graduatestudents in helping bring our manuscript to fruition. References 1. Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2. Lovitts, B. (2004). Research on the structure and process of graduate education: Retaining students. In D.H. Wulff, A.E. Austin & Associates, Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 115-136). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 3. Allum, J.R., Kent, J.D., & McCarthy, M.T. (2014). Understanding Ph.D. career pathways for program improvement: A CGS Report. Washington, D.C.: Council of Graduate Schools. 4. Lovitts, B. (2001
. Educ., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2013.[2] J. P. Gee, “Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education,” Rev. Res. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 99–125, 2000.[3] D. M. Wilson, P. Bell, D. Jones, and L. Hansen, “A cross-sectional study of belonging in engineering communities,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 687–698, 2010.[4] B. E. . 1960- Lovitts, Leaving the ivory tower : the causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.[5] B. E. Ashforth and S. A. Johnson, “Which hat to wear?: The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts,” in Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts, no. January 2001, M. A. Hogg and D. J
andrepresent individual pieces of students' knowledge or strategies of reasoning3. These facets wereclustered within particular domains of understanding, such as force and motion. For each cluster,facets were organized as: (a) appropriate or acceptable understanding for introductory physics,(b) arising from formal instruction, but either overgeneralized or undergeneralized in application,or (c) more problematic and needing instructional intervention to prevent student difficulty withthe cluster or ideas in related clusters3. This information was used in turn to develop items inwhich the answer choices were associated with specific facets of student thinking. In summary,Minstrell recommends the use of qualitative research strategies, such as open-ended
engineering education research”. Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Ed. Johri, Aditya, and Barbara M. Olds. Cambridge University Press, 2014. Page 26.1051.1628. Campbell, John L., et al. "Coding in-depth semistructured interviews problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement." Sociological Methods & Research (2013).29. Miles, Mattheu B., and A. Michael Huberman. "Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods." Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods. Sage publications, 1984.30. Livingstone, D. W. “Adults’ informal learning: definitions, findings, gaps and future
Paper ID #34866Use of Scrum in a Virtual Environment to Enhance Collaboration andSystemic Reasoning of Engineering StudentsDr. Gibr´an Sayeg-S´anchez, Tecnologico de Monterrey Dr. Gibr´an Sayeg-S´anchez is professor – consultant in the Science Department in Tecnologico de Mon- terrey, Puebla campus. He studied a PhD in Financial Science in EGADE Business School (2016), a MSc in Industrial Engineering in Tecnologico de Monterrey (2011), and a BEng in Industrial and Systems En- gineering in Tecnologico de Monterrey (2006). Dr. Sayeg-S´anchez has more than 10 years of experience in teaching statistics, mathematics, and
Paper ID #26796Work in Progress: Student to Scholar: A Learning Community Model forProfessional Skills DevelopmentDr. Matthew Frenkel, New York University Matthew Frenkel is the engineering librarian at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, and an adjunct faculty in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon. He is a member of the ASEE Engineering librarian division (ELD). Matthew’s background is in the experimental study of optical whispering gallery sensors, but his current research interests are in how undergraduate and graduate engineering students develop their professional skills.Dr. Jack Bringardner, New York University Jack
Paper ID #26399Work in Progress: Understanding Student Self-regulation During Engineer-ing Problem Solving: A Preliminary StudyDr. Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Dr. Oenardi Lawanto is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, USA. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa State University, his M.S.E.E. from the University of Dayton, and his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Before coming to Utah State, Dr. Lawanto taught and held several administrative positions at one large private university in In- donesia. He has developed and delivered
