a confusion matrix. The confusion matrix is a 2x2matrix with column headings scoring student oral reasoning and row headings scoring questionoutcome. These results are expected to illuminate the influence of luck versus true understandingduring the exam.Introduction Concept inventories have been around for many years now. As their title suggests, they testone’s understanding of concepts, and require no calculations. They can be considered as a way tounderstand a person’s thinking process. Concept inventories have been developed for Physics, [1],Statics [2], [3], Dynamics [4] , Strength of Materials [5], Heat Transfer [6] and many other statistics,engineering and/or physics topics [7]. Faculty often say that we want students
deposittheir research data into a repository at the time of publication to fulfill funding obligations. Thispaper describes the survey results conducted at a U15 research institution in Canada askingengineering faculty about their research data sharing practices and preferences. The purpose ofthe survey was to answer the following questions: 1. How well prepared are engineeringresearchers for data deposit, 2. Are engineering researchers willing to share their data, and 3.What barriers exist for sharing engineering data? Results demonstrate knowledge of andacceptance of open access (OA) practices but when it comes to data, engineering researchers aremore reluctant and less prepared to share their data widely and may need guidance on RDM bestpractices
systems, where the signals analyzed are mostly periodic and predictable. This might limit thevital connections that students could make between theory and application to the real world [1-2]. The focus of signals and systems for Biomedical Engineering (BME) is on modeling andanalysis of physiological signals, which are typically not periodic and are not alwayspredictable. This presents a unique educational opportunity in that BME students get to workwith their own physiological signals. In this way, they can relate the concepts and models tohow their own bodies operate as they analyze their blood pressure, heart rhythms (ECG), pulseoximetry (PPG), muscle stimulation (EMG), brain activation (EEG), and other relevant signals.MotivationSignals and
developed and implemented culturally informed library services, expanded its personnel four-fold, and re-established its physical locations as culturally safe spaces for Indigenous library users. Alex co-authored ASU Li- brary’s first land acknowledgement statement, is the recipient of the Society of American Archivists 2022 Archival Innovator Award, and recently was awarded a $1 million grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation for ”Firekeepers: Building Archival Data Sovereignty through Indigenous Memory Keeping,” a three-year project to preserve Indigenous knowledge through community-based participatory archival partnerships with Arizona’s Tribal communities. Alex’s journey to librarianship comes after years of
these alternate spaces can increasestudent involvement and interest in the instructional content.It was demonstrated that pedagogies of self-generated stories and informal peer assessmentsprovide a unique opportunity for students to creatively make connections to academic content[1]. When aligned with instructional goals, student-created stories capture their attention andemotional interests while providing instructors a concrete and memorable insight into theirstudents’ learning [2, 3]. Stories also facilitate student learning through engagement, higher orderthinking, and elaboration [4, 5]. Besides using the stories to promote technological literacy [6],stories help students make meaning of their own experiences, building self-awareness
programs in the 1990s and early 2000s [1],[2],[3],[4]. In 2005,the results of a survey of first-year programs showed that over 70% of the response had sometype of freshman dedicated course either in their department or by the college. Over half of theresponses had a FYE program for all students entering the college of engineering [1]. Part of thiswas attributed to a resurgence of emphasizing engineering design. Froyd et al. in 2012 [2]discussed five major shifts in engineering education. The first shift was switching from practicalengineering to more theoretical and analytical, which occurred in response to World War II. Inthe 1990s, engineering education started switching back to an emphasis on engineering designwhich still holds true today.A
themselves to shaping the evaluationculture based on the participation of multiple stakeholders and forming a joint forcefor quality assurance in engineering education, which provides importantenlightenment for the quality assurance in engineering education in other countries.1. IntroductionAs a type of talents cultivation, engineering education belongs to professionaleducation, yet bears the general characteristics of higher education. However, thestakeholders involved in talents cultivation must be complex as the talents it cultivatesare special. With the in-depth evolution of ABET, the stakeholders of the qualityassurance in engineering education have increasingly become diversified. Whichpower subjects do the stakeholders represent? Which
