engineering faculty attitudes and practices. Journal of Library Administration, 51(5-6), 432-454.4. Laakso, M., & Bjork, B.-C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 124. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741- 7015/10/1245. Bhat, M. H. (2009). Open access publishing in Indian premier research institutions. Information Research, 14(3). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/14-3/paper409.html6. Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Goerner, B., Darby, R., Hyppoelae, J., Igo-Kemenes, P., Kahn, D., Lambert, S., Lengenfelder, A., Leonard, C., Mele, S., Polydoratou, P., Ross, D., Ruiz-Perez, S., Schimmer, R., Swaisland, M
. & Mintz, S. “The Curricular and the Co-Curricular,” Inside Higher Ed. October 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/curricular-and-co-curricular. [Accessed April 12, 2021]. [8] Knight, D. B. & Novoselich, B. J., "Curricular and Co‐curricular Influences on Undergraduate Engineering Student Leadership", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 1, January, 2017). Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20153. [Accessed April 13, 2021]. [9] Burt, B. A., & Carpenter, D. D., & Finelli, C. J., & Harding, T. S., & Sutkus, J. A., & Holsapple, M., & Bielby, R. M., & Ra, E. (2011, June
-ratesAPPENDIX A. ELECTRONIC WORKSHOP SURVEY 1. How did you hear about this workshop? a. Science & Engineering Library website b. Email or newsletter c. Facebook d. Flyer or brochure e. Librarian referral f. Twitter g. Workshop calendar h. Other 2. Please rate your level of agreement with these statements about the session that you attended. Strongly Agree / Agree / Neither Agree nor Disagree / Disagree / Strongly Disagree The instructor presented the materials in a clear and understandable manner. The level of difficulty of the session was appropriate for my needs. The instruction session met my expectations. 3. Describe one thing you learned about in this session
Paper ID #13776Lending a Hand: Supporting the Maker Movement in Academic LibrariesAdam Rogers, North Carolina State University Libraries Adam Rogers is an innovative and user-focused librarian who works at the intersection of public services and new technologies. In his role as Emerging Technology Services Librarian based at NCSU’s new James B. Hunt Jr. Library, he planned for, launched, and currently manages the Hunt Library Makerspace which makes 3D printing, 3D scanning, laser cutting, and electronics prototyping tools accessible to all at NC State. He is also leading the development of a second, larger Makerspace, set
theindividual scores for each year’s presentations.Presentations were selected for analysis based on two criteria. First, we selected to ensure likewas compared to like. To do this, we created two grading silos: (a) Average performing students,and (b) Low performing students. This was done to eliminate the bias that might result fromcomparing high performing teams from one year to low performing teams in another. We basedour silos’ grade range on the University’s transcript guide and the course’s historical average. Apresentation was deemed to belong to the average performing silo if it received a B (between73% and 76%). Likewise, a low performing presentation scored a C (between 63% and 66%).Second, we selected for distinct evaluators for the
. Classification is intended to encompass “the whole body ofknowledge” and is divided into eight sections: A—Human Necessities; B—PerformingOperations and Transporting; C—Chemistry and Metallurgy; D—Textiles and Paper; E—FixedConstructions; F—Mechanical Engineering and Lighting and Heating and Weapons andBlasting; G—Physics; and H—Electricity. (The CPC added an additional category “Y” forcross-referencing purposes.) These sections are divided into a hierarchical classification systemwhich has further lower levels. When classifying an invention four specific areas of inventionare considered: 1) the invention’s intrinsic nature or function; 2) the invention’s particular use orpurpose; 3) the invention’s application; 4) the incorporation of an invention into
structuredtraining and mentoring will help current and future selectors develop these new skills in a moresystematic way than was possible in the past.References[1] K. Jensen, “No More Liaisons: Collection Management Strategies in Hard Times,” Collection Management, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 3-14, January 2008, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2016.1263812[2] B. Mehra, and A. Elder, “Benefits to Collection Development Librarians from Collaborating with “Community-Embedded” Librarians-In-Training,” Collection Management, vol. 43, no. 2, pp.120-137, February 2018, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2018.1426510[3] C. C. Wray, “Learning Collection Development and Management on the Job,” Collection Management, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 107-114, May 2016, doi
