manufacturing production in the U.S. createsmore economic activity both within and outside the sector than does a similar increment in anyother major sector. Historically, manufacturing’s innovations and investment raised itsproductivity faster than other large sectors and its productivity has added substantially to overallU.S. productivity.” 1 Similarly, in an article published in Time Business and Money Magazine(2013), the authors report, “The new economics of Made in the USA are built in large partaround acquiring cutting-edge technologies ahead of global competitors and then using thosenew techniques to produce more efficiently on super-automated factory floors.”2 It is stronglybelieved that manufacturing will once again become a local industry as
perpetuity by the IEEE on the Engineering andTechnology History Technology Wiki (http://www.ethw.org).IntroductionIt is well known that women “are more likely than men to ‘leak’ out of the pipeline in thesciences”1. Women earn 20.2% of physics degrees, 43.9% of mathematics degrees, 17.7% ofcomputer science degrees, and 17.5% of engineering degrees1. To encourage femaleundergraduate students to graduate with STEM degrees, and thereby increase femaleparticipation in STEM fields, this paper describes an Oral History project that provided femalestudents with unique mentorship with distinguished leaders whose careers align with thestudents’ intended careers.The project provided unique mentorship to the students so that the students are motivated
difficulties for a program offering distance learning revolve around one basic theme, getting students into the courses. 1) Conveying the program quality to the public: Distance learning has carried a stigma of poor educational value from the days of correspondence courses to today’s diploma mills. While the allure of a watered down program to get a quick buck is tempting for even traditionally strong academic institutions, especially in more trying economic times, it is becoming evident that a tradition of quality and value will stand the test of time. Students may complain about the amount, and rigor of work required to obtain a quality degree but they clearly value its significance. Programs these days need to beable to convey to the
Indianapolis BS Physics 2015 - Purdue University BS Informatics 2010 - Indiana University Interest areas: Aerospace engineering, human space flight, space logisticsGuy Nicholas Wiss, SEDS c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Problem-based Multi-disciplinary Participation in Aerospace DesignAbstractThis work explores the knowledge development of a diverse team of undergraduate studentsinvolved in a university organization in pursuit of a RASC-AL engineering challenge by NASAto develop a 1-G deep space station. This habitat would need to be fully self-sufficient withinfive years of its initial launch and have a 20-30 year operational time span. The breadth ofconsiderations is well-suited for a
the unit, students wereintroduced to the problem of land mines in Laos. Un-detonated land mines are a serious Page 26.857.5threat both to large animals such as elephants and to the people who live in these areas.One technique for dealing with them is to lob objects into areas with land mines to safelydetonate them. The students were tasked with the challenge of designing a cheap andportable “launcher” for throwing clay (play-doh) at land mines. Specifically, thefictitious client in this scenario asked the students for a launcher that 1) could launch aprojectile 10 m, 2) could land it within 0.5 m of a target, and 3) incorporated levers inorder to do
adjoining machine shop, and adjacent meeting rooms. Storage for designed systems, supplies,and stock is incorporated into the space. The machine shop, which is connected to the workstudio, is only open during hours when the professional staff is on site, with those hoursexpanded at the end of the semester. This facility is a component of MIT’s Department ofMechanical Engineering and primarily serves that segment of the MIT student population. Figure 1. MIT: Pappalardo LabThe Pappalardo Lab can be characterized as a notable academic makerspace for its level ofstaffing and its training programs. The lab is staffed by six fulltime manufacturing educatorswho provide training and instruction in using the facility’s
further developthan others, be societally relevant, and motivate the students.Figure 1: Methodology of German Engineering18,19.Examples of past design projects include “Construction of a modular coffee machine system forrestaurants of various sizes,” “Design of a very large barbeque grill” (winning design constructedand used successfully), “The use of water absorption on zeolites for cooling,” “An automatic haircleaning apparatus,” and “An un-manned system for destruction of illegal poppy plants.” Page 26.154.5Instructional approach: Didactic concept and support systemTo meet all of these goals in the project week course, it is taught in
