) the 2011 President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness goal of 10,000 more engineeringstudents from US colleges and universities each year, (b) the 2012 President’s Council onScience and Technology recommendation for one million more science, technology, engineeringand mathematics (STEM) degrees in the next decade, and (c) the Texas Workforce Commissionestimated state projected need of 62,000 more engineers by 2022 (25% increase)1,2,3. Therefore,developing strategic pathways to increase students, and underrepresented students in particular,achieving STEM degrees is essential4.Nearly half (49%) of students earning a bachelor’s degree in science and engineering reportedattending a community college at some point in their education5. Two-year
the same, student outcomes for theprojects are not included in the comparison. Throughout the semester, two drop-in tutors wereavailable on campus to assist students in completing their labs and assignments outside of class.Table 1. A comparison of class characteristics for the online and face-to-face sections of Engineering Graphics in Fall 2015. Class Characteristics Online Section Face-to-Face Section Number of students (as of 12 19 census date) Instructor Professor A Professor B Asynchronously through pre- In-person, twice a week for Lecture Delivery
. Clearly stated educational goals 2. Organized and systematic assessments a. Meaningful curricular goals with defensible standards for evaluation b. Demonstrate how goals prepare for success c. Support and sustain assessment and communicate results to stakeholders 3. Use of assessment results to improve educational effectiveness 4. Institution-level review of assessment services 5. Periodic Assessment of effectiveness of assessment processesProgram accreditation is also a focus at RCBC, especially for the Electrical EngineeringTechnology program accreditation by ABET, known under
to succeed academically6. Some of these skillsinclude mindsets and attitudes, metacognition, time management, working with others,seeking help, and utilizing one’s peers and professors. The Introduction to Engineeringcourse is a prime venue and opportunity to help cultivate many of these skills forstudents.Two main resources were used in helping students develop these skills. One of theseresources is the textbook for the course “Studying Engineering: A Road Map to aRewarding Career” by Dr. Raymond B. Landis37. This book covers many of the topicslisted above in the context of beginning and pursuing engineering study. Receptivity tochange and personal growth are strong underlying themes in the text and the assignmentsbased around the readings
, A., & Christopherson, C. (2010) The Importance of Formative Experiences for Engineering Student Identity. I nternational Journal of Engineering Education, 26 (6), 15501560. 11. Thorn ton, R., & Nardi, P. M.. (1975). The Dynamics of Role Acquisition. American Journal of Sociology , 80(4), 870–885. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2777199 Date accessed August 5, 2015 12. Lichtenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H., Claar, B., Chen, B., Sheppard, S. & Jackson, K. (2009) An Engineering Major Does Not (Necessarily) an Engineer Make: Career DecisionMaking Among Undergraduate Engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 98 (3), 227234. Retrieved from
of 20 content topics, and 6 general course learning objectives. B. The course lecture resources should be flexible for use by a variety of instructors (novice and experienced) in a variety of delivery formats (e.g., flipped, online, blended). In particular, although the initial implementation and testing of the curriculum was in a “traditional” flipped format, future implementations were planned in which students from two or more different courses would be simultaneously performing student-centered activities under the guidance of a single instructor. C. As with all of the lab curricula in the CALSTEP project, the lab should aim to achieve the thirteen objectives for engineering educational laboratories
Paper ID #15817Changing Student Behavior through the Use of Reflective Teaching Practicesin an Introduction to Engineering Course at a Two-Year CollegeMr. Richard Brown Bankhead III, Highline College Richard B Bankhead III is the engineering department coordinator at Highline College. At Highline Colleg,e Richard is committed to developing the behaviors of successful engineering students in transfer students as well as preparing them academically for the challenges of junior level engineering courses. Richard has taught at Highline since 2004 and was awarded the Faculty of the Year Award at Highline Col- lege for the 2009
accordance with the accepted goals for a classroom laboratory course, the development effortwas designed to provide student competencies in: instrumentation and measurement of circuitvariables; evaluation of circuit models; devising experiments; collecting, analyzing, andinterpreting data; designing, building and assembling circuits; and more3,4, only in a remote,online-learner context.With an expectation that remote online learners working independently on circuit labs and out ofsight of the instructor are liable to encounter overwhelming difficulties and be unable to resolveanomalous measurements, a guiding philosopy was adopted to A) keep labs simple to the extentpossible; B) aim to provide “fault proof” activities, and C) rely on the use of