. It was also important that the engineering teamtook this information seriously and used it to formulate the final results.At the conclusion of the semester, the engineering student team gave a presentation for anyinterested staff in the library. The PowerPoint they used included drawings of the currentconfiguration of Technical Services as well as two potential new layouts (see Appendix B). Italso included pictures of new desk and chair options as well as suggestions as to how thefurniture could be configured. The presentation was well-attended and well-received. It gave thestaff an additional opportunity to ask questions and make comments. Following the presentation,the engineering student team sent out a short feedback survey asking for
in a lightweight andadaptable manner, engage with the College of Engineering community regarding theconstruction of the James B. Hunt Jr. Library on Centennial Campus, and develop serviceexpectations for this new facility. This paper and the accompanying poster will discuss theprogram, as well as trends observed and improvements made in the five semesters preceding theopening of Hunt Library.Introduction & BackgroundThe James B. Hunt Jr. Library opened in January 2013. A two hundred thousand square-footbuilding (containing both library and non-library spaces) on a satellite campus that waspreviously served through a small branch library, the Hunt Library represents a dramatic shift inthe level of library resources, spaces, and services
deliver the content effectively and achieve equalacademic outcomes, how can we improve the experience?Overall, given the limited timeframe in which to redesign the course and challengingcircumstances for all, achieving parity with last year’s outcomes is a win and we remainoptimistic that first year students are getting the foundational research skills they’ll need to besuccessful in their academic and professional careers as engineers.References [1] E. Cordell, A. Link, S. Freeman, R. Whalen, and B. Williams, “A First-year Engineering Information Literacy Workshop to Increase Student Awareness of Research Databases,” American Society for Engineering Education, Virtual Online, June 2020, doi: 10.18260/1
. Proceedings from the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved from http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=1091910. Carroll, J. (2007). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education (2nd Ed). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.11. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.12. Duff, A. H., Rogers, D. P., & Harris, M. B. (2006). International engineering students--avoiding plagiarism through understanding the western academic context of scholarship. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 673
): p. 68-86.26. Coppernoll, S., J. Jahedkar, and T.P. Murphrey Online conferencing: tips and tricks for effective use. Journal of Extension, 2006. 44(5). Available from: http://www.joe.org/joe/2006october/tt2.php.27. Tremblay, R., "Best Practices" and collaborative software in online teaching. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2006. 7(1): p. 1-5.28. Riddle, J., Through the computer screen: on the other side of the webinar. MultiMedia & Internet@Schools, 2010. 17(4): p. 28-31.29. Reushle, S. and B. Loch, Conducting a trial of web conferencing software: why, how, and perceptions from the coalface. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2008. 9(3): p. 19-28.30. Vandenberg, L
. Harrop and B. Turpin, “A study exploring learners' informal learning space behaviors, attitudes, and preferences,” New Review of Academic Librarianship, vol.19, no.1, pp.58-77. 2013[4] G. Matthews and G. Walton, “Strategic development of university library space: Widening the influence,” New Library World, vol.115, no.5/6, pp.237-249, 2014.[5] M.D. Riddle and K. Souter, “Designing informal learning spaces using student perspectives,” Journal of Learning Spaces, vol.1, no.2, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152692. [Accessed Feb.2, 2020].[6] D.J. Mallon III, “Making their place: Identifying the transformation of college space to student place, a study of individual student
-7788Journal of Hazardous Materials 0304-3894Journal of Hydraulic Engineering - ASCE 0733-9429Journal of Hydrology 0022-1694Transportation Research Part B - Methodological 0191-2615 Table 1: Selected Journals for StudyEach citation from a research article in the May 2008 issues of these journals received a codeidentifier in the spreadsheet used for data analysis. This code identifier links the journal to thearticle in the issue and the citation within the article, facilitating verification or validation of thedata. This coding format should also assist in sharing data with other
find chemical information: A guide for practicing chemists, educators, and students (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.[9] ICIS. (2018). About us. Retrieved from https://www.icis.com/about/[10] Johnson, O. (2018). The price reporters: A guide to PRAs and commodity benchmarks. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.[11] Spectrum Chemical. (2017). Chemicals. Retrieved from https://www.spectrumchemical.com/OA_HTML/Chemicals.jsp?minisite=10020 &respid=22372[12] Raizada, T. (2017). MEG. ICIS Chemical Business, 291(26), 32.[13] Lord, C. (2000). Guide to information sources in engineering. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.[14] Osif, B. A. (2012). Using the engineering literature. Boca Raton: CRC Press.[15