InformationModels for the development of additional learning modules. The presented work illustrates howthe influence of instructional theories and design can support the generation of a new learningplatform for construction engineering and management.1. Introduction One of the main objectives of engineering education is to shape students that possess awide variety of knowledge, skills, and attitudes obtained as a result of education, experience, andachievement.[1] This holds true for construction engineering students, who are challenged withreal world problems during their education and after graduation. This educational objectiverequires educators to prepare their learners to solve real world problems, with which theArchitecture, Engineering and
most STEM departments reporting noactive faculty mentoring programs in place. The benefits of mentoring in the workplace havelong been documented in the literature, yet early and mid-career faculty at OU were generallyleft to fend for themselves unless they were fortunate enough to identify helpful faculty in theirdepartments on their own. So, it was thus not surprising that most faculty members indicated thatthey were not receiving assistance from their colleagues or department in the forms of careeradvice and development opportunities and that more mentoring, particularly as it pertains toresearch, was needed (Figure 1). As was seen in other studies, the percentage of women facultywho agreed or strongly agreed with the need for more
multidisciplinary program, housed in the College of Engineering, drawing on specific faculty and departments for its coursework; faculty appointments were in their home department. • Administration of the program by a Director of Graduate Studies, with a staff assistant • Overall coordination by an Advisory Committee appointed by the Dean of Engineering, responsible for curriculum and related issues. • Thesis and non-thesis options, based on coursework primarily in engineering, with at least one course in organizational behavior from the Business School (see Table 1). Courses include those specifically developed for the Manufacturing Systems program, as well as electives from several departmental programs
data indicates that JEE and EJEE have published a similarnumber of articles related to diversity till now, approximately 50 and 56 papers respectively.Itemization of publication data based on a historical timeline reveals the extent of diversity-related engineering education research during various time periods. The timeline data ispresented in Table 1. Table 1. Itemized timeline of diversity-related publications Time period Number of diversity related publications JEE EJEE 2010-2014 8 17 2005-2009 7 22 2000-2004
thecomplimentary studies requirements of Canada’s CEAB criteria, while responding to the uniquechallenges of delivering Humanities instruction to engineers. These in-house Humanitieselectives work to accommodate engineering timetables, address differences in typical courseinstruction and delivery that may challenge our students, and relieve the self-consciousness ofengineering students in an unfamiliar discipline. A more complete discussion of these motivatingfactors and the University of Toronto’s response can be found in Chong, Tihanyi andWilkinson[1].While Representing Science on Stage demands that students step out of their comfort zone totake risks in an unfamiliar discipline, it does so in an environment that is familiar: an engineeringclassroom
(NAE) and its 2007 publicationRising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter EconomicFuture [1] in which they urged a focus on developing, recruiting, and retaining engineers. Datasupporting this demand is documented in the National Science Foundation’s publication, Scienceand Engineering Indicators 2012 [2], using Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2002 to 2018 thatproject job openings from growth and needs replacement, which will top 160,000.There is an evermore urgent need for our higher education sector to graduate engineers whopossess the knowledge, skills, and abilities to respond to a 21st-century world with its technical,social, and ethical complexities. Indeed, engineers’ abilities to meet these needs
these, the Revise/Iterate activity proved promising for two reasons. Iterationis a goal-directed activity that involves making incremental refinements during the developmentof a design solution. A dependence on iteration to optimize solutions, along with consideringtrade-offs and constraints, is one of the distinguishing factors between the process of engineeringdesign and scientific inquiry.2 This is important in the context of STEM education to ensure thatscience inquiry and engineering design are represented authentically, as epistemologicallyrelated, but distinct, problem-solving processes. Secondly, as students iterate through a solutionsto a problem, their understanding of the problem also evolves,1 and studies suggest that a higherrate
students who had shown significant dedication andinterest in the design activities.The assessment process for individual students is designed to customize the assessment processto each student and is modeled after an industry performance appraisal system. Studentsestablish goals and expectations for the semester with guidance from their faculty mentor. Oncethe goals have been determined, progress toward the goals is documented and evaluated.Expectations are communicated with rubrics. Table 1 shows an example of the individualevaluation rubric that students complete to identify and summarize their accomplishments andlearning. Students are assessed over five dimensions of accomplishments, process, criticalthinking, communication and leadership
