AC 2012-5183: EASING INTO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: AN ORIEN-TATION PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSStephanie Cutler, Virginia TechWalter Curtis Lee Jr., Virginia Tech Walter Lee is a Graduate Assistant and doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. His pri- mary research interests focus on diversity and student retention. He earned a B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, communication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include
answer of item 3 relate to the cutoff frequency of the low pass filter? Page 25.56.8Experiment 6: Basic Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR)Concepts: Impedance matching and mismatching, line loss, reflected wave, cable’s propagationvelocity, matching load, line discontinuities, transmission line characteristic impedance, loadimpedance, reflection coefficient.Objectives: Students become familiar with the use of TDR as a standard procedure in detectingfaults in transmission lines. This technique is especially useful in cases where it is difficult toinspect the transmission line visually such as buried cables. One was the goals of this
visual artifacts in a website. ENGL 2000, however, requiredmore total pages of writing in a greater variety of genres. ENGL 2000 IE 4785 Blog Daily Journal Reflections Excursions Webpage Cultural Analysis Primary Research Daily Assignments Secondary Research Brochure Research Paper Figure 3: The diagram shows the overlap of the class assignments given in ENGL 2000 and IE
studies,methodologies, and frameworks for thinking about how to teach engineers about the nature oftheir work1. The American Society for Engineering Education has a separate Engineering EthicsDivision that has also tackled broader topics on how engineers should consider the ethical andsocietal implications of what they do. Our research paper here seeks to build bridges to some ofthat engineering education and ethics research by reflecting on recent efforts that have beenperformed from within a government agency, the National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration (NASA), to reflect on the implications on the work of engineers. This event wascalled the Artemis and Ethics workshop, and it focused on bringing in social science andhumanities scholars
andprovide flexible learning opportunities [9,10]. These efforts reflect a broader recognition of theimportance of communication skills in graduate education and a commitment to preparingstudents for the multifaceted demands of their professional and academic futures.The University of Connecticut has taken a step to advance its graduate engineering curriculumby recognizing the significance of structured support in scientific communication and overallcareer preparation for graduate students. The university has launched a ProfessionalDevelopment (PD) course series uniquely tailored to boost the success of its graduate students.This program distinguishes itself through its focus on career advancement and developingessential core skills for graduate
students graphically communicate their design solution effectively? Will students work produce evidence to suggest that they understood the conceptual approach of a DCG brief (by comparative experience)? Is there evidence on completion of the process that the students have the capacity to reflect on the activity and derive an educational value/meaning?ApproachThis study was conducted with third year undergraduate students on the Materials &Construction and Materials & Engineering initial teacher education degreeprogrammes at the University of Limerick. The activity took place within theirEngineering Design Graphics 1 module in the first semester of year 3. The approachtaken to the graphics module was to divide the
= 3.07, SD = .84; RQI: PreM = 3.07, SD = .37); see Figure 1(c).Both groups reported gains on post-program test scores, but those for the NanoJapan students weregreater such that these students reported higher post-test scores than their RQI counterparts(NanoJapan: PostM = 4.18, SD = .53; RQI: PostM = 3.81, SD = .57). This difference between thetwo groups was significant, suggesting that the NanoJapan students experienced greater gains oninterpersonal development as compared with the RQI students. This may reflect an importantdifference between the programs in that throughout the summer, the NanoJapan students completeda curriculum that required written updates and reflection exercises on not only their researchprojects but also intercultural
mixed results. Projects were assigned but with only part of theone credit available, it was difficult to find enough time to meet the needs of the community andto accomplish something significant from the students’ viewpoint. These factors createdfrustration on both the students and the community partners. These trials did, however, providevaluable experience to gauge the capabilities of the first year students and allow the instructionalteam to develop materials to support the service-learning projects. These experiences reinforcedthe fact that reflection was imperative to help students process their experiences in thecommunity. These experiences also showed that the seminar format was an excellentenvironment for these reflection discussions