and deliverables of the project are clearlystated in advance to keep students informed. The objective of this project is to incorporateIndustry 4.0 skills and knowledge to the students in addition to learn the methods to stay currentin industry. The project deliverables are (1) students will present their work to the rest of theclass, and (2) submit a reflective paper on their experience. This paper will discuss the setup ofresearch problems, survey results of the student experience before and after working on theproject, and summary of findings on the student experience from the reflective papers. Reflectivepapers serve as a tool both to summarize the student experience and for continuous improvementin the context of this project and future
Engineering from Duke University in 1996 and 1998, respec- tively. She is currently an Associate Professor of the Practice in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Duke University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Evaluation of 360 Coaching to Support Whole-Student Advising in the First-YearIntroductionThis Work in Progress paper will describe an initial evaluation of a first-year advising programfirst implemented in academic year 2021-22 in the engineering school at a medium-sized private(Research I) university – 360 Coaching [1]. The goal of 360 Coaching is to provide whole-student support for our first-year students through
Education, 2023 Resources and Exercises for STEM Educators and Students Navigating the “Misinformation Age”Teaching students how to research a topic and navigate source usage is an important part ofpreparing future professionals in any discipline. In STEM/STEAM fields, both professionals andstudents must keep up with the fast pace of innovation, making information literacy essential toprofessional growth. Source evaluation instruction in students’ disciplines can help studentsidentify the information sources most applicable to their research. Moreover, reading credible,current publications helps students learn the discourse of their discipline [1]. However, thecomplex range of sources and ways of searching available to
installations. The use of the term became more widespread followingadoption in the 1960s by NASA managers when used to refer to small teams of experts taskedwith solving difficult and pernicious issues; ‘tiger team’ in NASA was defined as: "a team ofundomesticated and uninhibited technical specialists, selected for their experience, energy, andimagination, and assigned to track down relentlessly every possible source of failure in aspacecraft subsystem or simulation" [1]. For example a tiger team was formed during the Apollo13 emergency to get the astronauts of the damaged module back to earth. As with the originalusage, tiger teams are still used for security assessments by testing an organization's defensesagainst spying, industrial espionage, or its
design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Response Process Validity of the CBE Adaptability Instrument When Used With Engineering InstructorsI. IntroductionThere have been several calls of action to change undergraduate engineering education with onefocus being on the adoption of research-based instructional practices [1]. Adoption of research-based instructional practices have been shown to contribute to attracting and retainingundergraduate STEM students [2]. This is particularly important given that more than
focus of the project has been enhancingthe courses taken by students early in the engineering curricula [2, 6]. This has included theintegration of significant design experiences into early curricular courses [1, 3, 7, 8]. Early in theproject, the freshmen introductory engineering courses taught within three departments:Chemical and Natural Gas Engineering (CNEN), Electrical Engineering and Computer Science(EECS), and Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (MIEN) were modified to include asignificant, collaborative, hands-on engineering design project [4, 5]. More recently theintroductory engineering course for the Civil and Architectural Engineering (CAEN) departmenthas also been updated to include a collaborative design project.The most recent
major search engines, Ethics: techniques for incorporating ethics in computer curriculum specifically in data science curriculum Programs/curricula: evaluating Data Science programs in the US and China and Retention: evaluating minority female retention in computer related degree programs. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Retention of Female Minority Students in Bachelor STEM Degree Programs: An Exploratory Study of Five Cohorts1.0 Introduction Female minority students are underrepresented in academic based undergraduate science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) degree programs [1]. This group of studentswhich is comprised of American Indian or
teaching.Theoretical FrameworkA reflective teaching framework guided the framing of this article. In this adopted reflectiveframework, the instructor “focuses on themselves, their beliefs, and personalities, and how theseinform their classroom practices.” [1, p. 3]. In addition to this, the evocative theoretical approachto autoethnography in which the author carries out a systematic self-introspection and recall oftheir personal story is adopted in this study[2], [3]. Auto-ethnographers recall their livedexperience to understand and relate them [3].When writing this article, the first author reflected on her classroom experiences of whatpedagogical strategies have worked in the classroom. To further explore the first author's livedteaching experience, a team
