Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session III: Collaboration

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

current systems. (1, 2, 3, 4)The higher education arena interacts in a complex way with a variety of external partners whoserole, participation, and expertise must be harnessed to help overcome some of the challenges thathave beset engineering education in the Region. Perhaps the most notable partner in thisendeavor is the industrial sector whose role and participation in shaping engineering educationhas, unfortunately, been extremely modest by best estimates. Establishing a beneficial workingrelationship between colleges of engineering in the Region and industries at large, has proven tobe difficult, often short-lived, and appears at the outset, not to be rewarding to either side.Among the many factors contributing to this failure, is the

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials

negatively affect the overall learning ofthe students as measured by their performance on a common, cumulative final exam. Studentsgenerally liked the opportunity to apply their knowledge to real world problems that werethematically centered on the biomedical industry and to be able to work in teams.IntroductionThe Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) supported by the Kern FamilyFoundation was created in 2005 to “champion the entrepreneurial mindset in undergraduateengineering students.”1-3 In an effort to achieve this goal, the Kern Family Foundation created anetwork made up of mostly private engineering schools that are committed to developing theentrepreneurial mindset in their undergraduate engineering students through the network

Conference Session

Identity and Engineering: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter M Ostafichuk, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; James Sibley, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Agnes Germaine d'Entremont P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Navid Shirzad, Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, UBC

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

but not solarge as to invalidate the tools. Steps should be considered to educate students about potentialbias.IntroductionTeamwork is an integral part of Engineering and Engineering Education.1 Well-designed groupand team projects can help students gain valuable teaming skills, and accrediting bodies requirethese skills of engineering graduates.2,3 But teamwork is not without its problems. Social loafingand “I better do it myself, if I want an A” syndrome are part of many peoples experiences withgroup and teamwork.4 A well-designed peer evaluation process can improve the studentexperience and lead to more powerful learning outcomes.Peer evaluation can be used to foster a better team experience and to equitably recognizeindividual student’s

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia R Backer, San Jose State University; Wenchiang Richard Chung, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

industries that had a great sense oftraditional values and environmental awareness, and explored Taiwan's culture through the eyesof local students. The cohort was a resounding success, with overwhelming positive studentfeedback. Overall, the SJSU GTI program has been very successful and has met the objectivesset for it. Embedding continuous assessment and improvement into this program has allowed usto adapt to changes and provide the participants with an intensive global experience.1. Purpose of the GTI ProgramIn the globally competitive 21st century, corporations have been aggressive in expandingmarkets and their workforces across the globe. In order for engineers to thrive in such anenvironment, they need to understand and prepare for this new

Conference Session

Topics in Computing and Information Technologies I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; Jianjun Yin, Jackson State University; Yanhua Cao, Jackson State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

Satisfaction Table 4 Data collection procedures and schedules Phases Contents Duration(1) Pre-tests Demographics , computer experience, GPA Two weeks Knowledge on selected subjects through Concept Inventory Learning disposition measured through MSLQ(2) Collaborative learning Online discussion for collaborative learning Ten weeksthrough online discussion Students' Self-report on collaborative learning process Instructors

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brianna Blaser, University of Washington; Katherine M. Steele, University of Washington; Sheryl Elaine Burgstahler, University of Washigton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Children’s Hospital, and the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago.Dr. Sheryl Elaine Burgstahler, University of Washigton Dr. Sheryl Burgstahler founded and directs the DO-IT (Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology) Center and the Access Technology Center. These two centers promote (1) the use of main- stream and assistive technology and other interventions to support the success of students with disabilities in postsecondary education and careers and (2) the development of facilities, computer labs, academic and administrative software, websites, multimedia, and distance learning programs that are welcoming and accessible to individuals with disabilities. The ATC focuses efforts at the UW; the DO-IT

