Conference Session

Teamwork and Student Learning in Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta; John M. Shaw, University of Alberta

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

 Development  and  Team  Competence   Figure  1.  Design  Course  Metacognitive  Cycles  Progressing  Team  and  Project  Development  The three cycles are aligned with initial design project definition including solution generation;the design and modeling stage; and the design evaluation stage. The first cycle comprises:individual and team skill assessments used as inputs to form a team development and designproject task plan with schedule; monitoring experience and progress on the preliminary planexecution and with the team over a period of ~ 4 weeks; reflection on individual and peerevaluation coupled with task progress evaluation at the end of the 4 week period. The secondand third ~ 4week cycles are structured similarly. Shorter metacognitive

Conference Session

Sustainability in Civil Engineering

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan McWhirter, Virginia Tech; Tripp Shealy, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

frustrated with the process, anddissatisfied with the end outcome and reflect about any heuristics used and how these might haveled to less than optimal decisions.Bounded rationality was the second behavioral decision science concept embedded within theHistoric Fourth Ward Park case study module. Bounded rationality means that the potential forrational or optimal decisions is limited by the decision maker’s cognitive capacity, availableinformation, and time [17]. Such limitations may be expected in complex decisions involvingtradeoffs, as are commonly found in sustainability problems. Bounded rationality relates to theHistoric Fourth Ward project through the stakeholder engagement meetings and public input,which were a major part of the process to

Conference Session

Practice I: Academic Success

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia Jane Wilson Orndoff Esq., Florida Southwestern State College; Elizabeth W. Schott, Florida Southwestern State College

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Rewards of an Engineering Pre-Requisite AssignmentAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes a proposal for an assignment in an introduction toengineering course designed to help students become aware of just what it takes academically toobtain an engineering degree. In an effort to promote this awareness, the authors have institutedan assignment that is designed for the students to explore various universities, their engineeringprograms, and the prerequisites for those engineering programs. The qualitative data gatheredthrough the assignment reflections were analyzed using criteria-based content analysis.Students have, to a significant degree, found this assignment to be

Conference Session

Continuous improvement of programs, practices and people.

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette; Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

4, it can be seen in the year 2030, theunder 18 population is at 18.4 million, while the 65 and above population is at 73.1 million. By2040, however, the under age 18 population is at 76.8 million, while the over 65 age population isat 80.8 million. The actual cross-over in population projections occurs in 2035. Figure 3 – Cross-Over of Dependent PopulationsFigure 4 – Population by Age: Projections 2020 to 2060The shift from a youth-dependent population to an elderly-dependent population has significantimplications as discussed above. The combined youth and old-age dependency, however, is evenmore revealing. Figure 5 below [1, p. 6] reflects this combined dependency on the working agepopulation. From the below figure, two lines in

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 22: Perspectives and Evaluation of Engineering Design Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lori C. Bland, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Anastasia P. Samaras, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

to project success. Laurillard’s [11] conception ofteaching as a design science provided the conceptual framework: (a) teaching improvementshould be encouraged; (b) improvement begins with self-reflection; (c) a teaching communitysupports change; (d) teaching change needs to be designed; (e) participating in a teachingcommunity supports engagement with new teaching designs; and (f) teaching changes should bedocumented and shared [11]. In a non-judgmental teaching community, faculty can take risks,sharing successes and failures, receive constructive feedback, and build on each other’s ideas.The design principles for this faculty development project were grounded within Laurillard’sconceptual framework [1], [11]. Thus, adaptive design

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Work in Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Scott Smith, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

the conclusion of the week’s first laboratory was graded according tothe unlimited attempt modality, whereas the second assignment afforded the students only 2 attemptsas described in the previous section. This method was the same for all students in the class.3.2 SurveysAt the conclusion of each assignment, students are asked to complete a reflective activity (survey) thattracks their homework habits, self-assessment of competence, and interest in the material. Threequestions from these surveys may help quantify differences in student experience between modalities. 1. How difficult did you find this assignment (Scale of 1-10)? 2. How comfortable would you be using “skill x” in the future? 3. How long did this assignment

