaining 40 percent ($68.5 billion) contributed to external expenses.” Page 25.1472.3 1 Green, Michael & McGill, Erin (2011). State of the Industry Report, 2011. Alexandria, VA: American Society forTraining & Development Research. 2| In 2006, the authors conducted a focus group with multiple corporate attendees from thefollowing industry areas (with emphasis on their engineers): a. Architecture b. Computer hardware c. Computer software d. Energy e. Government f. High tech g
applicability to needed employment skills? Given the many demands on the new cohort of program participants, what impact might be expected to time to graduation? Will the average age of the professional learner go up with the above presented life-phase shift? Will there be greater need for career and financial services in support of the many Page 26.1559.17 competing economic considerations?References1 Levine, A. & Dean, D. (2013). Generation on a Tightrope. San Francisco, CA.: John Wiley and Sons.2 Gurian, M. and Annis, B. (2008). Leadership and the sexes: Using gender science to create success in
acquisition, we had anticipatedattendees would recommend the design and implementation of a certificate program that couldbe offered through one or more academic institutions. However, they explicitly and emphaticallyrejected this option and much preferred knowledge acquisition via informal interpersonalmechanisms. There was also a slight preference for expert-led workshops, with a generic agendaas follows: 1. What challenges do you want to address? 2. Categorize the challenges with respect to type of change to be implemented a. Level of aggregation -- course level, dept level, college level b. Focus -- interpersonal, content, pedagogy, etc. 3. What success or failure stories to you have to share that give "lessons learned"? 4. What
Signal Processing etc. He has published 40 papers in National/International Conferences/Journals and he has Co-authored two books. He is Member of IEEE and life member of ISTEProf. Jayantrao Bhaurao Patil, R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur, India Jayantrao B. Patil is working as the Principal at the R. C. Patel institute of Technology, Shirpur, India and holds appointment as a Professor in the Department of Computer Engineering. He is also serving as a Dean, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Member of Senate, Member of Academic Council, and Chairman of Board of Studies in Computer Engineering & Information Technology at the North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon, India. Jayantrao’s research
staff. We found that people have strengths in - a. Strategy (leadership, communication) b. People (leadership) c. Projects (program management) d. Processes (business and financial operations, compliance issues) 2. Group similar programs and projects, and processes together. 3. Self-assign each category of task to a specific person depending on his or her SWKSA. 4. Provide professional development to staff. 5. Meet quarterly to measure progress. 6. Plan to self-assess again using IQMBT to see how far we advanced.As people played their strengths in operating processes to achieve success in projects andprograms, the levels in each criterion were higher in the self-assessment process. At thebeginning
the program gives good results.As an example, the results of the 2012-2013 academic year program polls are given. Theprogram participants and the leaders of the industry training departments were interviewed.The interviews gave the following results.1. Have you obtained a lot of new information during the program?a) Almost all information was new for me.b) I knew some facts, but most of the information was new for me.c) I knew almost everything; however, my knowledge was structured in the course of theprogram.d) I did not learn anything new.The majority of the program participants chose the “b” answer.2. Name the modules or parts of the program which were underdeveloped and did notmeet your requirements.None of the program
AC 2010-1217: CHALLENGES FACING CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENT FOR TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION IN THE IRISH SECONDLEVEL SYSTEMDiarmuid McCarthy, University of LimerickNiall Seery, University of LimerickSeamus Gordon, University of Limerick Page 15.273.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Challenges facing continuous professional development for technology education in Irish second level educationAs the demand for graduates of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematicsincreases, fewer second level students are choosing to pursue a third levelqualification within the STEM disciplines. This dichotomous relationship iscompounded by the recent trend showing
telephone and email,it is now possible to render academic assistance at a high level of effectiveness in both real-time/asynchronous settings across distance using various technical platforms. The educationalefficacy of several of these new modern communication tools, and the experiences with them,are discussed here.PlatformsThe synergistic combination of high-speed broadband internet and small, deployable cameras hasgreatly improved the ability of students and teachers to have meaningful, real time academiccommunications over video-conferencing platforms. Here is a brief review of the availableplatforms and services capable of accomplishing distance-based office hours:Apple FaceTimeApple’s FaceTime service is a traditional video-chat service that
