Paper ID #45981Essentials of the Nurse+Engineer: Wake up Engineering Educators, It’s Timeto Recognize Nursing is STEM!Dr. Daniel B Oerther P.E., Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving for ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Professor Oerther is internationally recognized for leadership of engineers, sanitarians, and nurses promoting
Paper ID #45982Essentials of the Nurse+Engineer: Considering Nurses’ Awareness Raising ofDEI Policy When Teaching Design in Engineering EducationDr. Daniel B Oerther P.E., Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving for ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Professor Oerther is internationally recognized for leadership of engineers
Paper ID #37068Did the NAE Changing the Conversation Campaign Introduce the CarePenalty into Engineering?Dr. Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Tech- nology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Did the NAE ‘Changing the Conversation’ Campaign
. Hinings, D. Logue, and C. Zietsma, “Fields, institutional infrastructure and gov- ernance,” The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, pp. 163–189, 2017. [5] E. Chenoweth, Civil resistance: What everyone needs to know®. Oxford University Press, 2021. [6] A. Reuel, B. Bucknall, S. Casper, T. Fist, L. Soder, O. Aarne, L. Hammond, L. Ibrahim, A. Chan, P. Wills et al., “Open problems in technical ai governance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14981, 2024. [7] R. Søraa, AI for diversity. CRC Press, 2023. [8] T. Gebru and É. P. Torres, “The tescreal bundle: Eugenics and the promise of utopia through artificial general intelligence,” First Monday, 2024. 6
). Determinants of Research Productivity in Higher Education.Research in Higher Education 39(6): 607-631.Estes, A., Nuttall, B., and McDaniel, C. (2008). Researchers and Practitioners: A Dual TrackPath to Tenure That Works. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22 – 25,Pittsburgh, PA.Gardner, S.K. and Veliz, D. Evincing the Ratchet: A Thematic Analysis of the Promotion andTenure Guidelines at a Striving University. The Review of Higher Education, 38(1): 105 – 132.Hardin, J.-M. and Hodges, T. (2006). Tenure and Promotion Requirements: Large Universitiesvs. Small Colleges. 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. June 18 – 22, Chicago, IL.McGill, M.M. and Settle, A. (2012). Identifying Effects of Institutional Resources and Supporton
cases sent to the divisional committee are those where either the executivecommittee or the dean has concerns over the faculty member meeting expectations, or where thedean has concerns over the post-tenure review process used by the executive committee.The divisional committee review of the case consists of the following elements. If the dean hasquestioned the process used, the divisional committee will determine if (a) the process followedthat written by the executive committee in their policies and procedures, and (b) if the executivecommittee’s process is in accord with the university’s PTR policy. If they find fault with theprocess, they will relay that information to the dean, who will typically ask the executivecommittee to redo the
Paper ID #42973Understanding Federal STEM Education InitiativesDr. Jessica Centers, The MITRE Corporation Jessica Centers is a communications engineer at the MITRE Corporation. She joined MITRE in 2023 after completing her Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering with a focus on signal and information processing at Duke University. Upon beginning her role at MITRE, she also completed her Master of Arts in Technology Ethics and Science Policy. Prior to graduate school, she received her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Milwaukee School of Engineering in 2018. She currently splits her time between STEM workforce and
Paper ID #37138The constituent elements of STEM education and their respective effecton talent cultivation performance in the unique context of China: Atwo-stage studyMr. Guangpei Chen, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University and Institute of China’s Science, Technologyand Education Policy, Zhejiang University PhD student at School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang Unvisity, China. Research interests lie at innovation policy, college-industry partnership, engineering education. A member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants at the UK.Yingying Qiao, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University and Institute of China’s
process involved removing (a) duplicates (the same award number reappearing in newterm searches); (b) transfer grants (a “replacement” grant with a different award number due to the PIchanging institutions); and (c) collaborative awards with multiple instances (awards with same title andabstract beyond the first instance; in those cases, information about collaborating investigators,institutions, and budgets was preserved for subsequent analyses).2.2 Developing the Coding SchemeOur process to develop a coding scheme was iterative, guided by an evolving goal: to create a set ofcategories that would differentiate the centrality of LGBTQ+ populations and their experiences as thefocus of the awards. The process began by analyzing a group of active
DS to ensure feasibility, alignment with course goals, and an AUKUS nexus. Problemstatements are as follows: 1. DS-41: The Diplomatic Security Counter-Unmanned Aerial System (C-UAS) Program Team needs scalable acoustic array detection capabilities in order to successfully detect modified adversary unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) that do not emit signals detectable by traditional radio frequency (RF) systems and radars. a. Team n: 5; site visit: IEEE Conference in Hawaii b. AUKUS connection: Drone technology is a core component of AUKUS Pillar 2 [9] 2. DS-47: United States Embassy security personnel within Diplomatic Security need explosive detection equipment with more robust analysis