Conference Session

Active & Cooperative Learning in ECE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zahrasadat Alavi, California State University, Chico; Kathleen Meehan, California State University, Chico

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

learning in this important path byemploying a customized version of experiential learning model. Kolb’s Model of ExperientialLearning [5] relies on the humanistic perspective that experience plays a critical role in learning.The four stages of the experiential learning cycle are shown in Figure 1a. The first stage in thismodel is concrete experience where a student or a team is assigned a task and learn by doing, notonly by watching or by listening to an instructor. The reflective observation is the step that thelearner reflects on the subject by communicating with the team or another individual. Theabstract conceptualization involves interpreting the experiment results. The final stage, activeexperimentation, is when the learner uses the outcomes

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University; Abigail Clark, Ohio State University; Soundouss Sassi, Mississippi State University; Jane Petrie

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

reflected in all of these identities indifferent was; however, additional work is needed.Work Completed to Date and FindingsTo date, we have completed a series of three baseline surveys related to engineeringcommunities and engineering identities across the first-year engineering experience with onecohort of students from two different universities. This was detailed in our pervious poster [4].Institution 1 approaches first-year engineering through a discipline specific model whileInstitution 2 uses the FYEP approach. Information from these surveys was used to inform thedevelopment of an interview protocol related to engineering communities and engineeringidentities. That protocol was used during our first of three rounds of interviews which

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Evans, Louisiana Tech University; Mitzi Desselles, Louisiana Tech University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Thinking content, and 3)industry trips to be made relevant to life as a future engineer. The grant team reflected on thestudent feedback with respect to the existing course elements and program structure and agreedthat improvements could be made. Table 1 provides a summary of the changes implemented inthe ENGR 189B course for the Summer 2018 Program, including the addition of course threadsthat were not present during the Summer 2017 Program. Student reactions to the revised ENGR189B professional development course were obtained through the annual evaluation survey, andtheir reception to the revised content was very positive. 1Table 1. ENGR 189B

Conference Session

International Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Carbine, Salt Lake Community College; Nick Safai, Salt Lake Community College

Tagged Divisions

International

in Figure 2 below, could leave someof the original color of the material showing between pathways making a square that almostlooks the same as the original material, but is slightly darker. Overlapping the pathways almostentirely, as shown in Figure 3, could leave the material black, charred, etched, or may be entirelynecessary depending on the reflectivity or light absorbing properties of the material beingmarked. The heat being retained by the material will become evident as line spacing is exploredfurther. Figure 2: spacing - normal view vs close-up view of large line separation Figure 3: spacing - Full coverage close-up viewRepetitionOne great thing about marking objects is that none of it has to be

Conference Session

Student Success II: Self-Regulatory, Metacognitive, and Professional Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Herring, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and creativity into the environmental engineering program at the University of Georgia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Academic help-seeking as a stand-alone, metacognitive action: An empirical study of experiences and behaviors in undergraduate engineering studentsAbstractContemporary research investigating academic help-seeking behavior (HSB) is predominantlyK-12 in focus. Few studies have

Conference Session

Student Teams, Groups, and Collaborations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Miller, Ohio State University; Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan; Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

teamexperiences. Second, we focus on negative feedback and experiences, rather than positive. Ourgoal is to capture elements of teaming that may not be captured by the more widely-usedapproaches. A common example of negative teaming behavior is ‘freeloaders’, students whomay devote little effort to the team but who benefit from the work of their teammates. Anotherexample is when one student re-does work produced by a teammate; this will likely lead to ahigher-quality output, an outcome which appears to be positive. However, the student whosework was re-done may find this to be a demotivating experience, undermining their confidence,which may in turn contribute to a lower commitment to engineering. Because teaming behavioris likely to reflect schemas

