Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 31 - 60 of 113 in total
Conference Session
Session 1 - Track 1: Diversifying STEM Pathways: Math Circles of Chicago
Collection
2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Douglas O'Roark, Math Circles of Chicago; Boz N Bell, HP Inc.; Tiffany Grant King, HP Inc.
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
named in his honor.Mr. Boz N Bell, HP Inc.Mrs. Tiffany Grant King, HP Inc. Mechanical engineer with both academic research experience and industry experience in the areas of automotive, pharmaceutical, paper manufacturing, consumer products/goods, and technology engaged in the challenges in STEM education, talent acquisition, and global business systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023DIVERSIFYINGSTEM PATHW AYS:MATH CIRCLES OFCHICAGO Doug O’ Roark Boz BellA Ne wJ o u rn e y 1. The Need 2. A Solution 3. Outcomes 4. Shared Vision 5. Reflecting on the JourneyIn t ro d u c t io n s Doug O’ Roark
Conference Session
Track 3: Technical Session 9: Exploring the Intersectionality of Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars in the LEGACY Scholars Program
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Jameka Wiggins, The Ohio State University; Monica Farmer Cox, The Ohio State University; Ayanna Howard, The Ohio State University; Beenish N/A Saba, The Ohio State University; Martina Leveni, The Ohio State University; Shawanee' Patrick, The Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
peers.Multiple Apprenticeship Model (Walker et al., 2008) Each of these features should shape the relationship between the scholar and their mentors. Faculty with scholarly and professional expertise help students self-reflect upon the Intentionality process of creating scholarly ideas and communicating them to others in their field. Multiple Students engage with numerous intellectual mentors. Relationships Collective All parties share responsibility for the development of students’ learning. Responsibility Allow individuals to learn mentoring techniques and be recognized and rewarded for Recognition demonstrating
Conference Session
Track 6: Technical Session 1:Technology Students' Recognition of Algorithmic Data Bias through Role-Play Case Studies
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Ashish Hingle, George Mason University; Aditya Johri, George Mason University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
Foundation Awards#1937950, 1939105; USDA/NIFA Award#2021-67021-35329. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this Aditya Johri johri@gmu.edu material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies. The research study has been approved by the George Mason University Institutional Review Board at George Mason University. bit.ly/mason-tech-ethicsThis talk is about a research
Conference Session
Track 2: Technical Session 8: Establishing and Sustaining Inclusive Learning Communities for Supporting Faculty Creating More Inclusive Engineering Classrooms
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Jessica Moriah Vaden, University of Pittsburgh; April Dukes, University of Pittsburgh; Amy Hermundstad Nave, Colorado School of Mines; Melissa M. Bilec, University of Pittsburgh; Amy L Brooks, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
3 3 Positionality Statement Before continuing this presentation, and in the spirit of self- reflection, I acknowledge my standpoint as an educated Black American woman. I have not been an instructor of record yet, but I have experienced and observed both positive and harmful situations within and outside of the engineering classroom involving minoritized and historically marginalized students. I acknowledge that my positionality has given me a unique perspective while working on this project. Inspired by Davis (2018) 4Positionality statement will also introduce the presenter(s
Conference Session
Track 8: Technical Session 5: Disrupting Computing Department Cultures, One Cohort at a Time
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Alicia Nicki Washington, Duke University; Shaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University; Cecilé Sadler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
Twitter hashtag unveiled the harshrealities of anti-Black racism faced by faculty, staff, andstudents in historically white colleges and universities. 2In response to these devastating events, on June 10, 2020,STEM faculty across the United States came together for#ShutDownSTEM, a one-day academic strike dedicated tounderstanding and confronting anti-Black racism in highereducation and STEM fields. #ShutDownSTEM provided acollective moment for STEM academics to reflect, havedifficult conversations, and commit to taking actionagainst systemic racism. However, we quickly realizedthat a single day was insufficient to prepare for the long-term, ongoing work required to truly dismantle
Conference Session
Technical Session 4 - Paper 2: Successful Practices for a Women in Engineering and Science Mentoring Program for First Year Students
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Sandra L. Furterer, University of Dayton; Elizabeth Hart, University of Dayton; Lily Behnke, University of Dayton
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
