Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brock E. Barry, U.S. Military Academy; Maj Jonathan Bodenhamer, U.S. Military Academy, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering; James J O'Brien Jr., American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

background knowledge andteaching experience. It is easy to be misled or misinterpret cues that are not filtered for context,culture, gender, and personal bias. The available literature focusing on nonverbal classroomcommunication is significantly partial toward projected cues of the instructor and providessurprisingly little content specific to decoding student generated cues.ReferencesAngelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques : a handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Davis, B. G. (2009). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Gregersen, T. S. (2005). Nonverbal cues: clues to the detection of foreign language anxiety. Foreign Language

Conference Session

Tips of the Trade: Best Practices, Expanded Advice, and Strategies for Implementable Course Improvement

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gillian M. Nicholls, Southeast Missouri State University; William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University; Neal A Lewis, University of Bridgeport

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Conference, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21680 5. Davis, J. L., & McDonald, T. (2014, June), Online Homework: Does it Help or Hurt in the Long Run? Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/228856. Stowell, C. (2012, June), Work-in-Progress: Challenges to Developing Online Homework for Upper-level Engineering Courses Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/222457. Pandian, P., & Gilbert, S. B., & Blessing, S. B., & Roselli, R., & Howard, L., & Raut, A. (2008, June), Integration Of An Intelligent Tutoring System With A Web Based Authoring System To Develop Online Homework Assignments

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald P. Visco Jr., University of Akron; Dirk Schaefer, University of Bath

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Classroom: A Survey of Research”, in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, June 23 - 26, 2013. 9. Van Wie, B., “Multi-Disciplinary Hands-on Desktop Learning Modules and Modern Pedagogies”, in ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX June 10 - 13, 2012. 10. Schaefer, D., Panchal, J.H., Thames, J.L., Haroon, S., and F. Mistree, “Educating Engineers for the Near Tomorrow”, International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), vol. 28, no. 2, 2012, pp. 381-396. 11. Mistree, F., Panchal, J.H., Schaefer, D., Allen, J.K., Haroon, S, and Z. Siddique, “Personalized Engineering Education for the 21st Century – A Competency-based Approach". In Gosper, M., Ifenthaler, D. (Eds.), Curriculum Models for the 21st

Conference Session

Assessing Students and Programs

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christa Moll Weisbrook, University of Missouri; William Schonberg, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

and these criteria [as described in the document], (b)a process that periodically documents and demonstrates that the objectives are based on theneeds of the program’s various constituencies, and (c) an assessment and evaluation process thatperiodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which these objectives are attained.” Insimple terms, program educational objectives describe the final goal of an engineering program,which is to develop competent engineers who are equipped to fulfill their responsibility to theiremployers and society. The process of establishing those goals must include input from those theprogram serves and assessment must take place to demonstrate that the program is achievingthose goals.B. Program OutcomesAs

Conference Session

NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dustyn Roberts P.E., Temple University; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Allen A. Jayne P.E., University of Delaware; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Andrew Novocin, University of Delaware; James Atlas, University of Delaware

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

://ctal.udel.edu/enhancing-teaching/inclusive-teaching/​. [Accessed: 01-Aug-2017].[2]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2016/09/26/an-ivy-league-professor-on-why-colleges-dont-hire-more-faculty-of-color-we-dont-want-them/?utm_term=.1ee6a408a7cc​ [Accessed:25-Oct-2017][3] T. Barnes and X. Zhang, “Assessment of Student Culture for Women and Underrepresented Groups inthe University of Delaware’s College of Engineering.” Delaware Education Research & Development, July2017.[4] B. R. Sandler, L. Silverberg, and R. Hall, ​The Chilly Classroom Climate: A Guide To Improve theEducation of Women.​ Washington, D.C.: National Association of Women in Education, 1996. Active LearningHow do I motivate students

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Creating successful NEEs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abul Azad, Northern Illinois University; Osman Tokhi, University of Sheffield, UK.

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

matters ‚ Assessment of students ‚ Program approval, monitoring and review ‚ Career education, information and guidance ‚ Placement learning ‚ Recruitment and admissions The QAA can be compared with the ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Engineering Technology) of the US 30. There are a number of differences between theABET and QAA: a) ABET only deals with engineering and engineering technology, whereQAA manages all branches of higher education; b) QAA deals with both the undergraduateand postgraduate programs, when ABET deals only with the undergraduate programs; c)All UK higher qualifications must be accredited by the QAA, while ABET’s accreditationis optional; d) ABET now practices outcome based