-1670, 2008.[6] Learn how to ask better questions with the question formulation technique. Available: https://docs.asee.org/public/Webinars/QFT_WebinarSlides.pdf.[7] D. Rothstein and L. Santana, Make just one change: Teach students to ask their own questions. Harvard Education Press, 2011.[8] "Right Question Institute." https://rightquestion.org/ (accessed.[9] S. Palmer and B. Tucker, "Planning, delivery and evaluation of information literacy training for engineering and technology students," Australian academic & research libraries, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 16-34, 2004.[10] P. R. Dempsey and H. Jagman, "" I Felt Like Such a Freshman": First-Year Students Crossing the Library Threshold," portal
Education, pp. 325-328.[14] A. Parker. (2010). "Introducing a technical writing communication course into a Canadian school of engineering," in Design Discourse: Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, D. Franke, A. Reid and A. DiRenzo, Eds. Fort Collins: Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press, pp. 203-218.[15] B. Shwom and P. Hirsch, (1999)."Re-envisioning the writing requirement: An interdisciplinary approach," Business Communication Quarterly, v.62 (1) 1999, pp. 104-107.[16] D. Ramey and J. Hudgins. (1999). "The evolution of integrating writing into engineering: Tracing iterations of writing instruction in a sophomore engineering course," in
librarianscreated several CoPs to support themselves [14].The University of Saskatchewan (USask) implemented a CoP in 2012 on the topic of leadershipdevelopment, inspired by the Ohio University Library system [15]. Their CoP developed out ofthe need to create momentum for activities following a leadership development workshop. Withsome member turnover annually, they have managed to establish a core group that come from alllayers of the organization with a shared passion in leadership.Designing and Cultivating a Conceptual CoP FrameworkKerno and Mace [7] provide a thorough overview of a theoretical framework for learningtogether. Within it, “CoPs contain four necessary components: (a) practice; (b) meaning; (c)community; and (d) identity, and these elements
and statements can vary among the campuses, therecords for the titles in the union catalog need to be consistent and display the shared printlocation. Cooperation and input among NRLF staff, the UC Berkeley systems department, andthe California Digital Library was vital for allowing this to happen with a minimum of delay.Below are two examples of records from the union catalog that reflect combined UC Berkeleyand UC Davis contributions.IEEE Micro holdings and MARC 852 field display in the Melvyl union catalog:NRLF UC Shared Print-1 Circ status University of California Libraries - Building Use Only v.1(Feb 1981)-24(2004), 26(2006)-27(2007)852 |a GLAD |b UL01 |j XXX Shared Print-1 |3 v.1
nights. No food, and no cell phones are allowed inthese spaces and a dedicated COE student worker monitors the room usage.a) b) (Figure 1a: Main COE Library space; Figure 1b: additional COE Library space)The main book and collections for engineering are housed at both the Paul A. M. Dirac ScienceLibrary, on the FSU main campus, and in the Coleman Library, on the FAMU main campus. TheEngineering Library is a satellite for both university libraries and houses a small collection alongwith extensive access to electronic collections (laptops, cameras, etc.). Materials not available inthe physical COE Library space or through a main campus library can be secured using theInterlibrary Loan or UBorrow
-k.Criteria and expected measuresOur program’s ABET outcomes at the outset of our information literacy mapping process wereas shown in Table 1, with mappings to ABET’s a-k as indicated:Table 1: Smith College and ABET Outcomes Picker Engineering Program Outcome ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes (a-k)1. Conceptual Analysis: a conceptual understanding of a. an ability to apply knowledge of engineering science fundamentals mathematics, science, and engineering2. Mathematical Analysis: the ability to quantitatively analyze b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, a component, process, or system using theoretical as well as to analyze and
, while completing the activities described below.Specific stations within the Research Studio were chosen to (a) help the students complete theirbridge design assignment, and (b) to introduce the students to relevant information sources thatthey may not be familiar with. The stations were designed to introduce students to many of theresources available at the University, as well as free sources available online.The students were divided into team of three to complete the Research Studio and also tocomplete the corresponding assignment. Each student went to three stations, so that at least onestudent in each team completed each of the six stations and two team members completed moststations. To help guide the students, at the start of the Studio
standards budget but spent $20,000 on standards in 2019.Institutions A, B, and OO did not provide values therefore they were counted as null values.Many librarians indicated a $0 budget but then reported spending money on standards.The responses to the questions 1-3 of this survey become of more interest when combined withquestion 12 of the survey. In the final question, respondents were asked to describe theirstandards access model and multiple librarians mentioned not having a budget but having aninformal cap on ordering for specific faculty/students. Figure 2A: Question 2: “What is your yearly Standards budget?” Figure 2B: Question 3: “In the last year, how much would you estimate that you spent on
