, NY.[22] Highlander Research and Education Center and Gabriela Hurtado-Ramos (artist), Methodologies en Color (1), https://highlandercenter.org/our-story/mission/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[23] D. Boyd, Under the Radar: Popular Education in North America, A White Paper, COMM-ORG Papers, vol. 18, 2012, https://comm-org.wisc.edu/papers2012/boyd.htm (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[24] A. Frausto Aceves, B. Torres-Alave, and S. Tolbert, “On love, becomings, and true generosity for science education: honoring Paulo Freire,” Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 17, pp. 217-230, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10098-w.[25] Medibank, “Uncle Bob Randall,” Medibank, Jul. 15, 2016, https://www.medibank.com.au
Paper ID #38993Cultivating ”global competency” in a divided world: A collaborative autoethnographyof the cross-border curriculum designYiXiang Shawn Sun, National Taiwan UniversityDr. Sharon Tsai-hsuan Ku, University of Virginia Dr. Sharon Ku has dual background in physics and STS, specializing in the sociology of scientific knowledge, standardization, and science policy in the US and China. She works closely with scientists and engineers from academia, government and industry. Dr. Ku received her PhD from History & Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University in 2010, and is currently an assistant professor at Dept. of
Paper ID #49261Enginovation: A Social Experiment in Innovating TogetherDr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Dr. Brooke Coley, Assistant Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University, is a trailblazing scholar and disruptor, redefining engineering through equity-driven innovation. As the Founding Executive Director of RARE JUSTICE, she spearheads transformative efforts to dismantle systemic barriers, eradicate anti-Blackness in STEM, and amplify the voices of racially minoritized scholars. Her groundbreaking research critically examines graduate education while demanding
Engineering Education, 2024 10 2024 ASEE Annual ConferenceRiley, D., Slaton, A. & Pawley, A. (2014). Social justice and inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering. InCambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Jahiri and B. Olds (eds.), 335-356.Schuck, P.H. (2017). One National Undecided: Clear Thinking about Five Hard Issues That Divide Us. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.Schwarz-Plaschg, C. (2018). The power of analogies for imagining and governing emerging technologies.Nanoethics,12, 139-153.Sedlack, V. (n.d.). Fish don’t know they’re in the water. Almeda Education Foundation.https://AlamedaEducation.org.Slaton, A. (2022, July 7). Fast-track
. Eddington, Kansas State University Sean Eddington (Ph.D., Purdue University) is an assistant professor of Communication Studies at Kansas State University. Sean’s primary research interests exist at the intersections of organizational communi- cation, new media, gender, and organizing.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Elmore Family School of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and (by courtesy) the School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Pur- due. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and a Ph.D. in
creatively to build on existing assets in ways that invite context-specific,bottom-up cultural change.AcknowledgementsBoth authors would like to thank all members of the School of Biological & Health SystemsEngineering at ASU who have supported, participated in, or contributed to the Community Gardenin any way, with particular gratitude to the faculty who have joined our regular gatherings. EF alsoacknowledges support from the National Science Foundation (Award #2045925).References[1] S. Hall, “A mental-health crisis is gripping science — toxic research culture is to blame,” Nature, vol. 617, no. 7962, pp. 666–668, May 2023, doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-01708-4.[2] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence
), Virtual, 2021, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/RESPECT51740.2021.9620612.[2] J. Jones. “LGBT identification in U.S. ticks up to 7.1%.” Gallup News. Accessed: May 1, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://news.gallup.com/poll/389792/lgbt-identification-ticks -up.aspx[3] S. E. James, J. L. Herman, S. Rankin, M. Keisling, L. Mottet, & M. Anafi, “The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey,” National Center for Transgender Equality, Washington, DC, 2016.[4] A. Menier, S. Sexton, B. Gutierrez, and J. Donoghue, “Nonbinary learners in state data: Implications for computing education research,” 2022 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology
in productive ways.References[1] b. hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York, NY,USA: Taylor & Francis Group, 1994.[2] D. Riley, “Employing liberative pedagogies in engineering education,” Journal of Womenand Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 137-258, 2003.[3] Office of Institutional Statistics. “Enrolment Reports | Institutional Analysis | University ofManitoba” umanitoba.ca. https://umanitoba.ca/institutional-analysis/enrolment-reports (accessed:Mar 27, 2024)..[4] A. Quan-Haase, Technology & Society: Social Networks, Power, and Inequality, 3rd ed. DonMills, Canada: Oxford University Press, 2020.[5] B. Arao and K. Clemens, “From safe spaces to brave spaces: A new way to frame
Instrument 1 and Instrument 2. Ultimately, we undertookindividual case study interviews with two of these students.Survey QuestionsInstrument 1 and Instrument 2 are both quantitative and qualitative surveys administered throughQualtrics. The questions in the surveys are listed in Table 1. Table 1: Questions asked in Instruments 1 and 2 Question Response Type Instr. 1. What types of things are you most curious about? (free entry long-form) 1,2 2. How curious are you about this habit? a. Literacy, Dialogue, and Expression b. Religion, Faith, and Ethics
Development, Taylor & Francis Group 2015, pp. 142-160 6. b. hooks, Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge. 1994 7. X. Du, L. Su, J. Liu, “Developing sustainability curricula using the PBL method in a Chinese context”. J. Clean. Prod. 61, 80–88. 2013 doi: /10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.012. 8. S. Sivapalan, M.J. Clifford, S. Speight, “Engineering education for sustainable development: using online learning to support the new paradigms”. Australas. J. Eng.Educ. 21 (2), 61–73. 2016 doi: 10.1080/22054952.2017.1307592. 9. G. Moriarty, “Ethics, Ethos and the Professions: Some Lessons from Engineering”, Professional Ethics, 4(1), 1995, pp. 75–93 10. R. C. Campbell and D
students’ equity orientations throughcourse experiences that affirm learners’ identities and lived experiences; center thesociotechnical nature of engineering; and prioritize equitable teaching and assessment practices.Our ultimate goal is for students to develop engineering equity-mindedness, involving thefollowing learning objectives: (a) Obj. 1: awareness and recognition of engineering as a sociotechnical field and occupation that requires understanding of micro-, meso-, and macro-level social contexts; (b)Obj. 2: capacity to identify and reflect on one’s positionality and the ways one’s engineering practice can affect societal (in)equity; (c) Obj. 3: capacity to consider, individually and with others, how societal (in
thatcommonly create hierarchies in engineering thought and practice, and embrace a culture that isholistic and integrated? a) characterize the current state of the departmental culture with regard to endorsement or rejection of historical binaries in engineering, b) describe the systemic conditions and processes that build capacity for students, staff, and faculty to co-create revolutionary change, c) examine how the culture shifts over time.R2. To what extent does our change model help students, staff, and faculty navigate, respond to,and engage in critical organizational change?R3. What are the impacts of a holistic environment on individual growth and social cohesion?To describe faculty members’ basic assumptions
toindependently construct a series of “Vignettes”, Appendix B, which contain our individualreflections on our backgrounds and motivations for participating in the course, the role ofcommunity, and our key takeaways. In our meetings, we also discussed how our individualexperiences related to others, the challenges we aimed to address in our Pilot Course, and the2025 LEES themes (i.e. Truth & Reconciliation, Conflict, Climate Change, and SociotechnicalIntegration). These individual vignettes and group discussions form the source material to whichwe refer frequently throughout the paper.The writing of the paper itself and the synthesis of ideas that it entailed was largely undertaken byJacque and Morgan (the lead, co-first authors) with methodological
Press, 2017.[2] P. Nagy, R. Wylie, J. Eschrich, and E. Finn. “Facing the Pariah of Science: TheFrankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists,” Science and EngineeringEthics, vol. 26, pp. 737-759, 2020.[3] J. Canino and K. B. Teichert. (2019, June). A Frankenstein-inspired Engineering DesignProject. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-frankenstein-inspired-engineering-design-project[4] H. Markus and P. Nurius, “Possible Selves,” American Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 9, pp.954-969, Sep. 1986.[5] M. Shelley, Frankenstein: Or, the Modern Prometheus, M. Hindle, Notes, E. Kostova,Introduction, New York, NY, USA: Penguin Books, 2007.[6
Paper ID #46487Love and Its Attributes as a Foundation for Student Learning in EngineeringEducationDr. Mark J. Povinelli, Syracuse University Dr. Mark Povinelli was the Kenneth A. and Mary Ann Shaw Professor of Practice in Entrepreneurial Leadership at Syracuse University, where he also serves as an adjunct professor in the Ren´ee Crown University Honors Program. He has taught at the secondary level in the New Vision Engineering College Preparatory Program and at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth. With a professional background spanning research, design, development, and management roles in advanced