 for their major and minors, campus involvement, off‐campus interests, and description or personality in three words. The survey asked interested mentors to reflect on previous mentoring experiences and impacts of mentors on their life, and why they wanted to mentor a freshman. Forty‐seven (47) upper‐class women completed the survey, where approximately 50% were sophomores, with a wide range of majors, minors, involvements, and hobbies. Sophomores in the WISE program were selected to be mentors because they were closest to the freshmen experience of the women students that they would mentor, and they were still part of the WISE program.Only freshman in the WISE program were recruited for the mentoring program, though in the future all freshman
Conference Session
Technical Session 13 - Paper 1: Transformational Resistance and Identity Development: A Case Study of an Asexual Woman Engineer
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Vivian Xian-Wei Chou, University of Texas at Austin; Jerry Austin Yang, Stanford University; Brandon Bakka, University of Texas at Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas at Austin; Patricia Clayton, Wake Forest University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
of studentorganizations within engineering during the data analysis.FindingsThe dominant narrative that emerged from Kayla’s experience in engineering was her contrastingperspective on asexuality and gender identity. This dichotomy was then reflected in her patternsof activism in her marginalized identities. Kayla’s resulting acts of resistance for her genderidentity was external, and her resistance for her sexual identity was internal. In both cases, herresistances included a social critique and an interest in social justice, making them both forms oftransformational resistance. However, her patterns of resistance between her visible identity as awoman and her invisible asexual identity differed significantly.It is important to note that
Conference Session
Track 3: Technical Session 6: Organizational Transformation for Graduate Education: Intentionally Engaging Graduate Students as Partners in Equity Work
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Julia Machele Brisbane, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Teirra K Holloman, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Natali Huggins, Virginia Tech ; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
consciousness context on reflection and to dominant role of power in address and self- awareness group members’ individual oppression awareness investment in interactions, and benefit from policy systems of development, domination and practiceTable 1: The six pillars of Linder’s power conscious framework [27], [28]Asset Based Community Development/Community EngagementIn response to the complexity of minoritized graduate student challenges, their reason to engagein DEI efforts
Conference Session
Technical Session: Transforming Engineering Education Is Possible! A Descriptive Case Study of Reimagining Engineering Education and Delivering a Wake Forest Engineering Student Experience Promoting Inclusion, Agency, Holistic Learning, and Success
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
and innovative curriculum, (c) pedagogiesthat empowered students, (d) partnerships that enabled transformation, (e) a vision to redefinethe culture of engineering education and the department. The strategies used reflected traditionand innovation, evidence-based and exploration, agility and compliance, student-centeredness,and external perspectives. Amid start-up mode and the Covid pandemic, the grueling work ofaccreditation was high stakes. WFU Engineering is now ABET accredited and has achievedunprecedented outcomes, including being recently ranked #14 by US News and World Report inthe category of Best Undergraduate Engineering Program Rankings (no doctorate). Thesuccesses and challenges are presented in this paper. Transformative change is
Conference Session
Track 7: Technical Session 3: The Missing Misrecognition in Recognition and Engineering Identity Research
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Annie Yong Patrick, Georgia Tech; Joseph M LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sara Schley Schley, Rochester Institute of Technology (NTID)
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
conferenceproceedings for the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the European Journalof Engineering Education, and Studies in Engineering Educationi. In this study, we bring attention to the literature that has quantitively assessed a student’srecognition through two primary questions. These studies have made significant contributions tothe field but have focused mainly on the aspect of being seen (recognized) as an engineer and havemeasured this concept through a student’s self-reflection and through their recognition of howmuch the people in their lives see them as an engineer: • “Parents/Relatives/friends see you as a physics person” and “Science teacher see[s] you as a physics person.” (Hazari et al., 2010
Conference Session
Session 6 - Track 3: The only difference is now it counts: Exploring the Role of a Summer Bridge Program in Shaping Student Expectations of Engineering
Collection
2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Taylor Y. Johnson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Malini Josiam, Virginia Tech; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
