various stages of their careers, and found thatwhen URMs leave the engineering field for a non-engineering career, they not only face less biasand discrimination, but also feel as if they are more positively impacting the world. We suggestsome methods for retaining URMs in engineering by leveraging interdisciplinary studies to offerbetter identity coherence by incorporating complex, impactful problem solving into their fields.All participants, especially URMs, expressed interest in the following methods of introducinginterdisciplinary aspects to engineering: (1) promoting interdisciplinary internships andintracollegiate research, (2) a revised first-year curriculum to introduce meaningfulinterdisciplinary-based projects, and (3) facilitation of
Engineering Education, 2023 Putting Individual Learning Responsibility Back into the Team Experience – An Application of the Design ExperienceIntroductionFor years engineering programs have focused on the importance of students participating in teamexperiences within subject and capstone classes. This team experience need was emphasized byABET in its Criteria 3 – Student Outcomes, specifically outcome d (for years 2000 to 2019) andoutcome 5 (for years 2019 to present) and emphatically adopted by most engineering programs[1] [2].The need for teamwork is also emphasized by industry. Industry, especially those associated withthe development of new or improved products, benefit from interdisciplinary teams which canrepresent various
assess, given the current post-pandemicconditions, whether those motivational factors are in place. The study was approached from aninsider, scholar-practitioner standpoint with the hope that the results of this survey would be usedto inform campus administrators in real-time and positively impact working conditions. Theapproach loosely aligns with an action research paradigm [1], but it is recognized that this projectcurrently does not represent a fully developed action research project. Thus, the study isdescriptive and exploratory in nature. It is also important to note that this study is cross-sectionaland does not include pre-pandemic data. Thus, it is impossible to empirically determine a causalrelationship between pandemic related issues
engineering students to work effectively in teams, writing that“because of the increasing complexity and scale of systems-based engineering problems, there isa growing need to pursue collaborations with multidisciplinary teams of experts across multiplefields” [1, pp. 34–35]. ABET has similarly dedicated one of its seven student outcomes toteamwork, wording it as: “An ability to function effectively on a team whose members togetherprovide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks,and meet objectives” [2]. Research studies have also repeatedly underlined the importance ofdeveloping engineering students’ abilities to work in teams to meet industry needs [3], [4].As a result, there has been an increased
method for determining the torque-speed curve of a wound-rotorinduction machine. Historically, induction machines have primarily been motors. As such, thecurrent method for determining a torque-speed curve uses the squirrel-cage induction machine asa motor to drive a DC generator acting as a load as illustrated in Figure 1. Conventional testingof the machine is performed in this fashion and has long been documented in IEEE Standards.[1]When a wound rotor induction machine is configured with two voltage sources, its applicationmay be as a Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG). This is how we have configured a woundrotor machine as part of a Type III wind turbine simulation test bed as illustrated in Figure 2.The wound rotor machine is connected
analysis of the questionnaire results. The application of the questionnairesurvey has explained the effect of questionnaire design to a large extent but alsoreflected some limitations. Finally, combined with the questionnaire survey andinterviews, the paper also suggests the possibility of further improvement of thecomprehensive questionnaire.Keywords: Evaluate Engineering Ethics Courses, Comprehensive Questionnaire,Develop the Questionnaire, Apply the Questionnaire, Improve the QuestionnaireIntroductionDifferent countries, colleges, universities, and even majors provide students withdifferent kinds of engineering ethics courses. Some scholars [1] point out thatengineering ethics cannot be isolated in a single curriculum, but must be
University of Michigan in 1985 and her M.S. in 1988 and Ph.D. in 1991 in chemical engineering both from Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Karen’s educational research emphasis includes faculty development and mentoring, graduate student development, critical thinking and communication skills, enhancing mathematical student success in Calculus (including Impact of COVID-19), and promoting women in STEM. Her technical research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, and multicriteria decision making. She also has extensive experience in K-12 STEM education and program evaluation and assessment. She has held a variety of administrative positions: 1) Director of STEM Faculty Development