wascreated to provide students with a working foundation for exploring the governing principles ofmaterials science and the mechanics of materials. Typical class size is 25 students per sectionwith two sections running per semester.The course has four major topic areas as shown in Figure 15: • Characterization of Mechanical Properties • Analysis of Structural Elements • Material Properties and Structure (Science-led Approach) • Life Cycle Thinking and Eco-audits (Design-led Approach) Integrative Design Project Figure 1. Course layout of Materials & Mechanics course5Materials & Mechanics is a multidisciplinary course that provides
differently than any other story. Fundamentals of episodic memory, empathy, andcollaboration were components of the students’ experience and the core part of a final interactiveexhibit visited by more than one hundred people. Results demonstrate broad applicability: 1)fostering communication among engineering and design students with their teams and theirusers, and 2) introducing a generative storytelling approach in an interaction design class.Introduction and BackgroundToday, the need for storytelling1 is perhaps one of the most vibrant, yet misunderstood andunderappreciated qualities of any business. Without coherent, considered storytelling, it isimpossible to craft the kind of subtle brand messaging which separates winning organizationsfrom also
for supporting new media literacies practices in the elementary classroom and, most recently, drawing on queer and transgender theory for understanding the dominant discourses of engineering education and how those discourses marginalize and exclude people from traditionally vulnerable gender, sexual, and ethnic groups. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Working in the Weeds: How do Instructors Sort Engineering Students from Non-Engineering Students in a First Year Pre-Calculus Course?1. IntroductionThe calculus sequence is widely recognized by engineering students and faculty and byengineering education researchers as one of the course sequences that “weed out”students who are
. Students may understand howto solve certain kinds of problems, but not necessarily why it works or where it came from.1 Inrecent years, engineering programs have emphasized the significance of creativity but have notnecessarily reinforced risk-taking personality traits. It is not often until there is a desperate needfor new ideas that the push for creativity and divergent thinking is desired. A clear example ofthis is the “Sputnik Shock” of 1957. The Soviet Union’s immense success in the space racepushed the Western world to challenge what they knew and come up with new innovations. Thisneed for new technology was in such a high demand, the US National Defense Education Act of1958 that was created with the purpose of stimulating and supporting
develop self-efficacy beliefs in design, modeland scaffold engineering design mindsets, and apply design concepts in engineering design. Theresearch questions we intend to address include: 1. What is the influence of the toy design workshop on students' self-efficacy? 2. What is the influence of the toy design workshop on students' application of engineering design concepts during design?Theoretical frameworkSelf-efficacy in Engineering DesignEngineering design self-efficacy is the degree to which students believe they can excel at tasksrelated to design and making3. Social cognitive theory and previous research has suggested thatstudents’ self-efficacy beliefs are under the influence of mastery experiences
track, ● support networking of these and other members, ● development of a STEM pipeline of female STEM academics.SWE, like other professional societies, recognizes the significance of mentoring, relationships,and retention of like-minded engineers. In the case of this discussion, it has been recognized fordecades that female STEM faculty benefit from mentoring due to their unique position inacademia.1 Not only are there issues based on gender, but female STEM faculty are often part ofa non-traditional group, which may include older, minority, and disabled women. Due to thenature of this paper, we will consider these topics as appropriate, but will focus on retention ofwomen in academia, support from other professional societies, networking
Education. Vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 625 – 651.2. Amirianzadeh, M. et al. (2011). Role of student associations in leadership development of engineering students. 2nd World Conference on Psychology, Counselling and Guidance.3. Shelby, R. et. al. (2013). Implementation of leadership and service learning in a first-year engineering course enhances professional skills. International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1 – 4.4. Schulich Student Activities Fund Policy Revised 2013. University of Calgary.
