4.19 belts, pulleys, and sprockets for mechanical design applications. 1 Ethics - understands the importance and consequences of ethical behavior. 4.18 Engineering Graphics - Read, apply, and measure GD & T and size tolerances to meet 2 4.17 design goals and reflect manufacturing process capabilities. Mechanics - Design axially loaded members, beams, bars in torsion and machine parts in 2 4.16 combined loading for both static failure and deflection
their undergraduate programs and educateinclusive communities of engineering and computer science students prepared to solve 21st-century challenges.”The idea for RED emerged from a high-level review of Engineering Education investments at theNSF. Informed by both internal program evaluations of current and prior programs and externalassessments in the engineering education literature [1, 2], the review revealed that while therehad been significant progress made in diffusing engineering education innovations in first-yearengineering and in capstone design, change had been much slower in the middle years of thecurriculum. In particular, while certain workplace-relevant engineering skills such ascommunication, teamwork, design, ethics, and socio
, ethics and values, and action/involvement—that can beapplied to many forms of literacy (Cheek, 1992). A later study (Gagel, 1997) definedtechnological literacy as being able to: “(a) accommodate and cope with rapid andcontinuous technological change, (b) generate creative and innovative solutions fortechnological problems, (c) act through technological knowledge both effectively andefficiently, and (d) assess technology and its involvement with the human lifeworldjudiciously.” Generally STS-derived definitions of technological literacy address the need toeducate individuals for living in a technologically mediated world and are system oriented,involve elements of the ethical and moral dimensions of society, and are both critical andintegrative
standard that covers mainengineering skills in sciences, mathematics and design. Students are prepared through arigorous curriculum. However, Universities fail to fully prepare students for aspects of theirlives beyond the academic scope. While the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology(ABET) requires student training in ethics, lifelong learning, communication, and working inmultidisciplinary teams, students remain insufficiently prepared with skills that help overcomemany challenges they face after leaving University.University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) is a public research university registering greater than20,000 students. One of the colleges at the University is the College of Engineering (COE). TheDepartment of Mechanical and
problems. Professional competence has been previouslydefined as a high level of motivation, use of intelligence to solve problems and make decisions,teamwork, management and leadership of others, communication, planning and management of aproject and resources, innovation, and a strategic view of the larger picture of the project2,3. Thesecompetences, along with strong technical knowledge skill set, have been linked to futureprofessional engineering success3,4. Additionally, ABET requires that graduating engineers meetthe following select criteria: (d) ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; (f) understandingof professional and ethical responsibility; (g) ability to communicate effectively; and (h) the broadeducation necessary to
the greater good o Alumni will uphold and advance the core values of: Community, Character, Civility, Citizenship, Commitment, and the university’s commitment to sustainability. o Alumni will behave with integrity in ways consistent with the Association of Energy Engineers Code of Ethics, the NSPE Code of Ethics, and their company’s values and beliefs, and will engage with other professionals through relevant professional societies and/or company ‘communities of practice’. Signs of upholding and advancing these values and contributing to the greater good could include: • Being engaged in the world and thinking beyond
data justice in the US/Mexican borderlands, and the development and practice of engineering expertise. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Teaching social responsibility in a Circuits courseAbstractIn an entry-level Electrical Circuits course, we designed a series of modules to help engineeringstudents consider the social and ethical implications of electrical engineering. Such implicationsare particularly evident when we consider the origin of materials that electrical engineers use, theproducts that they develop, and the lifecycle of those products. Engaging with issues related tosocial context can seem disconnected from technical course content by both students and
during their firstyear of college, and apply it to their habits for critical thinking and metacognition. Thisknowledge could inform our guided practice in reflection through essays and other prompts. Ourfirst-year engineering design course at a research institution in the southeastern United Statesalready includes practice in certain professional skills, such as ethics and integrity, teamwork andtechnical communication. It is evident that reflective judgment is another important professionalskill that should be initiated early in the engineering curriculum, both for solving ill-structuredproblems and for retaining knowledge.Our research question is as follows: How well do first year students develop higher level thinking skills through
, resource recovery from waste, and bioremediation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Integration of a Local ‘Wicked’ Problem into the Environmental Engineering Laboratory CurriculumINTRODUCTIONThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology Inc. (ABET) works to ensureconfidence in programs and ensure graduates are prepared for the workforce. One outcome ofspecific importance is ABET outcome j, which is for students to ‘gain a knowledge ofcontemporary issues’ or outcome 4 which comes into effect in 2019 and states that students musthave “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situationsand make informed judgments, which
isolationusing the currently available data. An independent control group with the exact same conditionsexcept for the “programming without computer” experience could enable more reliable statisticalinferences. However, since this technique has indicated significant improvements on students’performance and learning experience, it would not be ethically justifiable to eliminate thisexperience in a future course for the purpose of having a control group. Nonetheless, an improvedstudy design will be incorporated in our future study to more accurately and specifically investigatethe effect of this technique on students’ performance and learning experience in computerprogramming.As a side note, since using cell phones is typically forbidden during class time
