students are ableto experience quality laboratory learning and also be prepared for modern industry demandsand a globally-connected workplace culture.AcknowledgmentThe work reported in this article contributes to a larger research project on laboratorylearning in Science and Engineering that is supported by the Australia Research Councilthrough grant DP140104189 for which Human Research Ethics approval has been obtainedfrom Curtin University (Approval Number: RDSE-61-15). The authors wish to express theirgratitude to both institutions.The authors also wish to acknowledge the contribution of the University of Technology,Sydney for allowing the use of their remote laboratory rigs for the purpose of this study.References[1] D. Lowe, S. Murray, D
may design them [14] knowing their fundamentals, or take charge of contributing tobetter education for future students through projects with paper [15].ResultsOur unified performance-based direct assessment process has several benefits at a modestincrease of workload for faculty. First it increases the assessment pool to provide more statisticalreliability. The target assessments are easily trackable due to a well-maintained archive ofexaminations for comparisons of different courses laterally, and/or testing retention of the sameconcept longitudinally over time. The examples below show some reinforced results from ESCCarchives. The examples demonstrate tracking of vectors and coordinates with relevance tomechanics courses which will lead to
; Exposition, 2014.[9] R.D. Burke, C.L. Dancz, K. J. Ketchman, M.M. Bilec, T.H. Boyer, C. Davidson, A.E. Landis, and K. Parrish, “Faculty Perspectives on Sustainability Integration in Undergraduate Civil and Environmental Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(3), 2018.[10] D.L. Bondhegan, S.J. Komisar, and R. O’Neill, “Assessing Achievement of Sustainability Skills in the Environmental and Civil Engineering Curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[11] J.M. Stache, J.P. Hanus, and J. Gonser, “Assessing Sustainability in Design in an Infrastructure Course through Project
teaching first year engineering for the past nineteen years, with emphasis on computer aided design, computer programming, and project design and documentation.Prof. Fabian Hadipriono Tan P.E., Ohio State University Fabian Hadipriono Tan has worked in the areas of construction of infrastructures and buildings, failure assessment of buildings and bridges, construction accident investigations, forensic engineering, ancient buildings, ancient bridges, and the ancient history of science and engineering for over 40 years. The tools he uses include fault tree analysis, fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Classroom
help or hurt in the long run?," presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[15] J. L. Davis and T. McDonald, "Can Enforcing an Organized Solution Lead to Better Grades?," presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[16] H. J. Walberg, "Homework's Powerful Effects on Learning," Educational Leadership, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 76-79, 1985.[17] R. J. Beichner, J.M. Saul, D.S. Abbott, J.J. Morse, D. Deardorff, R.J. Allain, et al., "The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project," Research-based reform of university physics, vol.1, pp. 2-39, 2007.[18] L. K. Michaelsen, A. B. Knight
instruction becomes part of instruction; there may be significant advantages to thisshift. It also seems evident that rising costs, changes in the workforce due to technology willinevitably necessitate a re-envisioning of both curriculum and the partnerships universitiesneed to pursue to adapt to these changes. It is unlikely that universities will becomeredundant but they will inevitably change.Bibliography[1] J. H. Newman, The Idea of a University Defined and Illustrated: In Nine Discourses Delivered to the Catholics of Dublin. Project Gutenberg, 1852.[2] Committee on Understanding the Engineering Education-Workforce Continuum, “Understanding the Educational and Career Pathways of Engineers,” National Academy Press, Washington
promote diversity in all disciplines, thereby ensuring equity andachievement of full creative potential? The data shown in this paper demonstrate that computingand engineering have made considerable progress in becoming more gender diverse, even if theprogress has not always been on a consistent trend for computing. In contrast, several importantand large disciplinary areas are on course to continue becoming less gender diverse, as theybecome increasingly tilted towards more women receiving degrees. Ready arguments to expressstrong concern for reducing male dominance of computing and engineering can be made alignedwith the high demand and projected continued high demand for STEM degrees and competitivelevels of compensation. But, one of the
offeringappointments in December 2018. The Comm Lab is staffed by 5 advanced undergraduate peertutors, all of whom are engineering students. During the two-year pilot phase funded through agrant from a private foundation, the Comm Lab is tailoring its services to student competitionteams in Rose-Hulman’s makerspace, where students work on co-curricular projects like HumanPowered Vehicle and Concrete Canoe (Figure 1). These teams must submit design and safetyreports and make presentations as part of their national competitions, but because these teams’activities happen outside the context of a course, students received no formal writing orcommunication support, and team leaders and faculty advisors do not have the expertise or timeto devote to enhancing teams
. Short, informal free-writing activities can serve as one type offormative assessment that allows students to have this important opportunity to improve andenhance their learning.References[1] Angel, T. A. and Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, CA.[2] Connolly, P. and Vilardi, T. (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. New York: Teachers College Press.[3] Enns, C., Cho, M., and Karimidorabati, S. (2014). Using writing as a learning tool in engineering courses. Teaching Innovation Projects, 4(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/tips/article/ view/3678.[4] Elliott, L. A., Jaxon, K. and