within a very short timeframe –it is a task well suited to potentially being automated.Addressing the challenge of such labour-intensive marking has received much attention inrecent years with the significant advances in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) andMachine Learning (ML) [1]. In particular, Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniquesare being developed to exploit textual information for a variety of interesting linguisticapplications such as spam email filtering and sentiment analysis [2, 3]. Automated essayassessment model belongs to a class of NLP problems where the main task of the model is tolearn features and relationships between classes of human-marked sample essays and producetheir scores without further intervention of
;Gradescope where students submitted most written work, and where TAs graded all quizzes andexams; WeBWorK 1 , an online platform for automatically grading a large variety of mathproblems, for weekly practice problems and a limited number of “checkpoints” (described morefully below). This paper’s author was the main architect of the grading scheme overhaul.Unfortunately, at the beginning of the semester the second instructor fell ill and was replacedseveral weeks into the semester. The substitute instructor had not been planning to teach a largecourse that term, and as such focused mainly on lectures and writing exam problems, but was notavailable for much additional help.Students in the course attend 50-minute lectures three times a week, and a 50
challengesbrought about by the paradigm shift toward advanced manufacturing. The literature in Chineseindicates that engineering education researchers in China have noted the importance of resiliencein the training of engineers. Nonetheless, the literature in Chinese has not examined the processthrough which young engineers develop resilience at work. This study investigates the process ofresilience development.3. Method3.1 SamplingWe used homogeneous sampling method, which is a purposive sampling technique that aims torecruit research samples similar in characteristics relevant for the study. Based on Kovalchuk’(2017) study and the actual working situation of Chinese engineers, we created three inclusioncriteria for participant recruitment: (1) the
research assistants are partaking in all portions of the work which includes theintegration of the structural system from Revit to the Unity platform into a 3D model; definitionof materials, textures, and light sources; and development of the user navigation system. Studentassessment is conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the project approach to see how they wereable to successfully apply the concepts of human technology interaction in the engineeringapplication of virtual reality technology. Based on this assessment, future work will endeavor to:1) perform user studies with civil engineering professionals and students to evaluate the usabilityof the underlying environment as well as its effects on cognitive load on users’ memory, and 2)develop
) Knowledge Units (KUs) were used as thebasis for the course curriculum. The course was divided into three parts: (1) Introduction toCyber Risk Management and the Maritime Transportation System, (2) Building a Cyber SecurityPlan, and (3) a final team-based project to apply what has been learned to the annual StudentPoster Competition of the Maritime Risk Symposium [1] (see the syllabi provided in Appendix Iand II for additional information on the course schedule).Course Content and DevelopmentThe Cyber Risk Management course at the United States Coast Guard Academy has twoprerequisites: Fundamentals of Information Security (7218) and Systems Analysis and Design(8453). These course descriptions are provided in Appendix III. These courses provide
group setting. We also found acorrelation between social connectedness within a department and the competitiveness of thedepartment. These findings can be used to inform instructor’s pedagogical approaches andprovide additional support for the benefits of collaborative learning.IntroductionCollaborative learning has become a popular teaching tool for instructors who wish to increasestudent interaction and student academic outcomes. Put simply, collaborative learning “promotesthe building of peer relationships, fosters peer interactions and by involving students in differentdiscussions, it enables them to understand different perspectives, and to give and receivefeedback” [1]. Collaborative learning has been shown to help develop students
fourthmodules. At the end of the course, students were asked to complete an anonymousQualtrics survey, developed based on previous surveys that evaluated in-person versusvirtual presentation formats[1, 2], to identify the positives and negatives associated withpre-recorded presentation on both the presenter and the audience member. Nine students,eight graduate students, and one undergraduate student completed the survey. Allstudents had prior experience with in-person presentations, but only two students hadprevious experience with pre-recorded presentations. Students rated how deliveringpresentations in each presentation style impacted a variety of learning outcomes, such asability to be innovative and take risks, improving teamwork skills, and
. Accordingly, we are trying to answer the following: How does the faculty's effective communication affect students' motivation in engineering capstone design projects?I. FRAMEWORK The Assessment Scale for Communication Skills measures 6 Communication Skills Dimensions (Respect, Expression, Value, Impediment, Motivation, and Democratic Attitude). However, we were interested in the four dimensions: 1) Express dimension, which asks if professors can effectively express themselves through examples, proposing solutions, eye contact, and voice tone. 2) Value dimension asks if professors value students' thoughts and opinions. 3) Democratic Attitude dimension asks if professors create a friendly atmosphere that allows students to ask questions and freely
