Global Engineering: Taking the Engineering Classroom to the Real World CARL A. ERIKSON, JR. Department of Engineering Messiah College Grantham, PA 17027CARL A. ERIKSON, JR.Professor Erikson is an Assistant Professor of Engineering. He obtained his BSEE degreefrom Rutgers University in 1969 and his MSEE degree from Purdue University in 1971. Hehad worked in industry for 18 years before coming to Messiah College to help start the newBSE program in 1989. He has authored many articles on microelectronic processing andcomponents. He has given numerous presentations to industry, colleges, professionalsocieties
Heuristic Models for Creativity Experiments in Architectural and Engineering Design Joseph A. Betz Professor of Architecture State University of New York, Farmingdale State CollegeAbstractMany cognitive processes contribute to the generation of creative problem solving. Oneimportant characteristic involves the combination and reorganization of certain kinds ofknowledge to form new and novel category solutions. It is posited that convergent and divergentforms of thinking are used to manipulate these combinations categories. One experimentdeveloped by Mobley, Doares, & Mumford (1992)[1] has been used to test
1 Group Dynamics: Predicting Member Performance Prof. Alfred A. Scalza, P.E. Department of Architecture & Construction Management Farmingdale State CollegeI. IntroductionThis paper sets out to study the effectiveness of groups in studying Engineering, Architectureand Construction Management. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) has set “working in a group” as one of it’s outcomes to be assessed. Students mustlearn to operate in a group as preparation for that which will be expected of them aftergraduation. In fact, group
AC 2011-1562: SHORT TERM IMPACT OF AN ENGINEERING EDUCA-TION RESEARCH WORKSHOP ON PARTICIPANT’S RESEARCH IN-TERESTS AND CAPABILITIESJunaid A. Siddiqui, Purdue University, West Lafayette Junaid Siddiqui is a doctoral student at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. Before joining the doctoral program he worked for nine years at the faculty development office of King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Saudi Arabia. In this role he was involved in several faculty development activities, particularly working with the faculty members for exploring the use of web-based technologies in the support of classroom teaching. He received his MS in Civil Engineering from KFUPM while he has also
AC 2011-904: THE IMPACT OF ENGINEERING-BASED SCIENCE IN-STRUCTION ON SCIENCE CONTENT UNDERSTANDINGMs. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts UniversityMerredith D Portsmore, Tufts University Merredith Portsmore is a Research Assistant Professor in Education at Tufts University as well as the Director of Outreach Programs for Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Merredith has the unique honor of being a ”Quadruple Jumbo” having received all her four of her degrees from Tufts (B.A. English, B.S. Mechanical Engineering, M.A. Education, PhD in Engineering Education). Her research interests focus on how children engage in constructing solutions to engineering design problems. Her outreach work focuses on creating
AC 2011-1726: USING VERTICALLY INTEGRATED PROJECT TEAMSTO INSPIRE STUDNET INTEREST IN COMPUTING CAREERSMassood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Massood Towhidnejad is a tenure full professor of software engineering in the department of Electrical, Computer, Software and System Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. His teaching interests include artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and software engineering with emphasis on software quality assurance and testing. He has been involved in research activities in the areas of software engineering, software quality assurance and testing, autonomous systems, and human factors.Thomas B Hilburn, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ
students and faculty; and the 2008 Hewlett-Packard/Harriett B. Rigas Award from the IEEE Education Society in recognition of her contribution to the profession. Dr. Schrader earned her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Valparaiso University, and her M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. in Systems and Control from University of Notre Dame.Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University Seung Youn (Yonnie) Chyung is a professor in the Department of Instructional and Performance Technol- ogy in the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She received her Doctor of Education degree in Instructional Technology from Texas Tech University and teaches graduate-level courses on evaluation methodology. Her research