Paper ID #15799Active-Learning-Based Engineering at a Community College: A Key to Stu-dent SuccessProf. Michael E. Pelletier, Northern Essex Community College Professor Emeritus of Computer Technology & Engineering Northern Essex Community College Educa- tion: BEE, Villanova University MSEE, Northeastern University Additional graduate work in Computer Engineering, Northeastern UniversityProf. Linda A. Desjardins, Northern Essex Community College Linda A. Desjardins is professor, English and Communications departments. She holds an ASLA from Northern Essex Community College, a BA in English, Secondary Education from
Paper ID #17269A Systematic Evaluation of Implications of Admission GPA for Transfer Stu-dentsDr. Chris Gordon, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Chris Gordon is an Associate Professor at Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, where he serves as Chair of the Department of Construction, Interim Associate Dean of the School of Engineering, and co-director of the Construction Leadership Institute. In his research, Gordon investigates engineering education and innovation in the construction industry. Gordon earned a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University and both a B.S. and an
Paper ID #15033Association of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering Accredi-tation: A Viable Option for 2-Year Programs and their Pursuit of ExcellenceDr. Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University Robert A. ”Bob” Chin is a member of the Department of Technology Systems faculty, College of Engi- neering and Technology, East Carolina University, where he has taught since 1986. He just completed his second term as the director of publications for the Engineering Design Graphics Division and the Engineering Design Graphics Journal editor. Chin has also served as the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s annual and mid
Paper ID #16798A Successful Model for Partnership between Community College and Univer-sity Engineering Departments Leading to Expanded Access to BaccalaureateEngineering EducationMr. Eric James Davishahl, Everett Community College Eric Davishahl has been faculty and department chair in the Engineering and Computer Science Depart- ment at Everett Community College since Fall 2001. During that time he has overseen a rapid expansion evidenced by enrollment growth from 20 to over 150 full time equivalent students and associated staffing growth from one to eight full-time equivalent faculty. Eric has collaborated on several
Paper ID #17400Creating Pathways to Stackable Credentials in Robotics: Meeting IndustryNeeds by Manufacturing a Community College and University PartnershipMr. Mark Bradley Kinney, Bay de Noc Community College Mark Kinney became the Executive Dean for Business, Technology, and Workforce Development in July of 2012, but first came to Bay College as the Executive Director of Institutional Research and Effective- ness in February 2009. Prior to that, Mark served as the Dean for Computer Information Systems and Technology at Baker College of Cadillac and as the Chief Operating Officer and network administrator at Forest Area
Paper ID #16266When a Traditional Scholarship is Simply Not Enough: Addressing the Digi-tal Divide to Recruit and Motivate Engineering Technology Students throughGraduationMs. Elaine L. Craft, Florence-Darlington Technical College Elaine L. Craft (Florence-Darlington Technical College, Florence, SC) holds a baccalaureate degree in chemical engineering from the University of Mississippi and a MBA from the University of South Car- olina with additional graduate studies in mathematics. Her experience includes working as an engineer in industry as well as teaching and administration at community college and state levels. She has
Affairs in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. Anderson-Rowland was named a top 5% teacher in the Fulton Schools of Engineering for 2009-2010. She received WEPAN’s Betty Vetter Research Award 2015, the WEPAN President’s Award 2014, WEPAN’s Engineering Educator Award 2009, ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. She has over 190 publications primarily in the areas of recruitment and retention of women and underrepresented minority engineering and computer science students. Her awards are based
cohort of students, student’s academic course history was examined and the following variables created: total number of transferable credits earned cumulative transferable GPA calculated from all transferable credits earned grade (in GPA) in physics 1 grade (in GPA) in calculus 1 total number of credits in engineering earned GPA in engineering coursesStudent grades were converted to a grade point scale as follows: Letter grade Grade Point Equivalent A 4.0 A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B
. (DTIC Document, 1998). at 5. Thorsteinsson, G. Developing an Understanding of the Pedagogy of Using a Virtual Reality Learning Environment (VRLE) to Support Innovation Education. The Routledge International Handbook of Innovation Education. Edited by LV Shavinina. Oxford: Routledge. ISBN-10 415682215, 456–470 (2013).6. Tsai, F.-H., Tsai, C.-C. & Lin, K.-Y. The evaluation of different gaming modes and feedback types on game-based formative assessment in an online learning environment. Comput. Educ. 81, 259–269 (2015).7. Zyda, M. From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38, 25–32 (2005).8. Moreno-Ger, P., Burgos, D., Martínez-Ortiz, I., Sierra, J. L. & Fernández-Manjón, B. Educational