generally taught by faculty withsocial science PhDs. Those who identified as men felt a slightly stronger sense of belonging intheir disciplinary track courses (which include environmental engineering, geophysics, andindependent interdisciplinary options) than did women. Those courses also include students fromthose programs. We are cautious in making greater extrapolations based on our preliminarysurvey data, given that more people identifying as women (14) than men (9) filled out the survey.Figure 4: Average belongingness scores by gender for (a) major and (b) classesAdditional results broken down by socioeconomic status and race and ethnicity are available inthe Appendix.IdentityThe interviews were evocative for tracking the evolution of
Paper ID #42156The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation &Identity FormationDr. Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College ParkDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation and Identity FormationAbstract
.24521.[14] C. Seron, S. Silbey, E. Cech, and B. Rubineau, “‘I am Not a Feminist, but. . .’: Hegemony of a Meritocratic Ideology and the Limits of Critique Among Women in Engineering,” Work Occup., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 131–167, May 2018, doi: 10.1177/0730888418759774.[15] B. Bond-Trittipo, J. Valle, S. Secules, and A. Green, “Challenging the Hegemonic Culture of Engineering: Curricular and Co-Curricular Methodologies,” presented at the 2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity), Feb. 2022. Accessed: May 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/challenging-the- hegemonic-culture-of-engineering-curricular-and-co-curricular-methodologies[16] M. Chrysochoou, A. E. Zaghi, and C. M
. Kali, and S. Secules, “Narratives of Identity Coherence and Separation in the Figured Worlds of Undergraduate Engineering Education,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Oct. 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/narratives-of-identity-coherence-and-separation- in-the-figured-worlds-of-undergraduate-engineering-education[2] Y. Jackson Alecia and L. A. Mazzei, “Thinking with Theory: A New Analytic for Qualitative Inquiry,” in The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th edition). Sage Publications, Two Regimes of Madness: Texts and Interviews, 2017.[3] S. Secules, M. B. Kali, and C. McCall, “Audio Dissemination for Qualitative and Broadening
knowledge and skills in both. Also, this work providesa novel perspective from individuals who might not have necessarily experienced traditional conceptionsand practices of engineering, which are often artificially separated from societal contexts andresponsibility.References[1] W. K. Jenkins, “Today’s Engineering Education Is a Liberal Arts Education of the Future [Point of View],” Proc. IEEE, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 1306–1309, 2014.[2] S. B. Sample, “Engineering education and the liberal arts tradition,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 54–57, 1988.[3] K. L. S. Bernhardt and J. S. Rossmann, “An integrative education in engineering and the liberal arts: An institutional case study,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
术人员的质化研究报告[J].高等工程教育研究,2009(6):9-17.) Li M., Hu X. Key stages in the growth of excellent engineers and their influencing factors: a qualitativestudy[J]. Tsinghua Journal of Education,2010,31(3):80-89.(李曼丽,胡欣.优秀工程师成长历程中的关键阶段及其影响因素:一个质化研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2010,31(3):80-89.) Martin A J, Marsh H W. Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A constructvalidity approach[J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS,2006,43(3):267-281. Masten A S, Obradovi J . Competence and Resilience in Development[J]. Annals of the New York Academyof Sciences, 2006, 1094(1):13-27. Martin R, Maytham B, Case J, et al. Engineering Graduates’ Perceptions of How Well They Were Preparedfor Work in Industry[J].European Journal of Engineering
to employ a systems thinking approach. It’s about relations.Instructor B: The systems approach helps balance the different considerations. It helps identify relationships and make connections. It’s about scope and identifying strengths.Instructor A: It’s your Petri dish!The following excerpt by a student illustrates how faculty enriched students’ understanding ofthis concept through informal conversations and lectures where they expanded on why theconcept was important to training and how it will shape their work on various complex problems. Overall, I thought the other lectures were helpful too, just when they talk about systems thinking and design thinking and all that stuff, because those are things