BOK1-compliant accreditation criteria is illustrated by the tabularcomparison provided in Appendix B. The table lists the 15 BOK1 outcomes, the specificrequirements articulated for each outcome in Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21stCentury, and the associated provisions of the ABET GCBLP and CEPC. An outcome-by-outcome comparison clearly demonstrates that the BOK outcomes represent a significantly moreambitious and comprehensive standard than do the ABET criteria. For example, consider BOKOutcome 1, which includes requirements for “biology, chemistry, ecology,geology/geomorphology, engineering economics, mechanics, material properties, systems, geo-spatial representation, and information technology.” The corresponding provision of
Page 22.27.4 A and b are constants of the least squares fit.Students were asked to identify their sample as “strong”, :”normal” or “weak” by comparingtheir experimentally determined slope to reference values for “strong”, “normal” or “weak”coffee previously measured and included in the handout.A blind procedure, in which the lecturer did not know whether students were performing theexperiment virtually or “hands on” was not possible in this experiment because the instructorsknew in advance which type of procedure (actual or virtual) each section was doing. Laboratorylimitations prevented having dual setups for both experiments.Another consideration is student interest in the use of simulations in experiential learning.Would students
. However, Bronfenbrenner’s most recent writings indicatethat in addition to context, proximal processes (i.e., ongoing human interactions over time),person characteristics, and time effects also must be considered. Bronfenbrenner’s ecologicaltheory indicates healthy development is dynamic and continuous, separate from discretedevelopmental milestones occurring at particular points in time. To conduct ecological research,Bronfenbrenner proposed the PPCT model, a model which facilitates systematic study of thefollowing: (a) person characteristics (b) proximal processes; (c) over-arching, as well asimmediate, contextual influences; and (d) time effects.Bronfenbrenner4,5,7,8,9 theorized that individuals bring important person characteristics to
grading, and Taylor shows that theyare typically ill-trained and supervised.20 However, Smith points out that technical faculty areconsistently more effective than communication instructors at identifying technical errors instudent reports.21 Further complicating the authority problem, Cho explores the way peopledeliver communication feedback and the ways that students respond to it.22 Cho finds thatstudents respond best to feedback that is (A) positive and (B) directive—so long as the directivesare non-trivial. In order to deliver non-trivial directive feedback, communication instructors Page 22.1687.7must either be well-versed in the technical
AC 2011-975: ENGINEERING FOR AMERICAN COMMUNITIES: EN-GAGING ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY ALTRU-ISTIC ENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECTSMalinda S Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder MALINDA SCHAEFER ZARSKE is a doctoral candidate at the University of Colorado Boulder in engi- neering education. Her research interests include engineering student learning, diversity and recruitment. Her current research is centered on the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, recruitment, and retention in engineering. She is a Co-Director of the Engineering for American Commu- nities student organization, on the development team as well as a content editor for the TeachEngineer- ing.org digital
AC 2011-842: A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF USING WRITINGAS A CRITICAL THINKING TOOLN. Jean Hodges, VCUQatar Since Fall 2004, N. Jean Hodges has been an Assistant Professor of Writing at Virginia Commonwealth University Qatar (VCUQatar) in Doha, Qatar. She earned her degrees in North Carolina: a Master of Science in Technical Communication from North Carolina State University and a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration, magna cum laude, from Queens College (now Queens University). Her work experiences in legal, medical, executive, and academic positions and her business training have informed her understanding of writing in the workplace and in different fields. Her interdisciplinary Master’s pro- gram
AC 2011-1432: A SUCCESSFUL PLAN FOR FACULTY DEVELOPMENTTHAT HAS A LASTING IMPACTStephen W. Crown, University of Texas, Pan American Dr. Crown is a professor of mechanical engineering in south Texas. He has been actively involved in a number of grants supporting innovative and effective teaching methods for engineering education. Dr. Crown is director of the faculty development component of a large Department of Education grant that supports Challenge Based Instruction and is the director of the Texas Pre-Freshman Engineering Program in Edinburg.Arturo A Fuentes, University of Texas, Pan AmericanRobert A. Freeman, University of Texas-Pan American Dr. Robert A. Freeman has been on the faculty of The University of
