Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luis Delgado Jr., Penn State University; Stephanie Cutler, Penn State University; Sarah E Zappe, Penn State University; Ibukun Samuel Osunbunmi, Penn State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Paper ID #42184Lessons Learned: Summer Book Club to Promote Reflection among EngineeringFaculty on Mental Health of StudentsLuis Delgado Jr., Penn State University Luis R. Delgado Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Pennsylvania State University. He has a bachelor of science in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at El Paso and earned a master of science degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Public Policy from Penn State. Along with his role as a Ph.D., he is also a graduate research assistant at the Leonhard Center for Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Ibukunoluwa Eunice Salami, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Katie Mowat, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Paper ID #43568Examining the Implementation and Impact of Reflective Practices in EngineeringCourses: Insights from Faculty and Teaching AssistantsDr. Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Perry is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. His work contains a unique blend of engineering education and civil engineering projects. Dr. Perry’s current work centers on understandinMrs. Ibukunoluwa Eunice Salami, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Ibukunoluwa Eunice Salami is a PhD Student in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Lynn Orton P.E., University of Missouri, Columbia

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

and Supportive – instructor invites students to set and reach their learning goals and supports student success through constructive feedback, mentoring, advising, and listening [10-11] • Structured and Intentional – instructor plans course well, describes course clearly, aligns learning objectives activities and assessments, instructor clearly communicates expectations and what students need to do to meet them [12-13]Multiple measures are needed to provide a clear view of effective and inclusive teaching[14]. For example, student feedback forms may provide insights form the learner but maynot provide a clear view of instructional quality. Similarly, peer feedback and self-reflection may not fully measure effective and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 12

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vicki V. May, P.E., Dartmouth College; Petra Bonfert-Taylor, Dartmouth College; Eugene Korsunskiy

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

integration of formative feedback during a faculty member's earlycareer stages and tying in with our newly developed and evolving faculty mentoring program. In addition,we are designing a multi-pronged feedback system that will help instructors reflect on their teaching andreceive the support they need in order to improve their teaching continuously. Our new evaluation systemwill consist of three main parts: student impressions, self-reflections, and peer observations.In the summer of 2022, our school was awarded a grant through AAU to participate in their AAU STEMDepartment Project on Teaching Evaluation. A team from Thayer is participating in an AAU LearningCommunity around Teaching Evaluation (AAU, 2022).Goal and ObjectivesThe goal of our project

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jameka Wiggins, The Ohio State University; Monica Farmer Cox, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

assess and reconstruct their professional practices that influence their mindset andreform engineering education.Introduction Critical consciousness is an advanced educational pedagogy to liberate the masses fromsystemic inequity maintained and perpetuated by interdependent systems and institutions (Freire,1970; Jemal, 2017). It is often situated in the context of analyzing oppressive systemic forcesusing the cyclic process of critical reflection, critical motivation, and critical action. Critical reflection is defined as the process of individuals analyzing their reality andsocial inequities (e.g., economic, racial/ethnic, and gender inequities) that constrain well-beingand human agency. Authors argue that individuals who are

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Linjue Wang, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

doctoral research focused on 1) how engineering stu- dents develop empathy during community-based learning (e.g., service-learning) and 2) how engineering educators can integrate empathy into their teaching. Before studying in the U.S., Linjue (Jade) earned her B.E. in Building Environment and Energy Engineering from the School of Architecture at Tsinghua University in China. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons Learned: Designing an empathy workshop for engineering faculty to promote equity-focused teachingAbstract:This paper shares lessons learned from designing and reflecting on an empathy workshop for engineeringfaculty. The workshop

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gemma Henderson, University of Miami; Ines Basalo, University of Miami; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

take action(and which action) toward educational goals that matter to them. In particular, the agencyframework posits that professional capital (such as that can be developed in a group coachingsetting) can broaden an individual's awareness of possible actions to reach their goals [13].Consequently, a group coaching model was implemented to equip EIFs with the necessary toolsto lead educational change at their HSI. Coaching, often misinterpreted as other forms ofprofessional development such as mentoring or consultation, is a unique practice that avoidsadvice-giving strategies and encourages a client to seek solutions within themselves [14], [15].This coaching model was designed to encourage reflective practice, broaden their community(thereby

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenya Z. Mejia, California State University, Los Angeles; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Lizabeth L Thompson P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Yilin Feng, California State University, Los Angeles; Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

” than tenured faculty [10].Another common difference is the higher rate of women and faculty of color that are in NTTfaculty positions compared to those in Tenure-Track positions [13]. This reality points tosystemic inequities, given that Tenure-Track Faculty are, on average, paid significantly morethan NTT faculty. Given the project’s overarching goal of creating more inclusive environmentsand helping those in the ecosystem “thrive” and “meet them where they are,” it was an organicstep to create this space specifically for NTT faculty, given the tremendous contribution theymake to the ecosystem, and their unique needs.Data and ParticipantsThe data for this paper includes both participant and facilitator reflections in the form of“minute-papers

