, 2003; Tomar, Portugal[7] Lawlor, B., Farrell, A.,Jordan, A., Strawbridge, J., Brabazon, D.,Casey, K.,Coughlan, A.: “Interdisciplinary Communication Skills - Facilitating Students from Different Disciplines to Learn with, from and about each other”, 5th International Symposium for Engineering Education, 11 September 2014, University of Manchester.[8] Smith, R. A., & Khawaja, N. G.: “A review of the acculturation experiences of international students”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 699-713.[9] Geraedts, HGM., Päätalo,H.: “International collaboration in engineering projects on product innovation”,. 41-st SEFI Conference, 16-20 September 2013, Leuven, Belgium.[10] Schadewitz, N., Norhayati, Z., “Cross
otheruniversities.References [1] A. Holdsworth, K. Watty, and M. Davies, Developing Capstone Experiences. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, 2009. [2] Computing Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for accrediting computing programs, 2019-2020,” 2019, last accessed 29 January 2019. [Online]. Available: https: //www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2019-2020/ [3] R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan, and D. K. Anthony, “A survey of capstone engineering courses in north america,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 165–174, 1995. [4] Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for accrediting
senseof pride of what was accomplished when they are finished.References[1] A. Kolb and D. Kolb. (2005). Learning styles and learning space: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2):193-212.[2] K. Robinson, and A. M. Azzam. (2009). Why creativity now? (interview). Educational Leadership, 67(1):22-26.[3] S. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe, and E. Mahoney. (2015). The evolution of a flipped classroom: evidence-based recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2015.[4] A. Pears, S. Seidman, L. Malmi, L. Mannila, and E. Adams. (2007). A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. Working Group Report on ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in
Paper ID #27207Creation, Development, and Delivery of a New Interactive First-Year Intro-duction to Engineering CourseDr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of LouisvilleMr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nicholas Hawkins is a Graduate Teaching Assistance in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at the University of Louisville. A PhD student in Electrical and Computer Engineering, he received both his B.S. and M. Eng. from the University of Louisville in the same field. His research interests include power electronics and controls, as well as engineering education for first-year students.Dr. James E. Lewis
which changes to categories were made and agreed uponthrough discussion between the coders as new data were reviewed [11]. The finaloperationalizations are provided in Appendix B. Two people independently categorized eachutterance of the verbal protocols for each student’s pre- and post-problems, and agreement on thetwo categorizations was computed using Cohen’s Kappa. Agreement between the two rangedfrom .64 to .91, with a mean of .81 (SD = .06). All disagreements were resolved throughdiscussion.ResultsAggregate analysis: Interview data from entering first year IRE students andmetacognitive indicatorsEntry interview analysis provided consistent metacognitive declarative and procedural indicatorsthroughout with self-directed learning being a
Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014. [8] J. Ray and J. Farris, “First-Year Engineering Product Realization,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, St. Louis, MO, 2000. [9] M. F. Bays-Muchmore and A. Chronopoulou, “First Year Engineering Students Perceptions of Engineering,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake CIty, UT, 2018.[10] K. Meyers, J. Uhran, C. Pieronek, D. Budny, J. Ventura, P. Ralston, J. K. Estell, B. Hart, C. Slaboch, and R. Ladewski, “Some Perspectives on First Year Engineering Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.
proposed outcomes, b. Clarify common terminology for all faculty teams to apply across outcomes, c. Identify ill-defined concepts and develop common definitions for these concepts that were more clearly defined, d. Develop a philosophy for use of multiple criteria under a single outcome to address challenges combining outcomes between the four different outcome types, e. Prioritize departmental priorities about learning, including the addition, combination and deletion of some outcomes.5. We compiled a single summary of all outcomes and subjected the combined outcomes list to a common review. In this final step, we examined the outcomes one more time for redundancy, ill-defined terms
related to USP K-12 preparation, admission into higher education andsuccessful attainment of the engineering degree is well within reach with a tad bit of creativity andinnovation on behalf of educational institutions and higher education practitioners. 12References 1) B. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation Benchmarks for Undergraduate Engineering Schools, Departments and Programs,” Washington, DC, 2016. 2) F. A. Maton, Kenneth I., Pollard, Shauna A., Weise, Tatiana V. McDougall, and Hrabowski, III., “The Meyerhoff Scholars Program: A Strengths-Based, Institution-Wide Approach to Increasing Diversity in Science, Technology
Paper ID #26897Small-scale Underwater Robotics Development for Underwater Archaeologi-cal ApplicationsDr. Byul Hur, Texas A&M University Dr. B. Hur received his B.S. degree in Electronics Engineering from Yonsei University, in Seoul, Korea, in 2000, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, in 2007 and 2011, respectively. In 2017, he joined the faculty of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. USA, where he is currently an Assistant Professor. He worked as a postdoctoral associate from 2011 to 2016 at the University Florida
Paper ID #25277Visibly Random Grouping Applied to First-Semester EngineeringDr. Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is currently a member of the
