fact the mission at the universitystates; Cal Poly fosters teaching, scholarship, and service in a learn-by-doing environment in which students, staff, and faculty are partners in discovery. As a polytechnic, Cal Poly promotes the application of theory to practice. As a comprehensive institution, Cal Poly provides a balanced education in the arts, sciences, and technology, while encouraging cross-disciplinary and co-curricular experiences. As an academic community, Cal Poly values free inquiry, cultural and intellectual diversity, mutual respect, civic engagement, and social and environmental responsibility.[1]The aspirations of the institute promote technical or depth of knowledge in a field
purposes and 36.1 percent reporting a mixed medical/recreational use(Schauer et al., 2016).Schauer GL, King BA, Bunnell RE, Promoff G, McAfee TA. Toking, vaping and eating for healthor fun: Marijuana use patterns. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2016;50(1):1–8.[PubMed]In 2015, an estimated 8.3 percent of Americans 12 years of age or older reported usingNonmedical Marijuana. Nonmedical Marijuana use is most prevalent among young people ages18 to 25 (19.8 percent using) (CBHSQ, 2016a). Interestingly, since 2002 the use of NonmedicalMarijuana has decreased among 12- to 17-year-olds, while it has markedly increased in the seniorpopulation, those over 55 years (Azofeifa et al., 2016).Males are nearly twice as likely (10.6 percent) to use
both inside and outside of the classroom, through co-curricularactivities such as undergraduate research (Holloway & Radcliffe, 2018) and participation instudent clubs and organizations (Garrett et al., 2021).Despite the good intentions of engineering education researchers, program developers, andeducators, most professional skill development work is inadvertently deficit-based. This type ofapproach focuses on the skills or background knowledge that non-dominant student groups lackas they enter and navigate engineering programs (Valencia, 2012).1 National reports calling forimprovements in K-12 science and engineering education and explaining the need forinvestments in STEM education also contain a deficit perspective, focusing on the need
Powered by www.slayte.com 1Balancing Social, Personal, and Work Responsibilities for Minoritized Doctoral Students in Engineering Jerry A. Yang, Crystal A. Nattoo Electrical Engineering, School of Engineering, Stanford UniversityIntroduction Engineering doctoral students represent the next generation of engineering faculty andare trained in the means and mechanisms of their technical discipline [1]. However, doctoralstudents often must embrace a multitude of roles during their tenure, including serving asresearch assistants, teaching
widely reported that the majority of engineering departments in the United States ofAmerica are predominantly comprised of high functioning, white, males [1]. Despite the recentsurge in interest towards the involvement of women and racial minorities in the STEM fields,students with disabilities remain an underrepresented minority in these fields [2]–[4].Additionally, the barriers that those students with disability face once they do enter one of thesefields can hinder their success and lead to a higher than average rate of students leaving theirdegrees unfinished. In one such study, it was reported that while these students with disabilitiesare enrolling at the same rate as their non-disabled counterparts, their graduation rate is muchlower – 38
. In the end, this studysuggested the most effective teaching methods that can improve practical skilled aviationmaintenance professionals in Indonesia during the pandemic situation.IntroductionSince the first time it emerged in December 2019 from Wuhan city, China, the COVID-19pandemic has impacted significant disruption in the aviation industry worldwide, including theairlines, maintenance, and manufacturing field [1]. The pandemic led to isolation in manycountries and forced people to work online to maintain their performance amidst the pandemic toavoid drastic economic loss [2]. This case also applies to Indonesia. The COVID-19 pandemicdoes not only affect people working in companies but also affects students at all levels. Startingfrom
program. The results from thisassessment will provide an understanding of how research is utilized in engineering technologyprograms with the basic assumption that the utilization of research attracts, motivates, andengages students and faculty alike in a sustainable culture of excellence vertically within eachprogram, horizontally across engineering technology, and upwardly to the graduate program.The result of engaging in critical research is a better-prepared graduate to enter the engineeringprofession or advance to graduate school and tackle the demands of the 21st-centuryengineering industry.BackgroundWorld events of the 1940s-50s led to the 1955 Grinter report [1] urging faculty to revamp thecurricula and embrace a much higher math and
, the designer in education also needs to be mindful of theirclients—the effectiveness in the curriculum, instruction methodology, and the achievement ofthe desired result. The program provides a framework to identify teaching and learning priorities.The other aspect that needs to be considered is the needs of students when designing the learningexperiences.The backward design is a methodological approach that focuses on the purpose, outcomes of thecourse, and what one wants to achieve from the curriculum development. The course design isstructured based on the assessments linked to students' learning to meet the course goals andobjectives. There are three stages in the backward design process – (1) Identifying desiredresults, (2) Determining
