roles in industry and academia, having worked as a software engineer, project lead and manager for Accenture before serving as Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Electrical Engineering at the Ateneo de Davao University. She has also served in administrative and teaching faculty roles at Virginia Tech and The Ohio State University.Debarati Basu (Assistant Professor)Sreyoshi Bhaduri Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Research Scientist. As part of Global Talent Management Science at Amazon, she employs innovative and ethical mixed-methods research approaches to uncover insights about the 21st century workforce. Sreyoshi has a doctorate in Engineering Education, and Masters degrees in
part of who we areas people and shape our positionalities but bear less on our narratives than the dominantstructures imposed on us by our doctoral programs. Second, to ensure autoethnographic research quality, we considered Patton’s six criteriafor autoethnographic research: reflexivity, substantial contribution, aesthetic merit, expression ofa reality, impact, and relational ethics [43]. We discussed each of these constructs in detail whilewriting our counterstories and during the writing of the final paper. We incorporated reflexivitythrough our discussions and crafting of positionality statements after writing our counterstories,giving us an opportunity to understand precisely which frames of reference bore on ournarratives. For
autonomy and UAV dynamics. They alsolearned to do the scientific literature review, and had an opportunity to improve written and oralcommunication skills. The participants were required to present a poster, give an oralpresentation of the research, and submit abstract (s) to student and/or professional conferences[1].In addition, the students participated in a series of research symposium and seminars designed toexpose them to a range of research topics, and engaged in professional development activitiesSeveral workshops were conducted throughout the 8- or 10-week periods that included Ethics inEngineering and Science, Graduate School Application Process and Financial Support, ResumeBuilding, Improving Oral and Written Presentation Skills, and
educational backgrounds were accepted.The program began on May 18 and ended on July 22, 2021. Phase 1 was conducted in the firsttwo weeks, from May 18-28; and Phase 2 was conducted from May 24 to July 23. During Phase1 (Weeks 1 and 2), all participants participated in a welcoming virtual zoom meeting as well asparticipating in five workshops. Additionally, they were asked to read two readings to preparethem for Phase 2. The five workshops attended by participants were Workshop 1: LiteratureReview and Organization; Workshop 2: Research Ethics - Focusing on publication andauthorship; Workshop 3: Curriculum and Research: Developing an Educational ResearchQuestion; Workshop 4: Mixed Methods Research Methodologies with Emphasis on Qualitative;and Workshop
Program helping develop and implement curricular changes to embed engineering design, ethics, and technical communication throughout the BME curriculum. Prior to joining the faculty at IUPUI, Dr. Miller’s P-20 educational efforts included curriculum writing and program development for the John C. Dunham STEM Partnership School and Michael J. Birck Center for Innovation. Since joining IUPUI, Dr. Miller has been awarded internal and external grant funding to realize BME curricular changes and to pursue engineering education research of BME student self-efficacy toward design.Steven Higbee (Clinical Assistant Professor) Clinical Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
results of the vote and the qualitative results obtained from a review of thediscussion. The synthesized data was then reviewed with attendees from all SME teams to gainconsensus.Note also that in addition to voting on and discussing content-specific KSA+Ts, the employerSMEs at each meeting, whether in person or remote, voted on and discussed 12 keyemployability skills for each job cluster, which included topics like teamwork, ethics, and criticalthinking.The final step for each job cluster involved developing two supplemental resources. The ITSSteam first drafted Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for the prioritized Tasks, which wereultimately verified by the SMEs. And finally, educators who attended the SME meetings createdStudent Learning
complexity in professional practice through systems or network thinking [53] Professional Practice Learning 4 Ethics Classroom pedagogical approaches to teaching ethical leadership and reasoning skills [54] 5 Student Perceptions of EL Assessing leadership development through understanding the perception of students [55] Development 8 Advancing Women Recruiting, retaining, and advancing women within the engineering industry and education field to increase the number of women in engineering, particularly within renewable energy- Persistence