all SBP participants were asked to complete and a majority of the participants (n =54) submitted a response. The purpose of the questions we analyzed from the exit survey was touncover how students anticipate the SBP experience will compare to a school semester ofengineering and students’ interpretation of what the SBP prepared them for. As we created theexit survey after interviewing SBP participants, we were specifically interested in understandingmore about how students thought the SBP prepared them, which are reflected in the questions weasked them, provided in the next section. We thematically analyzed the responses to the exitsurvey. 5.1.1. Workshops Response We hosted a workshop with students during their
Conference Session
Session 1 - Track 3 : Exploring Experiences of Black Engineering Students Transitioning into Predominately White Institutions for Graduate Studies
Collection
2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Michael Lorenzo Greene, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
demographics. This lens will allow the research team to dive deeper into the phenomenon that is the transition itself, and the contexts in which they occur provide invaluable knowledge on how institutions can better prepare for students of color, rather than applying a monolithic, “one-size-fits-all” mentality towards it. As a part of the utilizing the phenomenological lens, each student transcript was initially read through looking for instances of the participant reflecting on their transition to their graduate institution. Structural coding was utilized for the first-cycle coding method. Structural coding applies a content-based or conceptual phrase representing a topic or inquiry to a segment of data that
Conference Session
Technical Session 6 - Paper 4: Retention Strategies for Educators from Women STEM Graduates of the 1970’s & 1980’s
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Kathleen Buse, Advancing Women in the Workforce; Debra Musch, Rising Careers, LLC; Allison Goodman, ArtCenter College of Design
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
University and her MFA from ArtCenter. She is also an accreditor for NASAD, The National Association of Schools of Art and Design. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 RETENTION STRATEGIES FOR EDUCATORS FROMWOMEN STEM GRADUATES OF THE 1970’S & 1980’S CoNECD Conference February 20 to 23, 2022 Kathleen Buse, Ph.D. Debra Musch Allison Goodman Abstract • Research study on the career experiences of women • All obtained STEM degrees between 1979 and 1983 • Explores expectations, achievements, challenges, and reflections on career journey • Recommendations are provided to
Conference Session
Technical Session 9 - Paper 1: The New Normal: Student Perspectives on Supportive University Policies during COVID and Beyond
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Maimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
student community, asthese policies fail to consider the intricacies of different student identities and experiences[8]. Also, since many educational policies and practices are developed without student input[23], they tend to reflect institutional priorities rather than the needs of the students. Whileimportant, these traditional resources should not be viewed as the only or ultimate solution toserve an entire university with a diverse student body.Universities that consider ‘students-as-partners’ or co-creator [26-28] learn from studentsabout their experiences to better understand how to accommodate them further [3,11] bycreating a campus culture and environment that promotes “the culture of wellness” [29-30].Considering the amount of time
Conference Session
Technical Session 11 - Paper 4: Living, Learning & Growing Together: Engineering Your World
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Ana M Dison, University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
Orientation (June – July)▪Internal Housing deadlines for room assignments (sometime in July)▪Roommate selections (must live with another LLC student on the floor)▪Online acceptance deadline▪Waiting listPROGRAM & SEMINAR Academic Aspects▪Required 1 hour seminar course▪Fall & Spring enrollment required▪Attendance based▪4 sections/semester offered▪Must remain a degree seeking student Fall Seminar Content▪Canvas is our LMS – assignments, communications, learning modules, articles▪Use How To College as our textbook ▪Focus on transition to college during fall semester with a mixture of hands on projects ▪Reflective writing ▪Resume & professional email assignments ▪Transition from High School group
Conference Session
Technical Session 12 - Paper 1: Creating Pathways for Success and Engagement for Women in Engineering
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Jalonda Nakay Thompson, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Anne Skutnik, Tickle College of Engineering; Jamie Baalis Coble, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Anahita Khojandi, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Angelica M Palomino, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Veerle Keppens, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Ozlem Kilic, University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