Conference Session

Self-efficacy and Emotion: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Philip M. Reeves, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Irene B. Mena, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

as compared to first-year students. The lower expectation of seniorstudents suggest that engineering instructors should consider ways to engage upper level studentsin creative behaviors. Future research includes a longitudinal study to examine how creative self-concept changes in progression through the engineering curriculum.Introduction The concept of creativity has been an important research topic since the 1950’s and1960’s.1 Educators and scholars with diverse domains of expertise have studied creativity, theskills associated with creativity, and techniques to increase creativity in their respective fields.2-6However, even in the field of psychology, where the most research pertaining to the topic hasbeen produced, researchers

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 2: Design in the First Year: Challenges and Successes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Jackelyn Raquel Lopez Roshwalb, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

 through the NSF sponsored Engineering Coalition of Schools for Excellence in Education and Leadership (ECSEL) program.  The main effort made under the ECSEL program was centered on creating a project­driven approach to teaching engineering design to incoming students 1 .  In 1992, seventeen students participated in the pilot section of ENES 100, which was anchored around the design and construction of a swing set. Afterwards, five design projects were developed to form a design project cycle.  Those projects were based on the development of a wind mill, a solar desalination still, a weighing machine, a postal scale, and a human­powered water pump.  The motivation was that the design project cycle would ensure that the projects remained fresh for

Conference Session

Reflective & Critical Pedagogies

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mania Orand, University of Washington ; Brook Sattler, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Lauren D. Thomas, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

and HCI practitioners.IntroductionNumerous studies have identified reflection as an essential element in learning, development ofexpertise, and supporting motivation.[1,2,3,4] As Rodgers put it “reflection is identified as astandard toward which all teachers and students must strive” and “the cry for accomplishment insystematic, reflective thinking is clear”.[5] While reflection is generally understood as animportant part of learning, it is emerging as a critical area of scholarship in engineeringeducation.[1] Operationalizing the concept of reflection in classrooms in order to help engineeringstudents engage in reflection has been a challenge and educators are seeking ways to best addressthis issue.[6,7,8]Similar to educators in engineering

Conference Session

Data Analysis and Assessment

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elaheh Molla Allameh, Purdue University; Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Seungwon Yang, George Mason University; Aditya Johri, George Mason University; Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

currently no easy methods tosynthesize research results, share research data, and indeed validate research studies effectively.In general, topics related to data and data sharing are largely treated as taboos in the engineeringeducation research space. Data sharing mechanisms to enable fundamental research inengineering education that has the potential to address systemic problems have not yet beenclarified. The research goal of this paper is to identify and understand patterns for data sharingmechanisms in order to inform design requirements for data sharing practices and infrastructurein engineering education.1. IntroductionThe scientific community is increasingly recognizing the necessity for sharing scientific databeyond the initial purposes

Conference Session

Fundamental: Tools and Content for K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jale F. Akyurtlu, Hampton University; Otsebele E Nare, Hampton University; Lumumba Harnett, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

(system).The general system analysis steps to problem solving are outlined in Figure 1.The initial step is producing a diagram illustrating the system and clearly delineating all theinput/output variables (V) that affect the behavior of the system and listing all the pertinentindependent equations (E) between the variables. The difference in the number of variables andindependent equations establishes the number of degrees of freedom (DoF) in the system. TheDoF value can be used as a check point on the mathematical reasoning or formulation of theproblem. If the DoF is zero, the solution of the problem is determinate with only one solution;but if V > E, there may be several alternative solutions, which defines the problem as a designcase

Conference Session

Software Engineering Constituent Committee Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Temesghen Kahsai , Carnegie Mellon University; Liam O'Reilly, Swansea University; Markus Roggenbach, Swansea University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

six learning outcomes in more detail:1. We refrain from addressing “Describe the difference between centralized and distributed software configuration management. [Familiarity]” 4 due to the constraints posed by teaching in the first year: software configuration management is beyond the scope of programming-in-the-small.2. We achieve the same mastery level on “Demonstrate the capability to use software tools in support of the development of a software product of medium size. [Usage]” 4.3. We exceed the recommended mastery level on “Describe how available static and dynamic test tools can be integrated into the software development environment. [Familiarity]” 4 by letting students have hands-on experience with testing tools such as