articles in compu- tational complexity theory, in professional ethics, and in engineering education research. He currently serves on the Advisory Group for the Online Ethics Center at the National Academy of Engineering. He is a Carnegie Scholar, a Fellow of the IEEE, and a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Edu- cation. Professor Loui was the editor of the Journal of Engineering Education from 2012 to 2017 and the executive editor of College Teaching from 2006 to 2012. He was Associate Dean of the Graduate Col- lege at Illinois from 1996 to 2000. He directed the theory of computing program at the National Science Foundation from 1990 to 1991. He earned the Ph.D. at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
industry. Such courses are bringing to the forefront many of the AccreditationBoard for Engineering Education (ABET) outcomes, e.g. project management, lifelong learning,design, teamwork, communication, problem solving, economics, ethics and contemporary issues[]. Even the sustainability is included in ABET design considerations, it is not very often fullydiscussed in student projects. However, students have often expressed the desire for the inclusionof renewable energy projects and sustainability concepts in senior design course sequence [6-10]. Such projects are providing multi-disciplinary collaboration, valuable hands-on experience, aswell as a working demonstration of green energy and design. Senior design projects are alsointended to
assessed.The dictionary meaning of Skill refers to expertise or the “ability to do something well”. AWorkplace Skill would then be one that provides expertise for success at completing tasksrelevant to an employee’s the area of work. For engineers, this at its highest level can bedescribed as technical problem solving. This has aptly focused engineering degree programs ondeveloping Problem Solving Skills in their curricula. At the same time, it’s been well recognizedthat engineers do not problem solve by themselves. This has led to a complimentary category ofskills commonly referred to as the Professional or Soft Skills. These include developing expertisein communication, teamwork, ethical practice and lifelong learning. This category of skills isalso
Junior 2nd Year 4 Environmental Health Sophomore 1st Year 5 Computer Engineering Junior 2nd Year 6 Computer Engineering Junior 2nd Year 7 Mathematics Junior 1st Year3.1 ExploreDuring the 2018 REU, the students engaged in a set of four structured learning activities designedto help them develop a number of technical and conceptual skills. In addition, they participated inregular workshops with topics including research and ethics, effective poster presentationpreparation, reflecting on the research experience, and graduate school application preparation.The students also participated in a
. The course topics thatwere not covered in ERSP at UIC due to time restrictions included: ethics in research, oralcommunication, peer-review (reduced time from 3 classes to 2 classes), and basic statistics andhypothesis testing. We also had to remove the following in-class exercises due to timerestrictions: final proposal presentation and reflections.One of the components that was critical to our adoption of ERSP, especially in ENG 294, waslogging because it helped us to identify team issues and determine proposal progress. Anothercritical aspect of the course was allocating time during class to check-in with each of the teams.Check-ins were done by the faculty and the graduate student.ConclusionOverall, the changes made to the ERSP model were
ability to think critically frommultiple perspectives, to be stringent in their application of ethical standards, and to be creativeand innovative. Our implementation case study demonstrates how to contextualize andoperationalize design thinking at regular course level to facilitate the development of globalcitizenship in engineering students. We hope this work has answered the vital question of “whatcan engineering educators do for sustainable development?” and prompt further discussion onengineering education for sustainable development.Background and Literature ReviewEngineering education for sustainable developmentEngineers are entrusted by the public to apply their professional knowledge and skills to innovate,design and implement solutions
interests are in renewable energy applications, fluid-thermal sciences, and international education.Dr. Shannon N. Conley, James Madison University Shannon N. Conley is an assistant professor in the Bachelors Program in Integrated Science and Tech- nology (ISAT) at James Madison University. She holds a PhD in Political Science from Arizona State University, and her research and teaching focus on social, policy, and ethical issues related to emerging science and technology. Additionally, her previous and current work focuses on the development and implementation of tools and approaches for socio-technical integration across disciplines. Conley also conducts research in pedagogy and responsible innovation, participates in the
2005 graduate of the United States Military Academy and received his Master of Science degree in civil and environmental engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 2014. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Collaboration in Assessment and Individual Validation for the “Digital Native”AbstractCollaborative problem solving is a valuable skill encouraged in many engineering classrooms. Thiscollaborative problem solving is an ABET requirement as well as a characteristic of the NationalAcademy of Engineering’s “Engineer of 2020”. Course grades, however, are assigned individually, andthe institution, which bears the ethical responsibility to validate
numerical code assigned to student 9. But, the instructor neversaw any of the 5 students that submitted the numerical code of student 11 working together. Thistype of issue is common in academic settings for low-stake assignments because little to noproctoring is available, the students proctor their own learning, and students are encouraged towork in groups. The LMS submission data may provide additional information to determine thedifference between group sharing and individual coping and is left for future work andevaluation. These results may be an indication of the work ethic of different students in theclass. Students with a high work ethic perform better and work harder to learn the material andsubmit their own work. Students with a lower