policy, and parking permits, as well. Orientation alsoincluded seminars on Research Methodology and Ethics, and Safety Training. Four facultymentors introduced their specific research projects. At the end of the orientation, four cohortswere formed, and each cohort had two teachers. Teachers from different STEM areas wereassigned into cohorts with the relevant focus.Preparatory Learning ModuleA four-day preparatory learning module was implemented for four cohorts following theorientation, which was led by faculty mentors and GAs. The preparatory learning moduleprovided the participants opportunities to learn the necessary skills that are needed to conductauthentic research in the summer research program. The learning was embedded in thediscovery
from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. Her current engineering education research interests include engineering students’ understanding of ethics and social responsibility, sociotechnical education, and assessment of engineering pedagogies.Jon A. Leydens (Professor) Dr. Jon A. Leydens is a Professor of Engineering Education Research in the Division of Humanities, Arts, & Social Sciences at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Leydens’ research interests are focused on three areas of engineering education: social justice, sustainable community development, and communication.Jenifer Blacklock (Director of the Western Colorado University PartnershipProgram) Dr
courses in circuits, biomechanics, biomaterials, bioinstrumentation, and nanotechnology. She is interested in educational environments and student learning; and social and ethical issues in STEM research and teaching. Her work includes creating opportunities for students to globalize their engineering degrees and mentoring students in teaching. In addition, Dr. Kim has mentored numerous student entrepreneurial teams to success. For more information, visit her website at: https://faculty.eng.ufl.edu/gloria-kim/Yong Kyu Yoon Yong-Kyu Yoon received his BS and MS degrees in Electrical Engineering from Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea in 1992 and 1994, respectively. He received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer
III Full Academic Term Full Academic TermCo-op RequirementsPrior to registering for a co-op, students are required to complete a one-credit-hour course onengineer career training during the spring semester of their sophomore year. The learningobjectives of the course cover topics on communication, professionalism, and ethics. Studentsalso create resumes and cover letters, participate in mock interviews, and network with industryleaders from the various disciplines in civil engineering. While on co-op, students are assigned afaculty advisor who visits the student and the student’s co-op supervisor sometime during themiddle of the co-op duration. The faculty advisor meets with the student and supervisor todiscuss the
Florida International University. He also holds Master of Public Administration and Graduate Certifi- cate in Homeland Security and Emergency Management from FIU, Master of Science in Civil Engi- neering/Construction Engineering and Management from IAU, and Bachelor of Science in Civil Engi- neering/Surveying from University of Tehran. Dr. Batouli is a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in SC. He also holds Project Management Professional (PMP) international certificate. Dr. Batouli teaches diverse range of courses in civil engineering, construction engineering, and construction/project manage- ment. As a teacher, he aims to inspire his students to think intensively and critically and to live ethically and morally
- lation, and engineering topics covered on the FE exam. • ABET Criteria: An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engi- neering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of en- gineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. o Case Method: students need to describe the economic, environmental, and societal context of a case. • ABET Criteria: An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. o Case-based Method: Case study reports require effective written/verbal communi- cation.Research Next StepsAs this research continues, quantitative and qualitative data will be collected from
peer mentoring relationships?Researcher PositionalityWithin this study, the first author was able to research a student population that she had been apart of for many years. She had completed undergraduate and graduate degrees at the institutionwithin the College of Engineering being studied. She brought personal experience to the study,both inside and outside of the classroom with both in-person and online courses, whichpositioned her as an insider since she was familiar with the organization and potential demandsin that realm [41]–[43]. She was mindful of her positionality throughout the study to providecritical and beneficial yet ethical research findings. The secondary author provided ampleexperience in the scholarship of mentoring and has