’ response to the micromoments. All the participants suggested and encouraged futureprofessional development sessions related to these implementations. This paper provides moredetailed recommendations for future EML micromoment learning activities for faculty membersand potential FLC groups with limited funding [The authors prefer a lightning talk for this work-in-progress paper].1. IntroductionEntrepreneurially minded learning (EML), supported by the Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork (KEEN), promotes curiosity, connections, and creating value strategies, known as the3C’s. Several resources and implementation activities are easily accessible through theEngineering Unleashed platform for faculty members in the form of “cards”[1]. The
based on desired university characteristics. Once the university is selected,students are challenged with the task of making themselves an attractive candidate for theuniversity’s program. Many different factors are involved in this process, and this study shedslight on how time spent in industry can affect these factors.Background and Literature ReviewDecision ProcessMany studies have been conducted pertaining to the factors which influence students to attendgraduate school as well as which specific program they will choose. Several of these papersfocus on the perspective of undergraduate students and how their experiences may influencetheir decision to enroll in the future [1] [2]. Other literature focuses on differences in the decisionmaking
increase engagement in science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM). Recent studies have made significant advances in unveiling LGBTQ+ inequities andmarginalization in STEM, such as disparate retention rates in STEM educational programs [1] andprofessional devaluation [2]. These emerging studies suggest that the LGBTQ+ community ismarginalized and that the LGBTQ+ community should be included in efforts to broaden participation inSTEM.Suitably, the number of grants awarded to study and support the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender,and queer (LGBTQ+) community in STEM fields has grown over the past few decades. For example, in2020, the NSF awarded the first-ever CAREER grant that explicitly included the acronym “LGBTQ” in theproposal title
provides a good base for expansion or adaptation as are described in the followingselected works. Figure 1: Smart Cell PCBs. Cell Connection on Left. Output on Right [1]“Completely Decentralized Active Balancing Battery Management System”, examines some ofthe drawbacks associated with centralized battery management systems and the strengths ofindividual cell monitoring [1]. The battery packs used in current all-electric vehicles are typicallyretired when the nominal capacity of the pack is reduced to around 70-80 percent of its value.Switched capacitor topologies are usually used in an active balancing system and are only ableto cope with minor differences in cell capacities. If cells have degraded enough, the currentmarket battery
)IntroductionLabor market indicators predict continued growth of well-paid employment in science andengineering[1], but evidence suggests lower readiness among rural students for jobs in these fields.Rural students are now graduating at rates comparable to their urban and suburban peers, butcontinue to fall behind in pursuing postsecondary education, including in engineering[2]. Multiplestudies indicate that these differences begin long before individuals enter the workforce and arebased in large part on the students’ sense of belonging in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM)[3-4]. Evidence points to the positive role that an equitable learningenvironment (ELE) can play in secondary classrooms to ensure that all students, particularly
method of assessment of problem-solving skills that may beextended to assist with the process of assessment planning and quantification for accreditation ofundergraduate degree programs in engineering. Accreditation of undergraduate degree programsin engineering, such as by ABET, currently requires programs to demonstrate students’ ability to“identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles ofengineering, science, and mathematics”[1]. Traditional assessment data can lack reliablegranularity [2] to measure problem-solving skills. Reliable granularity is the reliability (oragreement) of assessment across instructors while quantifying problem-solving processes withaccurate granularity. We propose a new method using
. Our analysis, based on responses from 314 students, demonstrates the effectiveness of the module in meeting our goals and also sheds light on opportunities for further improvement that we have already capitalized on. We envision that our module can be adopted and adapted by other CS programs and that our experiences can serve as an exemplar for the development of similar program-specific AInt learning modules, all with the overarching goal of mitigating AInt violations.1 IntroductionPrior studies suggest that Academic Integrity (AInt) cases are on the rise in Computer Science(CS) compared to other disciplines [1, 2], likely due to the Internet facilitating ready access toabundant CS materials and personal assistance
discussion will follow the Innovation-Based Learning course calledBiomedical Engineering Innovation-Based Learning 1, or BME 180. This is the first semester,freshman level course for biomedical engineering students. Innovation-based learning takes acombination of engineering education styles and uses them to fuel learning [1]. The core of theclass is centered around fundamental principles. These principles are class topics based onphysiology and biomedical engineering concepts. For example, action potentials, cardiacvasculature, and equilibrium potentials are all fundamental principles discussed in the course. Inour university’s classroom structure, one principle is assigned each week. These principles are tobe researched, investigated, and
