develop crucial leadership and communication skills as they spearhead efforts to raise awareness about cybersecurity in their communities.We created a Cybersecurity Ambassador Pledge, a testament to the core values that anchor theCybersecurity Ambassador Program. This pledge embodies the ethos of our mission – toeducate, protect, and inspire proactive digital citizenship. By adopting this pledge, ourambassadors affirm their dedication to upholding the highest digital safety and ethics standardsand serving as pillars of trust and knowledge within their communities.Cybersecurity Ambassador PledgeAs Cybersecurity Ambassadors, we commit to upholding the highest standards of ethical conductand promoting a culture of safety, respect, and inclusivity
. Thesediscussions were facilitated by educators uninvolved in the teaching of the cohort to maintainobjectivity. All participants were assured of anonymity to encourage candid feedback, and alldata were handled in compliance with ethical standards for educational research.Quantitative data from surveys are subjected to within-subject analysis using SPSS software. Bycomparing individual students' pre- and post-intervention responses, we can isolate thecurriculum's effect. This within-subject analysis, particularly for longitudinal data, is crucial foridentifying genuine progress and areas for improvement. Constant formative assessment andfeedback throughout project phases evaluate students' comprehension and application ofengineering design concepts. This
Transformational Resistance (Solórzano and Bernal,2001) • Classes that taught social justice theory Data Data which are identified by a student either: Barriers to students' resistance, such as: • Worrying about ethics in working in marginalized high degree of influence on career expectations (Bandura, 1997): Analysis
self-efficacy. As a result, elementary teachersmight then be better equipped to build students’ engineering identity and encourage them toconsider engineering as a potential career option.In addition to helping students develop engineering identities, exposure to engineering inelementary school is also beneficial for developing students’ engineering habits of mind(EHoM). EHoM are internalized dispositions and ways of thinking that engineers draw uponwhen confronted with problems [4] and include things such as optimism, persistence,collaboration, creativity, systems thinking, and attention to ethical considerations [5]. TheseEHoM can be beneficial to all students, regardless of career choice, but as with all habits,EHoM take time to develop. As
The ability to formulate well-defined questions, Domain Knowledge - Q1-Q6, Q19-Q20, creating a road map for successful project execution, Scientific Research Q34, Q42, Q47 while incorporating critical thinking, strategic Knowledge & Ethic Researching and 8 Knowledge. Planning Skill reasoning, and the ability to navigate, follow, and evaluate both the process and the outcome The capability to comprehend and utilize statistical Statistical Proficiency Q16, Q18, Q20-Q23, Analysis
force, which has traditionallybeen measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM), is measured using tribometry techniques.Education ResearchMy research interest broadly addresses the assertion that Chemical Engineering education mustbe revised to address a new generation of student. This student is information rich, technologysavvy, and must be trained to address the consequences of globalization. Thus, the education wereceived as students may not be the best way to approach this group. To this end, we haveperformed research on engineering ethics, the use of social networking, and video learning in aneffort to address the new skill set and resources available to our students
appropriate knowledge and skills to identify, formulate, analyze and solve complex engineering problems. CEAB 3.1.3 is the ability to conduct investigations of complex problems. CEAB 3.1.4 is the ability to design solutions for complex, open-ended engineering problems. CEAB 3.1.5 is the ability to create, select, apply, adapt, and extend appropriate techniques, resources, & modern engineering tools. CEAB 3.1.7 is the ability to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, and to give and effectively respond to clear instructions. CEAB 3.1.10 is the ability to apply professional ethics and equity. ACRL 1 is the determination of the nature and extent of the information needed; ACRL 1.3 is developing a working
. D An ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectives. E An ability to function effectively on teams. F An ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems. G An ability to communicate effectively in writing. H An ability to communicate effectively orally. I Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning. J An ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities. K Respect for diversity and knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues. L A commitment to quality, timeliness, and
the extent possible, as prescribed by the first Fundamental Canon of theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers’ (ASCE’s) Code of Ethics. 10“Incorporating Sustainability into Alternative Analysis” Module for Professional Practice.This course introduces students to key aspects of their senior design project and fills gaps in thecurriculum to prepare the students to become practicing engineers. The module for this coursefocuses on sustainability in existing projects and evaluating the potential impacts thatengineering solutions may have on sustainability.Senior Project Module and Checklist. The Senior Project module covers sustainableengineering concepts in more depth. In particular, it emphasizes quantifying sustainabilityindicators/metrics over
/Continuous/Major Change o Thinking Both Critically and Creatively - Independently and Cooperatively Curiosity and Desire to Learn - For Life (Show initiative, Inquire & Learn) o Seeking Advice and Forming Daily Questions to Discover New Insights. o Commitment to Quality, Timeliness, and Continuous Improvement o Understanding Basic Project and Risk Management and Continuous Improvement Concepts (like LEAN+) Ethical Standards and Professionalism o Operate in Accordance With Acceptable Business, Societal, and Professional Norms o Maintain the Highest Level of Integrity, Ethical Behavior, and Professional Competence o Understand and Applies Good Personal JudgmentAt the ASEE Annual