/0950017020902968.[2] B. A. Schuelke-Leech, T. C. Leech, B. Barry, and S. Jordan-Mattingly, “Ethical Dilemmas for engineers in the development of autonomous systems,” International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings, vol. 2018-Novem, pp. 49–54, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638282.[3] E. A. Cech and C. J. Finelli, “Learning to prioritize the public good: Does training in classes, workplaces, and professional societies shape engineers’ understanding of their public welfare responsibilities?,” Journal of Engineering Education, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1002/jee.20590.[4] D. Oliver, “Whistle-Blowing Engineer,” vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 246–256, 2004.[5] J. Metcalf, E. Moss, and danah boyd, “Owning Ethics
Paper ID #38441Dignity and well-being: Narratives of modifying the culture ofengineering education to improve mental health among underrepresentedSTEM studentsKatherine Robert, University of Denver Katherine is an adjunct professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Humanities, Arts & Social Sciences. Currently a PhD candidate in Higher Education at the University of Denver, Katherine’s disser- tation research used ground-breaking methods to collaborate with underrepresented engineering students and uncover how they experience being socialized into the professional culture of engineering during their education.Dr
/about/mission (accessed Oct. 09, 2022).[12] Loyola University Maryland, “Curriculum and Policies - Loyola University Maryland - Acalog ACMSTM.” https://catalogue.loyola.edu/content.php?catoid=28&navoid=957#curriculum (accessed Apr. 07, 2023).[13] B. D. Jones, “Motivating Students to Engage in Learning: The MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation,” Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 272–285, 2009.[14] National Academy of Engineering., Educating the engineer of 2020 : adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press, 2005, p. 192.[15] A. Hacker, “The Organization Man. By William H. WhyteJr., (New York: Simon and Schuster. 1956. Pp. 429. $5.00.),” Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., vol. 51
complementthe development of critical consciousness, “where students (a) gain sociopolitical understanding,or engage in critical reflection, to (b) change the world, or take critical action” [8].An analytical review of CC literature by Jemal [9] observes divergence in the interpretation of“critical action,” with some scholars viewing the capacity, or the intention, to take action, assufficient, and also divergence in whether and how critical consciousness may be experienced bythe privileged as well as the oppressed. Jemal proposes the notion of “transformative potential”to clarify the construct of critical consciousness on both counts.Engineering identity and critical consciousnessWhile the engaged presence of diverse perspectives in engineering
, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1177/089124399013005006.[7] C. McCall, A. Shew, D. R. Simmons, M. C. Paretti, and L. D. McNair, “Exploring student disability and professional identity: navigating sociocultural expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 79–89, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1720434.[8] L. Davenport Huyer et al., “Enhancing senior high school student engagement and academic performance using an inclusive and scalable inquiry-based program,” Npj Sci. Learn., vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41539-020-00076-2.[9] S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner III, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, “Major Differences: Variations in Undergraduate and
Paper ID #45486Female engineering academics in the Global South and North: An explorationof language of instruction, using Story Circles and Focus GroupsMrs. Amani A AL-Mqadma, Islamic University of Gaza Amani Al-Mqadma is a Council for At-Risk Academics fellow and a PhD candidate at Edinburgh University Business School. She is Head of International Relations at the Islamic University of Gaza, Palestine. Her research interest is in women’s empowerment and digital entrepreneurship in conflict contexts.Dr. Bill Guariento, University of Northumbria I am Programme Leader for the BA English Language Studies at Northumbria
questions, we walk’: How should engineering education address equity, the climate crisis, and its own moral infrastructure?,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 447–452, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20295.[10] E. Godfrey, “Understanding Disciplinary Cultures: The First Step to Cultural Change,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 437–456. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.028.[11] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305.[12] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. E. Canney, “Changes in
: - Guest speaker(s) on topics of interest identified by students 6 earlier in the course. 7 Open-Ended - Semi-structured and collaborative work periods to prepare 8 for the final presentation or reflection. - Student-led seminars on topics of interest. Students give final presentations, and receive feedback from 9 Final Presentations their peers and instructors.References [1] A. B. Diekman, M. P. Joshi, and T. M. Benson-Greenwald, “Chapter four – Goal congruity theory: Navigating the social structure to fulfill goals,” ser