prepared to perform systemintegration tasks. For example, recent studies by Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute notethat the U.S. faces a need for nearly 2.4 million manufacturing positions to be filled by 2028 [1].In addition, in May 2019, Deloitte surveyed 523 executives in a range of industries in 26countries across the globe on their intelligent automation strategies and the impact on theirworkforces. Results suggest that over the next three years, executives expect automation toincrease their workforce capacity by 27%, which is equivalent to 2.4 million additional full-timeemployees [2]. Needed are methods for helping students to develop system integration skillsreliably and efficiently.What is system integration?System integration
as well as practices of applying design thinking in engineering education. Ithas summarised and synthesized 87 relevant papers published in the last 20 years with thesystematic review method and meta-analysis (PRISMA) process. Four themes were identifiedand the key factors, including curriculum setting, curriculum framework, and student learningoutcomes, are examined based on the co-occurrence analysis. It also provides instructionalguidelines and directions for future design thinking cultivating research opportunities.1. INTRODUCTIONDesign thinking is a problem-solving approach that prioritizes innovation, human-centeredness,and the utilization of multiple disciplines [1]. It is an iterative and non-linear process that allowsfor multiple
ofthe semester.Concurrent with the curricular modification the faculty team has begun expandingthe program through new undergraduate course development (MET 300), andfocused community STEAM activities that engage pre-Kindergarten to retirementage participants.Program BackgroundThe Art + Engineering (A+E) program at South Dakota Mines is a unique program that has beenintegrated into all learning levels [1] of the Metallurgical Engineering curriculum. The field ofMetallurgical Engineering has a non-diverse professional makeup. Our program mimics thatprofile and has additional challenges associated with our rural location and relatively narrowdisciplinary focus. Consequently, our programmatic elements focused on making creativity,innovation
by nature,combining electrical and mechanical areas of study, prepares graduates for industrial andmanufacturing environments in product design, development, and production. Naturally, theimportance of capstone project experience has been appreciated for a long time in an engineeringeducation but not without some controversy, where Hoole [1] wrote in 1991, that “Universitiesshould concentrate on teaching the theory, leaving the completion of the engineer’s education toindustry.” Since then, the importance of capstone project experience is universally acknowledgedand built into educational programs, especially in engineering technology programs. Literatureprovides many examples of capstone project experiences [2, 3, 4, 5] to list a few. The
theoretical perspective onthe integrative nature of identity and its developmental mechanism” (p. 2037). Given that wewish to eventually examine STEM-persistence as a byproduct of the integrative nature of theLION STEM Scholars multiple role identities (Low-Income/College-Student/Future-Engineer),DSMRI (see Figure 1) serves as our theoretical framework. Specifically, this paper will begin toexplore the (1) ontological and epistemological beliefs, (2) purpose and goals, (3) self-perceptions and self-definitions, and (4) perceived-action possibilities within and between thevarious role identities that the LION STEM Scholars possess prior to their first semester ofcollege and before their participation in Engineering Ahead.The objective of the DSMRI is
. Ziliang Zhou, California Baptist University Ziliang Zhou is a professor of mechanical engineering at California Baptist UniversityDr. Jinxiang XiJun Zhang ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Impact of “Green” Requirements in Engineering Students’ Design Projects on Engineering Students’ Green Mindset Xiuhua April Si1, Jun Zhang1, Ziliang Zhou1, and Jinxiang Xi2 1 Aerospace, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, California Baptist University, Riverside, CA 92504 2 Biomedical Engineering, Francis College of Engineering, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854AbstractWith modern
,webinars and professional development training were also provided during the three weeks. Thetopics of the four research projects are 1) Airworthiness and System Safety, 2) DistributedPropulsion/Engine Vehicle Concepts, 3) Computer Simulation of Aerospace Systems withAnimation, and 4) Re-design of UAV Airplane to Fly on Mars. The paper discusses the detaileddesign of the 3-week virtual research program. It also describes the design of the four researchprojects. A post-survey was conducted to collect students’ feedback on the program and theresearch projects. The results of the survey and the impact of the program and the researchprojects on students’ interests and knowledge in aerospace engineering are discussed. Thechallenges and experiences are