% of students will be engaged in some form of mentoring. They will be expected to take part in cooperative education communities through advising, tutoring, conducting seminars, or working as Teaching Assistants (for university credit or for pay through other university funds).7. The program will provide post-graduation preparation. There will be career training as well as opportunities to learn about graduate work and internships. Objective: Scholars will have the opportunity to attend career-related workshops such as seminars about professions in the STEM disciplines, resume writing workshops, or mock interviews. Those that wish to further their education will be provided information and training for GRE completion
of the Engineering Technology department at IUPUI. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comComparison of Undergraduate Student Writing in Engineering Disciplines at Campuses with Varying DemographicsIntroductionEmployers of STEM graduates, especially industries, often emphasize the need for improvementin STEM undergraduate writing skills1. Research findings show that students in STEM fieldslack strong writing skills2.Writing is generally recognized as fundamental to the formation andcommunication of scientific and technical knowledge to peer groups and general audiences. Inthis aspect, persuasive writing is an essential
atTowson University for fostering librarian-faculty collaboration to build an IL infrastructureacross the university‟s curriculum (engineering and sciences are not specifically addressed).Investigations by Leckie and Fullerton[14] in the late 1990s explored faculty attitudes andpractices in regard to science and engineering IL instruction, and concluded (in part) thatinformation literacy is critical for college students, and must be tailored within disciplines andstrongly course-related to be meaningful and effective. The authors identify librarians as obviouspotential collaborators, warning that they must be flexible in regard to a range of pedagogicalpreferences and approaches among engineering faculty; and a balance should be sought
modification of traditional lectures give rise to a common question: “Is the large class aspecial case?” Although a shared perception among many faculty members is that large classespreclude significant participation by students, the literature suggests otherwise.(41) For example, afaculty member in a class of any reasonable size can instruct students to write a brief response toa question, to pair with another student seated on the left or the right, and to compare andcontrast both responses. Simply stated, activities could be tailor-made to take into considerationthe class-size, if need be. Also, it should consider differences in levels, nature of the materialbeing taught, and the maturity of the recipients.In-class discussion is considered by most
individuals as they practice implementing the engineering designprocess, students gain exposure to working in a more diverse context closer to that which theymight encounter post-graduation, rather than working with a solely technically-minded team4.Among its 2016-2017 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET includes “an abilityto communicate effectively,” “an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams,” and an“understanding of professional and ethical responsibility” as key Student Outcomes, those skillswhich engineering students are expected to have learned upon graduation5. According to a studyconducted by Riley, Furth, and Zelmer regarding the factors determining engineering alumni’sprofessional success, engineering graduates
development in instructional design, teaching diversity, and peer coaching. Dr. Utschig completed his PhD in Nuclear Engineering at the University of Wisconsin Madison. His technical expertise involves analysis of thermal systems for fusion reactor designs.Donna C. Llewellyn, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Llewellyn is the Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Georgia Tech. Her primary professional interests are in the area of faculty and graduate student pro- fessional development, engineering education research, and increasing access and support for under- represented minorities in the field of engineering
for and importance of such connections to academicsuccess.Morrow and Ackerman found that 65% of students who leave their university depart for non-academic reasons and that academic progress and achievement are closely related to a sense ofbelonging [10]. Research has shown that one predictor of persistence in college is feeling asense of mattering and belonging [1], [37]. Commuter students are particularly at risk of notpersisting [1]. Mattering is defined as “the feeling one has when he/she feels that he/she isnoticed, cared about, needed, and valued by another person” [12] and the sense of belonging as“the perception of peer and faculty support, classroom comfort, and isolation [3], [11], [38]-[40].The challenge is how one goes about
whatapproaches have been shown to work well for others; in other words, to consider evidence-basedteaching practices. The engineering education literature has provided such evidence-basedapproaches for introduction to engineering courses1, capstone courses2, and topic-specificcourses.3,4 It has also provided teaching guidelines for approaches ranging from teaching usingactive learning methods5, improving student self efficacy6 and retaining engineering students7. Page 24.977.2This paper summarizes other evidenced-based teaching practices which have recently emerged from our collaborative research on the role of a student’s connection to community in his
use of the Analog Discovery Board (ADB). Additionally, the leadershipteam supported program participants in addressing matters related to sustainability at the local andHBCU collaboration level. This included topics related to additional funding for instruction,developing and funding shared research efforts, and development of a broader leadership group.This section presents results related to the overall Year Three grant goals and activities.Finding: The majority of the grant participants expressed satisfaction with their project experience, noting that participation was beneficial for them professionally and personally, and would definitely impact their students. Positive outcomes included increased knowledge of