Conference Session

Student Success I: Interventions and Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Perry Weaver, University of Louisville; Marci S. Decaro, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville; Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

encouraging collaboration andreducing competition may increase achievement. Cooperative learning is one such instructionalstrategy that has been shown to improve affective outcomes, such as self-efficacy in students.12Cooperative Learning Group learning can take a variety of forms, and many of the terms to describe these formsare used interchangeably (e.g., cooperative, collaborative and problem-based learning13). Thesegroup learning varieties have been found to increase student motivation and achievement, butdiffer in terms of level of task structure, the assignment of roles to group members, use of sharedmaterials, involvement of instructors, and built-in reflection on the process. One particular grouplearning structure used in the current

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Development Opportunities for Diverse Engineering Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Morgan Irvin, Washington University in St. Louis; Elizabeth Hiteshue, University of Pennsylvania; Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Michael Geselowitz, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

finalized. The questions were personalized for each interviewee andreviewed by the IEEE Historian. Following changes, the participating students sent the oralhistory questions to the interviewee prior to the interview.A standard set of interview components included the following sections: Introduction, EarlyLife/Education, Career, Awards/Honors, Gender-Related Questions, Reflection/Advice, andConclusion. Table I (shown on the next page) shows the structure of a typical oral historyinterview. Excluding an introduction and conclusion, the five general sections covered in theinterview are Early Life/Education, Career, Awards/Honors, Gender, and Reflection/Advice.Questions are personalized for each interviewee. Questions in the Early Life/Education

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: It's All About Teams and Teamwork

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fernando Garcia Gonzalez, Florida Gulf Coast University; Janusz Zalewski, Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

networkgame, to verify how a two-semester sequence may reflect on the quality of the final product.The students worked on a team to design and develop the software requirements and relateddocuments in addition to building the software. The objective of the demonstration to the freshmen class was twofold: (1) illustrate theprocess of software development comprising multiple stages over two semesters, and (2)outline typical game programming technology with the use of professional tools. Page 26.769.63.2 Detailed Project Descriptions The data acquisition and control projects were all developed in LabVIEW and focused on acompletely different kind of

Conference Session

FPD 7: Beyond Course Content

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Ocif Love, Northeastern University; Susan F. Freeman, Northeastern University; Daniel Allan Sullivan, Center for STEM Education, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

observations and from the first-year engineering students’ ownobservations and feedback about their experiences. As a result of faculty members’ experiences,observations and reflections, 15 success factors have been identified for first-year engineeringstudents and engineering faculty to consider before implementing meaningful service-learningengineering projects in an urban community. The purpose of this paper is to share these 15success factors with other engineering educators who may be considering STEM educationservice-learning projects in their curriculum, especially those who will be initially managing theprojects all by themselves. “What Sticks” refers to what has been successful and meaningful forboth the first-year engineering students and

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elissa T. Morris, Texas A&M University; Daniel A. McAdams, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

experiencethroughout their undergraduate studies. IDEA offers a design certification program for studentsafter completion of several design-related courses, an engineering design portfolio, and multipledesign projects 10. The portfolio must demonstrate the students’ proficiency in the designprocess, design analysis, prototyping and implementation, modern software tools, and effectivecommunication. To enhance communication skills and provide quality instruction and feedback,students collaborate with graduate students, post-doctoral researchers, faculty advisors, andindustry professionals to complete projects. Graduates of IDEA are trained to become competentdesigners and reflective practitioners of engineering. They acquire a well-rounded design skillsetthat

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

-­‐based  activities  to  address  students’  common  misconceptions  in  heat  transfer.    These  activities  involved  three  parts  –  first,  a  description  of  a  situation  and  a  request  for  students  to  individually  make  a  written  prediction  about  how  that  situation  would  resolve.    For  example,  predict  which  lowers  the  temperature  of  a  cup  of  water  more:  a  single  large  ice  cube,  or  an  equal  mass  of  chipped  ice?    Then  students  worked  in  small  groups  to  replicate  the  experiment  as  described  and  record  observations.    Finally,  after  discussing  what  they  had  experienced,  students  would  complete  an  individual  written  reflection  on  what  they’d  observed  and  how  it