curricula as well as best practices to support engineering students’ leadershipdevelopment through their entire college experience.IntroductionLeadership has been widely recognized as a vital component of engineering education andprofessional development. Leadership skills can increase the likelihood of a student's individualprofessional success, as well as improve international competitiveness, marketability, andinnovation [1]. Calls for improving leadership development in engineering education are echoedthroughout the literature, policy, and accreditation criteria. ABET accreditation for studentlearning outcomes in engineering programs includes, “an ability to function effectively on a teamwhose members together provide leadership, create a
of 20 HEAT Scholars have earned their A.S. in Engineeringdegree so far; ten Scholars matriculated to engineering programs at GSoE, our formal partner;and five Scholars matriculated to engineering programs outside of the partnership to institutionsthat include Cornell University (4) and New Mexico Tech (1).Participation in mentored research has been an important component of the program. Thisintervention provides HEAT Scholars with extended academic and professional supportnetworks, especially when summer internships outside of the participating institutions andpresentation of their work at regional and national conferences are considered. These experiencesand the networks they create leverage institution resources via other STEM programs
customers a higher degree of mass customization inproduct design and development [1]. In today’s globalized marketplace, customers not only wanta variety of products but also demand for shorter lead times. Further, customer choices keep onchanging with time as newer options are made available through multiple markets [2]. As a result,the companies are under pressure to reduce the entire conceive, design, and realization phases ofa product life cycle to meet the changing customer expectations [3]. This can be achieved throughcyber-physical systems in the manufacturing space that enables factories to access the workspaceremotely and achieve the necessary efficiency and effectiveness in their operations [4]. Similarly,industry 4.0 and logistic 4.0 in
of the City University of New York.Wendy Martin (Research Scientist) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comBuilding Engineering Interest and Resilience through Maker Programming in Autism Inclusion SchoolsAbstract Maker programs, which involve hands-on production of physical or digital artifacts, arean engaging way to have youth pursue their personal interests as they learn the engineeringdesign process (EDP) [1], [2]. Autistic youth often have deep interests related to STEM [3] andautistic college students are drawn to majors in STEM fields at higher rates than the generalpopulation [4]. However, young
their maintakeaways from the summer experience.Key Takeaways from Summer ExperienceBeyond the benefits of engaging undergraduates in research as a pathway to graduate educationand scientific literacy, we found that engaging URAs during data analysis, specifically inresearch relevant to their own lived experiences, was additionally beneficial in three distinctways:1.) Contextualizing the findings and quality checkThe URAs provided a richer contextualization during our data analysis having recently beenstudents in the setting we were researching which provided a vital quality check for our findings.According to Walther et al. (2013), a key component of quality in interpretive research is tovalidate that the findings represent the social reality
beendecreasing over the last few decades, a large gap persists in engineering; with women earningonly 19.8% of undergraduate degrees and women of color earning less than 3%. One successfulSTEM intervention is a program based out of a natural history museum in a large urban city.This program trains and mentors a select group of urban high school women (100% low-income:85% under-represented minorities) through a curated curriculum in the first year, followed bypersistent mentorship by a scientist for the last three years of high school. The alumnae of theprogram all graduate high school, with 97% attending college (as opposed to 51% of womenwho graduate from the local school district), and 89% earning a 4-year degree, of which 54% arein STEM (vs. 1% of
considerations vary between pre-K and K settings? • What tools and supports can build on and enhance teachers’ existing knowledge and practices in order to help them successfully deliver integrated engineering and empathy activities in early childhood settings? Development of the activities and professional supports is guided by the E2K2 Design Principles, a set of key design considerations for developing the resources, which were developed through initial rounds of project testing. Through the iterative and collaborative design process, the project team developed: (1) a curriculum module of integrated engineering and empathy activities; (2) teacher supports, including a
