”(IUSE – 2211320 and 1934707).References[1] S. Streiner, D. Burkey, M. Young, R. Cimino, & J. Pascal, “Engineering Ethics Through High-Impact Collaborative/Competitive Scenarios (E-ETHICCS)." ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Long Beach, CA, July 2021[2] P. Patel, “Engineers, Ethics, and the VW Scandal,” IEEE Spectrum, 25 Sept. 2015. [Online].Available: http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/at-work/education/vw-scandal-shocking-but-not-surprising-ethicists-say. [Accessed Apr. 11, 2019].[3] M. Hart, “The Ethical Lessons of Deepwater,” ASME.org, March 2011. [Online]. Available:https://www.asme.org/engineering-topics/articles/engineering-ethics/the-ethical-lessons-of-deepwater. [Accessed Apr. 11, 2019].[4] R.P. Boisjoly, E.F. Curtis
. Lande, “Pedagogical ninjas: Using anadditive innovation cycle for faculty development of teaching-focused faculty,” in 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, 2019.[2] E. A. Canning, K. Muenks, D. J. Green, and M. C. Murphy, “Stem faculty who believe ability isfixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes,” Scienceadvances, vol. 5, no. 2, p. eaau4734, 2019.[3] M. Lande and S. S. Jordan, “Methods for examining the educational pathways of adult makers,”in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–903.[4] E. Ries, The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to createradically successful businesses. Currency, 2011.[5] S. C. Wheelwright
-2019 4. Huderson, A., Lawrey, A., Perry, T., and Balkey, K., “Industry Standards Infusion throughout Mechanical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology Degree Programs”, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 2019 5. Engineers Edge, “What are the Advantages using Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing GD&T”, https://www.engineersedge.com/training_documents/advantages_geometric_dimensioning_tolerance.ht m 6. Rios, O., “An Example of Teaching Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) Concepts using 3D Printed Parts”, 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Meeting, April 2019 7. Yip-Hoi, D., Gill, D., “Use of Model-Based Definition to Support Learning of GD
, “Collaborative research: Supporting agency among early career engineering education faculty in diverse institutional contexts: Developing a framework for faculty agency,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2019, American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10148508[30] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis,” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 589–597, Aug. 2019.[31] Consumer Reports, “Costs of ADHD Tests,” Jul-2010.
a computational design instructor in the Art and Design department at the California Polytechnic State University (CalPoly), San Luis Obispo where she leads the Computing for the Interactive Arts minor.Dr. Aaron Keen, California Polytechnic State UniversityChristian Eckhardt, California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo c American Society for Engineering Education, 20193/3/2019 ASEE CIA paper - Google Docs A crossdisciplinary minor to engage student’s creativity and engineering skills Zoë Wood (Computer Science), Enrica Lovaglio
and experiences,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 909–922, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8.[5] M. Christie and E. de Graaff, “The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5–16, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1254160.[6] C. Furse and D. H. Ziegenfuss, “Student-centered and teacher-friendly formative assessment in engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018-June, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 31019.[7] S. Stover, D. Noel, M. McNutt, and S. G. Heilmann, “Revisiting Use of Real-Time Polling for Learning Transfer,” J. Teach. Learn. with Technol., vol. 4, no. 1 SE-Articles
Research, 2, 1 (2001).[11] W. Riddell, S. Bakrania, K. Bhatia, K. Dahm, R. Harvey and L. Weiss, “Putting the HorseBefore the Cart: Fitting a new project into established design and writing pedagogy,” Paperpresented at 2009 ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Spring Conference, Baltimore, MD, April2009.[12] https://engineeringunleashed.com/about.aspx , accessed 11/19/2019[13] https://engineeringunleashed.com/cards.aspx, accessed 11/19/2019[14] Mynderse, J. A., & Liu, L., & Gerhart, A. L., & Fletcher, R. W., & Vejdani, H., & Jing, W.,& Yee, K. E. “Development of an Entrepreneurial Mind-set within a Three-Semester MechanicalEngineering Capstone Design Sequence Based on the SAE Collegiate Design Series,” Paperpresented at 2019 ASEE