Conference Session

Continuing Professional Development Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell L Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mark T Schuver, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

recession, tuition prices are skyrocketing, student loan debt has surpassed$1 trillion, parents, who have leveraged their homes through equity loans and first loans - for thesecond time, are losing faith in the value of education, state funding is dwindling, federal grantsare shrinking, and donor dollars are smaller5”. These are the times in which we live. Change isinevitable. We can continue to do what we do, until such time when we can’t, then, we must dosomething else. This is the prevalence of the literature today.There is a growing trend toward college and university mergers. Marcus6 states “…it’s a kind ofprivate sector-style consolidation that is becoming increasingly common, not only for publicinstitutions, but also for nonprofit

Conference Session

Qualitative Methodologies

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

of responsible science and social science writing. What is less often Page 26.1564.2addressed by even the most thoughtful researchers, however, is the available field of existingresearch options, as such; the universe of possible, credible methodological choices orevidentiary standards.1, 2 We believe that reflection on those parameters would support a morerobust inquiry into STEM education subjects, as would explicit contextualization of researchers’chosen methods or standards along societal terms: that is, attention to the question of whichsocietal conditions may determine researchers’ embrace of quantitative or qualitative methods

Conference Session

Measuring the Impact of Community Engagement on Students

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keilah Maria Tablante Bias, University of Prince Edward Island; Daniel Larsen, University of Prince Edward Island; Libby Osgood P. Eng, UPEI & Dalhousie University; Alex Gamble, University of Prince Edward Island; Spencer Paul Montgomery, University of New Brunswick

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

students are motived by their engineering mentor’s engagement in their learning and driveto seek improvement. The authors were also enthused by the desire to make a difference, makingtheir learning experience more meaningful. Design projects that address problems posed by realclients, especially those that involve third-world problems, provide that opportunity. Through anevaluation of the design curriculum the authors made recommendations to strengthen studentengagement in engineering education.1 Introduction and BackgroundContext based education methods, where students are presented with application before science,are proven to be significantly more effective than traditional approaches that teach science first,then apply it to real life.1,2 The

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adeel Khalid, Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering & Engineering Technology; Salahuddin Qazi, State University of New York, Institute of Tech.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

the German Institute ofEconomics, the country currently needs 117,000 engineers, scientists, IT experts and technicians. Page 26.337.2U.K is also faced with a chronic shortage of science graduates and especially engineers, whereseveral industries are struggling with a shortage of engineers in the area of power generation,aerospace and manufacturing. Sub-Saharan Africa alone needs 2.5 million new engineers andtechnicians if the region was to achieve the UN Millennium Development Goal of improvedaccess to clean water and sanitation [1].The number of engineering graduates enrolled in Asian countries and their population trendshows that the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Pre-college Student Experiences

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Gwen Blosser, Louisiana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

terms of theundergraduate and graduate degrees they earn at colleges and universities. Yet, in spite ofsuch advances, most science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields stillremain sharply gender segregated, with men making up the majority.1 This is nowheremore evident than in engineering. According to statistics, women earn 57% ofundergraduate degrees, but only 18% of baccalaureates in engineering.2-3 These trendsare a cause for concern because occupational gender segregation fuels the wage gapbetween men and women, which perpetuates gender inequalities.4 Additionally, a dearthof women in engineering represents the potential loss of human capital that could help toadvance scientific and technological discovery.5In response to this

Conference Session

Graduate Programs, Development, and Research Fellowships

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vanessa Dunn, University of Colorado, Boulder; Sarah Miller, University of Colorado, Boulder; Stephanie Swartz, University of Colorado, Boulder; Arthur L.C. Antoine, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

their faculty research advisors received $100.AssessmentDemographicsThe pilot Spring Break for Research program attracted 25 applications for the pilot program. Fromthese applications, a diverse group of 20 undergraduates and 20 graduate mentors were selected asseen in Table 1. 60% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 25.0% 24.3% 25% 20% 11.5% 10% 6.2% 0% URM Female Undergraduates in College of Engineering SB4R Undergraduates Graduates in College of Engineering SB4R GraduatesTable 1. Demographics

