a scale of 5.0. Also, 66% of the studentsfound 3D Printing and Design Of Experiments to be more appealing. Based on their hands-onexperience with Design of Experiments, SolidWorks and 3D printing and the comments receivedby the program participants it was found that: (a) All the students demonstrated basic level ofunderstanding (through their assigned project) on how to use basic engineering skills to tackle areal world problem based on the tools available to their disposal; (b) Educational environmentprovided to them in university setting motivated 45% of the participants with a positive impacton their career choices towards STEM.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors of this paper would like to thank the NSF (Grant No: NSF DUE-TUES-1246050)and the
spill water to run Page 11.329.4through water-wheels or other toys. In general the students tried to purchase parts and 3components instead of fabricating them at the machine and/or wood shops in order tosave their time and improve the product quality. Teams then drew their CAD drawingsand started to purchase some parts that were available from local stores. Because ofbudget limitations and availability of components at the local stores, a number of partshad to be fabricated by the students. Two teams spent their major time building the woodtables.(a) Conceptual design by Team 1 (b) CAD drawing by Team
. J. Roselli, S. P. Brophy, “Redesigning a biomechanics course using challenge-basedinstruction,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 22(4), 66-70, 2003[10] V. Gaddam, I. Fidan, B. Barger, “Hands-On Entrepreneurial Engineering ManagementCourse and Its Experiential Learning,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE2016, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/25433, accessed on April 5, 2019.
, Statistics Presentation Skills, Lifelong Learning, Knowledge Page 24.741.7Figure 5 The Four Pillars Content of the Pump Tester Project (highlighted in yellow)Mapping ABET Criteria to the Four PillarsThe ABET criteria for manufacturing engineering programs are listed, with the l, m, n, and o criteriaadded for the program at GVSU. Some of these criteria are addressed extensively with the standardacademic course work, for example a, b, c, e, g, and k. Other topics are more difficult to address in anengineering curriculum, for example d, f, h, i, and j. A. an ability to apply knowledge of
. Page 12.340.14 “Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ø 2007, American Society for Engineering Education”[4] Don Tapping and Tom Shuker, Value Stream Management for the Lean Office, Productivity Press, 2002.[5] Krista M. Schulte, Mohan R. Paruchuri and Jayesh B. Patel, “Applying Lean Principles in a Test Laboratory Environment, “ SAE 2005-01-1051, 2005 SAE World Congress, Detroit, Michigan.[6] Smon Wood, “How LIMS Facilitates Lean ManufacturingProcesses in the Laboratory,” Retrieved Feb 25, 2007 from http://www.starlims.com/AL-Wood- Reprint.pdf, American Laboratory September 2006.Biographical SketchFRANK LIOU: Frank Liou is a Professor
course.The reasoning given for the students’ choice for the over-damped systems also showeddifferences between the two versions of the course. Thirty one percent of ME students mentionedthat system 3 has the slowest pole, while none of the PDM students mentioned this. PDMstudents who correctly matched the over-damped systems mentioned that system 3 has higher 9 1.4 1.2 Amplitude 1.0 0.8 0.6 a 0.4 b
through an engineering technology educationconsistent with industry expectations.References[1] B. Pourabdollahiana, M. Taischa and E. Kergaa, "Serious Games in Manufacturing Education: Evaluation of Learners' Engagement," Procedia Computer Science, pp. 256-265, 2012.[2] Sadat-Hossieny and J. R. Gray, "Certificate Program Summary," in Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, 2002.[3] R. H. Todd, C. D. Sorensen and S. P. Magleby, "Designing a Senior Capstone Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 92-100, 1993.[4] J. Dewey, Experience and Education, New York: Collier Books, 1963.[5] C. Manolis, D. J. Burns, R. Assudani and R. Chinta, "Assessing experiential learning styles: A
detection (LIDAR) sensor. The MR uses the map transmitted by the SR for its path-planning algorithm and determines the best path for the slave robot and itself to efficiently clean the room. Additionally, the MR vacuums dust and dirt swept by the SR. Table 1: Engineering Parts and Specifications Items Master Robot Slave Robot Maximum Translational 0.22m/s 0.35m/s Velocity Maximum Rotational Velocity 1.82rad/s 2.84rad/s Maximum Payload 2kgs N/A Size (L x B x H