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi M Sherick, University of Michigan; Valerie N Johnson, University of Michigan; Heather Wagenschutz, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Leadership: An intentional approach to faculty leadership developmentPositive Leadership: An intentional approach to faculty leadership developmentAbstractAs Michigan Engineering (the University of Michigan College of Engineering) moved forwardafter the tumultuous pandemic years, College leaders recognized the need for concertedprofessional development in positive leadership. This evidenced-based practice paper discussesa year-long positive leadership development program for engineering faculty and staff members,which was grounded in research from the University of Michigan Center for PositiveOrganizations and a “learn-experiment-reflect” framework. The program was delivered throughsix in-person cohort sessions, self-paced learning via

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego; Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Josephine Relaford-Doyle, University of California, San Diego; Torus Washington II, University of California, San Diego; Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego; Marko Lubarda, University of California, San Diego; Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego; Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

activity–has been identified as an essential component forinstructional effectiveness [5]-[7] with highlights to the experience of mastery and socialpersuasion [7],[8]. This suggests that effective support for faculty should consist of learningcommunities that build supportive relationships between members, encourage critical reflection,and include opportunities for research partnerships [9].Faculty Communities of PracticesIn work focusing on educational and leadership development, Drago-Steverson [10] shares thateffective faculty development experiences allow faculty to experience conditions that supportadult learners through meaningful shared activities. Such activities enable faculty to experiencetransformational learning–learning that grows

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Marie Coppola, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

inclusive pedagogy.Dr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member of the governing board for the International Research in Engineering

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Selen Güler, University of Washington; Rae Jing Han, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

are“intentionally designed with organic elements” [10, p. 854]. Through articulating and embodyinga philosophy, and through forming a web of relationships, a CoT supports its members to engagein critical reflection and develop a plan of action to change systems in their institutional contexts.In this paper, we analyze our case study as an example of a community of transformation andwill use this term when referring specifically to this community. However, since CoTs aresituated within the scholarly lineage of CoPs and share many important features, we also drawupon literature about CoPs more broadly to understand the structures and interactions in thisCoT.Structure, Agency, and TransformationWhy have efforts to create pervasive changes in

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Moses Olayemi, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Mohammad Javad Ahmadi

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings were further used todesign and facilitate a virtual 7-session three-month faculty development workshop. Our researchteam was interested in the cultural lens of engineering education in this context. Our researchquestions were as follows: What does culturally relevant engineering education look like in thecontext of Iraq? How do engineering faculty members who participated in a focused professionaldevelopment workshop provide culturally relevant support to their students? We recruited 19workshop participants, and 9 consented to participate in this study. Our data consist of semi-structured interviews, reflection journals, and survey questions developed to investigate the threecriteria (academic

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida; Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, University of Florida; John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Edward Latorre-Navarro, University of Florida; Diego Alvarado, University of Florida; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

mentoring practicesAbstractThis full research paper discusses the experiences of five Latiné/x faculty in engineering andwhat motivated them towards developing equity-minded educational practices for theirundergraduate students. The five faculty participants provided written reflections on how theirlife and professional experiences have informed said practices. From a social constructionismparadigm and using narrative inquiry methodology, a combination of in vivo and descriptivecoding (first cycle) followed by emergent and focused coding (second cycle) were used by thefirst three authors to generate a codebook. The theoretical frameworks of Community CulturalWealth, LatCrit, and Hidden Curriculum guided the data analysis and interpretation

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Canino, Purdue University; Steve France, Purdue University; Ruth Wertz, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

processing between meetings, (2) group discussion and processing of ourexperiences at our bi-weekly meetings, and (3) at the conclusion of the term, an iterative processof individual and collaborative review of our reflections and notes to identify and thematicallyorganize key observations and results.Our Stories (In Brief)Each of us came to Purdue University in the Fall of 2023 from private, teaching-intensiveinstitutions with enrollments between 2,500 and 3,500 students. We differed in our depth ofteaching and industry experience, which is summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Prior Teaching and Industry Experience of the Authors Author Teaching Experience Industry Experience Steve Assistant Professor (NTT

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Jamieson, Miami University; Eric James Rapos, Miami University; Nathaniel Bryan

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

recognition, all aimed at collaborative software mod- eling. He also is actively researching the use of games in teaching and faculty development, and is an avid tabletop gamer in his spare time.Nathaniel Bryan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP - Let’s Play - Improving our Teaching by Reversing Roles and being a Learner with Board GamesAbstractThe focus of this work-in-progress (WIP) paper is on the creation and evaluation of a facultydevelopment activity to improve teaching through reflection and empathy. Our intervention takesthe form of a Faculty Learning Community (FLC) where staff and faculty participants havefrequent opportunities to experience role reversal