for design and development, and the continuous improvement on both thedesign methodologies and the fabrication technology. To be competitive in this area, industryemployers are looking for engineers with qualifications such as: self-guided learning, systemdesign skills, team-working skills, development tools skills, and ethical behavior. Educatingprofessionals at universities with these qualifications becomes a key to support the continuousdevelopment of the MbSD area. To do this, the authors have formally incorporated active-cooperative learning strategies based on the course redesign framework implemented at ITESMCampus Monterrey. This redesign framework provides the basis to adjust the curricula usingvaluable pedagogical principles such as
many of the less technical aspects of the profession--from preparing vitas andselling oneself, to project control, to running a private office, to professional ethics, etc. Thesubject involves constant interaction with practitioners, including a “chase an engineer”experience in which students spend a day with a practicing mentor. On Fridays, a luncheon isprovided where outside speakers are invited to present a seminar on current trends in theirparticular discipline.Starting in November and continuing through May, students work on a group project. Thestudents select their project by forming interdisciplinary groups and responding to one of the“RFPs” which are let during October. The proposals include both technical andadministrative/cost
work and interpret data c. Ability to design a system, component, or 3 2 design project, text problems process to meet desired needs d. Ability to function on multi disciplinary 2 1 class open to science majors, informal and teams formal team assignments, class exercises e. Ability to identify, formulate, and solve 3 2 textbook problems, local applications, special engineering problems assignments, f. Understanding of professional and ethical 2 2 current events, speaker, design problem responsibility situations, g. Ability to communicate
careers and different occupations. Page 4.410.11 They showed me that women can be engineers also and do just as good of work as men can. They told us about their jobs in language we could understand. I liked how they put the school "theory" into real life situations on the job. They taught me how hard, rewarding and fun engineering can be. They definitely focused my attention in the general direction of engineering.Ethics in EngineeringTwo sessions were devoted to exploring issues of ethics under the guidance of the dean of theCollege of Engineering and Applied Science, Lewis Duncan. These sessions began
trimmings in the overall process. Page 4.457.2Ultimately, Àdecision support routines,À dominated by human issues, have the strongestimpacts.Furthermore, the most dynamic factors are human elements, active in the total process not juston any single element.Behavioral influences such as individual values, personalities, propensity for risk, potential fordisagreement and ethical intensity all apply. So, the question ultimately is: How do CPEEs dealwith human elements when selecting technology to teach technology?IV. The InquiryData to answer this question will be collected through a written survey of key decision-makers ina purposive sample of 23
matter is to be presented. This approach allows the professor toorganize and present what is to be learned in the course and demonstrates to the students how thecourse is organized. The advance organizer model is designed to strengthen students’ owncognitive structure. 2 Technology Administration ETI 4635Management Functions Managing Technology Personal Technology Planning Research Time Management Design Ethics Decision Making Production Career Organizing Quality
in Materials at ISU The Materials Engineering Program at Iowa State University has established thefollowing desired learning outcomes in their graduates. Of course, this includes the 11outcomes in ABET’s Criterion 3;a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineeringb. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret datac. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needsd. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teamse. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problemsf. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityg. an ability to communicate effectivelyh. the broad education necessary to understand the
technical competency and an in-depthindustrial experience base in practice.The professional dimensions of the systematic engineering practice and professional leadershipof needs-driven innovation and technology development are now known. They include:• technical competence,• creative problem-solving, systems thinking, and innovation,• professional responsibility,• professional leadership of multidisciplinary groups for needs-driven collaborative creativity,• problem finding and visualization (needs-finding),• program making and strategic thinking,• policy making, value judgement, ethics in technology-social-safety-economic issues. 5. UNIVERSITY - INDUSTRY GRADUATE EDUCATION FOR INNOVATIONThere is now both the conceptual clarity
what will berequired of them once they enter the workforce. An on-campus seminar prior to the workassignment is one method of introducing students to important aspects and expectations about theco-op experience. Resume writing, interviewing skills and job requirements are a few of thetopics that may be discussed. This has been neglected in the work-integrated programs at MSU inthe past. These seminars can bridge the gap between the classroom and the workplace, while theco-op provides the opportunity to develop a “work ethic”.At the conclusion of the co-op, the employer routinely fills out a Student Evaluation Formcovering characteristics such as; work performance, employability, and personal qualities. TheMSU staff encourages the employer to