these concerning attributes, mostengineering graduate students consider writing to be a “knowledge transforming” process [3]. Inour most recent work for ASEE 2019, we observed the differences between international studentsand U.S. domestic students, finding that international students differ from U.S. domesticengineering graduate students in statistically significant ways on nearly all the attitudinal facets onwhich we characterize students [5]. Interestingly, international students tend to view academicwriting ability as an “innate ability,” whereas domestic U.S. students do not.These results directly inform the development of interventions for engineering graduate students,and inform our work-to-date on the Broader Impacts of this research
2011 26.00 18.2 2012 27.46 18.9 2013 28.33 20 2014 30.16 19.9 National undergraduate enrollment data from ASEE Engineering by the Numbers, 2011-2019 https://bit.ly/36naM9S
range of audiences.References[1] A. C. Szatmary, "Evidence for design of mechanical engineering curriculum," in 126thASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Charged Up for the Next 125 Years, ASEE 2019,June 15, 2019 - June 19, 2019, Tampa, FL, United states, 2019: American Society forEngineering Education, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[2] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019”, ABET.org (accessed March 7,2021).[3] Lappalainen, P., “Communication as part of the engineering skills set.” European Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp.123-129, 2009.[4] M. Menekse and M. T. Chi, "The role of collaborative interactions versus individualconstruction on students’ learning of
%, the four-year graduation rate was 46%, and the six-year graduation rate was 59%. These quantitative data indicatethat both FTIC and transfer students at CEC share similar attributes; they are part-time students, need morefinancial support, are older than traditional students, and many do not earn their degrees within four or evensix years.All of the CEC graduation rates are considerably lower than reflected in some national data sets (see Table1). For instance, the national four-year graduation rate for engineering undergraduates is 32% (AmericanSociety for Engineering Education or ASEE, 2019), compared to just 14% at Florida InternationalUniversity. The six-year graduation rate for CEC and all engineering undergraduates in the US is
/politics/2019/05/28/gop-lawmakers-extending- university-wisconsin-tuition-freeze/1227519001/ (accessed December 2020).[8] University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents. https://www.wisconsin.edu/regents/meetingmaterials/ (accessed December 2020). Note: the annual data for the previous year typically appears in the December meeting material for the Business and Finance Committee.[9] ASEE online profiles of Colleges. https://www.asee.org/papers-and- publications/publications/college-profiles#Online_Profiles (accessed December 2020).[10] University of Wisconsin-Madison Student Enrollment. https://uwmadison.app.box.com/s/d7901sp12wp0zxclyc9hpm2wrspfxf99/file/639595697 808 (accessed December 2020).[11
is designed to support online coursedevelopment. His application was accepted in Dec. 2018 and he developed the course in spring2019 in collaboration with a professional instructional designer. The course was offered in summer2019. The course demographics, student’s performance results, and student feedback are comparedbetween spring 2019 when the course was taught face-to-face and summer 2019 when it was taughtonline. The student performance indicated that the drop, fail, or withdrawal (DFW) rate was notmeaningfully impacted by the mode of delivery. However, the students’ final GPA in the course(before any form of adjustments or curving), improved from 81/100 in the face-to-face class to 88in the online class. Also, the rate of homework
of engineering, net zero objectives, and the information theygleaned from reading the news articles. Informal feedback from students on the climate changemodule has been positive. The author intends to continue developing this module and assesslearning outcomes in future semesters. The author acknowledges the UD Gerard J. MangoneClimate Change Science & Policy Hub Faculty Course Development Grant in supporting thedevelopment of this climate change module in Introduction to Engineering.References[1] H. Malladi, A. Trauth, J. Enszer, M. G. Headley, and J. Buckley, “Transforming a Large Lecture FYE Course Structure into Virtual Collaborative Learning,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Conference
-programs-2018-2019/#GC5 [Accessed: Jan. 27, 2019].[6] B. Harding and P. McPherson, “What do employers want in terms of employee knowledge of technical standards and the process of standardization?” in Proceedings of the 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, USA, June 20-23, 2010.[7] C. Leachman and C. Pezeshki, “What’s standard? Industry application versus university education of engineering standards,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14-17, 2015.[8] J. L. Gbur and D. Solomon, “Promoting technical standards education in engineering,” in Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA