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 10

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amber F Young-Brice, Marquette University; Allison Murray, Marquette University; Somesh Roy, Marquette University; Lisa Chase, Marquette University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

a humanistic approach to educating students. This humanistic approachacknowledges the importance of the affective side of teaching and learning. Engineering, whichshares many of the highly technical, decision-making aspects of nursing, could benefit from thisapproach for engineering education.Our ProgramOur team developed a Community of Practice (CoP) informed by a humanistic-educative caringframework, grounded in Caring Science, where the curriculum is about the process and intent tolearn coming from the interactions and transactions between faculty and learners. Thisframework embraces openness, human discovery, and deep reflection [4]. It also includesawareness of how learning works and co-creating meaningful learning experiences that

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Katey Shirey, eduKatey LLC, STEAM Education Services; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

card on EngineeringUnleashed.com,and (5) Upload a minimum of four completed student metacognitive reflection submissions tothe learning management system.2.1.2 Curriculum Development - Training Overview The professional development training followed the backwards curriculum designapproach ([11], a structured approach to curriculum development that ensures student learning isguided toward assessments designed to provide evidence students have mastered the learninggoal or objectives. Participants received peer and facilitator feedback three times throughout theprofessional development program. The Learning Goal was provided to the participants [8]. The purpose of the learninggoal is to articulate how students will be changed as a

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Peña, Arizona State University; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Jean M. Andino Ph.D., P.E., Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

outcomes. Scholarssuch as Felder and Brent have emphasized the importance of disciplined inquiry into teachingmethodologies to improve the learning experiences of engineering students especially related toactive learning [6], [7]. SoTL allows educators to systematically investigate effectiveinstructional strategies and assess their impact on student learning. Previous research hasunderscored the transformative potential of SoTL emphasizing its role in shaping curriculardesign and facilitating evidence-based teaching approaches [8]. Reflective practice and practicedissemination, two key components of SoTL, holds the potential to accelerate growth not only atthe micro (classroom) level but also at the meso (institutional) and macro (national

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 10

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nyna Jaye DeWitt, University of Georgia; Animesh Paul, University of Georgia; John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Classroom Observations Section C: After Classroom Observations The observer meets with the instructor to hear The observer meets with the instructor to hear their reflections, discuss new ideas or their reflections, discuss new ideas or questions, and provide constructive feedback questions, and provide constructive feedback with a focus on highlighting strengths over with a focus on highlighting strengths over areas for improvement (at least three times as areas for improvement. many strengths as areas with room for improvement).Section AThis initial step in the peer observation process is meant to orient the observer to the course. Thismeans reviewing the course material and understanding the classroom

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University; Katey Shirey, EduKatey; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University; Rhea Dutta, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, completion,and placement rates [9]. Study PurposeIn response, the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Accelerator program (a newengineering faculty professional development program) was created, implemented, and assessed;funding was provided by the Kern Family Foundation and Arizona State University Mentorship360 Program. The SoTL Accelerator program had two core parts (Figure 1): (1) New CurriculumDevelopment, Implementation, and Assessment, and (2) Reflection and Dissemination ofFindings. The SoTL Accelerator program was delivered in a virtual, structured, cohort manner topromote accessibility, accountability, and a sense of belonging. The purpose of this paper is toprovide an overview, results, and lessons learned from 30

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haley Briel, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Deesha Chadha; Chris Dakes, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Erica Jean Hagen, University of Wisconsin, Madison; James Iain Campbell, Imperial College London; Umang Vinubhai Shah

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

) recruitment and incentives for engagement in TA training. Bysharing these models, readers will be able to intentionally reflect on their own training programs,consider components of our practices that could be incorporated into their own contexts, andultimately serve future faculty in other institutions.1. Institutional ContextTraining teaching assistants is a relatively new practice in higher education, and the catalyst forprograms differs in the US and UK. In the US, there are no standardized guidelines at the federallevel for teacher preparedness in higher education whereas the training that Imperial CollegeLondon conducts in the UK is largely informed by national government mandate. The DearingReport of 1997 [5] provided a formal blueprint for