AC 2007-2763: A SERVICE LEARNING PROJECT IN DIGITAL MEDIADESIGNED TO DEVELOP PROFESSIONAL SKILLSCher Cornett, East Tennessee State University Cher Cornett, Associate Professor, is the Director of the Niswonger Digital Media Center at East Tennessee State University. She has worked professionally as a graphic designer and illustrator for over 25 years and has been involved in developing interactive multimedia products for over 16 years, including pioneering work in interactive instructional product design at Florida State University. Prior to coming to ETSU, she coordinated the Interactive Multimedia Masters Degree Program at Southern Illinois University; chaired the Graphic Arts Technology program
AC 2008-1347: THE FOUR-DOMAIN DEVELOPMENT DIAGRAM: A TOOL FORDESIGNING DEVELOPMENT-CENTERED TEACHINGLinda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State UniversityTrevor Harding, California Polytechnic State UniversityWilliam Hughes, California Polytechnic State University Page 13.1231.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The Four-Domain Development Diagram: A tool for designing development-centered teachingAbstractResearch in education has brought to light the complexity of the learning process, demonstratingthat students' development is influenced by a myriad of cultural and social factors, as well as theenvironment in which learning takes
AC 2008-950: WILL I SUCCEED IN ENGINEERING? USINGEXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY IN A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OFSTUDENTS’ BELIEFSHolly Matusovich, Purdue UniversityRuth Streveler, Purdue UniversityHeidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of MinesRonald Miller, Colorado School of MinesBarbara Olds, Colorado School of Mines Page 13.1403.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Will I Succeed in Engineering? Using Expectancy-Value Theory in a Longitudinal Investigation of Students’ BeliefsAbstractThis multi-case study qualitatively and inductively examines undergraduate engineeringstudents’ expectancies for success as engineers as well as how these
AC 2008-1034: FROM PIE TO APPLES: THE EVOLUTION OF A SURVEYINSTRUMENT TO EXPLORE ENGINEERING STUDENT PATHWAYSHelen Chen, Stanford UniversityKrista Donaldson, Stanford UniversityOzgur Eris, Franklin W. Olin College of EngineeringDebbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of EngineeringGary Lichtenstein, Stanford UniversitySheri Sheppard, Stanford UniversityGeorge Toye, Stanford University Page 13.633.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 From PIE to APPLES: The Evolution of a Survey Instrument to Explore Engineering Student PathwaysAbstractThe Academic Pathways Study (APS) of the Center for the
AC 2009-878: A REVISITED STUDY ON THE USE OF CLICKER TECHNOLOGYTO EVALUATE SHORT-TERM CONCEPT RETENTIONAdam Czekanski, United States Military Academy ADAM J. CZEKANSKI is an instructor in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. He teaches introductory courses in environmental science, environmental engineering, and hydrogeology. Mr. Czekanski’s academic and research interests include engineering education and drinking water treatment in developing nations. Mr. Czekanski is a licensed professional engineer in the Commonwealth of Virginia.David Roux, United States Military Academy DAVID-MICHAEL P. ROUX is an instructor
AC 2009-1304: DOES MAJOR MATTER? A LOOK AT WHAT MOTIVATESENGINEERING STUDENTS IN DIFFERENT MAJORSSarah Parikh, Stanford University Sarah Parikh is a third year graduate student at Stanford University working on her PhD in mechanical engineering with a focus on engineering education. She received a BS in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2006 and received a MS in mechanical engineering with a focus on microscale heat transfer from Stanford University in 2008.Helen Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is Research Scientist at the Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning and Research Associate in the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. Her
AC 2009-1546: A REFUTATION OF THE PERCENTAGES OFTEN ASSOCIATEDWITH EDGAR DALE'S "CONE OF LEARNING"James Stice, University of Texas, Austin Page 14.96.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Refutation of the Percentages Often Associated with Edgar Dale’s “Cone of Learning” In a 1987 article on using the Kolb cycle to improve student learning, I mentioned Edgar Dale’s “Cone of Learning,” which has resulted lately in a lot of requests for more information on the source of the data supporting his intuitive model. Recent attempts to obtain the source of the numbers attached to Dale’s model indicate that the
