organizing the data collectors and collected data. This is particularly true when working inclassroom settings. Large-scale data collection across multiple schools and classrooms in P-12settings has its own unique set of challenges. To begin with, identifying potential schools andteachers as adopters can be difficult (Back et al., 2015). Schools have schedules and professionaldevelopment commitments; planning for simultaneous implementation for multiple schoolsneeds to be carried out months in advance (Nadelson et al., 2013). Letters of commitment areoften needed from any potential collaborating institutions. P-12 schools may require only a letterof collaboration from the principal, or an in-depth vetting process involving specific
to forecast demand and plan for inventory which is one of the most critical concerns inthe fields of supply chain engineering technology. Table 2: Number of credit hours for each study core of different universities. General Math and Distr. Management Total Credit University Program Name Department Name Electives Education Science /Tech (Bus.) Hours Interdisciplinary Interdisciplinary Clarkson University
: Control System (Final Project I) o Control methodologies o Valves/Sensor - component selection o PLC Module 6: Prototyping and Comparison (Final Project II) o System development in the lab o Performance testing and comparison o Improvement and/or change system designThe modules have been developed as independent and self-contained as possible in order to makethem transportable so that other institutions or individuals will be able to adapt them for existingcourses. The initial plan is to offer this course as a 3-credit technical elective course during theFall 2019 semester (not during Spring’19 as originally planned, due to scheduling conflict). Thefirst offering of the course will
project.Next stepsAs we finish year two and plan for the third year of the funded programming, bridging thefindings between teacher and student outcomes and collaborative processes will become moreimportant. At the end of year one, we were able to bring together individuals from ourpartnership organizations at a summer summit to engage in collaborative curriculumdevelopment. Although the university still had a heavy hand in finalizing the classroom activitiesfor year two, this model of engagement allowed for more teacher buy-in with the material,consistent with our goals for sustainability. Another summit is planned for the end of year twoand, informed by our preliminary research findings, we seek to further scaffold classroomresponsibility to shift
specialized knowledge in subject and can involve in professional activities. 8. Demonstrates specialized knowledge in adjoining disciplines including knowledge in a new discipline or profession. Levels for Specialized Skills 1. Demonstrates basic cognitive and practical skills to perform tasks within stipulated rules. 2. Demonstrates skills needed to establish correlations among functions and tasks. 3. Demonstrates cognitive and practical skills for perform tasks and problem solve. 4. Demonstrates ability to select alternative actions based on reciprocal effects on other functional areas. 5. Plans and evaluates processes while considering alternatives and impacts. 6
difficulty.One tool for promoting first-to-second year undergraduate student retention is the use of a first-year seminar [5]. Most first-year seminars take place in small, discussion based settings and theyconsist of curricular and co-curricular topics that are designed to help students integrate bothacademically and socially into college life [6]. Due to the high number of credit hours requiredfor students in the GVSU School of Engineering, the first year curriculum is being reviewed toidentify how to include a mandatory first year seminar in the program plans. Rather than waitingfor the planning and approving of a fist year seminar, the learning skills modules wereimplemented in an Introduction to Engineering course during the Fall 2018 semester.The
Faculty Connections [7] Faculty Support [9] Professional Development [21] STEM Career Development [7] Cost-of-Attendance Support and Planning [7] Extracurricular Support [14] Academic Peer Support [6] Graduate Student Connections [5] Additional Support [16] Developing a Local Network [5] Engaging with Professionals [5] STEM Peer Connections [5] Extracurricular Information [6]Limitations & Future WorkAs the project is ongoing and developmental in nature, we do not currently have any limitationsto report. However, we do plan to pilot version 2.0 of our survey instrument with a broader set ofSTEM students and institutions in spring 2019. Our target sample for the second is
(summary of the Water, Earth, and Biota initiative as a 2000highlight for Geosciences), Geotimes, 46(7), 25-26.4. Hooper, R., and E. Foufoula-Georgiou (2008), Advancing the Theory and Practice of Hydrologic Science, EosTrans. AGU, 89(39), doi:10.1029/2008EO390005.5. CUAHSI (2010). Water in a Dynamic Planet: A Five-year Strategic Plan for Water Science(http://dx.doi.org/10.4211/sciplan.200711).6. Shaw, S. B., and M. T. Walter (2012), Using comparative analysis to teach about the nature of nonstationarityin future flood predictions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16(5), 1269–1279, doi:10.5194/hess-16-1269-2012.7. Meselhe, E., McCorquodale, J.A., Shelden, J., Dortch, M., Brown, T.S., Elkan, P., Rodrigue, M.D., Schindler,J.K