2006-1281: CONTENT ENRICHMENT - EXPLOITING THE CYCLE FROMACADEMIA TO INDUSTRY TO ACADEMIAJohn Robertson, Arizona State University John Robertson is a professor in the College of Science and Technology at the ASU Polytechnic in Mesa, Arizona. His research interests are in process control and data management for integrated circuit production, especially novel non-volatile memories. From 1994 to 2001, he was a Director in Motorola’s Semiconductor Products Sector and before that, he held the Lothian Chair of Microelectronics at Edinburgh University, UK.Joseph Tidwell, Boeing Co. Joseph P Tidwell was the Coordinator of Engineering and Technical Education for the Boeing Company at Mesa, AZ from
assigned to the two groups each time. Students were pre and post-tested bysurvey. The students attempted to answer questions involving basic linear and angular impulseand momentum questions. They were also surveyed as to their perceived understanding of thematerial addressed in the survey and their willingness to have their responses included in thestudy being performed.IntroductionThe author is an instructor for a university that provides classes in the traditional classroomlecture format as well as streaming the same lecture synchronously over the internet to studentsoff-campus. A brief experiment was devised in an effort to determine if there was a measurabledifference between the performances of the students receiving the lecture in-person
Paper ID #16892Piloting Accessible Engineering Education OnlineRachel LeBlanc, WPI Rachel LeBlanc is the Executive Director of Corporate and Professional Education at Worcester Polytech- nic Institute. She manages the portfolio of non-traditional academic programs for the University including online programs, corporate education, and professional education. Rachel has over ten years of experi- ence working with faculty and industry experts to create education solutions to meet business needs. She manages a variety of functional areas including business development, marketing, product development, and operations
Paper ID #21776The Impact of Free Lunch on Attendance at Voluntary Teacher TrainingDr. Todd Easton, Kansas State University Todd Easton received a B.S. in Mathematics with a minor in Statistics from Brigham Young University (1993), an M.S. in Operations Research from Stanford University (1994) and a Ph.D. in Industrial En- gineering from Georgia Institute of Technology (1999). He worked as a post-doctoral fellow at Georgia Institute of Technology until 2001, when he joined the Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineer- ing department at Kansas State University. He is a University Distinguished Teaching Scholar and an
AC 2008-1109: RISK MANAGEMENT – ARE ENGINEERS THE PROBLEM ORTHE SOLUTION?John Robertson, Arizona State University John Robertson is a Professor in the Electronic Systems Department at Arizona State University Polytechnic. He was formerly an executive with Motorola and now participates in many senior technical training programs with the JACMET consortium.Joseph Tidwell, Arizona State University Joe Tidwell is Managing Director of the JACMET consortium for industry technical training. He was formerly with the Boeing company and his current activities include ASEE industry programs and Project Lead-the-Way.Ronald Thomas, Raytheon Ron Thomas manages Raytheon’s Corporate Learning Center. He is
Paper ID #14162Building opportunities for College Completion in the U.S.: The Arizona StateUniversity and Starbucks PartnershipMr. Jeffrey S. Goss, Arizona State University Jeffrey Goss has served as the Executive Director for the Office of Global Outreach and Extended Education and Assistant Dean in the Ira A Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University for the past seven years. Mr. Goss has more than 18 years experience in professional and executive education collectively at University of Maryland, George Washington University, University of Michigan, and Arizona State University. At ASU’s Fulton
The Shaping of Virginia Tech’s International Engineering Education ProgramAbstractVirginia Tech’s strategic plan recognizes the need for its engineering graduates to have a moreglobal outlook. Today’s engineer is more likely than ever to interact with people from avariety of cultures and to be involved with projects that span across continents. Theinstitutional goal of increasing students’ global awareness put more focus on establishing aninternational department at the Dean’s level in the College of Engineering. This paper willdiscuss the development of this office and the administrative efforts to raise the percentage ofthe university’s engineering students going abroad. It will show how to use existing
and Human Resources. Dr. Springer possesses a significant strength in pattern recognition, analyzing and improving organizational systems. He is internationally recognized, has contributed to scholarship more than 200 books, articles, presentations, editorials and reviews on software development methodologies, management, organizational change, and program management. Dr. Springer sits on many university and community boards and advisory committees. He is the recipient of numerous awards and recognitions, most recently, the Purdue University, College of Technology, Equity, Inclusion and Advocacy Award. Dr. Springer is the President of the Indiana Council for Continuing Education as well as the Chair of the
-231-8822, zhi.ge@ndsu.edu.Charles McIntyre, North Dakota State University Charles McIntyre is on the faculty of the Department of Construction Management and Engineering at North Dakota State University. He received his Ph.D. from Penn State in 1996. As an active member of the North Midwest Section of ASEE, Dr. McIntyre is currently the Chair of the North Midwest Section and the Campus Representative at NDSU, as well as, the Chair Elect of ASEE Zone III. As a Campus Rep he has won number awards for recruiting and retaining faculty for membership in ASEE. He has several ASEE publications in the areas of active and cooperative learning. At NDSU he is very active in a number of
