-‐based activities to address students’ common misconceptions in heat transfer. These activities involved three parts – first, a description of a situation and a request for students to individually make a written prediction about how that situation would resolve. For example, predict which lowers the temperature of a cup of water more: a single large ice cube, or an equal mass of chipped ice? Then students worked in small groups to replicate the experiment as described and record observations. Finally, after discussing what they had experienced, students would complete an individual written reflection on what they’d observed and how it
incorporate real-world problems, issues, and scenarios into mini or majorprojects that are devised to prompt students to investigate, gather, and apply knowledge.Project-based learning aims to engage students in realistic, thought-provoking problems;typical projects present a problem to solve, a phenomenon to investigate, a model todesign, or a decision to make3. At the core of project-base learning are the following4: ● Students learning knowledge, processes, and methods in order to wrestle with realistic problems they would encounter in the “real-world” ● Increased student control over their personal learning ● Teachers serving as coaches of inquiry and reflection ● Students working in
aim is to teach skills, and notcontent. To ensure that skills are developed, in-class challenges are given for each of the analysis stages,deep learning assignments are given at major milestones in the course, and students complete a courseproject. Many assignments require justification of answers to break the student mentality of “what is theright answer” and lead them toward developing solutions that address system requirements and balancetradeoffs. The reflection that comes along with justification solidifies concepts and enables mastery ofthe systems analysis process.IntroductionThe engineering program at James Madison University provides an emphasis on engineering design,systems thinking, and sustainability. Our young engineering program
viewed appropriate. For this section, the Cadets were asked to writea three page essay on how the subject of how aeronautics intersects with their chosen major.This posed a thought provoking reflection essay which was not expected in an introductoryengineering class. Cadets were encouraged to talk with their advisor, other classmates, otherCadets in the major, and with the author. Several Cadets chose the latter and excellentdiscussions were had with the author outside of the classroom. As a result, the essays writtenwere thoughtful and thought provoking. In a survey that was accomplished after the essays weregraded and returned, many Cadets thought the essay experience was valuable and theyappreciated the opportunity to reflect on the relevance
validation of the research instruments, and the Concord Team focused oncalibration of the process analytics. These initial qualitative studies were designed to inform thelarger study in three ways. First, the classroom observations, interviews, and discussions with theteachers allow a deeper understanding of student cognition. These then inform the design ofpre/posttests. Second, the qualitative analyses of student design behaviors and reflective notescaptured through Energy3D provide information on students’ approaches to design. Third, thesecombined insights help inform the development and validation of models for the process analyticssuch as time series mining, association rule mining, and combined action-note analysis. The initialdesign of pre
include the followingparts: infrared proximity sensor, reflectance sensor array, magnetometer with six-degree-of-freedom, speaker, and Bluetooth and WiFi radios. Android tablets with built-in Bluetooth andWiFi were available in the lab for students to connect to the Bluetooth module on the robots.Figure 2 shows a robot chassis and an assembled FPGA robot. The total cost of the assembledparts was $160 per robot (aluminum robot chassis $25, two continuous rotation servos $26, twoplastic wheels and one wheel ball $10, a Parallax board of education shield PCB $35, a DE0-NANO FPGA board $59, 5-cell AA battery pack, nuts, screws, and standoffs $5). This low costrobot made it possible to have one robot per student. The university provides each student
26.1559.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The New Professional Working Adult Learner – The Next Generational CohortAbstractWith greatest respect and reference to Bob Dylan’s 1964 song “…the times [students] they are achangin…”, there has been a transitioning of professional working adult learners from onegenerational cohort to another, and now, to yet the youngest of generational cohorts… theMillennials.Correlations exist between the number of webpage “hits” and the subsequent fall enrollments.While this information is important, it reflects a lagging indicator; that is, it does not tell us whythere may have been more or less webpage hits. In contrast
practical and intellectually appropriateresearch design?In this paper, we consider one such idea: The prevailing stigma of research conducted on smallpopulations in research on equity. Whatever its source or however explicit (or not) its ideologicalorigins, disregard of the “small n” population as non-meaningful reproduces a marginalization ofstudents. It also casts particular human experiences as aberrant by virtue of statistical rarity. Butmost profoundly, researchers’ definition of small or large “ns” reiterates the value or necessityfor established categories (say, racial demarcations, or binaries of ability and disability), whilewe instead believe that critical reflection on categories is necessary for any address of power andprivilege. Our