desired. The goal of this project is for students to use basic engineering principles tomodel and study the current system and design a model filtering device. The project objectiveswere as follows: • Introduction to bioengineering and design in a medical context • Improve understanding of different engineering disciplines • Introduce engineering concepts - balance equations (mass and energy balances), Fick’s Law , Darcy’s Law, Hagen-Poiseuille • Improve data collection and experimental skills • Introduce students to engineering and medical ethics • Build student teamwork skills – conflict resolution, communication, time management • Improve both written and oral
engineering schools have used SL as a method to achieve ABETEAC program outcomes.5, 6 The “a through k” 2009-2010 ABET EAC program outcomes that Page 15.446.3engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain are listed below: 7 a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability d. an
reflective memos and how this information can be used to help makeimprovements to capstone pedagogy and to the engineering curriculum in general.Learning Objectives and OutcomesABET program outcomes call for students to demonstrate an ability to “(c) design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability,and sustainability”. We view this program outcome as central to engineering practice.First and foremost, the end results of engineering are system designs that come from thedesign process. The results of engineering design are ever present in virtually every facetof society and the connections between how engineering
learningenvironment. The following list briefly describes the focus of each lesson.Lesson 0- This is an overview lesson and briefly reviews design, projects, teamwork,ethics and the four aspects of the creative process.Lesson 1- This lesson covers the first of the four aspects of the creative process known asthe explorer. Here, students learn how to look at things in a different dimension.Lesson 2- Lesson 2 introduces students to the art of design, defining the problem, projectmanagement, communication, collaboration, and generating concepts.Lesson 3- The discussion in this lesson concentrates on being an artist. Students learnhow to take the raw material and make something new from it, experiment with variety ofapproaches, ask “what if” questions, and break
—11 Famous Bb Week 12 Envelopes & Ethics CO2 and TP—12 Finance Bb due Week 13 The Present 13 SoE Assessment Bb due Week 14 No class 14 Light Bb due Week 15* The Future Reflective Paper Two* due— and Bb tbaFigure 1. Fall 2013 syllabus extract for ENGR 160. Weeks and/or topics discussed in this article are denoted with an asterisk.CommunityEngineering students are part of both their immediate community, i.e., peers and campuspersonnel, and the wider community of practitioners. Literature reveals that connectionto peers is a strong indicator of student persistence and retention7. Linkage to a localgroup, i.e., a benefit of a small school experience, is
research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow.Ms. Lucia Howard
improve their communication skills. Inthe Fall semester, the students are required to a make an oral presentation of their projects totheir fellow classmates. Whereas in the Spring semester, the students are required to participatein the Rice Undergraduate Research Symposium (RURS) poster competition. The results fromthese presentations will be counted as a portion of their final course grade.Further Improvements. Two additional modules are planned for future implementation. Onemodule deals with scientific research ethics. Topics in this module may include experimentaltechniques and the treatment of data, conflict of interest, publication and openness, fair use ofsources. The second module is targeted to improve the students’ scientific writing
Society for Engineering EducationTable 1. Characteristics of Good Design vs. Bad Design14Good Design Bad Design1. Works all of the time 1. Works initially, but stops working after a short time2. Meets all technical requirements 2. Meets only some technical requirements3. Meets cost requirements 3. Costs more than it should4. Requires little or no maintenance 4. Requires frequent maintenance5. Is safe 5. Poses a hazard to the user6. Creates no ethical dilemma 6. Fulfills a need that is questionableCurricular Structure of the EPICS
competitiveness, free market development, multinational companies, varying ethical norms, and varying consumer protection mechanisms.· Familiarity with measurement systems, varying standards and codes, environmental concernsParticipating institutionsSouthern Polytechnic State University, an American University located inMarietta, Georgia. The mission of the university is to provide the residents of thestate of Georgia with university-level education in technology, engineering, artsand sciences, architecture, management, and related fields. In Georgia, which isone of the fastest growing states, the realization that we are a part of “globaleconomy” is very strong. Therefore, the mission of Southern Polytechnic StateUniversity (SPSU) is unambiguous
engineering students,and they select a major at the end of the freshman year. The first year curriculum is essentiallyidentical for all students and the Division of Engineering Fundamentals serves as their home.The Division’s 13 faculty teach the two first-year engineering classes (EF1015 and EF1016) anda variety of sophomore level programming and graphics classes. EF1015 and EF1016 are both 2credit hour courses typically offered in the fall and spring, respectively. In addition to teaching,EF faculty are the advisors of the 1200+ first year students.BackgroundUntil the fall of 2001, EF1015 topics included ethics, the engineering profession, problemsolving, programming with MatLab, statics; material balance; electricity; and energy.Traditional EF1016
outcomesresult from being involved out-of-classroom experiences, defined as Greek life (i.e. fraternitiesand sororities), community service, design teams, co-ops, and internships [4]. While students arepart of many clubs and organizations, experiencing out-of-classroom life, including service to thecommunity, at this university, they also tend take advantage of many of the employmentopportunities available. It is worth noting the benefits of a busy out-of-classroom lifestyle, canalso be a detriment if time-management skills are challenged. Capstone projects at this universityinvolve ethical engineering practices, including study of national organizations’ ethical codes ofconducts, help tie in-and out-of-classroom environments together.Passow and Passow