No.EEC 1751369. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.[2] H. A. Simon, The sciences of the artificial. MIT press, 1996.[3] K. Dorst, “Co-evolution and emergence in design,” Design Studies, vol. 65, pp. 60–77, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.005.[4] K. Dorst, “On the problem of design problems - problem solving and design expertise
Paper ID #37185Co-Designing Design Activities with Undergraduate StudentsChristopher Rennick (Engineering Educational Developer) Christopher Rennick received his B.ASc. and M.ASc. in electrical engineering from the University of Windsor, in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Chris is currently a Ph.D. candidate in Management Sciences at the University of Waterloo studying students’ design skill development. Chris was awarded the Canadian Engineering Education Association Engineering Education Graduate Student Award in 2019 for his contributions to the field. Since 2010, Chris has been a member of the instructional staff
PM, 5 days per week over 4 weeks. When offered inperson from 2016 through 2019, it was held in an engineering laboratory on the campus ofPortland State University. In 2020 and 2021, the camp was offered remotely via Zoom. Inchanging the format from in-person to remote delivery, we aimed for similar outcomes andparticipant activities. The differences in implementation are described later in this paper. We select 25 participants from a pool of applicants who are recruited from local highschools. We require applicants to have at least completed ninth grade. Our selection processfavors students who are finishing high school (entering eleventh or twelfth grade). Mixingstudents entering tenth, eleventh and twelfth grade has not been a big
/research university,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 211–233, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1002/tea.20004.[3] R. Butt, “‘Pulled in off the street’ and available: what qualifications and training do Teacher Assistants really need?,” Int. J. Incl. Educ., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 217–234, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2017.1362478.[4] W. W. Predebon and P. Cho, “A Teaching Assistant Training Program With A Focus On Teaching Improvement And Graduate Student Development,” in 1996 Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, District of Columbia: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 1996, p. 1.42.1- 1.42.7. doi: 10.18260/1-2--6311.[5] S. M. Ruder and C. Stanford, “Strategies for Training Undergraduate Teaching Assistants To Facilitate Large Active
. Silventoinen, "Upper secondary school students’gendered interests in electronics and electrical engineering," Research in Science &Technological Education, pp. 1–21, 2021, doi:10.1080/02635143.2021.2008342.[6] H. Ylöstalo, "Mitä tasa-arvoasenteet kertovat tasa-arvosta? [What do equality attitudes tellus about equality?]," in Näkökulmia sukupuolten tasa-arvoon - analyysejä tasa-arvobarometrista 2017 [Perspectives on gender equality – analyses of the Gender EqualityBarometer 2017], M. Teräsaho and J. Närvi, Eds., Helsinki: National Institute for Health andWelfare (THL), 2019, pp. 17–31.[7] A. Kauhanen and K. Riukula, "Työmarkkinoiden eriytyminen ja tasa-arvo Suomessa[Labour market segregation and equality in Finland]," in Näkökulmia sukupuolten tasa
Needs of Engineering Faculty: How the Library and Librarian Fit In," presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, July, 2021.[3] K. Tanaka et al., Teaching Business: Looking at the Support Needs of Instructors. Ithaka S+R, 2019.[4] Ithaka S+R. "About." https://sr.ithaka.org/about/ (accessed February 14, 2022).[5] D. Cooper et al., "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Agriculture Scholars," New York, NY, 2017.[6] D. Cooper et al., "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Asian Studies Scholars," New York, NY, 2018.[7] D. Cooper et al., "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Public Health Scholars," New York, NY, 2017.[8] D
, J. Laurel, J. Martinez, C. Bonilla, and E. Labandera, ‘Latinos in Higher Education: Compilation of Fast Facts’, 2019. [Online]. Available: www.EdExcelencia.org/FastFacts-2019[3] D. Gillborn, ‘Intersectionality, Critical Race Theory, and the Primacy of Racism: Race, Class, Gender, and Disability in Education’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 277– 287, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1077800414557827.[4] M. J. Lage, G. J. Platt, and M. Treglia, ‘Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment’, Journal of Economic Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 30– 43, 2000, doi: 10.1080/00220480009596759.[5] P. den Brok, J. Levy, T. Wubbels, and M. Rodriguez, ‘Cultural influences on
corporateresponsibility and global reputation. In 2019 Reputation Institute ranked the LEGO Group first inglobal corporate responsibility [6]. Following on this distinction, in 2020 and 2021 the LEGOGroup was named the most highly regarded company in the world in terms of corporatereputation [7,8]. These awards provide the impetus for the question that animates the course:Why has the LEGO Group earned such distinctions? What is it about the company’s brandidentity, policies, practices, and products that merit these honors?In response to these questions, the course offers an extended case study of a company engaged inengineering design that is explicit about its core values and that takes seriously its social andethical responsibilities to stakeholders and the