has been successful in obtaining funding and publishing for various research projects. She’s also the founder and advisor of the first ASEE student chapter in Puerto Rico at UPRM. Currently, she serves as Academic Senator and Faculty Representative at the Administrative Board at UPRM. Her research interests include investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in engineering sciences, especially for underrepresented populations (Hispanic students). She has studied the effectiveness of engineering concept inventories (Statics Concept Inventory - CATS and the Thermal and Transport Concept Inventory - TTCI) for diagnostic assessment and cultural differences among bilingual students. She has also
long term interest in pursuing coding careers, we hypothesize that longercamps spread over one or more academic years to be ideal.Acknowledgement:The authors would like to thank Texas Workforce Commision for funding the camp and the staffof Good Samaritan Community Center, San Antonio, Texas for providing space to hose thesummer campReferences[1] National girls collaborative alliance https://ngcproject.org/statistics Retrieved Dec 3, 2019.[2] Best time to build a love of STEM? It’s after the school day ends, research sayshttps://hechingerreport.org/school-programs-can-boost-interest-stem-research-shows/ Retrieved Dec 22, 2019[3] Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2016, February). Factors influencing computer science learning in
remain “in” the military during their graduate studies and return to formalmilitary service directly upon completion of their graduate degree.In sum, we argue that veteran and current servicemembers are a critical segment of the militarystudent population that deserves research attention aimed at understanding their experiences andcritiquing current institutional structures that impede their participation, belonging, and successin engineering degree programs. We believe that this group, among all military student groups,stands to benefit from concerted efforts by the engineering education community and are likelycandidates for attaining improved levels of support within civilian institutions of higher learning.Of all military student groups, we
andrepresent discipline-specific content in a manner that can foster student understanding is the mostonerous aspect of learning to teach [38], [39].In education, numerous researchers have studied PCK in association with math [40], [41] andscience teaching [42], [43], and recently, PCK has also been adapted in engineering education[44]. Within engineering education, PCK focuses on three domains: “knowledge of how studentsthink about, experience, and understand engineering; knowledge of engineering curricula; andknowledge of instructional strategies that are particularly powerful in teaching engineering [25,p. 148]. All three domains are critical for developing engineering teachers’ PCK. Thus, studieshave explored engineering and technology teachers
Assessment (i2e2a). She ob- tained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation Page 24.302.1 of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER
engineering or computer science into mathematics and science classes can support and enhance learning within and across the STEM disciplines.Dr. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and higher education mathe- matics, science, and engineering classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her research agenda focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. She is creating and testing innovative, interdisciplinary curricular approaches that engage
theperception of dishonest peers and positively associated with understanding of academic integritypolicies.10 This research lends support to the idea that students require explicit education aboutacademic integrity.Yet, the ways in which faculty can infuse integrity education into the classroom has not beensystematically studied. Etter and colleagues proposed using the moral obligation andresponsibility that engineers have for the “health, safety, and welfare” of society as a way toencourage ethical reasoning and promote academic integrity in engineering students. Suggestedmethods for institutions include case-based learning, cooperative learning groups, and service-based learning.13 McCabe and Pavela suggested that faculty encourage honesty in their
, Miami.Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Proposing a Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy Research Framework in Sub- Saharan African STEM Education: A Paradigm Shift from Deficit to Asset- Based PerspectivesAbstractResearch shows that
the College of Integrative Sciences and Arts at Arizona State University. Marvyn’s research interest include Latino/a Career Development and Multicultural Counseling Competencies. For instance, his research examines environmental and socio-cognitive variables associated with academic attainment among Latino/as in higher education.Wen Huang, Arizona State University PhD. student, Engineering Education Systems and Design (PhD) The Polytechnic School Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering Arizona State UniversityDr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University Ann F. McKenna is a Professor in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and Director of The Poly- technic School at Arizona State University. Prior to joining
efforts that acknowledge learner diversity, and understand their effects in students performance. Isabel received her professional degree in biological engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and her MA in policy, organizations and leadership studies at Stanford Graduate School of Education.Dr. Constanza Miranda Mendoza, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Constanza Miranda holds a PhD in design with a focus in anthropology from North Carolina State Uni- versity. While being a Fulbright grantee, Constanza worked as a visiting researcher at the Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering Department, at Stanford. Today she is an assistant professor at the P.Universidad Cat´olica de Chile’s
15% Research Paper 10% Discussion Boards (6 EML modules) 9% Research Presentation 5% Research Paper (EML Module) 10% EML Modules (none) 0% Research Presentation (EML Module) 5% TOTAL 100% TOTAL 100% Note: Total Percentage of EML Modules: 24%Table 1. EE 463 Before and After Percentages of Student DeliverablesIn Table 1, the reduction of percentage weight of nine percent in the three exams provided roomfor six discussion boards. Each discussion board is worth 1.5 percent. The reasons for onlinediscussion boards are described later in the
