Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 47 in total
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 12
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vicki V. May, P.E., Dartmouth College; Petra Bonfert-Taylor, Dartmouth College; Eugene Korsunskiy
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
integration of formative feedback during a faculty member's earlycareer stages and tying in with our newly developed and evolving faculty mentoring program. In addition,we are designing a multi-pronged feedback system that will help instructors reflect on their teaching andreceive the support they need in order to improve their teaching continuously. Our new evaluation systemwill consist of three main parts: student impressions, self-reflections, and peer observations.In the summer of 2022, our school was awarded a grant through AAU to participate in their AAU STEMDepartment Project on Teaching Evaluation. A team from Thayer is participating in an AAU LearningCommunity around Teaching Evaluation (AAU, 2022).Goal and ObjectivesThe goal of our project
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Linjue Wang, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
doctoral research focused on 1) how engineering stu- dents develop empathy during community-based learning (e.g., service-learning) and 2) how engineering educators can integrate empathy into their teaching. Before studying in the U.S., Linjue (Jade) earned her B.E. in Building Environment and Energy Engineering from the School of Architecture at Tsinghua University in China. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons Learned: Designing an empathy workshop for engineering faculty to promote equity-focused teachingAbstract:This paper shares lessons learned from designing and reflecting on an empathy workshop for engineeringfaculty. The workshop
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Marie Coppola, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
inclusive pedagogy.Dr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member of the governing board for the International Research in Engineering
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Moses Olayemi, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Mohammad Javad Ahmadi
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings were further used todesign and facilitate a virtual 7-session three-month faculty development workshop. Our researchteam was interested in the cultural lens of engineering education in this context. Our researchquestions were as follows: What does culturally relevant engineering education look like in thecontext of Iraq? How do engineering faculty members who participated in a focused professionaldevelopment workshop provide culturally relevant support to their students? We recruited 19workshop participants, and 9 consented to participate in this study. Our data consist of semi-structured interviews, reflection journals, and survey questions developed to investigate the threecriteria (academic
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida; Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, University of Florida; John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Edward Latorre-Navarro, University of Florida; Diego Alvarado, University of Florida; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
mentoring practicesAbstractThis full research paper discusses the experiences of five Latiné/x faculty in engineering andwhat motivated them towards developing equity-minded educational practices for theirundergraduate students. The five faculty participants provided written reflections on how theirlife and professional experiences have informed said practices. From a social constructionismparadigm and using narrative inquiry methodology, a combination of in vivo and descriptivecoding (first cycle) followed by emergent and focused coding (second cycle) were used by thefirst three authors to generate a codebook. The theoretical frameworks of Community CulturalWealth, LatCrit, and Hidden Curriculum guided the data analysis and interpretation
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Peter Jamieson, Miami University; Eric James Rapos, Miami University; Nathaniel Bryan
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
recognition, all aimed at collaborative software mod- eling. He also is actively researching the use of games in teaching and faculty development, and is an avid tabletop gamer in his spare time.Nathaniel Bryan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP - Let’s Play - Improving our Teaching by Reversing Roles and being a Learner with Board GamesAbstractThe focus of this work-in-progress (WIP) paper is on the creation and evaluation of a facultydevelopment activity to improve teaching through reflection and empathy. Our intervention takesthe form of a Faculty Learning Community (FLC) where staff and faculty participants havefrequent opportunities to experience role reversal
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa Bosman, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Katey Shirey, eduKatey LLC, STEAM Education Services; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
card on EngineeringUnleashed.com,and (5) Upload a minimum of four completed student metacognitive reflection submissions tothe learning management system.2.1.2 Curriculum Development - Training Overview The professional development training followed the backwards curriculum designapproach ([11], a structured approach to curriculum development that ensures student learning isguided toward assessments designed to provide evidence students have mastered the learninggoal or objectives. Participants received peer and facilitator feedback three times throughout theprofessional development program. The Learning Goal was provided to the participants [8]. The purpose of the learninggoal is to articulate how students will be changed as a
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amanda Ross, Virginia Tech; Andrew Katz, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Kai Jun Chew, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
was used when asking about theirdefinition of assessment. “...using this analogy, driving a car, I would like someone to be able to start the car, and drive around town, and do a couple basic tasks, without hurting someone, without hurting themselves…"By using this metaphor, we can see that this participant used assessment to assess whether or notstudents can perform a desired task, as opposed to, for example, assessing student understandingor knowledge.The participant then used the metaphor multiple times when explaining how they created theirtest questions. “Whether this particular aspect of a problem, I focused enough or not, that will reflect my current lecture. Did I pay too much attention in this