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Project-based Learning and Cornerstone Courses

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University; Justin J Henriques; Sancho Sequeira

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

incorporate real-world problems, issues, and scenarios into mini or majorprojects that are devised to prompt students to investigate, gather, and apply knowledge.Project-based learning aims to engage students in realistic, thought-provoking problems;typical projects present a problem to solve, a phenomenon to investigate, a model todesign, or a decision to make3.    At the core of project-base learning are the following4:   ● Students learning knowledge, processes, and methods in order to wrestle with realistic problems they would encounter in the “real-world” ● Increased student control over their personal learning ● Teachers serving as coaches of inquiry and reflection ● Students working in

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Course Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

aim is to teach skills, and notcontent. To ensure that skills are developed, in-class challenges are given for each of the analysis stages,deep learning assignments are given at major milestones in the course, and students complete a courseproject. Many assignments require justification of answers to break the student mentality of “what is theright answer” and lead them toward developing solutions that address system requirements and balancetradeoffs. The reflection that comes along with justification solidifies concepts and enables mastery ofthe systems analysis process.IntroductionThe engineering program at James Madison University provides an emphasis on engineering design,systems thinking, and sustainability. Our young engineering program

Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

viewed appropriate. For this section, the Cadets were asked to writea three page essay on how the subject of how aeronautics intersects with their chosen major.This posed a thought provoking reflection essay which was not expected in an introductoryengineering class. Cadets were encouraged to talk with their advisor, other classmates, otherCadets in the major, and with the author. Several Cadets chose the latter and excellentdiscussions were had with the author outside of the classroom. As a result, the essays writtenwere thoughtful and thought provoking. In a survey that was accomplished after the essays weregraded and returned, many Cadets thought the essay experience was valuable and theyappreciated the opportunity to reflect on the relevance

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Molly H Goldstein, Purdue University, West Lafayette; K. Anna Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

validation of the research instruments, and the Concord Team focused oncalibration of the process analytics. These initial qualitative studies were designed to inform thelarger study in three ways. First, the classroom observations, interviews, and discussions with theteachers allow a deeper understanding of student cognition. These then inform the design ofpre/posttests. Second, the qualitative analyses of student design behaviors and reflective notescaptured through Energy3D provide information on students’ approaches to design. Third, thesecombined insights help inform the development and validation of models for the process analyticssuch as time series mining, association rule mining, and combined action-note analysis. The initialdesign of pre

Conference Session

Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Digital Systems Education 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheng Chih Liu, University of Wisconsin Stout

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

include the followingparts: infrared proximity sensor, reflectance sensor array, magnetometer with six-degree-of-freedom, speaker, and Bluetooth and WiFi radios. Android tablets with built-in Bluetooth andWiFi were available in the lab for students to connect to the Bluetooth module on the robots.Figure 2 shows a robot chassis and an assembled FPGA robot. The total cost of the assembledparts was $160 per robot (aluminum robot chassis $25, two continuous rotation servos $26, twoplastic wheels and one wheel ball $10, a Parallax board of education shield PCB $35, a DE0-NANO FPGA board $59, 5-cell AA battery pack, nuts, screws, and standoffs $5). This low costrobot made it possible to have one robot per student. The university provides each student

Conference Session

Continuing Professional Development Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell L Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mark T Schuver, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

26.1559.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The New Professional Working Adult Learner – The Next Generational CohortAbstractWith greatest respect and reference to Bob Dylan’s 1964 song “…the times [students] they are achangin…”, there has been a transitioning of professional working adult learners from onegenerational cohort to another, and now, to yet the youngest of generational cohorts… theMillennials.Correlations exist between the number of webpage “hits” and the subsequent fall enrollments.While this information is important, it reflects a lagging indicator; that is, it does not tell us whythere may have been more or less webpage hits. In contrast