of industry andlabor leaders. Their goals are to: a) develop and nurture industry and labor partnerships to betterunderstand the changing workforce issues facing electric utilities and independent powerproducers; b) translate energy industry research into “Best Practices” training and education toensure programs meet industry’s workforce needs; c) provide clear education and careerpathways for students and job seekers for entry into high-skills, high-wage energy jobs; and d)create a competitive workforce pipeline to meet increasing energy demands and support theeconomic future of the Pacific Northwest.7The career outlook for the AAS-T in Clean Energy with a specialized certificate in the area ofpower electronics shows growth in both national
theRaspberry Pi board. There are a host of accessories available to be used with the Uno and thereare more powerful Arduino boards (like the Zero) that utilize a 32 microcontroller, however it isroughly twice as expensive as the Uno. A search of Amazon.com yields a selection of over onethousand Arduino products with various “starter kits” and accessories. Figure 1 – Microcontroller Platform – Arduino UnoThe other hardware platform used in the course is the Raspberry Pi 2 Model B starter kit. Thisdevice has a basic cost of approximately $50 and essentially is a full blown PC on a board. Oneneeds to provide a monitor and keyboard and you are good to go. The Raspberry Pi 2 platformshown below in Figure 2 is the second generation
Business BU 100 Introduction to Business 3 AC 101 Financial Accounting I 4 MG 101 Principles of Management 3 MK 103 Principles of Marketing 3 MK 213 Principles of Sales 3 MG 210 Entrepreneurship 3 OA 201 Business Communications 3 Manufacturing MN 133 A New Product Development 2 MN 133 B Lean Six Sigma Fundamentals 2The 25 credit Manufacturing Technology Certificate program (see Table 1 for detailedcurriculum with advising notes
value, to name a few. Similarly,in the calculus and above group, students get to pour liquids into geometrically shaped containersto observe related rates in action, use play dough to create volumes of revolution, and cutspherical coordinate shapes out of cantaloupe, oranges, and watermelons. A sample schedule ofdaily activities for the trigonometry and pre-calculus group can be found in Appendix A, and alink to the Math Jam Toolkit with best practices and more details about the program can befound in Appendix B.4. ResultsIn order for students to take major courses in engineering and other STEM fields, they mustsuccessfully complete college level math classes from trigonometry through calculus andbeyond. From previous studies, Math Jam has
in STEM Programs through a Renewable Energy Research and Education Partnership with Five Minority Institutions”, Asiabanpour, B. (PI).17. Reenergize project website: http://reenergize.engineering.txstate.edu/ Appendix ISan Antonio College Re-Energize Project, Year 1 Results and Year 2 Proposals, PowerPointPresentation by Steven Lewis, Dan Dimitriu, and Klaus Bartels, September 18, 2015Global Population and Urban Dynamics
thepeer mentor program in Mechanical Engineering will be used to inspire and improve peer mentorprograms throughout the College.Bibliography1. Marra, R. M., Shen, D., Rodgers, K., & Bogue, B., “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), p. 6-27 (2012). Retrieved January 30, 2016 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x/pdf.2. Laier, J., & Steadman, S. J., “Improving Transfer Student Success,” Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences (2014). Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/20616.3. Chen, X., “STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields,” Washington, DC, United States: National Center for
Paper ID #17058The Impact of Summer Research Experiences on Community College Stu-dents’ Self-EfficacyMs. Lea K Marlor, University of California, Berkeley Lea Marlor is the Education and Outreach Program Manager for the Center for Energy Efficient Electron- ics Science, a NSF-funded Science and Technology Center at the University of California, Berkeley. She manages undergraduate research programs to recruit and retain underrepresented students in science and engineering and also outreach to pre-college students to introduce them to science and engineering career opportunities. Ms. Marlor joined University of California
College and as a Career and Technology Education teacher. Kris earned a B.S. in Management from Clemson University, a Masters of Arts in Teaching in Business Education from the University of South Carolina, and an Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Educational Technology and online learning from the University of Florida. Her research interests include implementation of digital learning solutions in technical and vocational education, development of career pathways utilizing stackable certificates, educator professional develop- ment in communities of practice, and analysis of economic development and industry factors impacting education and workforce development. She is a licensed South
Paper ID #14501Performance of Engineering and Engineering Technology Scholars in the Trans-fer Pipeline ProgramDr. Surendra K. Gupta, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) ”Vinnie” Gupta is a professor of mechanical engineering, and a member of the graduate faculty of ma- terials science and engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), Rochester, NY. He is a recipient of the 2014 Robert G. Quinn Award from ASEE, and the 2000 Eisenhart Award for Outstanding Teaching. At RIT, he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in applied mechanics, computational techniques, and materials science.Dr. James E Moon