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Brewer, University of Georgia; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

response to feedback from “Dr. Jacobson” (see second anecdote below), we spent almost anentire meeting debating over whether or not to describe the upper-level administrator’s watch as:a) “flashy”, which was Michael’s original, immediate observation and visceral reaction, b) “whatlooks like an expensive watch”, or c) to simply leave this part of the story out altogether. Thosein favor of option “a” felt that it was important to highlight the difference between Michael’sprior life experiences and the level of privilege that such watches represent to him. At the sametime, we all agreed that the use of the word “flashy” served to set the anecdotes as immediatereactions captured in Michael’s natural voice apart from the other more formally written

Conference Session

NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary; Sepideh Afkhami Goli, University of Calgary; Ehsan Mohammadi, University of Calgary; Fatemeh Sharifi, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

senseof pride of what was accomplished when they are finished.References[1] A. Kolb and D. Kolb. (2005). Learning styles and learning space: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2):193-212.[2] K. Robinson, and A. M. Azzam. (2009). Why creativity now? (interview). Educational Leadership, 67(1):22-26.[3] S. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe, and E. Mahoney. (2015). The evolution of a flipped classroom: evidence-based recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2015.[4] A. Pears, S. Seidman, L. Malmi, L. Mannila, and E. Adams. (2007). A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. Working Group Report on ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in

Conference Session

Been There, Done That: Advice for NEEs

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Philip Gerhart, University of Evansville

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Voices: Academic Careers for a New Generation. American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC.4. Jackson, A., Chin, R., Coddington, C., Petersen, P., Hamid, F. 2007. “Mentoring New Faculty: How Much, How Often, and How?” Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI.5. Jordan, W., Elmore, B., Bradley, W. “Mentoring New Faculty: What Works and What Does Not Work.” 2006. Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL.6. Yimin, D., Lei, X. 2003. “An End to Business as Usual?” Science. Vol. 302. Oct. 3, 2003. p. 43.7. Gerhart, A.L., Gerhart, P.M., Fletcher, R.W. 2008. “Comparison of

Conference Session

Tips of the Trade: Best Practices, Expanded Advice, and Strategies for Implementable Course Improvement

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam R Carberry, Arizona State University; Matthew Siniawski, Loyola Marymount University; Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

that has the potential to revolutionize how weassess student achievement in higher education.    Acknowledgements    This work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF DUE-1503794). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.        Bibliography    1. Postman, N. 1992. Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY.2. Sadler, D. 2005, “Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175-194.3. Broad, B. 2000, “Pulling you hair out: Crises of

Conference Session

Best Methods for NEEs

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University; Michael Behm, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Innovation, 28(1): 41-54.19. Solomon, D. and Björk, B-C. (2012). A Study of Open Access Journals Using Article Processing Charges Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8):1485–1495.20. Sanchez, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science. 489 (7415). Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/predatory-publishers-are-corrupting-open- access-1.1138521. Beall, J. (2012a). Beall's List of Predatory Publishers 2013. December 4, 2012. Retrieved from http://scholarlyoa.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/2013-lists2.pdf22. Beall, J. (2012b). Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers (2nd edition). December 1, 2012

Conference Session

New Faculty Development

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl B. Schrader, Boise State University; Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University; William L. Hughes, Boise State University; Kotaro Sasaki, Boise State University; Teresa Cole, Boise State University, Computer Science Department; John N. Chiasson, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

students and faculty; and the 2008 Hewlett-Packard/Harriett B. Rigas Award from the IEEE Education Society in recognition of her contribution to the profession. Dr. Schrader earned her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Valparaiso University, and her M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. in Systems and Control from University of Notre Dame.Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University Seung Youn (Yonnie) Chyung is a professor in the Department of Instructional and Performance Technol- ogy in the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She received her Doctor of Education degree in Instructional Technology from Texas Tech University and teaches graduate-level courses on evaluation methodology. Her research

Conference Session

NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taryn Shalini Bipat, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Mitchell Fajardo; Yuliana Flores, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

circumstances and in what ways can engaging students inmicro-reflection activities function as a site for professional development? Specifically, we 2wonder for a specific set of educators in a specific situation, (a) what micro-reflections are takenup?, (b) in what ways does the experience advance their teaching knowledge?, and (c) whatfeatures of the situation emerge as significant for appreciating the micro-reflections used and theadvancement of teaching knowledge identified?We explored these questions with an approach that combined three ways of knowing: ● a proof-of-concept mentality (a focus on exploring potentials and informing future

Conference Session

Been There/Done That: Advice for NEEs

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gene Harding, Purdue University; Benedict Kazora, Purdue University; Robert Smethers, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

academictranscript. Also, when appropriate, it is wise to investigate funding. There may be internal orexternal grants available for certain types of development. Alternatively, corporate funding maybe an option in some cases.The details will vary from project to project, professor to professor, and school to school, but theresults of this effort will hopefully be an encouragement to others, and the aforementionedsuggestions helpful.Bibliography1 Gonzalez, R. V., Lopez, J., &Leiffer, P. (2004). Is a successful research laboratory possible with undergraduate students alone? Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.2 Formwalt, B., Hayes, M., Pittner, D., & Pack, D