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Helen Choi, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

mechanisms designed to address harms of the technology. Impact as measured byhuman and planetary well-being is also included.The student component of the framework concerns students' interactions with the technology athand. Instructors first consider the suitability of the technology in terms of its efficacy in helpingstudents reach learning goals; they then examine whether their students have equal and sufficientaccess and proficiency to use the technology. Instructors also consider whether the use of thetechnology promotes students' well-being and dignity, as well the sense of community in theclassroom.The self-reflection component of the framework asks instructors to consider whether thetechnology suits their teaching objectives and methods and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanda Ross, Virginia Tech; Andrew Katz, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Kai Jun Chew, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

was used when asking about theirdefinition of assessment. “...using this analogy, driving a car, I would like someone to be able to start the car, and drive around town, and do a couple basic tasks, without hurting someone, without hurting themselves…"By using this metaphor, we can see that this participant used assessment to assess whether or notstudents can perform a desired task, as opposed to, for example, assessing student understandingor knowledge.The participant then used the metaphor multiple times when explaining how they created theirtest questions. “Whether this particular aspect of a problem, I focused enough or not, that will reflect my current lecture. Did I pay too much attention in this

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret Ruth Hammond, Pennsylvania State University; Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

of their degree, the intent behind course sequencing, and how they are developingthe necessary breadth and depth to be proficient in their future professional realms.Need for a Shared Advising ModelFaculty are one of the best resources for advising on topics related to their discipline and thetechnical curriculum. Most faculty do not have a background in student development theories,educational psychology, and/or experience in student affairs settings, making them ill-positioned(and often not comfortable) in helping students navigate the social and emotional landscape ofcollege life, reflect on personal development as they transition into adulthood, explore the non-technical aspects of their undergraduate experience, and interpret university

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Josh Iorio; Kelly Scarff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Angelo Biviano, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Christine Burgoyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Caroline Finlay Branscome, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kathleen Carper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Sara L Arena, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, Paretti et. al (2014) challenge the1engineering education community to fill a gap in the literature by “expand[ing] our understanding ofeffective context-specific and generalizable practices that foster deep learning of both professionalcommunication and engineering concepts simultaneously” (p. 623, emphasis added). To contributeto this goal, our work focuses on sharing effective strategies for embedding communication skillswithin specific engineering disciplines. By sharing our collective reflections, our goal is to supportengineering educators in drawing connections to their own research and practice.Purpose and Research QuestionsThe purpose of this paper is to explore strategies for integrating communication skills intoengineering curricula

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarira Motaref, P.E., University of Connecticut; Mousumi Roy, P.E., University of Connecticut; Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Inclusive Teaching: An Exploratory Approach to Evaluate Faculty PerceptionsAbstract:This study describes an exploratory approach to evaluate faculty perception of the peerobservation practice aimed to enhance inclusive teaching.The quality of teaching is a part of the evaluation criteria for Promotion, Tenure andReappointment (PTR) process for university faculty. The student-based evaluation of teaching isknown to have several limitations and hence cannot be the sole basis for instructor evaluation.Peer observation, self-reflection, and assessment of teaching portfolios can be employed asholistic evaluation practices. The Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) department at theUniversity of Connecticut (UConn) adopted a calibrated

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gadhaun Aslam, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

unaware of the discipline of engineering education.As an effort to raise more awareness on the impact of engineering education research andpractice, the authors’ positionality stemmed from their reflections of their entry points into thefield of engineering education. This introspection prompted the authors to explore and share asmuch information about the discipline as was available at the time of this work.Research Approach & DesignThis exploratory study thoroughly investigated the current state of engineering education as adiscipline in the U.S. via an online content analysis of institutional or departmental websites tofind information about the faculty members working in the respective institutions. The sectionsand pages of ‘Faculty

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 12

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gianina Morales, University of Pittsburgh and Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile; Rene Alejandro Noel, Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

previouswork, we presented the design, execution, and lessons learned of a faculty development programfor instructors of introductory engineering courses developed in a Chilean regional university. Theprogram implemented a collaborative coaching model in which methodological experts led teamsof instructors in designing and creating coursework materials and accompanied theimplementation of the courses through classroom support and weekly reflection sessions. A totalof nine instructors started the program, but six continued during the entire year and ended withsuccessful results. Almost five years after the completion of the program, we wonder: How mightthe faculty development experience have impacted in the long-term the instructional practices

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erick S. Vasquez, University of Dayton; Megan Morin, ASHLIN Management Group; Vinayak Vijayan, University of Dayton; Timothy Reissman, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

ledincluding a process of learning, reflection, and support by colleagues. One way in which it canbe effective for faculty to acclimate is by doing small implementations through micromoments.Micromoments are rapid and easy active learning implementations that encourage students’learning. These activities can help support faculty who often struggle with competing demandsand lack of time, limiting improvement in teaching aspects. This work-in-progress paper showsthe authors’ reflections and suggestions to engage faculty in promoting micromoment activitiesin lecture-based teaching.At the University of Dayton - an R2 university, the lead engineering faculty started a FLC tosupport the integration of entrepreneurially minded learning (EML) using the KEEN