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Learning and Engagement

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine McGough, Clemson University; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

study was an interpretativephenomenology analysis (IPA)7; nine sophomore and junior biomedical engineering (BME) andmechanical engineering (ME) students at a southeastern land grant institution were interviewedabout their experiences in terms of connecting their future goals to their actions in the present.The themes that emerged from these interviews focused on the range of possible future selvesthat students described. These themes were then described graphically as being cone-shaped (seeFigure 1), where the three axes represent time-orientation, instrumentality, time attitude axis7.The second study was a phenomenography, focusing on the different ways in which students areperceiving the future5–7. This study was a continuation of the first

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 11

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haya Alshayji, Pennsylvania State University; Deja Workman, Pennsylvania State University; Swapnika Dulam, Pennsylvania State University; Lauren A Griggs, The Pennsylvania State University; Dixon Zor, Pennsylvania State University; Christopher L Dancy, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

key steps: Chatbot development, educational intervention,and assessment design and survey development. Each step was critical in ensuring the successfulapplication of the chatbot as both a technical resource and an educational tool aimed at fosteringcritical thinking and ethical awareness in engineering students. Below the framework wasoutlined for the methodology and illustrated in Figure 1: 1. Chatbot Development 2. Educational Intervention - Ethical Training - Technical Training 3. Assessment Design - Likert and Open-ended Questions

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Wessel, Franciscan University of Steubenville (FUS)

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

strengthen the latest technicaland ethical tenants, standards, methodologies and techniques to better manage the complexitiesof software enabled capabilities. Industry is a vital stakeholder who needs to prioritize properoperational qualities ahead of immediate monitory and schedule concerns. The relationshipsamong technology, process, people and culture must be understood and managed to effectivelyand efficiently orchestrate the release of software capabilities that benefit all stakeholders, andminimize issues.Early Technical Issues and Response PatternToward the end of the nineteenth century homeowners excitedly purchased electric vacuumcleaners whose makers declared its amazing capability e.g., “the Domestic Cyclone” [1]. Theseearly vacuum

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED): Assessment, Curriculum & Instructional Design

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karina Ivette Vielma, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Robin Lynn Nelson, University of Texas at San Antonio; JoAnn Browning P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED)

students also participated in the formal mentoringprogram with an experienced researcher as their faculty mentor and a network of mentors acrossthe NHERI sites.Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from NSF NHERI REU student participantsthrough pre-program and post-program assessments. These assessments were developed from thegoals of the NHERI REU program which include to (1) provide meaningful research experiencesto undergraduate students, (2) provide mentorship from an experienced faculty researcher, and(3) foster a community of researchers in natural hazards engineering research. This paper delvesdeeply into the mentoring experiences of students, highlighting the structure of the mentoringprogram and the outcomes from the students

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Developing Engineering Competencies III

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tanveer Mansur Syed, Florida Institute of Technology; Godwyll Aikins; Catherine G. P. Berdanier, The Pennsylvania State University; Kim-Doang Nguyen, Florida Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

contribute tostudents' professional identity formation through engineering education.Introduction and BackgroundEngineering education today faces the challenge of equipping students with both technicalknowledge and the ability to interpret and work with data. The increasing complexity ofengineering problems and the rapid growth of available data have made data proficiency essential[1]. Equally important is fostering a strong engineering identity, which influences students'persistence and career paths [2]. While much research has explored engineering identity—focusingon competence, recognition, and interest [3]—less attention has been given to how data proficiencyimpacts these identity components. This understanding is critical as engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Geoff Potvin, Florida International University; Jacqueline Doyle, Florida International University; Hank Boone, University of Nevada, Reno; Dina Verdin, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

the mountains “join” up). After mapping out the mountain, we can then lookto see if, for example, trees on different mountains have any systematic differences, such as theirgenus, average height, longevity, etc. The analogy of studying the location of trees on themountain is represented schematically in Figure 1 as a companion to the illustrative exampledescribed in this paragraph.Figure 1: Schematic representation of the illustrative example of use Topological Data Analysis. Here elevation profiles of mountains are examine to understand the different tree populations found in different elevation zones.In this same way, we use the Mapper algorithm to search the quantitative student response datafor patterns in the