Exposition, San Antonio, TX.[13] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly, and C. G. Nicometo, “Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–174, 2010.[14] M.E. Jordan and R.R. McDaniel Jr, “Managing uncertainty during collaborative problem solving in elementary school teams : The role of peer influence in robotics engineering activity,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 23, no.4, pp. 490-536, 2014.[15] National Research Council, Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2013.[16] Illustrative Mathematics. Standards for Mathematical practice
Paper ID #25717Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore-Level Aerospace Mechan-ics of Materials CoursesDr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, after which he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008, both in aerospace engineering.Dr. Jessica E
linear approximation of the data was used for future calculations. (a) Driver Side View (b) Passenger Side View (c) Support SystemFigure 3: Friction Testing 1/3 Scale Ford Model-T Friction Estimate y = 0.6853x + 10.439 25 Torque at Wheel [Nm] 20 15 10 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Vehicle
resource for college instructors,” 3rd Ed. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 2012.[8] B. E. Walvoord, “Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for college instructors,” 3rd Ed. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 2012.[9] M. Lanzerotti, C. I. Allen, M. Doroski, C. Medve, M. Seery, L. Orlando, F. Khafizov, “An electrical engineering graduate course sequence in integrated circuits targeted to real-world problems in industry, defense, and security,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Meeting, Paper ID#17791, Columbus, Ohio, June 25-28, 2017.[10] Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent, “Teaching and Learning in STEM: A Practical Guide,” New York: New York, Jossey-Bass, 2016. https://educationdesignsinc.com/book/[11] J
Conference and Exhibition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018.[5] N.M. Smith, J. Smith, L. Battalora, and B. Teschner, “Industry-University Partnerships:Engineering Education and Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice, vol. 144, no. 3, 2018.[6] J.M. Smith, C. McClelland and N. Smith, “Engineering Students’ Views of Corporate SocialResponsibility: A Case Study from Petroleum Engineering,” Science and Engineering Ethics,vol. 23, no. 6, p. 1775-1790, 2017.[7] A.C. Heinricher, P. Quinn, R.F. Vaz, and K.J. Rissmiller, “Long-term Impacts of Project-Based Learning in Science and Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 2013 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition
, 2003.28. N. Mohan, Power Electronics: A First Course, Wiley, 2011.29. D.W. Hart, Power Electronics, McGraw Hill, 2011 (ISBN: 978-0-07-338067-4).30. R. Shaffer, Fundamentals of Power Electronics with MATLAB, Charles River Media, Boston, MA, USA, 2007.31. P. T. Krein, Elements of Power Electronics (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, 2015.32. R.G. Belu, Power Electronics and Controls for Photovoltaic Systems, Handbook of Research on Solar EnergySystems and Technologies (Eds: Dr. Sohail Anwar, Dr. Salahuddin Qazi, and Dr. Harry Efstathiadis), IGI, Global,pp. 68-125, 2012 (DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-1996-8.ch004).33. S. M. Sharkh, M. A. Abu-Sara, G. I. Orfanoudakis, and B. Hussain, Power Electronic Converters forMicrogrids, Wiley-IEEE Press, 2014.34. R
. Pawley, “Social Justice and Inclusion,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 335–356.[23] M. Ross, “A unicorn's tale: Examining the experiences of Black women in engineering industry,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Engineering Education, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2016.
and a commercial on-the-shelve satellite messenger SPOT. The Arduino based GPS data was continuously sent to a cellphone by text message using a mobile phone carrier network. The SPOT device GPS data instead, was obtained directly from the SPOT satellite constellation through the cloud. (See Fig. 1) Fig. 1. Payload hardware configuration. The balloon utilized for this mission was a 1200 grams latex balloon. The gas used to fill thisballoon was helium, flyby type. It was needed about 3 m3. In addition, a radar deflector as well as a parachute was integrated to this HAB. It totallyweighted about 2000 grams. (See Fig. 2) Fig. 2. HAB team before launching. B. The Launch and Landing The scheduled launch day was January 4th, 2018. The
Paper ID #27310Queer(y)-ing Technical Practice: Queer Experiences in Student Theater Pro-ductions at a Technical UniversityMitch Cieminski, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Mitch Cieminski received a B.S. in electrical and computer engineering from Olin College of Engineering in Needham, MA in 2017. They are currently pursuing a PhD in Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, studying the intersections of engineering cultures, peace and ethics, educational power structures, and the experiences of disabled, queer, and trans engineers. c American Society for Engineering
, pp. 62–64, 1994.[9] A. Furco and B. E. Moely, “Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 128– 153, 2012.[10] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. ERIC, 1998.[11] L. Springer, M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan, “Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 21–51, 1999.[12] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2004.[13] E. F. Barkley, K. P. Cross, and C. H. Major
high attrition rates among science, mathematics & engineering undergraduate majors: final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation on an ethnographic inquiry at seven institutions. Ethnography and Assessment Research, Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado, 1994.[4] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving engineering: A multi‐year single institution study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6-27, January 2012.[5] J. Gill, M. Ayre and J. Mills, “Revisioning the Engineering Profession: How to Make It Happen!,” In Gender and Diversity: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Vol. 1, IGI Global. 2019, pp. 427-442.[6] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan and J. Tang