Teaching a Sophomore Course with a Laboratory Component Online Jumoke Ladeji-Osias, Kehinde Abimbola, Yacob Astatke, Craig Scott Morgan State University 1700 E. Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21239 Jumoke.Ladeji-Osias@Morgan.Edu, Kehinde.Abimbola@Morgan.Edu Yacob.Astatke@Morgan.Edu, Craig.Scott@Morgan.EduJUMOKE LADEJI-OSIASJumoke Ladeji-Osias, Ph.D. is an associate professor of electrical engineering at MorganState University. She teaches courses and conducts research in the area of digital design.KEHINDE ABIMBOLAKehinde Abimbola is a doctoral student in civil engineering at Morgan State University
Implementing Hands-on Laboratory Exercises and Design Projects for First Year Engineering Students", American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2001.2. Allam, Y., Tomasko, D.L., Trott, B., Schlosser, P., Yang, Y., Wilson, T.M., Merrill, J., "Lab-on-a-chip Design- Build Project with a Nanotechnology Component in a Freshman Engineering Course", Chemical Engineering Education, Volume 42, Number 4, 2008.3. Freuler, R.J., Hoffmann, M.J., Pavlic, T.P., Beams, J.M., Radigan, J.P., Dutta, P.K., Demel, J.T., Justen, E.D., "Experiences with a Comprehensive Freshman Hands-On Course 0 Designing, Building, and Testing Small Autonomous Robots", American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
“light” this second circuit, and how does store this electrical energy generatedenergy) this relate to the plan that you came through the movement of the magnet up with to improve the through the coil “flashlight’s” usability. • Disconnect the coil from the circuit board. • When the coil wires are connected • Shake the flashlight for two cases together the overall displacement of the (a) connect the two wires of the magnet within the coil is less than whenExperiment #3 coil together, and (b) disconnect the coil wires are
implementation. Bibliography1. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.2. Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (2000). Designing Mildred: Scaffolding Students’ Reflection and Arguemntation Using a Cognitive Software Guide. In B. Fishman & O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 142-149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.3. Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126.4. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility
ddesigned for UPF. The R Rockn’ Bowleer allows a person with partial p quadrriplegia to boowl. This devvice is a “high-end”attachmeent for the Un niversal Playy Frame, giv ving the userr a great deall of control oover the spinn andplacemen nt of the balll. Perhaps th he most uniqu ue feature off the Rock nn’ Bowler is the powereddspinning rail system that can be used u to add spin s to the b all. As the bball rolls dow wn the ramp,, itcomes inn contact with h two rails spinning
] Rowell, G. H., Perhac, D. G., Hankins, J. A., Parker, B. C., Pettey, C. C., and Iriarte-Gross, J. M. 2003.Computer-related gender differences. Proceedings from SIGCSE’03, Reno, Nevada, February 19-23.[5] Backnak, R., Chappa, E. and De La Rosa, K. 2009. Exposing K-12 students to science and engineering.Proceedings from 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, Texas, October 18-21.[6] Cantrell, P. and Ewing-Taylor, J. 2009. Exploring STEM career options through collaborative highschool seminars. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3): 295-303.[7] Heersink, D. and Moskal, B. 2010. Measuring high school students’ attitudes toward computing.Proceedings from SIGCSE’10, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.[8] Maxim, B. R. and Elenbogen, B. S
central database. Students whowere absent on the day of the assessment were not included in the database. No attempts weremade to return to the schools and give make-up assessments to these students.Data AnalysisAnalysis utilized comparisons of frequency statistics and nonparametric hypothesis testing. Priorto analysis, survey data within the central database were cleaned to fit the analysis process. Thesurvey and bubble sheets prompted students for responses A-E, therefore these alpha-responseswere converted into numeric-responses; A=1, B=2, …, E=5. Once the data were converted, thedatabase was checked for inappropriate or missing responses for the question that promptedstudents to identify their current grade. Resulting errors were checked
robust web-based tools to repeatedly measure theirexplicit and implicit attitudes toward self, math, engineering, and careers. Our objectives were:(a) Measure the implicit biases of freshman engineering men and women regarding STEM.(b) Determine whether engineering students and professionals are implicitly self-associated with engineering.(c) Determine whether project-based learning increases freshman students’ self-association with engineering.MethodsWe employed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) 20 and a recent variant, the Brief ImplicitAssociation Test (BIAT) 21, to measure association strengths between concepts (e.g., math andlanguages) and evaluations (e.g., good or bad) or attributes (e.g., male or female). In the IAT,participants