, pictures, diagrams and demonstrations are favored; Verbal Learner when sounds and words (and their written representations) are preferred.• What is the organization of the information preferred? If prefers to start from applications and phenomena to infer fundamental principles from them is an Inductive Learner; if, on the other hand, prefers to know the technical foundations, the basic concepts and then derive the applications and uses is a Deductive Learner.• How is the information processed? An Active Learner likes to take part in physical activities and group discussions, a Reflective Learner likes to have time to himself to reflect and elaborate individually.• How does the person move towards the understanding of the
utilized. In the pedagogicalliterature, Kolb’s experiential learning cycle is often referenced. Kolb’s learning cycle consistsof a concrete experience (feeling), reflective observation (watching), abstract conceptualisation(thinking), and active experimentation (doing)[5]. This is quite similar to Deming’s plan (think),do (and feel), check (reflect), and act (revise) learning cycle. Deming’s PDCA cycle is used herebecause it also further grounds the students’ learning in industrial engineering practice, asstudents may have learned about Deming and his work in their studies on quality, management,and continuous improvement, which is also cited in the project management literature[6, p.229].This enables the learning strategy to potentially be
using low-costfluorescent cameras, visible and near-IR cameras, and far-infrared thermal cameras areused to characterize the grain structure, defects, surface roughness, reflectivity,electroluminescence, photoluminescence, and photovoltaic operation of solar cellmaterials (e.g., monocrystalline and multicrystalline silicon wafers), thin-film and nanosolar cells, commercial silicon solar cells, and photovoltaic modules. Students canimport captured images into MATLAB or other widely-available image processingsoftware for analysis and interpretation. Topical laboratory modules and projects arebeing developed suitable for on-line delivery.Overview, Purpose and Broad Aims: The purpose of this work is to develop, validate,and disseminate a series of
specific setting.19 Observation of the expert helps the novice to develop aconceptual model of the task which provides a useful framework within which the novice canorganize, interpret, and reflect on feedback from the expert.19 The apprenticeship model is thecore of the undergraduate research experience, whereby a faculty researcher mentors anundergraduate student through hands-on, authentic, self-directed scientific investigation thatmakes an original contribution to the field.Out-of-class experiences are as equally effective as class-related experiences on improvededucational outcomes, suggesting that a holistic approach fosters students’ college success.20Extra-curricular opportunities for undergraduate students to be involved in faculty
Paper ID #7218Raze the Silos: Using Digital Portfolios to Increase Integrative ThinkingDr. Lisa DuPree McNair, Virginia Tech Dr. Lisa DuPree McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Assistant Department Head of Graduate Education and co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC). She received her Ph.D. in Linguistics from the University of Chicago and an M.A. and B.A. in English from the University of Georgia. Her research interests include interdis- ciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective
part of the grading process for the assignment which has been selected for programlevel assessment. The student should also complete a self-assessment of the work and reflect onthe progress made when comparing to previous portfolio artifacts and rubrics. A template forformatively assessing student’s longitudinal growth and students’ self-reflection is shown inAppendix B.The following recommended portfolio guidelines aim to reduce the workload burden andstandardize the process for formative assessment for the program: • A cloud folder should be created for each student that contains a copy of each rubric and portfolio template for an e-portfolio. Students should have “viewing” and “adding” permissions, but not ”editing
. The goal of these discussions is togather detailed information about how they use multiple languages and technology in labs, with afocus on how they communicate and understand tasks. Following these discussions, we holdreflection meetings to go over and confirm the details gathered from the interviews. The findingsfrom these interviews will help us think about how to make future classroom experiences bettersuited for graduate student assistants from different language backgrounds. In December 2023,during our reflection meetings, we took a close look at our own experiences. Hector led grouptalks and interviews to study our experiences, especially the cultural parts in our life stories andresearch. We found important topics and patterns. Hector