AC 2009-653: DEVELOPING A RUBRIC TO ASSESS CRITICAL THINKING INASSIGNMENTS WITH AN OPEN-ENDED COMPONENTKaren Alfrey, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Karen Alfrey is Director of the Undergraduate Program in Biomedical Engineering at IUPUI. Her areas of focus include computational neuroscience and biological modeling, undergraduate mentoring and advising, curriculum development, and assessment. She holds a PhD in Electrical Engineering from Rice University.Elaine Cooney, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Elaine Cooney is professor of electrical and computer engineering technology at IUPUI. She is the author of RFID+ The Complete Review of Radio Frequency
AC 2009-143: A METHOD FOR IMPROVING PAIRED COLLABORATIVELEARNING THROUGH APPROACHES OF SYSTEM ENGINEERINGKazuhiro Shin-ike, Maizuru National College of Technology Page 14.51.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Page 14.51.2Page 14.51.3Page 14.51.4Page 14.51.5Page 14.51.6Page 14.51.7Page 14.51.8Page 14.51.9Page 14.51.10Page 14.51.11Page 14.51.12Page 14.51.13Page 14.51.14Page 14.51.15Page 14.51.16
Paper ID #27151Integration of a Local Wicked Problem into the Environmental EngineeringLaboratory CurriculumMiss Adaline M. Buerck, University of South Florida Adaline M. Buerck is currently pursuing a PhD in Environmental Engineering with an emphasis in Inter- national Development and the University of South Florida (USF). Her research interest are based around clean water and developing nations. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering in May 2016 and her M.S. in Civil Engineering in May 2018 from Saint Louis University. She currently works as a Teaching Assis- tant and a Research Assistant at USF. She also holds
Paper ID #15847Blended Faculty Training: Modeling Learner-centered Pedagogy in a NewFaculty Teaching SeminarDr. John Tingerthal, Northern Arizona University John Tingerthal joined the Construction Management faculty at Northern Arizona University in 2007 and was appointed as a Distinguished Teaching Fellow in 2015. His engineering career spans a variety of design and forensic engineering experiences. He spent the first eight years of his career performing structural consulting engineering in Chicago. He earned his Doctorate in Education and is currently the Associate Chair of the Civil Engineering, Construction
Paper ID #15038The Impact of Project-based Learning on Engagement as a Function of Stu-dent DemographicsMs. Alyssa Bellingham, Drexel University Alyssa Bellingham is currently an electrical engineering Ph.D candidate at Drexel University. She re- cieved her B.S/M.S degrees in electrical engineering from Drexel University in 2012 and has a degree in materials engineering from Politecnico di Milano. As a National Science Foundation Stem GK-12 Pro- gram fellow, she has been teaching a robotics course at the Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia.Mr. John Kamal, Science Leadership Academy John teaches young people
Paper ID #9097Why I Am an Engineering Major: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergradu-ate StudentsDr. Louis Nadelson, Boise State University Louis S. Nadelson is an associate professor in the College of Education at Boise State University, with a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher professional development, program evaluation, multidis- ciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and college math, science, and engineering teaching to frame his research on STEM teaching
Paper ID #13356”Conceptual Change” as a guiding principle for the professional developmentof teaching staffClaudia M Walter, DiZ - Center for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Claudia M. Walter has a Masters degree in Education from the University of Regensburg, Germany. Since 2005, she has been planning and directing faculty development workshops at the Center for Teaching and Learning of the Bavarian Universities of Applied Science (DiZ). In 2009, Claudia became the deputy director of the Center. She is currently pursuing her doctorate in Education on a topic related to faculty development.Prof. Christian H Kautz
Paper ID #13427The Role of Outlier Analysis in Reducing Purposeful Sampling Bias: A Se-quential Mixed-Method ApproachMariana Tafur, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mariana Tafur is a Ph.D. candidate and a graduate assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She has a M.S., in Education at Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia; and a B.S., in Electrical Engineering at Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia. She is a 2010 Fulbright Fellow. Her research interests include engineering skills development, STEM for non-engineers adults, motivation in STEM to close the technology literacy gap, STEM