increases to the Pre105-Pos202 pairing, suggesting that there are other forces effecting SE. This “excess” SE increase represented ~40% of the total increase in SE. (b) The Math, MST and Art/Music majors exhibited the highest levels of SE, with Page 22.1044.13 these three populations exhibiting statistically significant higher SE levels compared to all other majors. A t-test between the Math and MST majors gave p(2-tail) = 0.095, indicating that there is no significant difference (to the α=0.05 level). Our hypothesis that the MST major eventually achieved the same SE as the Math major was valid, although there is certainly less difference
steel is used in the B-pillars of the Super Crew model of the F-150? _______________________________________________________________________ 3. What was the name of the “laminate steel panel” used in the F-150 that helped reduce noise? _______________________________________________________________________3-Leadership in Truck Game Starts Up Front (2:25): 4. The narrator states that the up-front structure can do a number of things for the truck: a. Stiffens up the ______________________________. b. Makes it more _____________________________________________________ c. ________________________ the cab. d. Helps win at the ___________________ game. 5. The F-150 received
, No. 7, p. 38.2. Sarasin, L., 1998, “Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom.” Madison, WI: Atwood.3. Gardner, H., 1999. “Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century.” New York: Basic Books.4. Joyce, B., and Weil, M., 2000, “Models of Teaching.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.5. Brandford, J.D., et al., Eds., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” Expanded Edition, National Academy of Sciences, 2000.6. Klingbeil, N., Newberry, B., Donaldson, A. and Ozdogan, J., 2010, "The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: Highlights from a CCLI Phase 3 Initiative," Proceedings 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 2010.7. Klingbeil, N
wind turbine Coherent Application Thread woven through Boston University Mechanical Engineering curriculum Page 22.770.8 CATs COHERENT A! PPLICATION THREADS ! "#$! %&!!!!'("!#)*+,+-.+*/01,+2345!-41.+326! ! 784!9:;(-,1545!:+35!9*.-+34!68;:3!+3!984! 6<49=8!+6!+3!984!>,;=<45?!;.!>-.1<45?! =;35+9+;3@!98;*28!984.4!1.4!69+,,!14.;5A31/+=! B;.=46!;3!984!-,1546@!16!68;:3@!5*4!9;!984! :+35&!!784!-.1<4!B;.=4!9819!<44C6!984!.;9;.! ,;=<45!+6!D
and tank’s automatic adjustment in this plane.References:1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Jet Propulsion LaboratoryNanorover web site http://robotics.jpl.nasa.gov/tasks/nrover/2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Mars Exploration RoversWeb Site http://marsrovers.nasa.gov3. Firat, B. (2004), Design of a Mars Rover Suspension Mechanism (Master’s thesis). Izmir Institute ofTechnology, Izmir, Turkey Page 22.387.12
Microelectronics/VLSI Technology program at UMass Lowell. Heholds his Ph.D. from University of South Carolina. He is a registered Professional Engineer,P.E., in the State of Commonwealth of Massachusetts. He is the ASEE’s campus representativeat the James B. Francis College of Engineering. He is also the transfer coordinate and thegraduate Semiconductor/VLSI certificate coordinator. He has been teaching and has an industrialexperience of 40+ years. He is the author of over 200 theses, dissertations and papers publishedand presented in journals/conferences of national and international repute. 7. AcknowledgementsThe author is highly grateful to the sponsors of the program from the Hi-Tech Industry leadersand the
AC 2011-1341: UTILIZING BRIDGES ACROSS COLLEGES TO PROPOSEA GRANT TO IMPROVE THE RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OFSTUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN STEM PROGRAMSDonald C. Richter, Eastern Washington University DONALD C. RICHTER obtained his B. Sc. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from The Ohio State University, M.S. and Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. He holds a Pro- fessional Engineer certification and worked as an Engineer and Engineering Manger in industry for 20 years before teaching. His interests include project management, robotics /automation, Energy Manage- ment and air pollution dispersion modelingWilliam R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is currently
(Electrical & Computer) Strength in Numbers (Aerospace & Civil)Seating capacity: 20 students Seating capacity: 20 students M 408C - Calculus I M 408C - Calculus I EE 302 - Intro to Electrical Engineering CH 301 - Chemistry I EE 306 - Intro to Computing FIG Seminar FIG SeminarThe Visionaries (Mechanical) The Innovators (Interdisciplinary)Seating capacity: 20 students Seating capacity: 20 students M 408C - Calculus I FIG Seminar CH 301 - Chemistry I ME 302 - Into to Mechanical Engineering FIG SeminarInfinite Momentum A (Interdisciplinary) Infinite Momentum B (Electrical &Seating capacity: 15 students