trevion.henderson@tufts.eduAbstractExisting research suggests introductory computer programming courses (i.e., CS1) constitute a significantbarrier for students’ entry into computer science and related disciplines. For example, extant literaturesuggests as high as 33% of students fail or drop out of introductory computer programming courses [1],precluding these students from pursuing computer science education in college. The purpose of thiswork in progress is twofold. First, we describe the development and implementation of a pedagogicalapproach to computing education that draws and expands on the Use-Modify-Create (UMC) framework[2, 3] to support students’ learning in introductory computer programming courses. Second, drawingon unique qualitative data
called out how theapp provided feedback. They specifically mentioned the positive experiences of receivingfeedback that is immediate, that explains boundary connections, and that deepens learning aftermistakes are made. These and other findings from the pilot study are discussed withcorresponding next steps for development.IntroductionNo skill is more important for a student of mechanics than the ability to draw a complete andaccurate free-body diagram (FBD). FBDs are foundational to all mechanics courses in civil,mechanical, and biomedical engineering programs. Together, these courses enroll a significantportion of the over 600,000 students who enter engineering programs in the United States eachyear [1]. Thus, educational approaches that
times of sample groups of students from a Construction Engineering program at aprivate Chilean university. Degree progression and graduation time results of the followinggroups are compared: 1) students who pass the intensive summer remedial courses, 2)students who do not take or who fail the intensive summer remedial courses, and 3) studentswho pass the related courses during regular semesters. The results show that graduation timesare positively impacted when students have passed intensive remedial courses. However, nostatistically significant differences are observed between groups in the degree progressionindicator, even though the average progression of students who passed intensive courses is9% higher than those who did not enroll in or
project, students completed nine laboratory sessionsaimed at consolidating their grasp of fundamental electrical circuits (DC and AC) concepts. Eachlab involved the design, construction, or measurement of a circuit that exemplified a specificECE circuit concept. Lab 1 provided a foundation in using the benchtop multimeter and powersupply, while Lab 2 delved into the principles of Ohm’s law, Kirchhoff’s current and voltagelaws, and nodal analysis. Lab 3 focused on diode fundamentals and the design of a simpledigital-to-analog converter. Lab 4 further explored diode behavior and introduced the desktoposcilloscope and function generator. In Lab 5, students employed Thevenin and Nortonequivalent techniques to analyze and simplify complex circuits
tofreshman engineering courses.1. IntroductionFirst-year engineering courses can be difficult to design — they need to be effective atconveying crucial concepts, enjoyable to keep students engaged and interested, and useful to theextent that they provide students with knowledge and skills, offering more opportunities for themin the future. Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) offers an Engineering Fundamentalscourse (ENGR-1100) which has been historically mathematics-focused. This is the firstengineering-related course students experience at MTSU, and students faced difficultmathematics lectures that ultimately drove numerous students away from the discipline.According to MTSU's course catalog, the Engineering Fundamentals course is described
. Engineeringeducation, especially in higher education, creates similar big data for both faculty and studentsrelated to learning experiences. From clicks to page and video view times, points can be awardedfor engagement or left as an opportunity for student self-evaluation. The digital platform ofinterest here is the interactive textbook with integrated online homework. While these tools aremore common in math and introductory science courses, interactive textbooks for engineeringcourses are becoming more widely available [1-5].Historically, engineering textbooks have been the antithesis of active learning with static text thatis updated about once per decade. However, interactive textbooks put onus on students tocomplete participation clicks, view animations
teachingassistants) who have the knowledge and tools to proactively provide students with support basedon deep understanding of how factors inside and outside the classroom influence learning. Suchinstructional teams can more effectively improve the learning experience and student outcomeslike persistence. We also envision students with attitudes and habits that help them learneffectively and use supporting resources to overcome any challenges they encounter. To achievethese goals, AAP includes three components at various stages of development, implementation,and assessment: 1) the Engineer Your Success Course for undergraduates, 2) Student SupportPlanning Checklist and community of practice for instructional teams, and 3) content on effectivelearning