Paper ID #24608Changing U.S. Age, Racial, and Ethnic Demographics and Its Impact onHigher EducationDr. Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette Dr. Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Dr. Springer currently serves as an Executive Director for Purdue University’s Polytechnic Institute lo- cated in West Lafayette, Indiana. He has over thirty-five years of theoretical and defense industry-based practical experience from four disciplines: software engineering, systems engineering, program manage- ment and human resources. Dr. Springer possesses a significant strength in
Research programs. Fletcher is the Vice President of Fraser Technical Consulting, where her responsibilities include services specializ- ing in software data management, proposal management, and technical publications. She was previously employed by Solipsys Corporation (now Raytheon Solipsys), where she held the following positions: Data Management Group Supervisor, Assistant Program Manager for DD(X), and Corporate Proposal Manager. Fletcher is a member of the following organizations: American Association of Engineering Ed- ucation, American Society for Engineering Management, Society of Technical Communications, Women in Engineering ProActive Network, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Wyoming Geological Associa
in undergraduate engineering students. Dr. Finelli leads a national initiative to create a taxonomy/keyword outline for the field of en- gineering education research, and she is past Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of the American Society of Engineering Education.Dr. Joanna Mirecki Millunchick, University of Michigan Joanna Mirecki Millunchick is a professor of materials science and engineering at the University of Michi- gan. She is active in scientific and pedagogical research. Her current work in education research revolves around examining student use of multimedia resources such as screencasts to improve their performance in large lecture courses. She is also the current Academic
Paper ID #19778Applying Backward Design Principles to Online Continuing Education CourseDesign and Development for Working ProfessionalsMr. Hiro Iino, Iowa State University Hiro Iino is the Director of the Professional Development (PD) Program in Engineering-LAS Online Learning at Iowa State University. The program offers non-credit short courses to working engineers who are seeking just-in-time courses, continuing education units (CEU), and professional development hours (PDH). He has over eighteen years of experience working with faculty and industry experts to develop online education programs. Hiro received a B.S. in
2006-1872: CUBISM IN EDUCATION, FLEXING TO ALL PATRONS’ NEEDS FOREDUCATION, LEARNING STYLES, CULTURES…Mani Mina, Iowa State University Page 11.377.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Cubism in education: Flexing to all patrons’ needs for education, learning styles, cultures…AbstractThis paper will consider the use of technology as a medium for innovation in engineeringeducation, which can certainly be expanded to all fields and disciplines. For the most part,technology has been invading all classes and subjects. From kindergarten to college graduates,all students and educators have been influenced by the
AC 2012-5163: TRAINING ENGINEERING TEACHERS ONLINE FORPRACTICE AND APPLICATION OF TEAM-BASED LEARNING (TBL)Ms. Pil-Won On, University of Missouri, Columbia Pil-Won On, Instructional Designer/E-learning Specialist, College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, has a M.S. in instructional systems technology, Indiana University, Bloomington.Dr. Robert O’Connell, University of Missouri, Columbia Robert O’Connell received the B.E. degree in electrical engineering from Manhattan College, N.Y., and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana. He is cur- rently professor and Associate Department Head of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of
2006-841: EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES: WHAT WORKS, WHAT DOESN’TWORK, AND WHYEugene Rutz, University of Cincinnati Eugene Rutz is Director of Distance Learning and Manager of the ACCEND programs in the College of Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. He is a registered professional engineer with industry experience and administrative experience in academia. Mr. Rutz has taught courses in the traditional classroom setting as well as with a number of educational technolgies. Page 11.512.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Educational Technologies: What Works, What Doesn’t Work, and
2006-2520: INVESTIGATION OF DEVELOPING AND DELIVERING ON-LINECOURSES IN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTZhili Gao, North Dakota State University Dr. Gao is an Assistant Professor of Construction in the Department of Engineering Technology at Missouri Western State University. He can be reached at the Department of Engineering Technology, Wilson Hall, 4525 Downs Dr., St. Joseph, Missouri 64507, 816-271-4561, zgao@missouriwestern.edu.Virendra Varma, Missouri Western State University Dr. Varma, P.E., F. ASCE, is a Professor of Construction, and the Chairman of the Department of Engineering Technology at Missouri Western State University. He has presented and published extensively in engineering