the course and expectations. Key components forsuccess in the course are work ethic and professional behavior. Tardiness and unexcusedabsences (in-class or clinic rotation) may result in a course grade of F.Didactic ComponentTo prepare students for observing in the clinical environment, an initial meeting with theinstructor takes place about 5 weeks before the beginning of the semester. At this meeting, basicrequirements for observing in the healthcare clinics are discussed. The students are provided witha check list and deadline for completing and submitting paperwork for all clinics. Thesedocuments are submitted before students begin the clinic rotations. Requirements include avisitor application, copy of health insurance card, verification
introductory and honors courses in bioengi- neering, tissue and protein engineering lab courses, bioengineering ethics, leadership, and bioengineering capstone writing and design courses. She is committed to enhancing diversity and inclusivity in engineer- ing, and creating opportunities for undergraduate students to engage in K-12 educational outreach. Dr. Hendricks has over a decade of experience leading educational outreach and summer camp programs at both Duke University and the University of Washington. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work-in-Progress: Making an Introductory Tissue Culture Lab Course Accessible to Novice StudentsThe ability
to our customers is of utmost importance.” • Share ideas on how best to work together. • Sketch fully-labeled process flow diagrams comparing our current design with one utilizing the exciting new additive. • Brainstorm specific engineering questions that need to be answered, then choose at least one and describe how you would recommend addressing it using the scientific process: o Hypothesis o Research/experiment (details, e.g. qualitative size, concentrations, flows, etc.) o Analyze/conclude (e.g. If we see this, then… If that, then….) • Provide me [supervisor] any feedback you might have on my ethical approach to investigating this opportunity.Data CollectionVideo data of
Paper ID #25639STEM Servingness at Hispanic Serving InstitutionsDr. Vignesh Subbian, The University of Arizona Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineer- ing, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation in engineering and computing. Subbian’s educational research is focused on ethical decision-making and formation of identities in engineering.Dr
same time as the second capstone designcourse in which the students continue assessing the feasibility of their design projects, developtheir functional design specifications and work toward system-level designs. Thus, the deviceevaluation course complements the design process topics with those of regulation and deviceevaluation and allows for course assignments specific to the students’ design projects. Thecourse is offered two quarters after the Professional Topics in Biomedical Engineering courseand builds upon other professional BME topics such as intellectual property, engineeringstandards, design for manufacturing, healthcare economics, globalization of medical devices,ethics in medical device development, documentation, and user
Appendix B.On the first day of class (for undergraduates) or before the first session (for high schoolstudents), this survey was distributed and collected by a sociology graduate student, so thatrespondents would not feel that their answers would prejudice the professor towards them oneway or another. After removing unique identifiers from the survey, the engineering professorsgraded them. Each professor was responsible for the same questions at Time 1 (before thecourse) and Time 2 (after the course) so as to maintain as much uniformity in grading aspossible. No grade was attached to the survey, as per ethical guidelines, but students were told to“do their best.”Research Questions:Thus, our research questions include: i) what is the knowledge
not permit statistical comparisons, however from this dataset public schools average nearly 0.70 more PEO’s compared to private schools. This demonstrates the use of population statistics. Table 5: Example count data, Criterion 2 Average % topic mentioned in program educational objectives AdvDgr Team Int’l Comm Rank Ethics LLL All (n=37) 32.4 51.4 16.2 67.6 24.3 54.1 67.6 Public (n=29) 34.5 51.7 20.7 69.0 27.6 51.7 69.0 Private (n=8) 25.0 50.0 0.0 62.5 12.5 62.5 62.5 Large (n=13
dataStudents designed and built an apparatus that met the specifications given to them, tested theapparatus, collected data, and analyzed the data. They were able to meet the safety, budget, time,and space constraints in each of these designs.(c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health andsafety, manufacturability, and sustainabilityStudents were able to meet the safety, budget, time, and space constraints, in each project. Theyexamined codes and checked EPA regulations. They manufactured several parts and madeseveral modifications to some purchased parts. Students contacted different companies for partsand discussed
therefore might provide the most useful data for addressingthe research question.Table 2. Prompts given on different days of the trip Trip day Prompt 1 What are your expectations for the trip? 6 What differences have you seen with respect to business, culture, and technology between Italy and Switzerland? 8 What role do you think ethics should play in your role as an engineer? 11 What differences have you seen with respect to engineering business, culture, and technology between the companies you’ve seen and the United States? 14 What are your immediate takeaways from this international experience?The qualitative data were analyzed using the software NVivo. Four
of individual assessments (points in time) are stated, includingbreadth and depth limitations, coverage limitations, and circumstantial limitations.Since Nyquist-Shannon’s sampling theorem uses ideal sampling to address the question ofsampling frequency, and because ideal sampling is based on the so-called unit impulse function,the widely accepted one-or-two-hour exam is suggested as a practical approximation of the unitimpulse function. Under this assumption, it is argued that an adequately weighted homeworkassignment could also be considered as a practical approximation of the unit impulse function,provided a high ethical standard is adhered to. This brings up the issues of ethics and plagiarismin modern engineering schools, and the need
, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the