. Page 26.1718.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 What Behaviors and Characteristics Do Engineering Competition Team Members Associate with Leadership?Engineering student competition teams (ECT) are promoted as incubators for the development ofleadership, 1, 2 yet we know little about how leadership actually develops within these teams. Acase study of two teams at a public university in the central U. S. was performed, with theobjective of exploring leadership development at the individual and team levels. Implicit in theconcept of team leadership development is the development of individuals as leaders. This paperdiscusses the behaviors and characteristics that students
Page 26.1724.3a process modified from the Stanford University design process that begins with whateach student personally cares for about the challenges faced by the underservedcommunity. This serves as the team’s point of view for the remainder of the designprocess. It becomes a method for balancing the need to provide immediate assistancewith the ability to thoughtfully create breakthrough-engineering solutions collaborativelywith the community that needs them.The GEE course has the following learning components: 1. An overview of conventional paradigms of development for addressing complex global problems, academia-led engineering initiatives in underserved communities, and challenges of finding sustainable solutions to
freshman tojunior year of our B.S. Bioengineering curriculum.Introduction to the Engineering ProfessionEGS1006L - Introduction to the Engineering Profession is a 1 credit hour freshman level coursethat is the gateway to all subsequent FGCU engineering courses. The course is designed tointroduce the engineering approach to problem solving and the engineering design process,utilizing team-based learning. This is accomplished through an over-arching semester-longresearch project focused on discipline-specific engineering innovations. “Mini projects” are usedin this class to encourage student discovery of new technologies or innovations within their fieldof study as a means of helping them select an appropriate topic for their research project
23 Copyright ©2019 American Society for Engineering Education Session CPDD 444 Continuing (Engineering) Education in Nordic countries/ Norway My university, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2018: Two Working Groups on the development of LLL/ CE: 1. Strategy/ organisation/ business models and financing 2. Develop CE in the area of digitization + establish NTNU CE Office in Oslo (capital) Group members: deans, vice deans; faculty leaders of the institution (goal: to make them understand/ discuss Continuing Education) Resulted in two
discuss in more detail how the collaboration with industry partners have aided instudents learning, creating an active/project based learning curriculum, provided careeropportunities for students and how the new space will be leveraged to continue building off offour years of partnerships. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 315IntroductionWith the exception of a handful of schools that specifically offer certifications/degrees in qualityassurance [1], teaching quality control is often either an afterthought or
what it means to them. The researchertries to maintain a participant perspective assuming the interviewees experiences andways of reasoning are logical, even if they do not appear as such at first.Phenomenographic analysis is an hermeneutical process.”42Dahlgren and Fallsberg’s43 eight-step model for data analysis was chosen for thisresearch project. The steps are 1) familiarization, 2) compilation, 3) condensation, 4)grouping, 5) comparison, 6) naming, 7) contrastive comparison, and 8) create a hierarchy.Based on this work, an outcome space was developed. The outcome space includes boththe referential aspects, which are the global meanings of each conception, as well as thestructural aspects, which are the features of each referential
Sensor, (ii) ADXL237 Accelerometer, (iii) GT0950RP3 Speaker and ADMP504Microphone. The students are able to master the following laboratory skills: (i) read resistor valuesby using resistor color code, (ii) build electrical and electronic circuits using breadboard, (iii) useinstruments, such as arbitrary waveform generator, scope, power supply, voltmeter, networkanalyzer, and (iv) obtain Bode Plots by using a network analyzer. Two examples from the EEPracticum are shown in Figures 1 and 2. To learn basic laboratory skills and the use of LEDs, thestudents built the waveform polarity indicator circuit shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the Bodeplot obtained from the RLC circuit by using the Network Analyzer of the Analog Discovery Board.Bode Plots
who coordinate it, raising issues and highlightingcurrent practices in engineering capstone design education to guide further development in the field.1. IntroductionCapstone design courses provide a major design experience for engineering students, usually during theirfinal year of undergraduate study. Although these courses are common across engineering programs inthe U.S., they vary substantially in the way they are implemented. The first nationwide survey ofcapstone courses was conducted in 1994 in an effort to better understand current practices at the time.1This was followed in 2005 by another nationwide survey2 using many of the same questions to update thedata and also to capture trends over time; the 2005 survey repeated many of the