time to answer requestsfor this information.I also identified the liaison librarian to Mechanical Engineering Technology from eachinstitution, by searching the institution’s library web site. Where an explicit MET liaison wasnot indicated, a likely candidate was identified (e.g., if there was only one STEM librarian in thelibrary), and as a last choice, the library director was identified as the point of contact. A surveywas distributed to the so-identified library representative of each institution, using the Qualtricssurvey program (see Appendix B). An email invitation to the survey was sent as well as onereminder.The information provided by MET departments varied in depth and type, so a systematicanalysis was challenging. Thus, the results
students’ recollection of simple facts (for example, that the library’sbooks are organized using Library of Congress Classification), others walk students throughprescribed database searches with specific instructions designed to provide practice with searchtechniques. For example, in one question students are instructed to use quotes around two wordsin order to search for an exact phrase. In another, students consider how Boolean operatorswould affect a search for multiple concepts. Perhaps the most important question in Quiz Aintroduces students to the engineering-specific databases by directing them to the Engineeringsubject category of the FGCU Library’s Databases page, the portal to the over 400 databases towhich the Library subscribes.Quiz B
facets amongst the same and similar information sources was compared. Thiscomparison led to the modification of codes for 23 of the 622 citations or 3.7%.The authors, one of which was the instructor for the course during the three year period, alsoevaluated the theory section of each report for completeness, accuracy, as well as clarity anddepth using a rubric (Appendix B). For each year and topic, the reports were divided into threegroupings based on the rubric assessment scores: top, middle, and bottom third. The division intothirds was done by the population, meaning that the scores that define each group may havevaried from year to year or report to report. Each group consisted of approximately 35 studentsover the three year period. Using
academic programs and key administrative units, such as the Professional EnrichmentCenter (CEP) and the Office of Graduate Studies (OGS). The liaison librarian to the College ofEngineering was particularly effective in partnering with the Engineering faculty to a) cultivatethe development of information literacy skills, b) create specific assignments, and c) offercustomized instruction sessions and workshops on a wide variety of topics. These trainingsessions included topics such as finding scholarly information, evaluating Internet resources,writing literature reviews, citing references, and presenting ethical issues related to academicintegrity and plagiarism. Furthermore, the engineering liaison librarian works in collaborationwith the College
Paper ID #24617Understanding Undergraduate Engineering Student Information Access andNeeds: Results from a Scoping ReviewMs. Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo Kate Mercer is the liaison librarian for Systems Design Engineering, Electrical & Computer Engineering and Earth & Environmental Sciences at the University of Waterloo. Kate’s main duties include providing instruction and research services to students, faculty and staff. Kate graduated with a MI from the Univer- sity of Toronto in 2011, and in addition to her job as a liaison librarian is a PhD Candidate at the University of Waterloo’s School of
library services: both previously used and/or needed ● Needs and expectations of what the Hunt Library can provide or do for the faculty/grad studentsThis more thorough analysis added richness to the Hunt Library planning team’s understandingof trends and discrepancies across departments and campus affiliation (i.e. faculty, graduate).B. Creating user personasIn addition to the detailed reports, user personas were the other major product resulting from thespring 2011 interviews of faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates. This techniqueinvolves creating a cast of fictional characters – archetypal users, each representing a particularcore need or set of needs. These characters are fully fleshed out with names, photos, bios
practice information retrieval and evaluationskills. Students are asked to find the best sources to support their answers to the followingquestions (skills practiced noted in parentheses following each question): a. Who developed the patent for the Clif shot litter leash? What earlier innovations did it Page 14.761.5 build upon? (Requires a patent search.) b. Find two peer reviewed original research articles published in the last year about how climate change will affect hurricane frequency in the Atlantic. (Practices database search strategies and proper citation format) c. What is a ballast in a fluorescent light fixture