trends in projects and team functionality. Trends, results, and observed practices on thetechnical design side have been documented by the authors in the following papers: Solnoskyand Fairchild [24], Solnosky and Parfitt [25], and Solnosky et al. [26].Research Approach The results presented in this paper were gathered from an Architectural Engineering (AE)capstone program at Penn State over the last 10 years (2010-2019, Year ‘20 & ‘21 wereexcluded). Student cohorts are 5th year standing AEs in either the Bachelor of ArchitecturalEngineering (BAE) degree program or the integrated Bachelor of Architectural Engineering /Master of Architectural Engineering (BAE/MAE). Here, the capstone is a year-long, two coursecumulating experience that
Chair for the IEEE Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG) 2018 and 2020. His work on automatic facial expression analysis by computer vision algorithms was featured in Motor Trend Magazine in 2014, 2015 and 2016 for the Best Driver Car of the Year event. Dr. Cruz obtained a few awards for dissemination of research to the greater public (NSF Com- munity Award (2013) and NSF Judges Choice Award (2012) in NSF IGERT Video/Poster Competition). He is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the Association for Com- puting Machinery (ACM), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE
(International Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEE Women in Engineering division from 2010 to present.Dr. Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on engineering education; design tools
Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Award, the 2015 Frontiers in Education Faculty Fellow Award, and the 2019 Betty Vetter Award for Research from WEPAN. In 2017, Dr. Main received a National Science Foundation CAREER award to examine
Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and
cross- disciplinary educational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven Jean Nocito-Gobel, Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of New Haven, received her Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. She has been actively involved in a number of educational initiatives in the Tagliatela College of Engineering including KEEN and PITCH, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
as a software engineer at Sina for one year after I graduated as a master from China Agriculture University in 2009. He received the Best Paper Award from IEEE Edge in 2019.Jin Lu, University of Georgia Jin Lu received his Ph.D. degree in computer science and engineering from the University of Connecticut, USA in 2019. He worked as an assistant professor at the University of Michigan - Dearborn from 2019 to 2023. He is currently an assistant professor at the School of Computing at the University of Georgia. My major research interests include machine learning, data mining, and optimization. I am particularly interested in transparent machine learning models, distributed learning algorithms, optimization and so
. Despite the growing number of papersand discussions in academic forums like the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE), there is no universally accepted strategy for integrating sustainability into theengineering curriculum. In efforts to integrate sustainability into undergraduate engineering curricula, variousstrategies and pedagogies are explored, but a universally accepted approach is yet to beestablished. Sustainability initiatives can be implemented at different levels within educationalinstitutions, including departmental, individual, school, or university-wide strategies. This studyfocuses on individual-level efforts and adopts an integrated approach, which is widely consideredpreferable, to incorporate sustainability into
engineering faculty member to receive the national Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Balancing Student Learning and Community Relations in Software-Based Service-LearningAbstract Service-learning is a form
study related to asset-basedpractices.2. BackgroundAppreciative Inquiry is often used as a themed methodology of conducting interviews [5], [6],[7] or focus groups [8], [9] and as an organizational change framework in higher education [8],[10], [11], [12], [13]. A preliminary search for APPI in the ASEE PEER database and a search for“engineering education AND appreciative inquiry” across abstracts, keywords, or titles onProQuest databases yielded only around 37 results. Those studies that do discuss APPI primarilyreference the method for structuring interviews for data gathering [5], [6], [7]. The next mostcommon use of APPI was as a framework for guiding organizational change in severaleducational contexts, including but not limited to