0.00 0.20 0.07 0.00 Interaction 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.03 0.04 0.28 -0.05 0.04 0.16 Interaction 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.03 0.14The analysis of model 1 presented in table 1, revealed that socioeconomic status is significantlyassociated with student wellbeing, b = 0.12 (SE = 0.02), (p < 0.05). Similarly, schools’ meansocio-economic status and school type were found to be significantly correlated with wellbeingwith b = 0.00 (SE = 0.00), (p < 0.05) and b = 0.20 (SE = 0.08), (p < 0.05) respectively. Theresults also found that the schools’ urbanicity status was also significant b = -0.08 (SE = 0.03),(p< 0.05) and explained a good
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesBeddoes, K. &, Danowitz, A. (2022). In Their Own Words: How Aspects of Engineering Education Undermine Students’ Mental Health. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN.Banks, B. M. (2020). Meet them where they are: An outreach model to address university counseling center disparities. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 34(3), 240–251.Danowitz, A. & Beddoes, K. (2020). Work in Progress: A Snapshot of Mental Health and Wellness of Engineering Students Across the Western United States. Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Virtual Conference.Danowitz, A
major policy issues and events:1. The concepts of Moral responsibility, Official Responsibility, Professional Responsibility, and Role Responsibility are important not only in the political, economic, social and religious spheres but also in the fields of science and engineering. Briefly define these concepts and: a) Discuss and define whistleblowing, including its four elements; b) Discuss and define the Categorical Imperative, and how it should inform decisions to engage in whistleblowing.2. Many thinkers strongly advocate a focus on Systems Thinking and have advanced an approach to this way of thinking called Complex Systems Theory. a) What is Systems Thinking? b) What are the properties of Complex Systems Theory, including its
engineering students received no or little education on EDCM standardsand guidelines during their undergraduate and graduate courses. Participants stated that theyreceived basic departmental training or campuswide drills such as fire extinguisher drill(FG#04-D), fire evacuation and hurricane evacuation drill (FG#02-A), and active shootertraining (FG#01-C, FG#04-C). Graduate students (FG#01-B, FG#01-D), indicated that theyreceived basic lab safety training as a requirement for their research activities. Besides drills andtraining sessions, participants viewed safety seminar series in campus and TechAlert, acampuswide safety alert system as additional sources of EDCM information.No student, except one, took courses relevant to EDCM standards and
Inflation Reduction Act,” Environmental and Energy Study Institute. Accessed: Jun. 03, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/tracking- electric-vehicle-investments-in-the-infrastructure-investment-and-jobs-act-and-inflation- reduction-act[2] B. T. McLennand, “Automotive Mechanics: A Developmental Study of Automotive Programs in Two-Year Colleges with Implications for a Planning and Standards Guide,” Texax Education Agency, Jun. 1971. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED058414.pdf[3] S. Savin, “Autotronics: Implications for automotive related training programs standards based upon emerging technologies,” Ed.D., Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2007. Accessed: Feb
for each question, below which a student would earn a zero on thatquestion. Hence, in order to maximize the total grade on an assignment, a student mustcontribute equally on all assignment questions.In case of heterogeneous teams, imagine a team comprises of two types of students : TypeA (High intrinsic motivation or Low effort cost) and Type B (Low intrinsic motivation or Higheffort cost). In this case, the challenge for the instructor is to design a policy that deters Type Bstudents from strategically inflating their contribution (moral hazard) or free-riding on Type A’sefforts. Similarly, the policy should also de-incentive Type A students from single-handedlyelevating the team grade. In this case, the likely equilibrium behavior is Type B
expectations.References[1] Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J. Student satisfaction in the virtual classroom. InternetJournal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3(2), 2005. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2005.1071[2] Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. Evaluation of evidence-basedpractices in online learning: A metanalysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Departmentof Education (September 2010). https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf[3] Essary, M. L. Key external factors influencing successful distance education programs. TheAcademy of Educational Leadership Journal, 8(3), 121–136, 2014.[4] Rapchak, M., Lewis, L., Motyka, J., & Balmert, M. Information
observation protocol (appendix A) to follow, whichalso contains an observation notes section to document what happened during the game.Additionally, observers completed a reflective summary immediately following the exercise,documenting key inflection points, tactics used, the role of the facilitator, and the activity of theparties within the game.Participants also completed surveys pre- and post-exercise, which were administered viaQuestionPro (attached as appendix B). The participants were asked to complete the consentprocess and pre-survey two days in advance to the game, and the period for submissions wasopen until the game started. Participants were then sent a post-survey via email four days later,which contained the same questions as the pre