%, respectively (ASEE,2019). The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2019) projected higher job growth for computationalroles (12%) compared to mechanical, electrical, and computer hardware engineering (4-6%).Reflecting this demand, computer science and computer engineering faculty emerged with thehighest salaries in academia, surpassing their engineering counterparts (ASEE, 2022).These disciplinary distinctions permeate beyond academic and professional spheres, influencingsocialization, enrollment, and persistence, and carrying significant implications forunderrepresented groups. Hocker and colleagues (2019) pinpoint challenges in academiacontributing to a noteworthy doctoral dropout rate in engineering, particularly impacting womenand URMs. The prevalence
Training for Industrial Engineers,” in 2020 Industrial and Systems Engineering Conference, ISEC 2020, 2020.[14] J. Kaspar and M. Vielhaber, “Cooperative and application-oriented learning in engineering design – Systems design methodology educated on solutions for mousetrap-powered vehicles,” Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Eng. Prod. Des. Educ. Towar. a New Innov. Landscape, E PDE 2019, no. September, 2019.[15] S. A. Sohoni, S. S. Jordan, J. Kittur, and N. L. Pereira, “Work in progress: Integrating differentiated instruction and project-based learning to teach embedded systems,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., no. June, 2019.[16] R. Crespo, E. Lopez-Caudana, and P. Ponce, “An Immersive Week for
response to the following questions. Your response is confidential, will not affectyour scholarship, and most importantly will help us to improve the university’s NSF ScholarshipProgram.Q1 When did you enter the NSF Scholarship Program? o Fall 2017 o Fall 2018 o Fall 2019 o Fall 2020Q2 What is your current class standing? o Freshman o Sophomore o Junior o Senior © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference ProceedingsQ3 Please evaluate the extent to which participation in S-STEM Scholars helped you in the following areas: N/A None Not Much A Little Quite a
Architecture and Engineering Students Conceptualize Design Creation: Report of a Pilot Study,” 2019.[16] J. O. Perez, “Understanding the Experience of Women in Undergraduate Engineering Programs at Public Universities,” 2018.[17] S. Fagan, “A Phenomenological Exploration of Women’s Lived Experiences and Factors That Influence Their Choice and Persistence in Engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2020.[18] L. D. Thomas et al., “As Purple is to Lavender: Exploring Womanism as a Theoretical Framework in Engineering Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2016, pp. 1–16.[19] J. Rossmann and M. Armstrong, “”A New Way of Seeing”: Engagement With Women’s and Gender Studies Fosters Engineering Identity
. Fernandez, T. M., Martin, K. M., Mangum, R. T. & Bell-Huff, C. L. Whose grade is it anyway?: Transitioning engineering courses to an evidence-based specifications grading system. in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access (2020).29. Arthurs, N., Stenhaug, B., Karayev, S. & Piech, C. Grades Are Not Normal: Improving Exam Score Models Using the Logit-Normal Distribution. International Educational Data Mining Society https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED599204 (2019).30. Miller, Curtis. Grades Aren’t Normal | R-bloggers. https://www.r- bloggers.com/2019/07/grades-arent-normal/ (2019).31. Tannock, S. No grades in higher education now! Revisiting the place of graded assessment in the reimagination of the
second language acquisition in programming languages, flipped classroom, and virtual training. She is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Enhancing Learning of Engineering Graphics through GamificationIntroductionGeneration Z, who were born after 1997 are the majority in today’s college classrooms ([1]–[3]).Comparing to millennial predecessors, they grow up immersed in technology, regularly playvideo games, have an even shorter attention span, and prefer engaged and interactive learning([4]–[7]). As college professors, how do we face challenges posed by tech-savvy Gen Zers andengage their learning using new
," in ACM SIGSCE 2019, Minneapolis, 2019.[14] J. Christman and R. Yerrick, "”She’s More Like a Guy”: The Legacy of Gender Inequity Passed on to," in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual conference, 2021.[15] M. A. Silva and A. Dominguez, "Women in Construction Engineering: Improving the Students' Experience throughout their Careers," in 2021 ASEE Vitrual Annual Conference, Virtual conference, 2021.[16] S. Beyer, K. Rynes, J. Perrault, K. Hay and S. Haller, "Gender differences in computer science students," in In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '03), New York, 2003.[17] G. D. Ruxton, "The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and