-specific (identified as criteria l-p in Table 1) and the general (ABET-specified a-k) criteria. Thespecific criteria for manufacturing programs are written as: Program Outcome Criteria for Manufacturing and Similarly Named Programs10 The program must prepare graduates to have proficiency in (a) materials and manufacturing processes: ability to design manufacturing processes that result in products that meet specific material and other requirements; (b) process, assembly and product engineering: ability to design products and the equipment, tooling, and environment necessary for their manufacture; (c) manufacturing competitiveness: ability to create
HSNGB 1 Housing Back Custom 3D printed part $0.25 $0.25 9 INSTR 1 Circuit Design handout Appendix - - Total Cost: $2.53 $1.71Step 1. The large square pad on the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) must be tinned for the batterycontact (Figure 1). a. PCB Front b. PCB Back Figure 1. Printed Circuit Board Battery PadStep 2. The battery holder (BT) is installed on the bottom of the printed circuit board (PCB)with its open side towards the lower edge. Its two terminals are then soldered into place on thetop side of the board (Figure 2
23.5%B 2 11.8%C+ 1 05.9%F 1 05.9%A: ≥ 90%; B+: 85 – 89%; B: 80 – 84; C+: 75 – 79; C: 70 – 74%; D: 60 – 69%; F < 60 The students performed well during the Fall 05. This performance wassignificantly better than the Fall ’04 term, where 50% of the class obtained C or lowergrade. According to the existing course description, the following ABET outcomes wereexpected to be satisfied by this course: • Outcomes 1: an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering • Outcome 2: an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze
/ Page 26.12.13obamaadministrationlaunchescompetitionthreenewmanufacturinginnova [2] Kim, M. and M. L. Maher (2008). “The impact of tangible user interfaces on designers’ spatial cognition.” HumanComputer Interaction 23(2): 101–137. [3] Viswanathan, V. and J. Linsey (2012). “Physical models and design thinking: A study of functionality, novelty and variety of ideas.” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 134(9): 091004091001091012. [4] Sheppard, S. D. and R. Jenison (1997). “Freshman engineering design experiences: An organizational framework.” International Journal of Engineering Education 13(3): 190–197. [5] Jariwala, A. S., Burks Fasse, B., Quintero, C., Forest, C. R., Linsey, J., Ngo, P
a notepad, which is to be used as student journal for this class. In the journal, students need to keep: a. All notes taken in class b. All field trip reflections c. Time management calendar and reflections d. Questions, issues, or perspectives you gained from the readings and would like to raise in class e. Current event article link and paragraph f. Reflections on what you gained from your FYE activities. g. These journals will be collected twice during the semester for feedback. The final h. Journal must be submitted to your instructor at the scheduled time of the final exam.Themes There are mainly five themes
Content: “The technical content of aprogram must focus on the applied aspects of science and engineering…” and “must develop theskills, knowledge, methods, procedures, and techniques associated with the technical disciplineand appropriate to the goals of the program.” Part d stipulates, the “Capstone or other integratingexperiences must draw together diverse elements of the curriculum and develop studentcompetence in focusing both technical and non-technical skills in solving problems.1”Criterion 3 of the General TAC/ABET criteria provides for the following desired outcomes: a. Demonstrate mastery of knowledge, techniques, skills and tools of the discipline b. Apply current knowledge to emerging applications c. Design and conduct
AC 2012-3022: TEACHING BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN PRO-CESS AND DEVELOPMENT TOOLS TO MANUFACTURING STUDENTSDr. Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University Arif Sirinterlikci is a professor of engineering at Robert Morris University School of Engineering, Math- ematics, and Science. He also serves as a Director of Engineering Laboratories as well as Co-head of the Research and Outreach Center. He has been an active member of ASEE and SME, serving as an officer of both societies and engaged in engineering education and K-12 outreach. Page 25.1239.1 c American Society for Engineering