. Strong’s research aims to improve the design of educational experiences for students by critically examining the work and learning environments of practitioners. Specifically, she focuses on (1) how to design and change educational and work systems through studies of practicing engineers and educators and (2) how to help students transition into, through and out of educational and work systems.Gemma Henderson (Senior Instructional Designer)Ines Basalo (Assistant Professor in Practice) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The AMPLIFY Project: Experiences of Engineering Instructional Faculty at
summarize our progress and accomplishments in these three areas:(1) the identification of curriculum-specific indicators of overpersistence (which refers to whena student persists in a major yet does not progress toward attaining a degree for that major)conducted through Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) analysis; (2)development and validation of the Multidimensional Inventory of Decision-Making Competency(MIDC); and (3) the design process of the Academic Dashboard for students with functionalitiessuch as tracking their study habits, predicting exam grades and developing their meta-cognitionattributes.Project OverviewThe main purpose of this project is to help students learn to make adaptive decisions to besuccessful in their
found that themajority of the students liked the course and its content requirements, i.e., 4.58 + 0.67 and 4.58 +0.51, respectively (13 students) on a Likert scale (1 strongly disagree and 5 strongly agree). Onthe other hand, students did not indicate that the content of the course was useful in their learningin other courses (3.75 + 0.97). These students also indicated that they did not produce asatisfactory final project in the final round of the competition (3.75 + 1.36) that was reflective oftheir learning experience. Jong et al. (2013) examined whether incorporation of an online gamefor cooperative learning of operating systems enhanced the motivation of students to learn thecourse materials. They found that students who engaged with the
loweraverages than their non-SSELP STEM peers in almost every area of science motivation. After over three years of implementation of the NSF-funded STEM Scholars Engaging inLocal Problems program, the recruitment effort has grown significantly in STEM fields in theuniversity. Within the two cohorts, the most common majors were environmental science andengineering. While 100% of Cohorts 1 and 2 students were retained into the Fall semester of thesecond year, two students from Cohort 1 left the program between the third and fourth semestersof their studies. While one student from Cohort 2 had a leave of absence, they have returned tocontinue their studies. The support system formed among the SSELP scholars and between thescholars and faculty has
the question we usually ask is “are students ready for college?”,but a growing trend is putting the onus on colleges by asking if “colleges are ready for students”[1],[2]. Transfer students face unique barriers to success, including “transfer shock,” lack ofcurricular mapping, and economic hardships that require at least part time employment.Engineering students in particular often arrive at four –year colleges without adequateprerequisites to take junior-level (or major-specific) courses. As a result, these students oftentake as long as four years to graduate following transfer, increasing the likelihood of attrition.In 2015, the state of Tennessee launched Tennessee Promise, a scholarship and mentoringprogram that makes attendance at two
the REU Site is increased autonomy and safety ofUAVs for accelerated integration into the National Airspace System (NAS) for mass adoption.The Participants learn to do both hardware integration and develop algorithms for the increasedautonomy of UAVs as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Hardware Integration Diagram for Search and Rescue Missions.The Participants test the developed algorithms and methods in simulation prior to testing them inflight as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Simulation Environment for UAV Autonomy Research.Finally, the participants test the developed algorithms in flights of UAVs as shown in Figure 3for example
address KCURE Fellows’ emergent needs within the contextof their engineering degree programs.Contextual BackgroundThe KCURE scholarship program links two Kansas City area higher education institutions:Metropolitan Community College (MCC) and the University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC).Program objectives are twofold: (1) increase the number of low-income, meritorious MCCtransfer students who transfer to and graduate from the UMKC Civil and MechanicalEngineering (CME) degree program, and (2) instill within the UMKC CME department a culturethat facilitates the full participation of low-income, meritorious MCC transfer students. TheKCURE scholarship program is slated to provide 176 annual scholarships between 2020 and2025 to an estimated 56