implementation issues in Indonesia: Identifying the problems source and Its implications,” Qualitative Report, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2213–2229, 2023, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5667.[6] O. F. Nugroho, A. Permanasari, and H. Firman, “The movement of STEM education in Indonesia: Science teachers’ perspectives,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 417–425, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19252.[7] N. Gaus, M. Yunus, A. Karim, and H. Sadia, “The analysis of policy implementation models in higher education: the case study of Indonesia,” Policy Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 92–109, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/01442872.2018.1539224.[8] B. Y. Moeliodihardjo, “Higher education sector in Indonesia,”[9
frameworks, data and an ability topredict system behavior. At the same time, engineering education plays a critical role in situatingmodels and analyses in the larger context of engineering and its impact on society. We explorethe political, economic, cultural and moral foundations of the research and engineering of crashtest dummy models in the automotive industry. The research question underlying this work in-progress is: how do representative models in engineering influence public affairs in the contextof safety in the automotive industry? Automotive safety for years has been known to rely oncrash test dummy models created in the 1950s that are modeled after the average male. Thisresulted in a significant gap in a balanced representation in
Paper ID #41098Race to R1: An Analysis of Historically Black Colleges or Universities (HBCUs)Potential to Reach Research 1 Carnegie Classification® (R1) StatusDr. Trina L. Fletcher, Florida International University Dr. Trina Fletcher is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University and the founder of m3i Journey, a start-up focused on research-based, personalized, holistic, innovative, relevant, and engaging (PHIRE) financial literacy education. She serves as the Director of the READi Lab (readilab.com) where her research portfolio consists of equity, access, and inclusion
dialogue is critical to fosteringmutual understanding and respect, ensuring that the rights and contributions of artists aresafeguarded in an era of rapid technological advancement.Through this collaborative effort, we aim to inspire the development of ethical frameworks andbest practices in AI, centering the needs and concerns of artists in future innovations. Byprioritizing fairness, transparency, and accountability, this project contributes to a vision of AIdevelopment that respects human creativity and actively enhances and supports it, paving theway for a more inclusive and artist-centered technological landscape.references[1] B. Thompson, M. Atkinson, A. Whalen, and S. Kirby, “Complex cognitive algorithms preserved by selectivesocial
Teaching Associate Professor at Southern University of Science and Technology, research interests focus on engineering educationProf. Yiming Rong, Southern University of Science and Technology Professor Rong is the founding chair of mechanical and energy engineering department at Souhtern Uni- versity of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China. He has worked as a professor and researcher in the area of manufacturing for many years, including with Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, and Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Tracing the Policy Shift to New Engineering Education in China
Paper ID #48985Digital Transformation of Engineering Education—The Practices in ChineseUniversitiesDr. Huiming Fan, East China University of Science and Technology I am an associate professor from the Institute of Higher Education, East China University of Science and Technology. I got a Ph.D. degree from Zhejiang University in 2014. I was also a visiting scholar in the area of University-Industry Collaboration at the North Carolina State University.Lan Yu, East China University of Science and Technology I am a graduate student of School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology. I
Paper ID #49140Revolutionizing Semiconductor Education: An Immersive Virtual Cleanroomfor Enhanced Nanofabrication TrainingMona El Helbawy, University of Colorado BoulderPat Clark, University of Colorado Boulder ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Revolutionizing Semiconductor Education: An Immersive Virtual Cleanroom for Enhanced Nanofabrication Training (Work in Progress Paper)AbstractThe semiconductor industry is advancing rapidly, and initiatives like the CHIPS and ScienceAct are making it clear that there’s a pressing need to develop a skilled workforce. Withnearly $53
Paper ID #38964Research on Governance of Higher Engineering Education Quality in Chinaafter Accessing the Washington AccordDr. Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University Dr. Ming Li is an assistant professor at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies Univer- sity, Beijing, China. He received his PhD in Administration at the Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. From March 2013 to June 2013, he visited the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University as a visiting scholar. He ever worked as a post-doctor at the Institute of Education, Tsinghua University from 2016 to 2018. His research