] LulzBot, “LulzBot Taz 5,” LulzBot, Accessed Dec. 19, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.lulzbot.com/store/printers/lulzbot-taz-5[11] Mellinger, A., Ward, E., Kyger, H., Renda, W., Jones, B., Shelby, C., Majocha, J., and Hooper, M., “FSAE Sidepod Composites Project,” Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, 2018Appendix A – Tool Manufacturing and Final ProductsMale Foam Tooling Manufacturing [11]Female Foam Tooling Manufacturing [11]3D printed Male Tooling3D printed Dissolvable Tooling (made with PVA)Soluble Ceramic Mandrel Mold
upon the number of good partsproduced and the defect rate 3. However, there has been no report so far that a simple hands-onexperiment has been designed to help the engineering students apply the control charts in theSQR course.3. design of the catapult experimentThe catapult project simulates the manufacturing improvement process. It uses a catapult tosimulate a production process and a target board as product specifications. As the major shootingequipment in the experiment, the catapult is shown in Figure 1 (a). The projectile is either atennis ball or a golf ball as shown in Figure 1 (b). The target board is made of plastic foam. It has3 concentric circles. The largest circle has the diameter of about 1 foot (as shown in Figure 1(c)). The
Engineering Subject Centre. Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre. ISBN 978-1-904804-741 6. Yorke, M. and Longden, B., 2007. The first-year experience in higher education in the UK. The Higher Education Academy. Available from www.eacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/research/surveys/fye 7. Frey, D., 2007. The Importance of Freshman-Year Projects. MIT Faculty Newsletter, Volume XIX, No. 4.Appendix A: Course Redesign Effectiveness SurveyQ1ExportCustomizeHow much did the redesigned 'Foundations of Engineering'course increase your interest and enthusiasm about STEM education?Answer Choices– Responses
getting crushed, it is best to place it very close to the edge of the smaller star.15. Drill holes into the points of the plastic stars and cut these same holes in the larger foam star so that everything is aligned.16. On each point of the star: a. Push a bolt through the top plastic layer and then screw a nut into place on the bottom side of it, applying Loctite to keep the nut from moving. This will keep the points of the stars from collapsing. b. Push the bolt through the rest of the layers and screw a second nut on the bottom, sealing it with Loctite.17. Attach a material to the bottom of the star that will help it grip to the floor.18. Repeat this process for however many stars you would like to
developing a low cost3D printing laboratory that is accessible, as well as improving each machine by adding limitswitches to them. Changes to the outcomes assessment will be also be carried out as definedearlier in this paper.References[1] RepRap. “Welcome to RepRap.Org” http://reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page. Accessed April 10, 2013.[2] Wikipedia. “RepRap Project” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RepRap_Project Accessed April 10, 2013.[3] Thingisverse.“MendelMax Thingiverse” http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:20355 Accessed April 10, 2013.[4] MendelMax. “Recommended Software” http://www.mendelmax.com/wiki/recommended-software/. Accesed April 10, 2013.[5] Winning NAMII Proposal to AFRL[6] Sirinterlikci, A., Badger, P., Yarmeak, G., Mura, C.J., Jasenak, B
between two bar magnets is modeled by the following Equation. ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! F= !"!! (! ! + !!!! ! − (!!!)! ) (Equation 1)Gilbert’s model of magnetostatics is used to derive the force between two bar magnets. B –magnetic flux density near each pole (Tesla), A – area of each pole (m2), L – length of magnets(m), R – radius of cylindrical bar magnets (m), µ - permeability of space (N * Ampere-2), and x –distance between two magnets.Equation 1 uses Gilbert model of magnetostatics, where it is assumed that magnetic monopolesexist. Electrostatic equations can
Labview interface Personal Computer (a) (b) Figure 1. Embedded thermocouple technique for temperature measuring, (a) schematic and (b) cutting insert cutting tool with thermocouple Page 24.371.3 Figure 2 Experiment setup for measuring temperature rising in turning processes with embedded thermocoupleFinally, the whole experiment setup is illustrated as Figure 2: the lathe (to the left), thermocouple (copper wiresattached to the cutting tool), DAQ (white box in the middle