problem solving,management of resources, and process planning. Manufacturing is important and has greatimpact on economic development. Thus, it is imperative to provide pathways for students topursue careers in the manufacturing field.This paper discusses the development and implementation of articulated college credit forholders of "Louisiana’s Fast Start Program C4M Certification for Manufacturing”. Thiscertification was developed by Louisiana Economic Development – Fast Start Program and isoffered by different technical and community colleges in the state. It requires the completion ofone year of training on manufacturing oriented topics to include: Introduction to Manufacturing,Tools and Equipment Used in Manufacturing, and Introduction to
practice. K-12 science teachers are increasingly pressured to include engineeringdesign in their curriculum; however, there are relatively few engineering-focused professionaldevelopment programs in comparison to those for traditional science and mathematics. [3] [4] Professional development can improve teacher practice,[5] [6] especially if the programsare content specific,[7] inquiry-based, and learner-centered. [8] [9] Successful professionaldevelopment provides teachers with content, pedagogical knowledge, and training; training thatincludes guidance, support, feedback, and time for reflection and planning.[10] [11] In addition,effective professional development approaches include peer support, teacher-developed researchexperiences, and
students on the path toskill development, it is critical to assess whether or not they intend to change their behaviorsbased on the feedback with which they have been provided. The theory of planned behavior16postulates that behavioral intentions are the most proximal construct to behavioral change, asthey represent one’s attitude towards that behavior. This then captures the effort they are willingto expend in order to engage in that behavior and their motivation to engage in that behavior andimprove upon it. However, the role of intentions in future behavior is qualified by individuals’volitional control over the behavior in question, which is the control the individual has over theirability to engage in that behavior16. Volitional control can
. Figure 1: Original Pole-Mounted Transformers Figure 2: Original 480V Breaker PanelThe senior design team was tasked with designing a completely new electrical system whichincluded two pad-mounted transformers: one 2300V/480V transformer for the foam breakerpower and another 480V/120V transformer for lighting and maintenance equipment. The teamwas responsible for providing one-line drawings, elementary drawings, panel schedules, a bill ofmaterials, a cable schedule, a conduit plan, a lighting plan and a construction package. The teamwas also responsible for assembling two electrical panels and shipping them to the mill. 4. ImplementationIn the process of completing this project for Verso, the team gained a great
the use ofadditional resources about research-based teaching and learning3 to scaffold their discussions.Each instructor chose a new (to them) interactive teaching strategy to use in an upcoming course.Groups met regularly throughout the school year to discuss and plan their teaching. The group Page 26.765.2leaders continued meeting throughout the year (again via phone conference), as well. Conferencecall meeting notes, longer narrative descriptions written by group leaders, and survey data werecollected to study the design of the groups.ResultsResearch Question #1- Faculty Development ModelThe survey results indicated that the faculty
assist in instrument testing andvalidation; 3) to complete a literature and prior art review and construct our test instrument informs appropriate to both engineering students and practicing engineers with the assistance ofpsychometric experts; and 4) to develop an instrument testing and validation plan appropriate toour research goals and contexts.Significant ResultsIn this section, we summarize the following: 1) Delphi Study key findings; 2) results ofcollaborator recruitment efforts; 3) a summary of our instrument research, instrumentconstruction process, and face validity study; and 4) the design of our unique testing andvalidation process
engineeringcommunity in earthquake risk mitigation and response operations in future earthquake disasters.Keywords: Volunteer programs, Engineering students, Lebanon, Earthquake, Disaster riskmitigationIntroductionIt has been shown from recent earthquake devastations that loss of lives and long term effectscan only be effectively reduced through planned response action programs that engagecommunity trained volunteers led by credible organizations. A case study in the Nishi Suma area( Japan) by R. Shaw and K. Goda 1 pointed out that 60 percent of residents were evacuated bytheir own efforts, and approximately 20 per cent were rescued by neighbor volunteers. This datasignifies the importance of community volunteer in the immediate rescue operation