Progression 8Our retention-based programs were developed in reaction to our students need forprofessional development and community. Our initial measure of success wasbased upon the number of event attendees, event satisfaction survey, and retentionnumbers. The Annual Welcome Dinner Progression graph reflects of our fall first-year student classes from 2016 - 2019.The first section reflects our number of incoming first-year women enrolled in ourcollege. The second section accounts for the first-year women who attended thewelcome dinner. Finally, we collaborated with our Office of Institutional Researchand Assessment to calculate how many women who attended the women
Conference Session
Session 3 - Track 2: Discovering our "We": Marginalization as Connection between International STEM Faculty and their Black and Brown Doctoral Mentees
Collection
2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Lisa Merriweather, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Cathy Howell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Edith Gnanadass, University of Memphis
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Dr. Edith GnanadassDr. Cathy D. Howell Dr. Lisa R. MerriweatherRev. Dr. Martin Luther KingBirth of a New Age, 195680% of all STEM faculty are white or Asian25% of all STEM full professors are womenLess than 10% are from racially minoritized groups  2.5% are Black  4.6% Latine  37% of American colleges and universities have no Black STEM faculty  28% have only 1 Black STEM faculty53% STEM professors at HBCUs are White men. 22% of STEM faculty are foreign-born/international75% of foreign-born/international faculty are in STEMUniversity Personally Cultural exchange  Welcomed in departments Globalization
Conference Session
Technical Session 8 - Paper 2: PhD’ing While Black: Unpacking the Emotions of Navigating Engineering as a Black Student and the Implications for Mental Health
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Michael Lorenzo Greene, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Katreena Thomas, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Julia Machele Brisbane, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Debalina Maitra, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
chemicalengineering graduate student, realized many low activation emotions when reflecting on his ownexperiences undergraduate organizations. Early on in his college career, Joshua recalls feeling anaversion to a minority serving organization because he felt it “wasn’t meant for someone with[his] background” being in good academic standing. Reflecting on this experience Joshuaexplains his thought process throughout the situation. I felt like, as black student myself, I came from an inner-city context where there weren't a lot of resources that we had. In a way that I wanted to do better and support my community, but I also wanted to get out of it. I didn't want to be [Joshua] from the hood. I didn't want to be seen like that, even
Conference Session
Technical Session 8 - Paper 3: Academic Success of College Students with ADHD: The First Year of College
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Laura Carroll, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Stephen L DesJardins
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
Institutional type context Student-specific Financial concerns, incoming freshman; Financial characteristics concerns, end of first year Student engagement Been late to class; Skipped class; Turned in course (academic assignment(s) late; Turned in course assignments that do disengagement1) not reflect your best work; Fell asleep in class2 Individual student Student engagement Bored in class (proxy for short-term self-motivation) experience: Interact with faculty outside of class or office hours; Classroom
Conference Session
Session 6 - Track 2: Illuminating the APIDA Experience in Engineering Education: A Scoping Review
Collection
2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Michelle Choi Ausman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Qin Zhu, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
andexperiences contribute to their ways of defining and solving engineering problems or how theirengineering learning experience has helped them reflect on their cultural identities as Asians. Wehope that future research on Asian American engineering students considers their variouscultural identities when discussing matters regarding race, particularly of Asian Americanstudents.Discussion and Future ResearchFuture research needs to address the extreme cultural diversity within the Asian Americancommunity, which has been a focal discussion among Asian American studies researchers [2].Recent studies in higher education have shown that Filipino students are 60% less likely to majorin STEM fields than other Asian American students [11] and Hmong and
Conference Session
Track 3: Technical Session 7: Promotion of Student Well-being via Successful Navigation through Conflict Resolution Pathways
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Boni Frances Yraguen, Vanderbilt University; Bettina K Arkhurst; Stuart Montgomery, Georgia Institute of Technology; Derek Ashton Nichols, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jennifer Molnar, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