/25979.[2] A. Huynh and N. T. Buswell, “How was your internship: Stories about the engineering internship experience from five female engineering students,” in 2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting. California State University, Los Angeles , California: ASEE Conferences, April 2019, https://peer.asee.org/31829.[3] D. Weagle, D. B. Ortendahl, and M. A. P.E., “Universities and industries: A proactive partnership shaping the future of work,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–33486. Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, June 2019, https://peer.asee.org/33486.[4] J. P. Martin, S. D. Garrett, S. G. Adams, and J. Hamilton, “A qualitative look at african american students: Perceptions of developing engineer of
2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Team Update Meetings as a Homework Replacement with Enhanced Student-Faculty Interaction Laura P. Ford University of TulsaKeywordsFaculty paper, student-faculty interaction, homework, chemical engineering, student engagementExtended AbstractStudent engagement hit a low in my Fall 2020 fluid mechanics course, when only four studentsregularly attended in-person and the remaining 17 were on-line synchronously. The course wasflipped and lecture time was used for me to work a problem followed by the students working arelated problem in pairs. Their work was submitted at
2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference An undergraduate experience for studying the diffusion of a solute in an aqueous solution Abner Peralta and Natacha Souto-Melgar University of Arkansas, Ralph E. Martin Chemical Engineering DepartmentKeywordsStudent extended abstract, laboratory, chemical engineering, diffusion, Fick’s law.Molecular diffusion driven by concentration gradients is the most common type of diffusion inchemical separation processes, such as liquid-liquid extraction, stripping, and adsorption. Tobetter understand molecular diffusion, a fundamental knowledge of Fick’s law of diffusion iscrucial. In the Spring 2021
University, Will participates in robotics, is the past president of his school’s ASEE chapter, and is a member of Tau Beta Pi, IEEE and ACM. His engineering interests lie mainly in the fields of electrical and computer engineering. Upon graduation, he hopes to begin teaching engineering to high school students and to serve as both a role model and advocate for pursuing STEM, and specifically engineering as a field of study and career. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Lessons Learned from a First-Year Engineering Wind Turbine Project Project Description Learning Objectives
. M. Rege, P. D. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Jobs. University of St. Thomas.11. University, C. T. (2023). The Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence. Washington DC: Capitol Technology University.12. Students, E. I. (2019). Solar Decathlon Competition 2019. MI, USA: Not published report.Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference 8Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education
Precollege division of ASEE in 2004; was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education, and was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011. She has served on multiple NAE committees, and on the NSF ENG division’s Advisory Committee. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Minority Status and Belonging: Engineering Math as a Vehicle to Build CommunityAbstractThis research explored feelings of belonging and engineering identity among entering first yearstudents, within the case study of an engineering math course at a large, public institution.Incoming first-year students who did not place
PhD from U.C. Berkeley.Dr. Hadas Ritz, Cornell University Hadas Ritz is a senior lecturer in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and a Faculty Teaching Fellow at the James McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI) at Cornell University, where she received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2008. Since then she has taught required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum. In her work with MTEI she co-leads teaching workshops for new faculty and assists with other teaching excellence initiatives. Her main teaching interests include solid mechanics and engineering mathematics. Among other teaching awards, she received the 2020 ASEE St
Engineers and Surveyors as the public member andher term expired Dec. 2019. She was the first public member to serve as the NC board chair (2018) .She is also heavily involved as an ASEE-CIPD Board member and in 2019 she was elected to be CIECTreasurer and the Assistant PIC V. Ms. Thurman is also member of the WiMfg national and NC Chapterand SoACE and NCACE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: A Holistic Approach to the First-Year Engineering ExperienceIntroductionThe University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte is North Carolina’s urban researchuniversity. The William States Lee College of Engineering (COE) at UNC Charlotte