understanding have been identified. The basicobservations were identified by common code and grouped under shared themes which arepresented in the Results section. As is the case with grounded theory, validity in this qualitativestudy is established through saturation. That is, when continued data analysis and reflection donot bring forth any new facets or insight, the effort is confirmed to be complete. The datacollection occurred in two different sections – one in the spring and one in the fall – wheresimilar problems were given to both groups, but an alteration of scope for the fall group wasintended to provide more focus in the coding process
2Presentations from Professional Engineers 5.59 1.11 2 Page 26.418.11Proposed Experimental ActivitiesIn this section, we propose six experimental activities to facilitate the growth of inclusiveengineering identities: student trading cards, egalitarian social norms, panel of professionalengineers, reflective writing assignments, examples of diversity benefiting engineering practice,and interactive theater sketch. We identified these activities based upon criteria for developingprofessional identities25, 26, review of literature, and student feedback from the surveys. Inselecting these activities we have sought to identify
solution to the scenario using materials provided and discuss the prototype with a partner andteam to determine how effectively the prototype meets the needs of the stakeholder. The teacherparticipants will then explain the solution to the scenario to the group and how this prototype will meet theneeds of the stakeholders.Reflection- Reflection is an essential part of the educational process not only with students but withinstruction. The teachers will reflect using the following questions. • How would this process help identify potential projects and the critical thinking associated with delivering a possible engineering solution in your community? • How are the discussions that the prototype facilitates helpful for understanding
global development has been recognized as a promising means to prepare engineers for a rapidly changing global landscape and to be reflective of their impact on the development of communities worldwide [13]. While these types of programs have been shown to increase student competency in engineering and global development, most of the programs underutilize the potential to deepen this understanding by building crosscultural peer collaborations. Furthermore, when international service learning programs do have a peer collaboration component, these peer collaborations are usually from a topdown approach in which the peer collaboration is a part of a program, but not necessarily driven by the students themselves [14]. Additionally, in these
thesemeetings was invaluable as we transitioned to more integrated self-direct learning for studentsand faculty. Through this learning initiative, the faculty built the capacity to reflect and examineassumptions. We also believe that an important part of this experiment was the availability of thestudent community voice as feedback to the faculty.Students took between half and three-quarters of their course load with faculty who taught pre-existing general education courses. The difference for the students was that they took courseswith a cohort and that faculty attempted to integrate content across disciplines. Courses includedEnglish, communications, humanities (ethnic studies, history, sociology), STEM (physics,biology, and engineering). Students
participants to learnabout this concept, our research team has developed a game that allows participants to build theirown model of an engineer complete with engineering habit of mind, personal interest andmotivation. This paper seeks to explain how this game was developed and intended to be played.Development of the GamePieces of the engineering body were sketched on a 2D sketching software, and printed using alaser printer and cardboard. The head, for example had the basic shape of a circle and wasiterated to form an oval, a quarter circle and a semi-circle. Arms were developed from the basicshape of a rectangle, triangles for the torso (body) pieces and hexagonal piece for the legs. Eachpiece was intended to reflect a gender neutral engineer that
suggesting that students may be at risk or facing academic challenges.The analysis uncovered the opportunity to refine intrusive advising principles. Research on theimpact of advising reflects the correlation which exists between successful academic advisingand an increase in student retention and graduation rates. Intrusive advising involves themandatory requirement for a student to meet with the academic advisor. Through therequirement of the advising discussion, advisors can collaboratively develop strategies forengagement with resources that will promote academic success. Theories and research focusingon academic advising approaches and student engagement guide advising discussions. We hopeto realize a significant improvement in freshmen