. Yilmaz andTunçalp state that: “Practical experience is of prime importance in effective learning, particularlyin engineering and science disciplines.” [11], but Kim and Tranquillo [12] point out thateducation is not complete with experience alone, and must also include a way to process thatexperience. This role is traditionally fulfilled by the instructor, but could also be filled by otherstudents in a cooperative environment. Riofrio and Northrup [13] found that collaboration amongthe students when working on mechatronics based projects increased their comprehension andretention of the material.The contribution of this work is to extend the THK paradigm by designing a kit to be usedexplicitly with MBD. The kit will provide a HIL tester and
out to students that they believe could be a good fit to be a TA. ● If at all possible, it would be great to have an extensive database that TAs can reference ahead of time to become aware of what topics the students' homework assignments and projects will contain. In addition, some more community-building activities could benefit the students' experiences and hopefully inspire them to continue pursuing engineering. ● More specialization with regards to which classes which TAs know best.DiscussionThe results support the conclusion that this new program, aimed at supportingunderprepared students through their prerequisites, both academically and emotionallyis having the
Univer- sity). He has developed and/or taught courses in systems engineering, systems modeling & simulation, integration, testing, & evaluation, production systems engineering, construction engineering, engineer- ing economics, engineering probability & statistics, project engineering, engineering optimization, risk & failure analysis, reliability engineering, and engineering research methods. His current research in- terest includes modeling, analysis, and optimization of complex operational systems and infrastructures susceptible to disruptions. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Instructor and Student Perceptions of the Authorized, Self- Prepared
)Figure 3. Student self-assessment survey responses (n = 17) before and after reading the “Data Analysis”and “Uncertainty” comics in a Transport I Laboratory course, as previously reported and reprinted withpermission of ASEE.57 In order to assess student understanding, students finished the Transport Laboratory I course witha design project, for which they developed an experimental proposal to address one of the NationalAcademy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges. For their proposed study, students were required todetermine a purpose, design an experiment and analysis, and describe their plan for limitingmeasurement uncertainty. This proposal was submitted as a written report evaluated by the instructor. The instructor compared
, beliefs, self-regulation, and achievement.Min Tang, College of Education, Learning and Cognition Program,Florida State University The research interests of mine are: 1) to understand teachers’ pedagogical practices and the potential effects of those practices on students’ critical thinking and epistemic beliefs in engineering domain, 2) to quantify epistemically-related emotions that occur during the epistemic activity, 3) to explore the best pedagogical practices to improve the efficiency integrating classroom project-based learning and students’ real-world problem-solving practice. I have MS degree from Florida State University in Curriculum and Instruction and BA degree from China Nanchang University in English
the project lead for Web-CAT, the most widely used open-source automated grading system in the world. Web-CAT is known for al- lowing instructors to grade students based on how well they test their own code. In addition, his research group has produced a number of other open-source tools used in classrooms at many other institutions. Currently, he is researching innovative for giving feedback to students as they work on assignments to provide a more welcoming experience for students, recognizing the effort they put in and the accomplish- ments they make as they work on solutions, rather than simply looking at whether the student has finished what is required. The goals of his research are to strengthen growth
from a study conducted in a large research library”, Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, vol. 23, no. 4-5, pp. 191–200, 2013. DOI: 10.1080/1072303X.2014.890151.[10] G. Blackburn and R. Tiemeyer, “Textbooks and interlibrary loan”, Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2013. DOI: 10.1080/1072303X.2013.769040.[11] T. M. Calcagno and J. Bowdoin, “Meeting the textbook needs of engineering students”, in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, https://peer.asee.org/21685, San Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2012.[12] M. Hale and R. A. Coffman, “Observations from an engineering writing project”, in 2011 ASEE
engineering classes. 2. Did your elementary, middle, or high school have a gifted studies program? Did you participate in gifted studies? 3. Did you have any engineering experience before attending college? Where did you get this engineering experience? 4. Did you take any Project Lead the Way classes? 5. Have you participated in any advanced curriculum? Describe your experience. 6. Does either of your parents work in engineering or science related field? Explain. 7. Is there any reason that you might want to leave aerospace or engineering now or at some time in the future? Explain. 8. Are you an engineer? 9. Are you involved with any on-campus groups? If yes, then which ones? 10. What are your
. Advised by Parent / Teacher / Mentor b. Heard about it on the News / Internet c. Personal Experience d. School Project e. Internship f. Other: ____________________________________________________________ 4. What are your expectations for the week? 5. How did you hear about the summer camp at LTU? a. Advertisement b. Email/Newsletter c. Facebook d. Family or Friend e. Newspaper or Magazine Article f. Website/Search Engine g. Other: _____________________Appendix CNANOTECHNOLOGYENGINEERINGSUMMERCAMP2015We hope you enjoyed the Nanotechnology Summer Camp. To help us improve the quality of the camp, please complete this survey. Thank you
communitywithin the engineering team.Proposed Changes Aligned with the Philosophy of the PersonalWhile the ABET criteria have significant flaws from the perspective of Macmurray’s philosophyof the personal, there are positive features that emerge from the revisions. Several of these havebeen mentioned previously. One additional positive change is the merging of outcomes (a) and(e) since this shift more closely integrates knowing and acting. Another positive shift is theinclusion of language on codes and standards in the preamble. This has the opportunity toengage students into a larger community and consider how personal relations can be extended tothose we do not directly interact with. Furthermore the culminating design project outlined inCriterion 5