Paper ID #40712Promotion of Student Well-being via Successful Navigation throughConflict Resolution PathwaysDr. Boni Frances Yraguen, Vanderbilt University Boni Yraguen is a recent PhD graduate from Georgia Tech. Her dissertation work is in the field of combustion/thermo./fluids. She studies a novel diesel injection strategy: Ducted Fuel Injection (DFI), which is used to drastically decrease soot emissions during diesel combustion. In addition to her thesis work, Boni is passionate about engineering education. She has led and participated in various educational studies on the impact of student reflections, authentic
Conference Session
Track 4: Technical Session 3: Considerations for assessment, evaluation, and continuous improvement of a pre-college STEM summer program for promising Black high school students
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Jesika Monet McDaniel, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Cynthia Hampton Ph.D., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kim Lester, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
ProgramInsight from 2022 Cohort, Needs for 2023 Cohort, and Change for 2023 CohortThe insight, needs, and change addressed from 2022 to 2023 was a process that started withtranscribing reflections from the co-author of this paper who is the co-director of DISTINCTION.Open responses from the 2022 cohort were also cross-checked to ensure that participants’communication of their experiences were integrated into this exercise. The insight for 2022 fromthe co-author and crosschecked, the needs derived from the insight to address in 2023, and thechange enacted in 2023 is organized in this section.Evaluation Topic: Infrastructure Insight from 2022: Lenient on time and structure of free time. Need identified for 2023: adjustments to routine to set
Conference Session
Track 6: Technical Session 6: Stewardship of the Stories: Learning from Black Engineering Students' Lived Experiences
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Tanya D Ennis, University of Colorado Boulder; Donna Auguste Ph.D., Auguste Research Group, LLC; Cynthia Hampton Ph.D., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
. These participants used a narrative form of storytelling to share theirexperiences at the university and other settings, including experiences of physical conflicts,emotional conflicts, bias, microaggressions, mental stress, and physical illness.Their experiences spoke their truth, sometimes for the first time. The participants’ experienceswere consequential for each of them, even while being inconvenient and uncomfortable for otherpeople who did not share their experiences and may not believe their truth. However, webelieved them. In 2023, we sought to revisit a reflective question related to conducting theoriginal research study: What methodological nuances arose from participants sharing theirlived experiences in a study of 24 Black
Conference Session
Track 1: Technical Session 7:Beyond Math Readiness: Understanding Why Some Women Pursue Engineering
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Olivia Ryan, Virginia Tech Engineering Education; Susan Sajadi, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
emerging themes.‬‭ rustworthiness‬T‭Reporting on the quality, credibility, and validation of qualitative research is the best practice to‬ ‭ensure the study's trustworthiness‬‭[47]‬‭. In engineering‬‭education, Walther et al.‬‭[48]‬‭provide‬ ‭validation strategies to ensure the quality and trustworthiness of qualitative research.‬‭ heoretical validation of a study should reflect the complexity of the lived experience under‬T‭investigation. This can be validated through the use of an opposing case analysis. As can be seen‬ ‭in the findings, different factors had opposing narratives emerge. Considering alternative or‬ ‭opposing perspectives is particularly important to ensure the reliability of a case study‬‭[43]‬‭.‬ ‭Communicative validation of
Conference Session
Technical Session 2 - Paper 5: Need for Change: How Interview Preparation and the Hiring Process in Computing Can Be Made More Equitable
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Stephanie Jill Lunn, Georgia Institute of Technology ; Ellen Zerbe, Pennsylvania State University; Monique S Ross, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
andparticipants’ interpretations of their experiences [13, 14]. Understanding arises simultaneouslyfrom individual reflections, as well as through interpretation of the collective experiences acrossgroups of individuals to explore the similarities and differences. Data is often gathered usinginterviews, although there other other means for doing so, and then the transcripts from theseinterviews are examined [15]. Analysis occurs over several iterations, and involves assessingeither the entire transcript [14] or decontextualized excerpts referred to as a “pool of meanings”[15, p. 43]. Both options serve to obtain the same purpose from the data, a conceptually distinctset of categories of description which encompass the different ways the phenomena is
Conference Session
Session 10 - Track 1: Walking Between Two Worlds: Creating a Framework for Conducting Culturally-Responsive Research with University Indigenous Communities
Collection