Conference Session

Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession - and ASCE

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark William Killgore, American Society of Civil Engineers; Eric Lee Flicker PE, Pennoni Associates Inc.; Bradley Aldrich P.E., Aldrich + Elliott, PC

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

of the traditional four-year baccalaureate degree.”The National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES), is the nationalorganization that represents the state licensing boards for professional engineering and surveyingacross the U.S. In 2015, NCEES approved Position Statement 35 – Future EducationalRequirements for Engineering Licensure4 by a nearly 2:1 ratio. The preamble of the statementsays: “One of the goals of NCEES is to advance licensure standards for all professional engineers. Those standards describe the technical and professional competencies needed to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of the public. The council recognizes that the future demands for increasing technical and

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty Development

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Coso Strong, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Mel Chua, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

  1​prestige and conceptual hurdles​ . The POD community represents a young field with many new practitioners who have been ­­ or still are ­­ faculty in various disciplines and who have  2​journeyed into faculty development later in their careers​ . Both communities intersect in the realm of engineering faculty development. All three of us work within that intersection; we are engineers who journeyed into education research during our time in graduate school and who now focus aspects of our education research and outreach on engineering faculty development. The purpose of this paper is to share what we have learned about the challenges and opportunities that arose while working to

Conference Session

Fundamental: Tools and Content for K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Moorhead, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering; Jennifer B Listman, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering; Vikram Kapila, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distinguished Award for Excellence in the cate- gory Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior Faculty Fellow of NYU-SoE’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 7 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 55 journal articles, and 109 conference papers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 16 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 31 undergraduate research students and 11 under- graduate senior design project teams

Conference Session

Making in Design

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ethan Reggia, University of Maryland, College Park; Kevin M Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park; Justin Albrecht, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

 have access to this technology.  The remainder of this paper details the approach taken and lessons learned implementing 3D printers into a first­year engineering design course. First, implementation details including specific tools, techniques and equipment used in the labs are provided. Next, the instructional approach developed to introduce the concepts and techniques linking CAD with 3D printing is presented. Preliminary results of this effort are then discussed by presenting (1) the print log data collected throughout the semester that provides an indication of the use and success rates associated with the printers and (2) data collected from a survey designed to determine the perceived effectiveness of the system and student

Conference Session

Best Practices for Two-Year Students Majoring in Engineering & STEM Fields

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen M. Groppi P.E., Cabrillo College; Susan Tappero, Cabrillo College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

institutionalization strategies thatwere eventually employed. We will also discuss this project’s contribution to a greaterSTEM presence and culture on campus which has resulted in our Latino/Hispanic studentsapproaching full representation in STEM and engineering majors on our campus. (Figure 1) Approaching Representation 50% Percentage of STEM majors who are Latino Percentage of Latino students 40% 30% 34% 32% 34% 20% 26% 23% 19% 20% 10

Conference Session

Development as Faculty and Researcher: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Pulford, University of Washington Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT); Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Laura D Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Denise Thorsen, University of Alaska, Fairbanks

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

faculty5,10. For these reasonsand more, learning communities should be a more visible and common means to helpengineering faculty to learn, share, and thrive.Building a Faculty Learning Community: A High Bar?How should a faculty learning community be formed? How should it operate? And who shouldset the process into motion? The most visible recommended practices for faculty learningcommunities in higher education come from the highly influential pioneering work of Milt Coxand his colleagues at Miami University. From their literature directed toward learningcommunity builders10,13–15, we might infer that: 1. A learning community must gain broad support within the hierarchy of an institution, including deans and departments and faculty. 2. A