streamline undergraduate STEM education.Vidya Reddy Madana, Purdue University Vidya Madana is an undergraduate student in the Department of Computer Science at Purdue University, concentrating on machine intelligence and software engineering. She is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree in May 2027. Vidya’s research interests include artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data visualization. In addition to her academic pursuits, she has experience in STEM education, robotics, and journalism, reflecting her broad interests and diverse skill set. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Gender Differences in Global Identity Development: Implications for
effectively ona team, integrate information from multiple sources, communicate with written and visualmaterial, and make connections across disciplines 18 .PBL is not inherently transdisciplinary or convergent, but PBL can be used to teach and addressconvergent problems. While PBL is not the only way to learn convergence methodologies, it canbe an efficient “means” to the “end” which is understanding and implementing convergencemethodologies. It emphasizes the process of question identification and framing as much asproblem solving, encouraging students to iterate and seek feedback, and to reflect on theirapproach and proposed solution. Additionally, outcomes of PBL are similar to the skills neededfor the future of convergence research in industry
the course topics.” (LeDoux and Waller, 2016) In this approach, students workin small groups (typically dyads) to analyze problems and develop solutions through interactionwith their peers. The interaction with instructors is intended to provide positive reinforcementand “just in time” intervention using the principles of being a reflective teacher outlined byBrookfield (1995). In the PSS, the interactions meet the criteria defined by Chi et al and providefor increased formative assessment opportunities within the learning environment from peers andinstructors “in the moment.” Furthermore, LeDoux and Waller (2016) measured the impact ofthis approach on student learning with summative assessments and conclude that “no matterwhat level of
Alignment Model,In this paper, the authors attempted to investigate current engineering entrepreneurship educationthrough the lens of Constructive Alignment. We want to understand if this framework can capturethe nuts and bolts of the abovementioned diverse entrepreneurship education program designs. Theauthors proposed a modified model for the existing constructive alignment model to reflect thefeedback we received from the field.2. Methodology2.1 Data SourceTo obtain a comprehensive view of Canadian entrepreneurship education, we accessed the list ofdesignated educational institutions from the Canadian Federal government’s web tool provided byEmployment and Social Development Canada. We limited the scope of the project to educationalinstitutions
[2,3] showed that students have high self-reported IL skills but are in factlacking in their academic ability; finding, evaluating, citing, and synthesizing information.Providing a way to link IL to the field makes it more relevant and worthwhile for students. Thisalso is a way to support students in the development of their writing skills in a supportive,content-related way.ObjectivesLearning objectives for the collaboration between the engineering faculty and librarian includedteaching the first-year engineering students information literacy skills; the set of integratedabilities encompassing the reflective discovery of information, the understanding of howinformation is produced and valued, and the use of information in creating new
accreditation procedure using one study program case study. Thirdly, theexperience and practices of the Faculty of Applied Sciences (APPS) at the Ukrainian CatholicUniversity (UCU) are shared concerning the set of central stakeholders (Academic programdirectors, professors, students, internal supporting departments, and external stakeholders). Finally, the paper contains the reflection part and further improvements to continuousimprovement and a shortlist of suggestions for a broad audience. There is an improveddashboard designed, and the build-in markers are presented to improve the experience of themain stakeholders. Background National system of HEI accreditation in Ukraine experienced several years ofstagnation motivated by the low
assignments with lower stakes were duethroughout the week: a reading/lecture quiz, a survey to submit questions, and a shortenedhomework assignment. Finally, we changed some content near the end of the course to allowstudents to connect the course to their own career aspirations, which we expect can aid in long-term retention. Specifically, students chose among several possible topics to cover in the finalweeks, covered via typical pre-recorded lectures and reading, and also guest lectures. They wrotean abstract-length reflection on how they could use what they learned in this course later in theircareers. Overall, students remained engaged with the course throughout the semester andprovided favorable comments and evaluations of the course, including
the results and achieve a conclusion with higherconfidence.IntroductionLearning happens in many ways, such as seeing, hearing, reflecting, acting, reasoning,memorizing, and visualizing. Teaching methods, materials, and activities also vary. Someinstructors lecture, others demonstrate or discuss, some focus on principles, and others onapplications. There are studies arguing that the most effective teaching can be achieved when thematerials and activities overlap with the students' learning styles [1], [2]. There are several methodsand indexes categorizing learning styles [3]. This case study aims to improve the teachingeffectiveness within the context of engineering courses and is based on the hypothesis that studentshave a set of preferred