Conference Session

Lessons for New Engineering Educators

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amani Salim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

focus involving mathematical modeling. Whatsets the first-year engineering courses apart from traditional engineering classes is instructionthat requires students to not only solve technical problems, but apply and adapt engineeringconcepts in mathematical models while developing professional skills - the ability to work inteams and translate mathematical models into a written procedure8.B. Model-Eliciting-Activities (MEA)Typical engineering classes are exam-based, project-based, or a combination of these. Seldomdo engineering classes provide sufficient activities that involve real-world problem solving.Therefore, there is a need for engineering classrooms to increase students’ exposure in suchactivities. One method for fulfilling the FYE

Conference Session

Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh; Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul, University of Pittsburgh; Amr Hassan, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

meetings to fosterunderstanding and communicate with students. Nevertheless, irrespective of their teachingpedagogy, class interactivity was among the apparent challenges in online classes. The use ofactive learning techniques increased the level of interactivity in the classes.In future work, we plan to survey more faculty from other departments and other engineeringschools to analyze their experience and share their points on how to teach an effective engineeringclass. Also, in a different study, we plan to investigate active learning effectiveness in online ECEclasses.References[1] K. P. Hardy and B. L. Bower, "Instructional and work life issues for distance learning faculty," New Dir. Community Coll., vol. 2004, no. 128, pp. 47–54, 2004

Conference Session

Educational Research and the New Engineering Educator

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malcolm Drewery, National Academy of Engineering; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering; Stefani A. Bjorklund

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. Second, engineering administrators can use information gathered from the F-NSSE tobetter mentor new faculty member by: (1) seeing how faculty are incorporating innovations ininstruction and curriculum development; (2) helping to lay the groundwork for discussions aboutthe assumptions and values that underlie the role of new faculty members; (3) diagnosing facultymember’s strength and weaknesses; (4) developing professional development programming thataddresses identified teaching and learning issues; and (5) making fairer comparisons amongfaculty.The data collected from the E-NSSE and F-NSSE will provide all faculty members (both newand experienced) with: (a) tools to make them more effective teachers and (b) data which caninform classroom-based

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Evelyn C. Brown, East Carolina University; Mary A. Farwell, East Carolina University; Anthony M. Kennedy, East Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

engineering: results of a qualitative study.Presentation at Mid-South Research Association Meeting, Biloxi, MS.[6] Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College. 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.[7] Ponton, M.K., Edmister, J.H., Ukeiley, L.S., & Seiner, J.M. (2001). Understanding the role of self-efficacy inengineering education". Journal of Engineering Education 90(2), 247-251.[8] Maton, K. I. & Hrabowski III, F.A. (2004). Increasing the number of African American PhDs in the Sciencesand Engineering: A Strengths-Based Approach. American Physiologist 59, 547-556.[9] Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research, v2. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.[10] Ost, B. (2010). The role of peers

Conference Session

Educating Students for Professional Success

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ajit D. Kelkar, North Carolina A&T State University; James G. Ryan, Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student

automotive applications. To make the leap from the research laboratory to new products, and thus new jobs,requires an educated and well qualified workforce that comprehends simultaneously (a) theinterdisciplinary principles of nanoengineering with the understanding of the unique andenabling properties at nanoscale and their associated nanoscale engineering and scientificprinciples (b) the implications that nanotechnology holds for not only revolutionizing thematerials and products used in daily life but to see nanotechnology’s promise for entirely newclasses of products as well, (c) the skill set required for managing the nanoengineered materialdevelopment, processing, design and nano-manufacturing procedures and (d) the ability tocommunicate

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Devine, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

2006-808: A SPECIFIC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION (SPIE)David Devine, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne David P. Devine, P.E., is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering Technology in the Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW). He is a registered Professional Engineer in Indiana and completed a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Notre Dame and a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Purdue University. Page 11.122.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jerry Samples, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

AC 2010-1211: LEADERSHIP 107: STUDENT CENTEREDNESS – A BALANCEJerry Samples, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown DR. JERRY SAMPLES holds a BS Ch.E. from Clarkson College, MS and Ph.D. in ME from Oklahoma State University. Dr. Samples served at the United States Military Academy twelve years before assuming the position of Director of the Engineering Technology Division at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown in 1996. After a five year period as the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs he returned to the Engineering Technology Division. He is a Fellow of the International Society for Teaching and Learning receiving that honor in 2007. In 2008, he received the American