currently works as a learning experience designer at a design thinking consultancy and explores the intersection of AR and education in her spare time.Julian Goni Iñaki Goñi is a psychologist specialized in interdisciplinary research. As a lecturer and researcher at the Engineering Design Initiative, Universidad Católica de Chile (DILAB UC), he researches the intersection between engineering design, social research and responsible innovation.Constanza Miranda (Faculty) Constanza is a multidisciplinary academic interested in the intersection between the creativity of design, the ethics of cultural anthropology and the tech aspects of engineering. Before Johns Hopkins, she was an assistant professor at PUC Chile's
, economic, environmental and ethical issues facing the development of nanomanufacturing and other emerging technologies. Her 1998 NSF Career Award is one of the first that focused on environ- mentally benign manufacturing. She also guides research on development and assessment of educational computer games where students explore environmentally benign processes and supply chains in manufac- turing. She has been recognized by Northeastern University, receiving a University-wide Excellence in Teaching Award in 2000, the President’s Aspiration Award in 2005, and a College of Engineering Excel- lence in Mentoring Award in 2015. An ELATE Fellow, Dr. Isaacs has served in numerous administrative leadership roles at Northeastern
evidence-based teaching practices. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student miscoDr. Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon Jenefer Husman, Professor in the Education Studies department at the University of Oregon. Her research focuses on students’ motivation for learning in engineering contexts
HurricaneKatrina. Two readings covered: 1) the culmination of many decisions that led to segregation andinequity in New Orleans, and 2) the engineering failures of the levy system which lefthistorically black neighborhoods at risk. Class discussion began by acknowledging the sensitivityof these topics. The discussion focused on the convergence of the articles. This topic relates topower imbalances in both political institutions and engineering decision-making.Third, we asked students to select a scenario either local to the community the university is in ortheir hometowns that centered on public health, environmental, or ethical concerns related toinfrastructure or industry. Scenarios selected included historical sites, such as the Love Canal, tomodern
naturaldisasters and the impacts of agriculture on water resources. The series of seminars - thesociological perspective, research methodology and engineering research and ethics inengineering, and technical workshops on remote sensing guided students how to prepare scientificproject and posters. Three posters were presented at the 62nd Annual Geomatics EngineeringConference at California State University at Fresno focused on the Creek Fire, Flooding in ValleyCommunities, and Decrease of Farmland in the Central Valley.Spring 2022 were designed to expend value in understanding the world we live in, and share withothers, from many different perspectives so that cultural norms, as well as cultural bias, can bebetter understood. To make a connection to
combination with a pair of engineering scenarios in both the pre-SET and post-SETinterviews. Pre-SET means prior to taking a class that involved SET training and post-SETmeans after taking a class that involved SET training. It is possible students may haveexperienced SET or other non-SET socially engaged content prior to or during the semester butwe did not collect that information.The SET content covered in the capstone course consisted of self-directed online modules thatcovered the following content: a variety of design processes, problem definition, conceptexploration, identity and power in engineering design, environmental context assessment, socialcontext assessment, and ethical decision making. Each of these online modules consisted of
, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation and promoting servingness in engineering, biomedicine, and computing, particularly at land-grant and Hispanic Serving Institutions. Subbian’s ed- ucational research is focused on asset-based practices, ethics education, and formation of professional identities.Ann Shivers-McNairFrancesa Lopez ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Inclusive, asset-based instructional strategies in engineering design: empowering faculty with professional
CO-OP III Full Academic Term Full Academic Term *Summer Co-op (2020) was cancelled for the Class of 2022 studentsCo-op RequirementsPrior to registering for a co-op, students are required to complete a one-credit-hour course onengineer career training during the spring semester of their sophomore year. The learningobjectives of the course cover topics on communication, professionalism, and ethics. Studentsalso create resumes and cover letters, participate in mock interviews, and network with industryleaders from the various disciplines in civil engineering. While on co-op, students are assigned afaculty advisor who visits the student and the student’s co-op supervisor sometime during themiddle of the co-op