Conference Session

Qualitative Methodologies

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

practical and intellectually appropriateresearch design?In this paper, we consider one such idea: The prevailing stigma of research conducted on smallpopulations in research on equity. Whatever its source or however explicit (or not) its ideologicalorigins, disregard of the “small n” population as non-meaningful reproduces a marginalization ofstudents. It also casts particular human experiences as aberrant by virtue of statistical rarity. Butmost profoundly, researchers’ definition of small or large “ns” reiterates the value or necessityfor established categories (say, racial demarcations, or binaries of ability and disability), whilewe instead believe that critical reflection on categories is necessary for any address of power andprivilege. Our

Conference Session

Student Approaches to Problem Solving: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin James Call, Utah State University; Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University; Christopher Green, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

understanding have been identified. The basicobservations were identified by common code and grouped under shared themes which arepresented in the Results section. As is the case with grounded theory, validity in this qualitativestudy is established through saturation. That is, when continued data analysis and reflection donot bring forth any new facets or insight, the effort is confirmed to be complete. The datacollection occurred in two different sections – one in the spring and one in the fall – wheresimilar problems were given to both groups, but an alteration of scope for the fall group wasintended to provide more focus in the coding process

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 4: The Best of the All: FPD Best Papers

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina H Paguyo, Colorado State University; Rebecca A Atadero, Colorado State University; Karen E Rambo-Hernandez, West Virginia University; Jennifer Francis, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

2Presentations from Professional Engineers 5.59 1.11 2 Page 26.418.11Proposed Experimental ActivitiesIn this section, we propose six experimental activities to facilitate the growth of inclusiveengineering identities: student trading cards, egalitarian social norms, panel of professionalengineers, reflective writing assignments, examples of diversity benefiting engineering practice,and interactive theater sketch. We identified these activities based upon criteria for developingprofessional identities25, 26, review of literature, and student feedback from the surveys. Inselecting these activities we have sought to identify

Conference Session

Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jean M. Trusedell, EPICS

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

solution to the scenario using materials provided and discuss the prototype with a partner andteam to determine how effectively the prototype meets the needs of the stakeholder. The teacherparticipants will then explain the solution to the scenario to the group and how this prototype will meet theneeds of the stakeholders.Reflection- Reflection is an essential part of the educational process not only with students but withinstruction. The teachers will reflect using the following questions. • How would this process help identify potential projects and the critical thinking associated with delivering a possible engineering solution in your community? • How are the discussions that the prototype facilitates helpful for understanding

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sahithya Reddivari, University of Michigan; Elizabeth Frances Cloos Dreyer, University of Michigan; Sara P Rimer, University of Michigan; Aline Cotel, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

 global development has been recognized as a promising means to prepare engineers for a rapidly changing global landscape and to be reflective of their impact on the development of communities worldwide [13]. While these types of programs have been shown to increase student competency in engineering and global development, most of the programs underutilize the potential to deepen this understanding by building cross­cultural peer collaborations. Furthermore, when international service learning programs do have a peer collaboration component, these peer collaborations are usually from a top­down approach in which the peer collaboration is a part of a program, but not necessarily driven by the students themselves [14]. Additionally, in these

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Linda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lizabeth T Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

thesemeetings was invaluable as we transitioned to more integrated self-direct learning for studentsand faculty. Through this learning initiative, the faculty built the capacity to reflect and examineassumptions. We also believe that an important part of this experiment was the availability of thestudent community voice as feedback to the faculty.Students took between half and three-quarters of their course load with faculty who taught pre-existing general education courses. The difference for the students was that they took courseswith a cohort and that faculty attempted to integrate content across disciplines. Courses includedEnglish, communications, humanities (ethnic studies, history, sociology), STEM (physics,biology, and engineering). Students