typically cannot be formed using the snap-cubesEach lab group consisted of 20 students with a range of spatial visualization abilities (Table3). Rather than looking on this as a hindrance, we decided to empower students in variousways. An example of this can be explained through the revolving activity shown in Figure 5.Rather than solely converging on the solution (which is B), students were encouraged todiscuss in pairs or groups why the other three options were incorrect. Students typicallysketched the profile of the objects or created 3D models in SolidWorks. Page 26.286.7 Figure 5 – Looking beyond the solutionWe
. Again, these laboratory practicals were graded on a 20point scale. Students were told that they had to model the taper of the marker body, the capindentions and overall shape, as well as the necessary rounds and chamfers. Students were alsorequired to relate the size of the cap to the size of the octagon at the end of the marker body(similar to the relation required in the original laboratory practical). a. b. Figure 3. Photo (a.) and CAD Model (b.) of Marker Used for Lab Practical in Semester 2.CAM Course Laboratory Exercises a
theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.5. Gredler, M. (2009). Learning and instruction; Theory into practice (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.6. Hartman, N. W., & Branoff, T. J. (2005). Learning theories: Applications for instruction in constraint-based solid modeling and other engineering graphics topics. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 69 (2), 6-15.7. Schmittau, J. (2003). Cultural-historical theory and mathematics education. In: Kozulin A, Gindis B, Ageyev V, Miller S (ed), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.8. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes
erase all lines. Zoom and Pan=> pinch two fingers to zoom in or out. Move both fingers to pan.Sketch Grading and Assignment Navigation • When done with a sketch press “Submit.” If your solution is correct you will move on to the nextA)assignment, otherwise you will be asked Correct Sketch to try again. B) Incorrect Copies Sketch with of your Peek at submitted Solution assignments are sent to the Spatial
Paper ID #13075Engineering Graphics Concepts: A Delphi StudyDr. Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mary A. Sadowski has been at Purdue since 2003 and until September 1, 2011 served as the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Learning in the Purdue College of Technology where she provided leadership for strategic initiatives in undergraduate education. As a professor of Computer Graphics, her research interests include enhancing visualization skills, cre- ative thinking, and learning styles. She is currently funded to begin gathering data to create a concept inventory for engineering graphics. As
Paper ID #12499Transforming a Computer Graphics Department from Traditional EducationMethods to a Polytechnic ApproachDr. Patrick E. Connolly, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Patrick Connolly is a professor and interim department head of the Department of Computer Graph- ics Technology in the College of Technology at Purdue University. He has extensive experience in the aerospace design and CAD/CAE software industries, and has been serving in higher education for almost twenty years. Dr. Connolly has a BS degree in Design and Graphics Technology and an MS in Com- puter Integrated Manufacturing from Brigham Young
it through one of five diagrams ofan aperture. For Keyhole problems, once the object starts through the aperture, it cannot beturned in space. Figure 1 shows a sample problem from the keyhole portion of the test. Figure 1. Keyhole problems from the PAT (Correct answer is A)The second type of problem on the PAT is called the Top/Front/End problem. Theseproblems are essentially missing view problems where students are presented with two viewsof an object, e.g., the top and front views, and they must choose the missing view from thechoices given. Figure 2 shows an example problem from the Top/Front/End portion of thePAT. Figure 2. Top/Front/End problems from the PAT (Correct answer is B
Paper ID #11432Enhancing a Blended Learning Approach to CAD Instruction Using LeanManufacturing PrinciplesDr. Derek M Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University Dr. Yip-Hoi received his Ph.D. from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1997. His dissertation research focused on developing Computer-Aided Process Planning methods and software tools to support automation of machining on Mill/Turn machining centers. In 2003 he joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia. His appointment included a position as junior chair of the NSERC
Paper ID #12027Using Peer Review in a Freshman Engineering Graphics Course to EnhanceUnderstanding of Basic Dimensioning TechniquesDr. Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University, Erie Nancy E. Study is on the faculty of the School of Engineering at Penn State Erie - The Behrend College where she teaches courses in engineering graphics and rapid prototyping, and is the coordinator of the rapid prototyping lab. Her research interests include visualization and haptics. She is a former chair of the ASEE Engineering Design Graphics Division and is currently the Circulation Manager and Treasurer of the Engineering Design
Paper ID #12654Comparison of On-line versus Paper Spatial Testing MethodsMs. Norma L Veurink, Michigan Technological University Norma Veurink is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Michigan Techno- logical University where she teaches introductory engineering courses and a spatial visualization course designed for engineering students with poorly developed spatial visualization skills. Ms. Veurink man- ages several summer programs that introduce middle and high school students to engineering. She is active in the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE.Dr. A. J. Hamlin, Michigan
Paper ID #13533Improving Student Learning Experience in an Engineering Graphics Class-room through a Rapid Feedback and Re-submission CycleDr. Vimal Viswanathan, Tuskegee University Dr. Vimal Viswanathan is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Tuskegee University. He earned his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University. His research interests include design innovation, creativity, design theory and engineering education.Dr. Maria Calhoun Charlton, Tuskegee University Page 26.925.1
Paper ID #12872Confidence - A Path to Mastering Challenge, Exploring strategies to strengthenstudents’ confidence in graphical expression through transformative experi-encesMs. Monika Herrmann, University of Wisconsin, Stout About the Author Monika Herrmann is an assistant professor in the Engineering and Technology depart- ment at the University of Wisconsin Stout. She holds professional licenses in Architecture and Interior Architecture in Germany and the USA and is practicing in the design field for about 25 years. Research interests include sustainability with an emphasis on building performance and on design strategies to
plane of Fig. 7c is chosen tobe the top, though the front or right plane could the used. The top plane is the default inAutoCAD 3D space, so no switching of view direction is necessary. Fig. 7d shows the sketch ofthe profile for Fig. 7b on the front plane while Fig. 7e shows the sketch of the profile for Fig. 7con the top plane. This completes the planning phase for Example 1. a) b) c) d) Fig. 8: Example 1 segments a) b) c
in various forms. a. Classroom – Basics of orthographic projection b. Classroom – Creating 3-D foam models of parts c. AutoCAD to solve orthographic projection problems d. Classroom – Basics of isometric drawings e. Classroom – Basics of auxiliary views f. Classroom – Basics of sectional views g. AutoCAD and Inventor to create auxiliary views h. Inventor to create sectional views i. Classroom – Exercises in descriptive geometry II. Learning software. a. AutoCAD basics, then introducing new commands as needed each class session b. Learning by practice – using AutoCAD to solve visualization problems and create drawings c. Inventor basics, then introducing new
Fluids Calc I Engineering pro gram at Daniel Webster Co llege, at graduatio n, will have demo nstrated: an ability to apply kno wledge o f a mathematics, science, and I I I I I I I I I R I R R R R R engineering an ability to design and co nduct b experiments, as well as to I I I I I R
Paper ID #12423Visual Modeling of Chinese Temple Construction for Student EducationAdrian Hadipriono Tan, The Ohio State University Adrian H. Tan is a graduate student at the Ohio State University. He has a B.S. in Computer Science and Engineering and an M.S. in Civil Engineering from the Ohio State University, and is currently working towards a Ph.D. in civil engineering and construction with a focus on computer graphics and virtual simulation for engineering education.Mr. Shilun Hao, The Ohio State University Shilun Hao is a graduate student at the Ohio State University. He has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from the