Paper ID #11875Continuously Improving a Diversity-Bolstering System through IntegratingQuantitative and Qualitative Engineering GoldShirt Program FacetsJacquelyn F. Sullivan Ph.D., University of Colorado, Boulder As Associate Dean for Inclusive Excellence, Sullivan spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering GoldShirt Program to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier stu- dents not admitted through the standard admissions process . Sullivan was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Edu- cation. She
Paper ID #15997Voicing the Indescribable - Using Photo Elicitation as a Method to UncoverBelonging and CommunityDr. Nicole P. Pitterson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nicole is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She holds a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University and other degrees in Manufacturing Engineering from Western Illinois Univer- sity and a B.Sc. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Technology, Jamaica. Her research interest is eliciting conceptual understanding of AC circuit concepts using active learning strategies.Mr. Juan David Ortega-Alvarez
Paper ID #19109A Preliminary Exploration of the Role of Surveys In Student Reflection andBehaviorMs. Amber Dale Levine, Stanford University Amber Levine is pursuing her Bachelors degree in Engineering with a focus in Architectural Design and a minor in Dance at Stanford University. She is particularly interested in education and inclusiveness in engineering.Dr. Tua A. Bj¨orklund, Aalto University Design Factory Dr. Bj¨orklund focuses on supporting idea development efforts in product design, entrepreneurship and teaching in higher education. She has been a part of creating the Aalto University Design Factory, an
Paper ID #19316A Socio-cognitive Framework and Method for Studying Technology-mediatedProblem SolvingDarren K. Maczka, Virginia Tech Darren Maczka is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His background is in control systems engineering and information systems design and he received his B.S. in Computer Sys- tems Engineering from The University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He has several years of experience teaching and developing curricula in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech.Dr. Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering
Paper ID #22543Open Educational Resources in the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum:A Materials Science Case StudyMr. Amir Behbahanian, Utah State University I‘m a Ph.D. Studen at the Mechanical and Aerospace engineering department of Utah State University, my main area of research is Nano Thermal Analysis. I also had the chance to be the TA of material science for two semesters.Erin L. Davis, Utah State UniversityProf. Nick A. Roberts, Utah State University Prof. Roberts is an Assistant Professor at Utah State University where his research is focused on the fundamental study of material behavior, specifically
Paper ID #23811WIP: Student and Faculty Experience with Blended Learning in a First-YearChemistry for Engineers CourseDr. Eline Boghaert, University of Waterloo Eline Boghaert is a lecturer in the Chemical Engineering department at the University of Waterloo. Before joining the faculty at the University of Waterloo she taught mathematics at Hopewell Valley Central High School in New Jersey. Her current research interests focus on engineering education and studying how students learn, to improve teaching and learning at the University of Waterloo.Dr. Jason Grove P.E., University of Waterloo Jason Grove is the Graduate
Paper ID #31669Exploration of Degree Program Change: A Novel Use of Nearest NeighborClassifiersDr. George D. Ricco, University Of Indianapolis George D. Ricco is an assistant professor of engineering and first-year engineering coordinator at the University of Indianapolis. He focuses his work between teaching the first two years of introductory en- gineering and engineering design and research in student progression. Previously, he was a special title series assistant professor in electrical engineering at the University of Kentucky, and the KEEN Program Coordinator at Gonzaga University in the School of Engineering and
AC 2007-1849: A COMPARISON OF ATTITUDES ABOUT ENGINEERINGBETWEEN INTRODUCTORY DESIGN STUDENTS IN DIFFERENT PROGRAMSLinda Lindsley, Arizona State UniversityVeronica Burrows, Arizona State University Page 12.18.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Comparison of Attitudes about Engineering between Introductory Design Students in Different ProgramsAbstractThis paper discusses the difference in attitudes about engineering between students enrolled intwo different types of engineering design courses: standard introduction to engineering designoffered to freshman engineering majors and a course in engineering design offered to in