, Seoul National University Associate Professor at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Seoul National Uni- versity in Seoul, Korea. He has worked on construction management, occupational health and safety in construction, disaster management, and IT applications in construction specifically using advanced tech- nologies including Big Data analysis, PMIS (Project Information Management Systems), video mining, and smart sensing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Smartphone-based Tool for Checking Attendance of Students in Classroom Automatically Myungchul Kwak, Junghwan Song, Selin Chun, Taekyoung (Ted) Kwon, Seokho Chi
Paper ID #15953ABET Data as a Model for Improving Engineering Education: A Pilot of theEngineering Economy CourseDr. Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University Jerome P. Lavelle is Associate Dean of Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of engineering economic analysis, decision analysis, project management, leadership, engineering management and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 ABET’s Self Study Report: a New Model for Improving
disciplines andasked to post a response to the following questions on an online discussion board: 1. What questions do you have for faculty and/or students in these disciplines? (This can be discipline-specific or general for all engineering disciplines) 2. What interests you most about each discipline? 3. What similarities and differences do you notice about the various disciplines?Department faculty retained autonomy in developing their presentations, so there was no pre-determined format. Some departments brought graduate and undergraduate students for aquestion and answer session. Some departments brought faculty and department heads that gavecompelling presentations, and some brought demonstrations of projects students may work on
Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. Matusovich has authored a book chapter, 10 journal manuscripts and more than 50
at the University of Chicago.Dr. David B Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15591 David B. Nelson is Associate Director of the Center for Instructional Excellence at Purdue University. He received his Ph.D in World History from the University of California, Irvine in 2008. David has been involved in many educational research projects at Purdue, including published worked in the programming education, student engagement and academic performance in dynamics engineering courses, and educational modalities in engineering, technology
reviewed research arti- cles and has presented his research at national and international meetings (most recently Portugal). Most recently, he led a service learning project with 5 students to build a latrine-based biogas system in west- ern Uganda for an elementary school of 1400 students. LTC Starke is a registered Professional Engineer (Delaware), member of several professional associations, and is a member of the National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (NCEES). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessing and Inspiring Lifelong Learning in an Undergraduate Environmental Engineering SeminarIntroductionDeveloping lifelong
, the group projects and the quizzes. Completing exercises from the textbook. Group work with in class helps me in improving and sharing the ideas with my group mates. Flexible group work makes to get in touch with every person in the class.What is hindering your learning in this course? The time to complete the class prep problems is sometimes hard to come by. No, not in this class. Not prepare lessons and materials before class. The slides for chapter 10 "2 sample inferences" (week 11 I believe) that were on Isidore were terrible, because they were just a copy from the book. The other slides were good because the presented the concepts in a different way which provided insight into what
Paper ID #14851Assessing Student Learning of Civil Engineering InfrastructureDr. Matthew W Roberts, Southern Utah University Dr. Roberts has been teaching structural engineering topics for 14 years. He recently joined the faculty in the Engineering and Technology department at Southern Utah University.Dr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Dr. Carol Haden is a Principal Evaluator at Magnolia Consulting, LLC. She has served as evaluator for STEM education projects sponsored by the National Science Foundation, NASA, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and the Arizona Department of Education, among others. Areas of
resonator arrays.Dr. Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University Dr. Colleen Janeiro teaches engineering fundamentals such as Introduction to Engineering, Materials and Processes, and Statics. Her teaching interests include development of solid communication skills and enhancing laboratory skills.Dr. William E. Howard, East Carolina University William E (Ed) Howard is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. He was previously a faculty member at Milwaukee School of Engineering, following a 14- year career as a design and project engineer with Thiokol Corporation, Spaulding Composites Company, and Sta-Rite Industries. c American Society for Engineering
global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability.Dr. Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University Prof. Melani Plett is a Professor in Electrical Engineering at Seattle Pacific University. She has over sev- enteen years of experience in teaching a variety of engineering undergraduate students (freshman through senior) and has participated in several engineering education research projects, with a focus how faculty can best facilitate student learning.Prof. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently a
educational process.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to sincerely thank to College of Engineering and Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering for their support of the inversion of this course. Special thanks go tothe always reliable Victoria Minerva, College Coordinator of E-Learning for facilitating themaintenance of videos on the Mediasite system and for personally generating numerous usagereports. This study would not have been possible without her assistance.Bibliography 1. Mills, J.E. and Treagus, D.F. (2003) “Engineering Education, Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer?” Australian Journal of Engineering Education. 2. Perrenet, J., Bouhuijs, P., and Smits, J. (2000) “The Suitability of Problem-Based