“busywork” that they must complete in order to graduate. What accounts for thesediscrepancies, and what can we, as engineering educators, do to help students become moreskilled communicators and better understand the role that communication plays in engineering?One reason that many students fail to recognize the importance of communication may be thatcommunication is generally treated as a set of skills that students are supposed to acquireoutside of engineering—in composition, technical writing, or public speaking courses. Studentssee no relation between communication and their genuine engineering work, such as solvingequations, modeling processes or doing product design. Although widespread, this approach tocommunication pedagogy is criticized by
and the projectionsfor a scaled porting of the model to a campus-wide level.I. IntroductionEducational research has widely documented the achievement gap between students fromdifferent socioeconomic statuses (SES). The seminal work by Coleman et al. in 1966 sparked amyriad of studies and initiatives addressing this phenomenon with different views regardingrelation, incident factors, or effects [1][2][3][4]. Despite more than fifty years of documentedefforts, the prevalence of the gap, studied at national and global levels, continues to highlight theneed for renovated approaches [5][6]. At the college level, this gap manifests among studentsfrom lower SES with a higher attrition level, longer times to graduate, and significantly
potential to help educatorsconnect to their students and understand key aspects of their identities and motivations whilejourney maps have the potential to help educators better understand students’ experiences duringa learning activity, class session, semester, or even an entire curriculum. Collectively, they mighthelp educators empathize with students and identify key issues to address as they develop or reviselearning experiences. This paper will describe a persona and journey mapping cycle, present threecase studies of their use among engineering educators, and explore three research questions: 1) How might the persona-journey map cycle be used by engineering educators when designing or redesigning core engineering courses? 2) How does
approach. It was noticed by my department chair that studentscharacterized both classes as transformative experiences. In this way, T-shaped coursesare quickly noticed by students and administrators. University alumni in particular see themerit, and view this type of training as something that makes their alma mater special.For that reason, these activities can become great show pieces for the administration.Both the biomusic project and Brain Mind Culture class have been featured inUniversity-level publications.In the process of building a T-shaped experience, faculty may also find others at theirinstitution who wish to collaborate on an unusual project. For example, through ourregular contact in the Brain, Mind and Culture class, the comparative
a computer. The promise and advantages of onlineeducational content have been well researched and explained1. The advantages touted includeincreased access2 and convenience for learners as well as increased potential for collaborationand efficiency among educators.1 There is evidence that students can even learn better in onlineenvironments.3,4 One report4 describes how web-based content fosters constructivist learningand how online resources can help create an environment that “makes a difference in the kinds ofteaching and learning experiences that are possible.” Online content also favors “personalized”learning, as listed by the National Academy of Engineers as one of their Engineering GrandChallenges 2010.5 A “student-centered approach
Paper ID #42737Navigating Epistemological Borders: Considerations for Team Teaching atthe Intersection of Humanities and STEMXueni Fan, Texas Tech University Xueni Fan is currently a graduate student in the Doctor of Education program, specializing in instructional technology at Texas Tech University. Holding a Master’s degree in applied linguistics, Fan’s research focuses on qualitative research methods, interdisciplinary studies, online learner engagement, and interprofessional education in the medical field.Dr. Joshua M. Cruz, Texas Tech University Joshua Cruz is an assistant professor of education at Texas Tech
Technical Managers2023 ASEE Engineering Management Division (EMD) Abstract This work in progress (WIP) paper aims at demonstrating the innovative design ofintegrating a communication course with the Capstone course, which is part of the Master ofEngineering Technical Management (METM), a 21-month online graduate program for workingprofessionals in the engineering technical management fields. As the culmination of theirgraduate study, students must identify an organizational/technical challenge, formulate a feasibleproject plan to address the issue to bring impact to the organization. During this process, theywill conduct research, create a strong business case for their industry sponsors
outcomes, international students in engineering, and cognitive sciences. She holds a B.S. in Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering and an M.S. in Geological Sciences.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair of the Engineering Education Research Program at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024WIP: The Role of Classroom Teaching Practices on the Academic Success ofEngineering College Students with ADHDAbstractAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurological
in the context ofcomputer programming was both related to and distinct from this notion of the functions of aproduct.)At some point, someone signed “so, it’s what the thing tells you about itself?” and there was anelectric moment in the room. “Yes, that! It’s what the thing tells you about — how you can useit, what it’s for…” And so, with several grammatical and production tweaks, our signedprototypes for affordance theory was born.The signs for “affordance” and “to afford” reveal (or rather, afford) exploring aspects ofaffordance theory that may be less obvious in English. For instance, when these signs wereshown to a hearing non-signer who uses affordance theory in their research, they began to usethe signs as tools with which to think
within the USUsystem for a specific topic or course in one location. The libguide for this course (http://libguides.usu.edu/engr1000) is updated each time we teach the course.Final research papers are due during finals week and carry a stiff penalty for lateness-due toobvious reasons. Papers are turned in electronically via Blackboard. A grading rubric that wasestablished by the instructors and is updated each time the course is taught is used as the basis forassigning grades. To perform grading, the papers are equally divided among the instructors sothat each instructor initially grades 1/n of the total number of papers, where “n” is the number ofinstructors. Instructors assign grades to their assigned papers using the rubric. A master rubric