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Margaret Ruth Hammond, Pennsylvania State University; Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
of their degree, the intent behind course sequencing, and how they are developingthe necessary breadth and depth to be proficient in their future professional realms.Need for a Shared Advising ModelFaculty are one of the best resources for advising on topics related to their discipline and thetechnical curriculum. Most faculty do not have a background in student development theories,educational psychology, and/or experience in student affairs settings, making them ill-positioned(and often not comfortable) in helping students navigate the social and emotional landscape ofcollege life, reflect on personal development as they transition into adulthood, explore the non-technical aspects of their undergraduate experience, and interpret university
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarira Motaref, P.E., University of Connecticut; Mousumi Roy, P.E., University of Connecticut; Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
Inclusive Teaching: An Exploratory Approach to Evaluate Faculty PerceptionsAbstract:This study describes an exploratory approach to evaluate faculty perception of the peerobservation practice aimed to enhance inclusive teaching.The quality of teaching is a part of the evaluation criteria for Promotion, Tenure andReappointment (PTR) process for university faculty. The student-based evaluation of teaching isknown to have several limitations and hence cannot be the sole basis for instructor evaluation.Peer observation, self-reflection, and assessment of teaching portfolios can be employed asholistic evaluation practices. The Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) department at theUniversity of Connecticut (UConn) adopted a calibrated
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 12
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gianina Morales, University of Pittsburgh and Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile; Rene Alejandro Noel, Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
previouswork, we presented the design, execution, and lessons learned of a faculty development programfor instructors of introductory engineering courses developed in a Chilean regional university. Theprogram implemented a collaborative coaching model in which methodological experts led teamsof instructors in designing and creating coursework materials and accompanied theimplementation of the courses through classroom support and weekly reflection sessions. A totalof nine instructors started the program, but six continued during the entire year and ended withsuccessful results. Almost five years after the completion of the program, we wonder: How mightthe faculty development experience have impacted in the long-term the instructional practices
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Erick S. Vasquez, University of Dayton; Megan Morin, ASHLIN Management Group; Vinayak Vijayan, University of Dayton; Timothy Reissman, University of Dayton
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
ledincluding a process of learning, reflection, and support by colleagues. One way in which it canbe effective for faculty to acclimate is by doing small implementations through micromoments.Micromoments are rapid and easy active learning implementations that encourage students’learning. These activities can help support faculty who often struggle with competing demandsand lack of time, limiting improvement in teaching aspects. This work-in-progress paper showsthe authors’ reflections and suggestions to engage faculty in promoting micromoment activitiesin lecture-based teaching.At the University of Dayton - an R2 university, the lead engineering faculty started a FLC tosupport the integration of entrepreneurially minded learning (EML) using the KEEN
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
W. Vincent Wilding, Brigham Young University; Jennifer Ramsey, Brigham Young University; Richard Swan, Brigham Young University; Tina M. Taylor
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
are working to find better ways to evaluation teaching. Peerevaluation of teaching is used by many institutions; however, these evaluations commonly lacksubstance. Teaching portfolios are also commonly used as a tool for teacher reflection leading toefforts of improvement. Yet concerns persist about the nature and effectiveness of teachingevaluation.Over the past five years, Brigham Young University has developed a process built on the conceptthat peer review can be an effective tool for the evaluation of teaching just like it is for theevaluation of scholarship. In this process, the faculty member is responsible to providesubstantive evidence of the effectiveness of their teaching efforts in a teaching portfolio. Peerreviewers then evaluate
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Katie Mowat, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Her role in the College of Engineering at UNL is to lead the disciplinary-based education research ini- tiative, establishing a cadre of engineering education research faculty in the engineering departments and creating a graduate program. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts; the design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners.Mrs. Katie Mowat, University of Nebraska, Lincoln I am an engineer who loves to work with people, learn about new ideas and
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Sangster, Northeastern University; Andrew L. Gillen, Northeastern University; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
reflection is the idea that communities ofpractice tend to form more often in a workplace environment than in formal school education [5].Many of the members of our group are faculty with significant teaching loads, who practice amore traditional kind of knowledge transfer within our classes each week. When it is then ourown turn to seek out new knowledge, we instead choose an informal, collaborativecommunication format. While it is outside of the scope of this paper, there is a fair amount tounpack about how, as older adults, we balance companionship as an equally important valuealong with knowledge gain. It is possible that more reflection is needed on the needs of ourstudents, and the potential exists to incorporate more companionship components
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
S. Stavros Valenti, Hofstra University; Kevin Patrick Nolan, Hofstra University; Lynn A. Albers, Hofstra University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