Industrial AdvisoryBoard, faculty, and industry representatives, in the projects.IntroductionA capstone design course is a major part of an engineering program. Students in the last year oftheir bachelor studies perform a team-based design project to show their ability to apply theknowledge obtained earlier to an engineering problem. This is important as students will facesimilar projects when they start working in the industry after graduation. In capstone experience,students are required to use engineering codes and standards and consider other constraints,including economic, environmental, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, sustainability,and social and political thoughts in a problem. According to ABET, the capstone course is
acceptable. Specifically, the emphasis is that Cornerstone is a lens by whichengineering learning can come together to develop practical applications to solving problems.The Cornerstone 1 course focuses on learning the principles of engineering and design; this isaccomplished through active learning in areas such as problem definition, conceptual design,preliminary and detailed design, design communication and implementation, engineering ethics,along with report writing and presentations in relation to projects that students produce in teams.There is a strong emphasis on applying technical knowledge, developing problem-solving anddecision-making skills, and using computer-aided design (CAD) to communicate graphically.Within this course, algorithmic
series ofquestions asking if they feel that they would do better, same, worse, or are undecided withregards to grade (Q5) and achieving the following individual ABET learning outcomes [37] dueto the current emergency online learning environment compared to a traditional in-person class: Q6.Gain an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems; Q7.Gain an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors; Q8.Gain an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences; Q9.Gain an ability to recognize ethical and
onelectrophysiological and required using MATLAB software to preprocess biosignals and assessphysiological reactions to different scenarios. This study was approved by the University ofToronto Research Ethics Board (Protocol #40392). The ‘asynchronous’ lab focused on skeletal muscle physiology, reflex arcs, and EMG signals.Students independently completed the virtual simulation “Skeletal Muscle: Learn About theMuscles We Use to Walk and Run” (Labster; runtime 48 minutes) and subsequently usedMATLAB to process previously recorded EMG signals [7] and complete a series of questions. Thegoal of data analysis was to use a peak detecting function in MATLAB to calculate the temporaldistance between the stimulus and the muscle contraction reflex to understand
concepts throughout the course the civil engineering course because then you would be and further layering social taught the principles of social justice as they apply to What would justice within different courses what we’re learning in class.” make learning ● Providing more opportunities for about social students to have conversations “If open discussions were promoted more.” justice in the on engineering social justice classroom easier for “If there was a sort of standard of ethics in the you? ● Making safe, intentional spaces
electrical circuits using appropriate CAD tools. Thegeneral criteria for basic level programs includes; students; program educationalobjectives; program outcome and assessments; professional component; faculty;facilities; institutional support; and program criteria [1]. In this paper we address theprofessional component in the electrical engineering program.The professional component requires that the engineering graduate should be exposedand involved in a major and practical engineering accomplishment to facilitate his/hertransition to practice in a real world engineering projects. The major design experienceshould utilize engineering standards and various constraints. These constraints include:economic, environmental, manufacturability, ethical
and analysis • Collect, analyze, and present data in an appropriate manner • Begin to develop professional habits necessary for success as a practicing engineer, including engineering ethics and written and oral communication.Also, before and after the project, we surveyed to measure improvement in students' understandingand confidence in their knowledge.MethodsThis project was given to students after they learned chapter 5 (The second law of thermodynamics)to ensure that relevant topics were covered in class. The project included basic information withhands-on experimental activities with the stirling engine. The stirling engine is an externalcombustion engine that operates on the principles of a thermodynamic power cycle where
to improve the 2 5 4.33 0.94 0.89 current practices. I am prepared to work effectively as a member of a 2 5 4.53 0.81 0.65 team. I am able to communicate effectively including the 2 5 4.27 0.93 0.86 preparation and presentation of written and oral technical reports. I understand the importance of professional, ethical, 3 5 4.6 0.61 0.37 and social responsibilities. I have respect for diversity and knowledge of 3 5 4.6 0.61 0.37 contemporary professional