through Project & e-Learning Final Exam Module (Blackboard) Question Discussion Reinforce learning through a Class Project Figure 1. Integration components of e-Learning modulesInstructors are asked to perform the following to integrate e-learning modules into their classes: 1. Complete the e-learning module; 2. Attend training designed for faculty deploying the modules; 3. Revise course syllabi to reflect integration of e-learning
). Rather than establishing this binary, we think it might be helpful toconsider positivism and interpretivism along continua or spectra, in which ICR measures mightbe helpful in the context of some qualitative studies but inconsistent in the context of others. Tofurther raise questions about the use of ICR, we next describe our own qualitative work inengineering educational research and we describe our discussions and considerationssurrounding ICR in our attempts to ensure quality in our own qualitative research. Intercoder Reliability and Quality: Reflections on a Qualitative Multiple Case StudyTo contextualize our discussion of ICR measures and quality, we begin with a brief descriptionof our own ongoing qualitative work: a multiple case study
collecting autoethnographic, ethnographic, and interviewing data of designteams working in makerspaces over the course of two years.The undergraduate engineering students joined the research team as sophomores and participated in year-long training in methods of autoethnographic writing and ethnographic methods of participant observationthe year prior to the onset of data collection. As part of that methodological preparation, student researchersspent considerable time reflecting on their own identities as nascent engineers, critically interrogating whatbrought them to the engineering major and what aspects of engineering most interest them. This earlyreflective process prepares students to understand and situate their identities within the maker
. Further, this form of community-engaged learningoffers an authentic setting to develop many of the integrated student outcomes stated in the newengineering accreditation criteria. We contend that effective transdisciplinary learning is a meansto the oft-stated goal of systemic transformation in engineering education, particularly forsustainability aims. However, this complex, dynamic systems view of engineeringeducation represents a radical departure from education-as-usual and thus requires a similarlyradical departure from research- and assessment- -as-usual. It reflects a shift in the unit ofanalysis: from a singular focus on student learning outcomes to a broader view that captureslearning at the transdisciplinary system level. It also
canfertilize the learning of these subjects as well as engineering in general, the inclusion ofwriting/communication in the curriculum should become easier.Writing as a cognitive processIn order to write about something, we need to understand in depth what we write about - writingis therefore a learning strategy for reaching deeper knowledge and new insights. The writingprocess has been shown to have positive aspects besides that writing itself, for example toimprove student reflection [12, 13], and to improve critical thinking skills [14]. As noted earlier,both integration in regular courses and progression over the entire curriculum is important.Towards this aim, it is beneficial to break down ”writing” to units that can be distinguished
curriculaof engineering programs, we developed and delivered a free-standing, semester-length course indesign ethics, in which students worked in groups on a design project for a client, with frequent,structured opportunities to reflect on the ethical values at stake in their design decisions. We alsoconducted a pilot test of a novel assessment method using Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) (Foltz1998, Landauer 1998) to detect changes in the cognitive schemas students bring to bear on ethicalquestions. BACKGROUNDEthics and Design A course in design ethics is conditioned on the long-recognized parallel between ethicalproblem-solving and the design process (Whitbeck 2011, Bero and Kuhlman 2011, Feister et al
gauging elements of students’ affect that can be immensely useful in encouraging students andhelping them succeed. However, simply gauging students’ feelings may also give insight intotheir experiences as an engineering student.In this work, we focus on data that resulted from a larger study investigating students’perceptions of engineering, sense of belonging, and sense of community as they participate in aCommon Read first-year program. In the study, incoming first-year students participated in apre- and mid-summer survey and a post-program survey. A subset of these students alsoparticipated in focus groups, held with students of all levels who were prompted to reflect ontheir experiences starting college and participating in first-year
, the students are grouped in pairs and are challenged to solvepuzzles in VR. However, only one student can wear the headset, while the other has a manualwith the solution to the puzzle. The students need to communicate with each other to solve thepuzzle. At the end of the VR game, the students need to reflect on the challenges that theyencountered and how they can improve their team communication. To support the Project Management lecture topic, the Virtual Construction Simulator 4(VCS4) game was selected. The game is “a simulation game that teaches students the dynamicnature of the construction process and frequent changes to construction schedules” [ 31]. Thegame was selected because of its extensive supporting instructional