agreed on three guiding principles (a) Update the SET instrument to makeit a more useful instrument for faculty development; (b) Include items that capture studentperceptions of class climate; (c) Broaden the scope of teaching behaviors assessed to reflect thebroad range of course structures and effective teaching styles of our faculty.The Committee researched and compared the SET standards and processes at OU to peer andaspirant institutions. As part of this research, we examined best practices for preventing bias inresponses from students. We note that none of OUs peer and aspirant schools are using paper-and-pencil SET data collection processes. Benchmarking information and best-practice insights weregleaned for both the solicitation of
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Megan Morin, ASHLIN Management Group; Richard Goldberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Bryant Hutson, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
at least one “micromoment activity” in their courses. To support faculty in theseactivities, we created a set of 25 micromoment activities [16] that faculty could use immediatelyand easily adapt to the content at hand. Not only would these activities help faculty to be moreconfident in their teaching, but they would support pedagogical change and encourage morefrequent implementations. Students would also have more opportunities for engaging in learningexperiences to develop an entrepreneurial mindset [16].After implementing each micromoment activity, faculty completed a reflection and submitted toan online forum on Engineering Unleashed [17] to discuss the activity, how it went, and howthey can improve. They were also asked how they felt
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Boni Frances Yraguen, Georgia Institute of Technology; Adam Steinberg; Carol Subiño Sullivan, Georgia Institute of Technology; Lance Matthew Crawford
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
student reflections, authentic learning assignments, ad the use of technology in the classroom. Boni hopes to pursue a career in academia with a focus on teaching and engineering education.Adam Steinberg ˜ Sullivan, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Carol Subino Carol Subi˜no Sullivan is the assistant director of faculty teaching and learning initiatives for the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). In this role she supports educators through workshops, short courses, consultations, faculty learning communities and fellows groups, special events, scholarship of teaching and learning, digital resources awards and recognitions, and partnerships. In all of her efforts, her goal is to support educators in
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Camila Olivero-Araya, The Ohio State University; Julie P. Martin, The Ohio State University; Micah Organ
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
relationshipswith these students and enhance the quality of education for everyone. 3. Theoretical Framework: Intercultural communication competenceICC is a crucial skill that researchers have been exploring for the last two decades. A review ofthe literature reveals a multitude of definitions of ICC [14]. This variability in the content ofICC models and dimensions presents several challenges. For this reason, Griffith and others[14] propose a framework and operational definition to serve as the basis for the developmentof the concept of ICC in higher education research. This operational definition is based onprior research and states that ICC “reflects a person’s capability to gather, interpret, and actupon these radically different cues to function
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Swetha Nittala, Uber Technologies; Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
Lab [DEL] at Stanford University. The participant group had a diverse set of educational and professional backgrounds and included undergraduates (N=3), graduate students and postdoctoral scholars (N=4), visiting student researchers (N=5), academic staff (N=1), and experienced faculty members (N=3). As a part of the session, the participants were asked to reflect and respond to two questions: 1) As an instructor, what is a teaching strategy or practice that you use to create a more inclusive and equitable classroom (i.e., to help students feel like they belong and are supported)? 2) As a student, what is a teaching strategy or practice that you wish your instructors used to create a better
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Renukadevi Selvaraj, The National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research (NITTTR) Chennai, India ; Subathradevi Subramoniam
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
underlying Well-being and developmental programsand addresses the theories in relation to teachers. Author Theoretical Background Relevance To Teachers & Year Diener, Diener’s Subjective Well-being explores Teachers’ Subjective Well-being has 1984 the perception of the individual about been shown to influence their view on his/her life. It reflects the positive and work and their overall satisfaction with limiting emotional reactions to one’s life [27]. It has been predominantly noted satisfaction with life [26]. This theory by that teachers with decreased levels of Diener shows Well-being as an outcome
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
mind map was created as shown in Appendix A.Two very important points should be made about the mind map as presented here. First, a mindmap is simply a way to organize ideas, concepts, techniques, etc. It should not be considered aone-size-fits-all final objective document. It should be considered a living document wherein thecontents can be expanded, techniques can be moved to other levels or removed altogether, etc.For example, there are no set rules on the amount of time spent on a Rank Order and how deepof a learning impact it may have on the students. The author has witnessed a Rank Order withonly five items to rank by each individual student for a total class time of about 8 minutesincluding reflection. Also witnessed is a Rank Order
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marcus Vinicius Melo de Lyra, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
is important for ensuring that interventions are adequately designed to supporttheir teaching development. This study used semi-structured interviews to investigate challengesand support structures that early-career engineering faculty experience during their initialtransition into the classroom. The outcome of this study will help faculty personally reflect ontheir teaching experiences and support the design of appropriate professional developmentactivities addressing actual challenges that early-career engineering faculty face.PositionalityThe primary author of this paper is an international graduate student in an engineering educationprogram who aligns with a social-constructivist perspective, which centers his understanding ofthe