collective experiences made with others. Through the increasedunderstanding of mentorship, one can gain the experiences and understanding of how to guideand support others around them. Across different models of mentorship is the focus on self-reflection, identification of personal goals, and creation of pathways to provide bothpsychological support and role modeling [2, 5].2.1 Characteristics of Mentorship ProgramsMentorship programs are built and supported by individuals based on the direction ofcommunication, degree of exchange, and intention. These three characteristics define anddetermine how models of mentorship are different, as they emphasize and promote the levels oflearning for both individuals in what they hope to take away from the
program from most to leastimportant. The survey also contains open-ended items so that the scholar may explain theirrankings in their own words.ResultsData collected from 20 Scholars in the first two cohorts across 4 surveys indicates that thefaculty and peer mentoring are the most valued and important components of the HEATScholarship program. Specifically, by the end of the Spring 2021 semester, 95% of HEATScholars reported that either faculty mentoring (60%), or peer mentoring (35%) are the mostvaluable aspects of the HEAT Program while none of the Scholars indicated that the financialsupport or academic experiences are the most valuable aspects of HEAT.A representative selection of HEAT Scholar’s reflections are shown in Tables 1 and 2
agreed thatthey did while 36.4% agreed. Teachers also responded positively when asked if they feltprepared to teach their maker club session; 45.5% of respondents strongly agreed that they feltprepared, 48.1% of respondents agreed that they felt prepared, and 5.2% of respondents feltneutral when reflecting on their level of preparedness When asked if their students made social connections during maker club, 44.2 % ofteachers strongly agreed and 37.7% of teachers agreed that social connections were made.Overall, 9.1% of teachers felt neutral about whether their students made social connections, 6.5%disagreed, and 2.6% strongly disagreed. When asked if they felt their students improved theirunderstanding of the EDP after participating in a
York University TandonSchool of Engineering is a one-semester design course. Approximately 100 UGTAs support theprogram through content delivery, grading, curriculum development, and administrative tasks.Typically, UGTAs are hired as second-years and are retained until their graduation.We are currently piloting the following schedule for training (Table 1). In the fall semester oftheir first year, UGTAs learn foundational concepts related to GIDBEA; in the second year,power and privilege; and in the third year, strategies for engaging GIDBEA in their futurecareers. The spring semesters offer time for concept reinforcement and reflection on the fallsemester. By scaffolding the training over the UGTAs’ three-year tenure in the program, we seek
includecase studies, cooperative groups, jigsaw teams, discussion forums, and rich media contentcreation and sharing [4],[5],[6]. These approaches are more reflective of what students wouldencounter in real-life scenarios and workplaces, where problems are not always fully defined,choices are not totally clear, and effective team communication and collaboration are essential [7],[8].Table 1: Learning Objective 1: Demonstrate ability to transmit, receive, and collect health data withinstruments, devices, and software tools.Key active learning interventions: case study, brainstorming, cooperative groupsTask: Teams of three to four students have three weeks to design a health informatics system toaddress a challenging global health scenario of relevance
, error, significance, and agreement and agreement and agreement significance, and agreement with with with and agreement with hypothesis. hypothesis. hypothesis. with hypothesis. hypothesis.Present results Presentation of Presentation of Presentation is Presentation Presentation results is results is clear and has errors, is has significant detailed, well detailed, and reflects some not detailed, errors, is not organized and clear, and thought
by their ability to provide greatertechnology innovation management and leadership.In essence, the more education one acquires, the greater the likelihood for continued gainfulemployment and the greater the financial rewards. As is the case with any entrepreneuriallyoriented individual, the acquisition of a doctoral level education is highly sought after. Currentwait lists reflect this backed-up demand.Job Role Differentiation and Rewards –In business/industry titles and roles map to product life cycle phases. As a project evolves fromConcept Exploration to Operations and Support, different skill sets are required. In the earlyphases of the product life cycle, research and systems thinking/engineering are dominant. As theproduct life cycle