sizes. To normalize, the mean response fromeach of the seven programs were then averaged together, giving equal one-seventh weight toeach program of study.Response categories of “Strongly Disagree,” “Disagree,” “Neutral,” “Agree,” and “StronglyAgree” were assigned corresponding ordinal ranks of one through five respectively. The likertvalue responses were averaged for these groups in order to represent a “general consensus”response. Mean likert responses near one for any given question reflect a strong disagreementthat the given behavior is an important factor for student-instructor rapport, while meanresponses near five indicate a strong agreement that the behavior is an important factor forstudent-instructor rapport. Median was not calculated
., pre-entryengineering identity); Time 2, reflecting engineering identity at the end of the first semester; andTime 3, reflecting engineering identity at the end of the spring semester.Demographic control variables, including gender, age, and ethnicity, were gathered throughuniversity records.ResultsIn the fall semester, 24 (2.0%) students engaged in research, 7 (0.6%) served as engineeringstudent ambassadors, 6 (0.5%) were peer mentors, 10 (0.8%) engaged in internships, 300(25.0%) participated in student organizations directly related to engineering, and 212 (17.7%)participated in student organizations outside engineering. In the spring semester, 68 (5.7%)students were involved in research, 20 (1.7%) served as engineering student ambassadors
and communication with technical and non-technical peers. Students worked in teamsof three and four to solve ill-defined problems presented by the instructor. Topics coveredConstruction Waste, Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Recycling Education, PublicTransportation, and Campus Transit. Deliverables, including a technical report, an oralpresentation, and an analytical reflection, were used as data for this project. Students weresurveyed to assess their perceptions of problem-based learning. There were seventy-twoparticipants over three semesters. One preliminary result from both the survey and qualitativedata is that students felt confident about working with others from different disciplines. Studentsmostly commented positively about their
organizations. Findings: Legal SystemJudicial interpretation of Title IX and Title VII hasincentivized organizations to create policies, procedures,and training on sexual harassment that focus onsymbolic compliance with current law and avoidingliability, and not on preventing sexual harassment.Title IX, Title VII, and case law reflect the inaccurateassumption that a target of sexual harassment willpromptly report the harassment without worrying aboutretaliation. Findings: Predictors of Sexual HarassmentSexual harassment is most likely to take place inenvironments that are:• Male-dominated in number, leaders, and culture• Organizational tolerance of sexual harassment o Reporting is perceived as risky o Reports
result of its inclusionand elevated importance in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [1]. Within thenascent field of pre-college engineering education, the ways in which elementary engineeringexperiences may support the formation of engineering identities in young children are not wellunderstood [2]. What is known about formative experiences in engineering is that participationtends to be gendered [3], with girls and boys engaging in and reflecting on engineering activitiesin different ways. This paper focuses on identity, as developing a strong engineering identity, orsense of belonging in engineering, is essential to pursuing and persisting in the field.Participation in engineering outreach programs is widely seen as an opportunity
. Page 12.558.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Diversity in Engineering Teaching – Views from Future Engineering FacultyAbstractThis current paper uses a qualitative analysis approach to explore the conceptions of diversity asexpressed by future engineering educators. Engineering graduate students and post-docs (futureengineering educators) wrote a statement of diversity as it relates to teaching engineering as acomponent of a teaching portfolio. We then interviewed these participants about the processesthey used for this writing task. During the interview, they reflected on their processes in writing thediversity statement; they also discussed their personal experiences with
; • experiences or incidents that reflected ideas discussed in class; • thoughts, feelings, and values derived from their service activities; • what was learned.These weekly reports formed the basis for each team’s final written project report and oralpresentation to the entire class. Each student presented a portion of the final team report andincluded operations and procedures that were characteristic to their site, as well as theirpersonal reflections on the activity. Finally, an open forum was provided for the entire classto discuss their ideas and exchange lessons learned during the project. Students completingthe project were recognized in front of the entire class and were presented with certificates ofappreciation.Because of liability