2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Qualla Jo Ketchum, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jennifer Lyn Benning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Donna Westfall-Rudd
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
that of the Elders. These are people in the community“who have acquired wisdom through life experiences, education (a process of gaining skills, knowledge, andunderstanding), and reflection (Archibald, 2008 p 37). Age is not a factor when it comes to being an Elder. The maincriteria are that an individual is respected by others in the community and has important cultural knowledge that isshared (Archibald, 2008). When conducting culturally responsive research, particularly with Indigenouscommunities, a very important beginning step is receiving permission from the community members(Masta, 2018). As such, I framed my starting conversations around the purpose of receiving permission orblessing for my research as well as engaging and building a
Conference Session
Track 8: Technical Session 9: On the Importance of Spatiality and Intersectionality: Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Undergraduate Engineering Experiences Through Critical Collaborative Ethnographic Site Visits
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Finn Johnson M.A., Oregon State University; Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
the research process (Jolivette,2015). Surveys, interviews, and focus groups create great benefits for the institution and itsresearch team (in the forms of grant funding, tenure, and graduate degrees, among others) oftenwith little to no benefit for the subject community (which may or may not even receivecompensation). Fair financial compensation that matches or exceeds the per-hour wages of theresearchers is a way to strive for equal benefit for TGNC subject populations from a researchjustice perspective. Our participants were compensated at a comparable hourly rate as theresearchers in order to reflect the unparalleled value of the unique expertise that they brought tothe research project.Site-visitsThe site-visit activities were divided
Conference Session
Track 6: Technical Session 2: Enhancing the Cultural Competence of K-12 STEM Teachers through a Global Research Experience
Collection
2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton; Leanne Petry, Central State University; Kelly Bohrer, University of Dayton; Kellie Schneider, University of Dayton; Marjorie Langston Langston; Elizabeth Generas
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
teachersengaged in a pre-departure course, a four-week program in China, and a follow-up curriculumdesign and delivery activity. These researchers used the IDI to assess participants’ gains, as wellas other qualitative methods including ongoing reflections, and an assessment of the participants’curriculum design projects. Similar to Cushner and Chang (2015), He Lundgren and Pines(2017) did not see dramatic growth on the IDI, but did see some positive changes in theparticipants’ beliefs, insights, and teaching practices.Using a different assessment strategy, Oken, Jansen, Hoffman and Coelen (2022) foundinternational experience to have a significant positive impact on developing the interculturalcompetence of teachers. Finally, Charity Hudley, and
Conference Session
Technical Session 8 - Paper 4: Implicit and Explicit Balanced Identity Scores Vary as a Function of Gender and STEM Major
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Rachelle Pedersen, Texas A&M University; Nyima Sanneh, Motivation and Learning Lab; Paul R Hernandez, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
averagedto create a composite score. The scale historically holds acceptable levels of internalconsistency.And finally for stereotype endorsement, a three-item scale was used to measure theextent to which participants endorsed various stereotypes associated with their genderand their STEM domain. Participants answered items an a scale of 1 to 5 and acomposite scale was calculated by averaging the value of each of the three items.Unlike the other scales, verbiage was only worded in one way, such as “In general, menmay be better than women at Engineering.” Therefore, the scores were reverse codedfor women to reflect a self-gender association of the “stereotype endorsement.” Thescale has a historically high internal consistency.Implicit Association
Conference Session
Session 6 - Track 1: Intersectionality: Professional identity formation and the success of women of color in higher education STEM disciplines
Collection
2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD)
Authors
Saundra Johnson Austin, University of South Florida; Michelle Bradham-Cousar, Florida International University; Kemesha Gabbidon, University of South Florida
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
focuses on health disparities. This is reflected in ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #36496 her work with the Disability Competencies. She is currently working on research that relates to students with disabilities within the school system. Also, part of a collaborative effort she is working with various faculty members to find ways to learn and address how faculty with disabilities are successful within Academia.Dr. Kemesha Gabbidon, University of South Florida Dr. Kemesha Gabbidon is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of South