Johnstown. The research ideahas been granted by the UPJ College Council in 2016. This support is gratefully acknowledged.8. References[1] De Borst, R., Crisfield, M. A., Remmers, J. J., & Verhoosel, C. V. (2012).Nonlinear finite element analysis of solids and structures. John Wiley & Sons.[2] Berman, B. (2012). 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Business horizons, 55(2), 155-162.[3] Wettergreen, M. A., Bucklen, B. S., Liebschner, M. A. K., & Sun, W. (2008). CAD assembly process for bone replacement scaffolds in computer-aided tissue engineering. In Virtual Prototyping & Bio Manufacturing in Medical Applications (pp. 87-111). Springer US.[4] Kruth, J. P., Leu, M. C., & Nakagawa, T. (1998
1 2 Company B 1 1 1 Company D Company A 3 Company E Company B 5 Company F Company C Company G 2 Company D
F actor N ame C A M old Temp BC B C oolant F low ABD C A lpha D C ooling Time ABC AC CD BD Term BCD AD ACD A AB D B ABCD
AC 2011-17: INTEGRATING ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTO MANUFAC-TURING ENGINEERING EDUCATIONNing Fang, Utah State University Ning Fang is an Associate Professor in the College of Engineering at Utah State University, USA. He has taught a variety of engineering courses such as metal machining, design for manufacturing, and engineer- ing dynamics. His areas of interest include computer-assisted instructional technology, curricular reform in engineering education, the modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes, and lean product design. He earned his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in mechanical engineering and is the author of more than 60 technical papers published in refereed international journals and conference
, the laboratory exercises are arranged as a sequence of small homeworkassignments and laboratory exercises with the schedule shown in Table 1. The IL and STlanguages are used for the exercises until the conveyor belt station. Figure 1: Uni-trainer (a) and Conveyor Belt Station (b) for PLC ProgrammingDuring the teaching process, in addition to provide students the basic concepts about PLCprogramming, such as the programming structure, logic operations, basis concepts as normallyopen/closed circuit and set/reset dominance latches for storing elements, switch on/off delaytimers, up/down counters, we focus on enhancing students' problem solving capability throughthe kinesthetic learning style. For example, after we teach students the function
. Few sites includedinformation on enrollment or the award of degrees in ‘manufacturing’. It is quite clear that thereis far from universal understanding as to the meaning of this designation in terms of content orextent. The next stage of the current study was the compilation and distribution of a comprehensivesurvey form. It was an attempt to collect information in some depth in five substantivecategories: [a] program identification; [b] program context and content; [c] research andindustry focus; [d] resources; [e] enrollment and degree production. This survey wasadministered through an SME web-based automated survey instrument. Announcements weresent via email to the 104 contacts who had responded to the earlier SME inquiry into
learner to Figure 6: OSHA e-tools uses 3D animations toexplore the environment on their own. illustrate concepts such as the operational timing of Type A vs. Type B gates.A variety of technologies exist that allowusers to navigate through 3-D environments. Most academic programs will certainly have accessto solid modeling software such as Inventor, Solidworks, or Pro/E. Most solid modelingpackages also include the ability to generate animations. In some cases, these models may evenbe exported to cross-platform web-friendly formats such as VRML (Virtual Reality MarkupLanguage).Though some of the desired capabilities for developing a virtual environment for
cooling channels, and combining multi-part assembliesinto a single printed component are just some of the benefits known to additive manufacturing.However, there are challenges in understanding the design and reliability of the material, and theprocess of additive manufacturing. A designer for AM needs sophisticated tools that integratematerial information with geometry, simulation tools, topology optimization, materials databases,and tools for manufacturing process selection, manufacturability analysis and manufacturingsimulation. (a) (b) 6 Figure 2 (a) Parts from GE 3D Printing Challenge , (b) Organic Shaped Brake Disc.Creating a