in Information and Communication Technologies from Tecnologico de Monterrey. His field of work is related to making smarter machines, applying the knowledge of several disciplines ranging from advanced Electronics, IoT, to Artificial Intelligence. Experienced in the use of embedded c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27274electronics, FPGAs, PLCs and control algorithms such as PID and Fuzzy Logic, he has been the authorof scientific publications in the field of intelligent control and autonomous vehicles. His current interestsinclude smart city infrastructure, autonomous systems, and
Paper ID #39415Conceptualizing Program Quality in Engineering Education Ph.D. ProgramsDr. Le Shorn Benjamin, University of Houston Dr. Le Shorn Benjamin has amassed over a decade of experience in the field of education. Her career spans local and international borders and have included roles in educational research, program administra- tion, higher education accreditation and K-12 teaching. She is the recipient of the Robert Newby Award for Diversity Efforts, the Central Michigan University College of Graduate Studies 2019 Outstanding Dissertation Award, a Central Michigan University Department of Educational Leadership
(under 1%),only changing from 117 doctorate degree recipients in 2010 to 120 in 2019 [3].NASA Historical Efforts with Tribal Colleges and UniversitiesAccording to Maynard [3], NASA has supported an effort called “Tribal Colleges andUniversities Project (TCUP)” since 2010, as one of various STEM education and outreach grantprograms specifically targeted to support Tribal Colleges and Universities-related initiatives.“The overall goal of the project is to expand opportunities for the nation’s STEM workforcethrough capacity building, infrastructure development, research and engineering experience,outreach, and information exchange” [4]. In 2008, Congress directed NASA to establish a projectthat was focused on climate change education. The Global
the intercultural competence of the students. We also plan to conductfuture studies to assess the long-term impact of intercultural development on the students and thelevel of autonomy students acquire through this course.References[1] M. Handford, J. Van Maele, P. Matous, and Y. Maemura, “Which ‘culture’? A critical analysis of intercultural communication in engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 161–177, 2019.[2] C. Demetry and R. Vaz, “Influence of an Education Abroad Program on the Intercultural Sensitivity of STEM Undergraduates: A Mixed Methods Study.,” Adv. Eng. Educ., no. Query date: 2022-06-02 08:39:17, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1138841[3] D. Rock, H. Grant, and J. Grey
top four career competencies most valued by employers,as reported by the National Academy of Colleges and Employers (NACE). In a 2019 job outlooksurvey, oral and written communication was rated consistently high in the past three years. Also,proficient communication is essential for engineers in the 21st Century to create an inclusiveenvironment and engage multiple stakeholders, as indicated by the National Academy ofEngineering. In particular, the ability to communicate effectively to various audiences across theSTEM disciplines and the public is a great need. The engineering program at the University ofSouth Florida (USF) aims to fulfill the NACE’s professional competencies for career readiness bydevising new methodologies for communication
within theSchool of Engineering until ABET accreditation and final implementation of the program took about 8years (Figure 1). In this section, we will discuss the six-phase process for developing the new program(Table 1). It should be noted that these phases were not necessarily sequential and may overlap or occursimultaneously, depending on the specific circumstances of the program development. Conception Advisory Board Foundation Hiring of Pilot ABET of Idea Established Approval New Faculty Implementation Accreditation 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Study Internal CHE Curriculum Instructional
andadvancement to workforce preparation to the basic and applied research that contributes tonational economies [1]. After completing their PhD program, engineering students embark on avariety of career pathways; therefore, workforce preparation for engineering PhD studentsnecessitates multiple forms. Of all doctorate recipients in the United States in 2019, 41%reported that their first postgraduate position would be in academia. Employment varied bydiscipline and the number of jobs in academia was lowest in engineering; only 12% of doctoralrecipients indicated an academic employment commitment [7]. This percentage does not includepostdoctoral positions, where 34% of doctoral recipients in engineering committed aftergraduation [7]. Given our focus on
students and building community on a small campus where thestudent to faculty ratio is 10:1. The research and scholarship of Spelman faculty is an extensionof their commitments to teaching and mentoring undergraduates, and the institution is recognizednationally for excellence in supporting minority students [28].In contrast, Michigan State University is a large public research institution, with nearly 40,000undergraduates and more than 11,000 graduate and professional students, over 70% of whomidentify as White. The most recent research expenditure totals (from 2019) topped $725 millionacross campus, including more than $330 million in federally funded projects [29]. In responseto the growing demand for data science, MSU has made significant