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, Rowan University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Ivan E. Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University; Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
communication about DEI initiatives and progress o Difficulties with implementing consistent policy or communication across departments o Who is coordinating and holding people accountable?Challenges relating to strategizing the DEI curriculum focused most often on finding room in thecurriculum for DEI courses or content, as reflected in this comment: “The curriculum is tightalready, so there's not much wiggle room for making changes.” Several respondents wereconcerned about the need for a “curriculum overhaul,” either by adding new courses or newcontent to existing courses. Other challenges pertained to the scope of DEI content and scale ofimplementation: o Achieving critical mass of DEI content so that these concepts are embedded, not
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cassondra Wallwey, Virginia Tech; Renee M. Desing, Oregon State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
anything. And so, yes, it was a good experience, yes, it was incredibly stressful because it was extra, it was always seen as extra.” (Mitchell)While participation in this program may not have resulted in grant money, publications, orteaching credits, benefits and outcomes described by participants do relate to their developmentas researchers and educators and can affect the characteristics, output, and metrics used whenbeing considered for promotion and tenure. Some faculty participants did not make thisconnection, but others did with varying degrees of reflection on the applicability of their growthin communication and collaboration skills related to more tangible promotion and tenure metrics. Table 1: Applicability of Participation in
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 12
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy L Brooks, Oregon State University; Jeff Knowles; Elliott Clement, Oregon State University; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Shane A. Brown, P.E., Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
87 students in a class session are called upon to do other than simply watching, listening, and taking notes. Case-based teaching Asking students to analyze case studies of historical or 65 hypothetical situations that involve solving problems and/or making decisions. Collaborative Asking students to work together in small groups toward a 65 learning common goal. Concept tests Asking multiple-choice conceptual questions with distracters 50 (incorrect responses) that reflect common student misconceptions. Cooperative
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Randy McDonald, Texas A&M University; Lani Draper, Texas A&M University; Sunay Palsole, Texas A&M University; Sandra R. Childers, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
at Texas A&M University, and has been involved in academic technology for over 20 years. He helped establish the Engineering Studio for Advanced Instruction & Learning (eSAIL),Sandra R. Childers, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 LESSONS LEARNED: A 360-Degree Review of Faculty Development ResourcesAbstractThis paper reflects on the process, results, and lessons learned from a comprehensive review ofthe professional development resources and program provided for Engineering faculty by adistance education support unit at a large research university. The purpose of the review is todetermine the overall effectiveness
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robin Andreasen, University of Delaware; Heather Doty, University of Delaware; Shawna Vican, University of Delaware
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
tenure stuff was, like, a whole another step in its own right.” [R2]Peer-review committee feedback was often minimal as well. Several faculty reported that officialletters were often generic and positive (“Keep up the good work!”), and under-reflected whatwould be needed for tenure and promotion. R10 speculated that committees try to be positive intheir official letters because the letters stay in the candidate’s record, and are included in theirP&T dossier.A female non-STEM faculty member received a positive official letter from her committee, butwas also told in a side conversation with faculty from her department that changes were needed.In her words: “The official letter is really positive and praiseworthy, and the summary is
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maria L. Espino, University of South Carolina; Brian D. Le, University of California, Los Angeles; Henry Tran, University of South Carolina; Spencer Platt, University of South Carolina
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
get out of that, and this is what I would tell you to say to do that or, you know, so I have people in my corner, who definitely are trying to help reduce that kind of workload.”Eva has a mentor that understands the tenure process and is a support for her as she navigates theworkload and faculty norms. Understanding the importance of mentorship in these experiences iscrucial to understanding how faculty navigate the tenure process, especially with the lack ofmentors that reflect their identities which promotes isolation.Understanding the Tenure and Promotion process in Engineering Departments Participants spoke in detail about the worries they had about the process. Some of theareas of concern are highlighted by a few
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Iftekhar Ibne Basith, Sam Houston State University; Vajih Khan, Sam Houston State University; Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University; Abdulhamid Zaidi; Suleiman M Obeidat, Sam Houston State University; Sumith Yesudasan, Sam Houston State University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
60% on the pre-test and 96% on the post-test, indicating significant improvement aftercompleting the training. By investing in faculty development, we are better equipped to provideour students with hands-on experience and knowledge of integrated systems, ensuring they areprepared for the challenges and opportunities of Industry 4.0.Importance of Such Trainings and Student SuccessTo address the skill challenges of the cutting-edge industry, it is essential for higher educationalinstitutions like ours to reflect these needs in our course curriculum, especially for EngineeringTechnology departments that emphasize applied engineering and hands-on learning. To achievethis, faculty members participate in professional development trainings to