[Accessed July 4, 2018] 7. J. O. Choi, P. P. Shrestha, J. Lim, & B. K. Shrestha, “An investigation of construction workforce inequalities and biases in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Industry,” Construction Research Congress: Sustainable Design and Construction and Education, 2018. [Online] Available doi:10.1061/9780784481301.007 [accessed July 10, 2018] 8. H. Blackburn, “The status of women in STEM in higher education: A review of the literature 2007 – 2017,” Science and Technology Libraries, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 235 – 273, 2017. 9. A. Furnham, E. Reeves, & S. Budhani, “Parents think their sons are brighter than their daughters: Sex differences in parental
reports. The instructor observed that theEWF were exceptional in helping students with poor reports (a C- or lower) revise their reports toa satisfactory report (B- or higher). For a report where a revision could be submitted after meetingwith the EWF, the average percent increase in the grade between the first and second drafts was15.6%. Responses to the guided questions on the lab worksheets showed that further instruction isneeded in how to communicate through tables and figures. IV. ConclusionOverall, both the curricular strategies were successful at helping students improve their technicalwriting skills, according to the student feedback. The Linear Circuits Lab instructor also indicatedmarked improvement in some of the students’ lab
. They remarked that the tools provided “novel hands-on” interdisciplinary teaching instrument for aerospace and mechanical engineering students.[6]. Spearrin, R. M., & Bendana, F. A. (2018). Design-build-launch: a hybrid project-based laboratory course for aerospace engineering education. Acta Astronautica.[7]. Kroll, E., & Artzi, D. (2011). Enhancing aerospace engineering students' learning with 3D printing wind-tunnel models. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 17(5), 393-402.[8]. Chiou, R., Tseng, T. L. B., & Jayadev, S. (2018, June). Enhanced 3-D Printing for Energy Harvesting Project Implementation into Green Energy Manufacturing Laboratory. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[9]. Cengel, Y. A., &
teams.References: [1] Rutar, T., & MS, B. S. (2011, June), A Modular Project Management Approach to Undergraduate Senior Design Projects Paper presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/17350 [2] Lawanto, O., & Cromwell, M., & Febrian, A. (2016, June), Student’s Self-Regulation in Managing Their Capstone Senior Design Projects Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. [3] Chen, Z. (2017, June), Applying Scrum to Manage a Senior Capstone Project Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27605 [4] Porter, J., & Wright, G., & Morgan, J
University.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech David B. Knight is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head of Graduate Programs in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International Engagement in Engineering Education, directs the Rising Sophomore Abroad Program, and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to be data-driven by leveraging large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the inter- section between policy and organizational contexts. He has B.S., M.S
Schools, Ph.D. Completion and Attrition: Policies and Practices to Promote Student Success. Ph.D. Completion Project, 2010.[8] D. F. Feldon, J. Peugh, B. E. Timmerman, M. A. Maher, M. Hurst, D. Strickland, J. A. Gilmore, C. Stiegelmeyer, “Graduate Students’ Teaching Experiences Improve Their Methodological Research Skills,” Science, vol. 333, pp. 1037-1039, Aug. 2011.[9] Houston Independent School District. General Information: HISD At A Glance. [Online.] Available: https://www.houstonisd.org/domain/7908. [Accessed: Feb. 4, 2019].
universities, such as Purdue, University at Buffalo, University ofDelaware, Rensselaer Poly, University at Maryland, University at Texas, Case Western, Universityof Massachusetts at Amherst, James Madison, Dayton, etc. In this year, we saw the enrollmentfrom our school drop to 62.5%. This was an indication that the class was now better known tostudents and administrators from other universities. In contrast, the enrollment from the yearsFigure 5: Summer 2015 F2F class Student Evaluation: Average for the lecture (labeled A) and therecitation (labeled B) are on par with the department average, but slightly lower than the universityaverage.before 2016 never crossed 50. It was apparent that an OL class could provide the same opportunityto students from
State.Monika B Kwapisz, Montana State University Monika Kwapisz (they/them) is an undergraduate at Montana State University studying Industrial and Management Systems Engineering with a minor in Mathematics. Monika is the president of MSU’s chapter of Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (oSTEM), a cross-country ski coach, and an avid outdoors-person. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Exploring the Relationship Between Students’ Engineering Identity and Leadership Self-EfficacyAbstractIn order to lead the social process required to solve society’s grandest challenges and ensure thatthe capabilities of an expanded engineering workforce are
students from various majors and had between two and eight semesters ofexperience assisting with the course. They had each passed the course with a grade of B orhigher. Each participant was given $20 at the conclusion of the interview.Think-aloud interviews. Think-aloud interviews (i.e., interviews in which participantsverbalize their thought processes while performing tasks) were conducted in the spring of 2017following the suggestions of Boren and Ramey [27]. The interviews lasted approximately onehour and consisted of grading three real, de-identified student responses for each learningobjective in one of the course’s problem sets. The problem set used in the interview was thatwhich had the lowest average accuracy with respect to the