Conference Session

Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kenya Z Mejia, University of Washington; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. This work encourages the engineering educationcommunity to find new ways to define how an inclusive practice is working for a specificcontext, as a supplement to a quantitative approach.References[1] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:’ Achieving Individual Diversity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x.[2] B. Berhane, S. Secules, and F. Onuma, “Learning While Black: Identity Formation and Experience for Five Black Men Who Transferred Into Engineering Undergraduate Programs,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 26, 2020, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020024994.[3] M. Kali, S. Secules, and C

Conference Session

Encouraging Students to Think Critically

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of Washington; Terri L. Lovins, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington Cynthia J. Atman is the founding director of the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. Her research focuses on engineering design learning, considering context in engineering design, and the use of reflection to support learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wendy Roldan, University of Washington; Schawnery Lin; Yuxin Xu, University of Washington; Andrea Jacqueline Sequeira; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

the seminar, and present one keytakeaway of their experience.” Finally, during our third round of analysis the research team cameto a consensus about the four student portraits we wanted to highlight in our findings by: a)synthesizing our analysis of interviews, portraits, and artifacts; b) engaging with existingresearch in engineering education and visual notetaking; and c) reflecting on our collectiveexperience in the seminar. To ensure trustworthiness of our work [21], we engaged in peerscrutiny among other education researchers and engineering educator.Positionality statementQualitative research and analysis are inherently personal [22], [23]. Our prior experiences andlenses informed the way we designed and offered the seminar, our

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan M. Hicks, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

HW 5 HW 8Assessment … … … … … … … …Section A 3.93 … 3.38 … 2.93 … 2.86 … 3.30 0.25 … 1.10 … 1.43 … 1.34 … 1.48Section B 3.71 … 3.89 … 2.67 … 2.99 … 3.13 0.75 … 0.65 … 1.54 … 1.49 … 1.65Section C 3.81 … 1.54 … 2.56 … 2.28 … 2.83 0.61 … 0.73 … 1.44 … 1.42 … 1.80Section D 3.75 … 1.86 … 2.36 … 2.87 … 3.11 0.47 … 0.91 … 1.59 … 1.18 … 1.65Section E 3.71 … 1.91 … 2.57 … 2.57 … 2.66 0.81 … 0.99 … 1.46 … 1.29 … 1.82Section F 3.74 … 2.60 … 2.31 … 2.44 … 2.48

Conference Session

Tools and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #34860Re-designing a Large Enrollment Online Course Using a Learner-CenteredApproachDr. John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida John Mendoza Garcia is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University, and his Master’s and a Bachelor’s in Systems and Comput- ing Engineering from Universidad de Los Andes, in Colombia, and Universidad Nacional de Colombia respectively. He teaches professional skills like systems thinking, design

Conference Session

NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #26554Service at a Research University: A Veteran Faculty Member’s Perspectivefor New Engineering FacultyDr. John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Dr. John R. Reisel is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM). He serves as the co-director of the Energy Conversion Efficiency Lab. In addition to research into engineering education, his efforts focus on combustion and energy utilization. Dr. Reisel was a 2005 recipient of the UWM Distinguished Undergraduate Teaching Award, a 2000 recipient of the UWM Col- lege of Engineering and Applied Science Outstanding

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University; John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #21561A Study on the Student Success in a Blended-Model Engineering ClassroomDr. Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University Dr. Vimal Viswanathan is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at San Jose State University. His research interests include design innovation, creativity, design theory and engineer- ing education.Dr. John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University John T Solomon is an assistant professor in the mechanical engineering department of Tuskegee Univer- sity. He received PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Florida State University, USA in 2010. Prior join- ing Tuskegee

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Hossein EbrahimNejad, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

with others.AcknowledgementThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF DUE1503794 and NSF IIS 1552288). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.The authors wish to thank the whole course instructional team for coming along on this journey,particularly the support staff who have worked diligently to meet the first criteria.References[1] B. E. Walvoord and V. J. Anderson, Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment in College. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009.[2] Alverno College Faculty, Feedback is Teaching. Milwaukee, WI

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University; Kyle Frederick Larsen P.E., Eastern Washington University; Heechang Bae, Eastern Washington University; N.M. A. Hossain, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

relating to Kinetics: Rotation about a fixed axis.The slender rod of length L and mass m is released from rest when θ =0°. Determine as a functionof θ the normal and the frictional forces which are exerted by the ledge on the rod at A as it fallsdownward. At what angle θ does the rod begin to slip if the coefficient of static friction at A is μ? Figure 2: A typical textbook homework problem relating to Kinetics: General plane motion.In-house problemThe bar is released from rest. Find the reactions at A at that moment if a) A is a pin b) A is a roller c) Find the minimum μs for it is not to slide. 1Take mbar = 10 kg, Length of bar, L = 2 m and 𝐼𝑏𝑎𝑟 = 3