faculty mentee, iii) faculty whoparticipated in a focus group on disciplinary writing goals, and iv) engineering graduate studentswho took our class on writing practice and pedagogy.Discursive turbulence now informs our mentoring approach. It can be generative as well aschallenging. Importantly, it takes time to resolve, suggesting the utility of sustained mentoringduring pedagogical change.IntroductionCalls for improving communication skills during engineering education are both widespread andlongstanding [1], [2], but development of these skills continues to be challenging. We apply atransdisciplinary action research approach [3], iteratively developing and revising interventionsthrough tight integration with research into their effectiveness
directly mentioned a connection between their experiences with humanitarianengineering projects and their views of DEI. Additionally, the codes connected to existingliterature in engineering education as well as theories like empathy, identity development, andemotional intelligence. These results are promising for this study and will be expanded uponthrough interviews where these connections will be examined at a deeper level.Background: The basis of this project is described in [1] and will be briefly described here. Thebroader impact of this NSF PFE:RIEF grant (#2024525) is to increase diversity in engineering bydeveloping a model to create more inclusive engineers. A variety of projects and initiatives havebeen designed to increase
years. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Development, Dissemination and Assessment of Inexpensive Miniature Equipment for Interactive Learning of Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer and Biomedical ConceptsIntroduction When a connection is established between theoretical engineering knowledge andpractical applications the concepts can be understood better to perform tasks more satisfactorily[1], [2]. Therefore, creating an interactive learning environment helps students to learn moreefficiently [2], [3]. In undergraduate STEM education, hands-on tasks allow students tounderstand concepts better
, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Discrimination & Identity: How Engineering Graduate Students Navigate Pathways to PersistenceIntroduction Traditionally underserved students, namely racially minoritized students and women,remain underrepresented among engineering doctoral degree holders [1, 2, 3]. Retention anddegree completion rates are consistently low, even as more racially minoritized students andwomen are recruited into engineering graduate programs [1, 2]. A consistent reason that studentsleave engineering graduate programs is racism and sexism embedded in interpersonalinteractions and institutional policies [4, 5, 6, 7
, skills,and utility of the field (values). Background Past research has identified an explanatory model of how Engineering Self-Efficacy,Values, and Identity combine to drive student engagement in engineering activities such as studygroups, internships, design-workshops, and conferences (Walton, Knisley, McCullough, 2019).The model (see Figure 1), suggests that engineering self-efficacy is the most proximal driver ofengagement and mediates the impact of engineering identity and values which are more indirectand distal motivators of engagement in engineering activities with their effects on studentengagement being mediated by the more proximal influence of engineering self-efficacy. Inessence, for
[1-4].This project aims to serve the national interest by improving STEM learning environments throughthe creation of a STEAM-infused engineering curriculum and co-curriculum. The project willinvestigate a research hypothesis of whether positive outcomes (innovation, creativity, collegiality,entrepreneurship, and broadening of the undergraduate talent pool) can be achieved throughstrategic curricular and co-curricular modifications that integrate and embrace development ofSTEAM programs. The quantitative assessment of the above-mentioned outcome will bediscussed in more detail later and current data and analysis can be seen in the results.STEAM, in simple terms, is the inclusion of Art into the now accepted Science-Technology-Engineering
cohorts and retention of scholars from year 1 to year 2.Project OverviewThis grant funded scholarships and programming for 2 cohorts of low-income engineeringstudents, one of which began their undergraduate studies in Fall 2020 and the other which beganin Fall 2021. Each cohort was planned to be comprised of 20 students pursuing a Bachelor ofScience in Engineering degree from ECU and 20 total students pursuing either an Associate inScience or Associate in Engineering degree from the partnering community colleges. Based uponanticipated enrollment, PCC was allocated 10 scholarships per cohort and LCC and WCC wereallocated 5 scholarships each per cohort. Scholarship amounts were limited to a maximum of$10,000 per year for university students and
and social stigmas when seeking degrees and career preparation. Compared to othercommunity college STEM students, technology students are more likely to enroll as only part-time (15%), and to leave community college without completing any certificate or degree (41%)[1]. Compared to other community college students, technology students are the least likely tohave successfully transferred to a university STEM program (19%), and more likely to beenrolled in community college for more than six years. Compared to all community collegestudents, technology students have the highest average loan amounts amongst those with studentloans after 6 years. Compared to university STEM students, community college technologystudents are more likely to be first