incorporated into this program were the ability to examine local,global, and intercultural issues, understand and appreciate different perspectives and worldviews, interactsuccessfully and respectfully with others, and take responsible action toward sustainability and collectivewell-being.[1] Global competencies can be developed through international short-term study abroadprograms designed to offer experiential learning opportunities that students may not get in a traditionalclassroom setting.[2],[3] This program was designed to offer learning opportunities for the students on globalcompetencies through engineering curriculum, culture classes, and tours of various energy infrastructurefacilities around the country which helped the students
Tribe. My neighbors were lovely, and we even had a biggarden to grow our own produce. I consider Kenya my second home now.In Chimamanda Adichie’s TED talk [1], she discusses the dangers of a single, and one-dimensional, story. This concept helped me reflect on the ways my travels opened more complexstories about the places I traveled to. There were simple stories that influenced my ideas of theUnited States and Kenya before I traveled and experienced them personally. Now those storieshave been replaced by more holistic and complex stories through lived experience.When I started a Ph.D. in engineering and computing education in 2021, and started reading theliterature, I saw different stories being told about women in computing. Some scholars
seven current ABETStudent Outcomes (SOs), it is envisioned that, with the appropriate performance indices, the coursewill contribute to satisfying SO (1): Identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems,SO (5): Ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership,create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives,and SO (7): Ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learningstrategies. Student reporting requirements and the necessary rubrics are incorporated to enable theassessment of the various performance indices for the ABET SO’s.IntroductionTraditionally, undergraduate computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer
, assessments should consistently beconsidered while discussing pedagogical improvements. To contribute to faculty developmentresearch, our study illuminates several metaphors engineering faculty use to discuss assessmentconcepts and knowledge. This paper helps to answer the research question: which metaphors dofaculty use when talking about assessment in their classrooms? Through interviews grounded inmental model theory, six metaphors emerged: (1) cooking, (2) playing golf, (3) driving a car, (4)coaching football, (5) blood tests, (6) and generically playing a sport or an instrument. Twoimportant takeaways stemmed from the analysis. First, these metaphors were experiencescommonly portrayed in the culture in which the study took place. This is
up. Nothing is ablack box; most of the circuitry is exposed on the breadboard and the chip datasheets generallyshow the internal workings down to individual gates if not individual transistors. Every logicsignal can be probed, gate delay can be tested, and power consumption measured.Given that our course emphasizes building complex logic from scratch, discrete logic chipsprovide excellent emphasis on fundamentals. However, it has been decades since digital logicsystems were actually built like this. While design with discrete logic chips may still bepedagogically useful, it no longer represents professional practice.A second approach is to use graphical simulators, such as CedarLogic [1] and LogiSim Evolution[2]. Because these tools allow
discussion,future improvements to the projects will be covered along with concluding remarks.BackgroundThe idea of implementing programming projects in engineering courses is not novel. In recentyears the number of projects involving the use of programming software such has MATLAB hasrapidly grown. This growth in the mechanical engineering field has occurred for two reasons: 1)it helps provide students with more exposure to programing which is desired skill in industry and2) allows instructors to assign problems that would otherwise be cumbersome to solve by hand.When designing an engineering curriculum, it is important to consider problems and projects toincorporate concepts from Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Project-Based Learning (PjBL).PBL
universitiesthat are a) known for being military-friendly schools and/or b) located in military-friendlycommunities, often in close proximity to U.S. military installations, that offer substantial socialsupport for veterans and servicemembers outside of school [1]. Little research exists thatexamines military student experiences in other contexts, such as 2- and 4- year public collegesand universities that may have limited supports (and support dollars) for military students, and/orare not located in or near military-friendly communities. Despite this dearth of research, there isboth a need and desire to increase awareness and support for military students at theseinstitutions.LiteratureResearch with military students who are engaged in undergraduate