ideas, best practices, reports, and strategies throughout theyear via teleconferencing and email. Although simple in some ways, it also included a lot ofchallenges. Further discussion refined the early ideas to focus on a pre-capstone experience forJunior students, where NJU and OSU students could work on teams and gain extra design andteam skills, with an international perspective, before the senior capstone course. From this, thecurrent plan is detailed here of an annual Summer Design Experiences (SDE) at both institutions,and an internationally co-mentored senior design project in alternate years at NJU.Program StructureThe overall program structure is presented in Table 1, showing the timeline for events in a two-year cycle. The Summer
beginning in 2006 (over 80 to date). One student completedall requirements for the Coastal Engineering concentration and graduated in December 2013 inthe course only option. Three students graduated in May 2015 in the Coastal Engineeringconcentration (two in the course only option and one with the Project option). All these studentshave permanent engineering positions in the local commuting area. All four are currently EIT’sin the state of Mississippi and plan to take the PE exam this calendar year. Students working inengineering firms (or for the government) appear to be well served by the course only optionsince they work on projects in their day to day jobs and most prefer knowledge gained fromadditional graduate coursework to research
from Los Andes University in Colombia, and a master’s degree and Ph.D in Engineering Management from Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, NJ.Dr. Donald N. Merino P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Donald N. Merino, Ph.D., P.E. Alexander Crombie Humphreys Professor of Economics of Engineering Emeritus Donald N. Merino retired as a tenured full professor and as the Alexander Crombie Humphreys Chaired Professor of Economics of Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. He taught Engi- neering Economy, Financial Management, Decision Analysis, Total Quality Management, and Strategic Planning. He is Founder Emeritus of the undergraduate Bachelor of Engineering in Engineering
mechanics totechnical learning, often found in computer and software engineering6. This paper will explorean on-going design development process at the University of Calgary for integratinggamification and creative thinking with technical design techniques. The objectives of this workwere to use gamification as a method of expanding opportunities for creativity and to engagestudent innovation. This paper will describe the four stages of the current research, results andobservations of the various project iterations, and plans for future work.Methodology and Analysis of Research StagesThis multi-year study began in 2012, with the latest results expected in April 2015. The entireresearch methodology has been separated across four main stages of work
sound activated switch, could beimplemented in the module. The research group also plan to develop additional modules basedon other engineering discipline (such as chemical, mechanical, or civil engineering).Due to a small sample size and a low percent of underrepresented groups in the course, theauthors were unable to analyze the data by gender, ethnicity, or entry level (first semester versussecond semester or above). However, we plan to implement the module in Fall 2015 in a largernumber of students, which will allow for a more in depth analysis of the data and of the impactof the module in students’ confidence, and interest in engineering.Conclusion:Losing nearly half of talented first year engineering students is not acceptable and more
engineers and technologists do, the various typesof engineers and technologists that exist, the types of problems they solve, and the impact they can haveon society, especially the Dominican society. Additionally, it was considered strategic to lay out amultiple year curriculum plan for the four groups of students to ensure that students participating inMACILE for several years had the opportunity to experience a broad range of topics and an engineering 2 Page 26.1517.3and technology curriculum adjusted to different level of challenges. On
does not intervene duringthe assembly process. Another practical example of an adjustment made occurs in the lectureconcerning computer programming. The various computer programming concepts includingvariables, functions, and structures are presented as an analogy to parts of speech like nouns,verbs, and punctuation. The analogy grounds the computer programming concepts into adiscipline (language arts) that high school students have more familiarity. The instructormaterials were also revised to provide more background information concerning the lessons andmore detailed lesson plans. A daily lesson plan was developed for the high school versionincluding a minute-to-minute timeline of the day. A significant difference in a high school course
% of the participants planned to incorporate at least 25% of theworkshop activities/resources into their teaching. We believe that numerous instructors (atcollege level, high school level, and middle school level) would find Google tools an excellentplatform to provide online supplements to their face-to-face instructions from multipleperspectives, including but not limited to accessibility, flexibility, and ease of employingmultimedia. After our workshop, we continue working with K-12 teachers to help them applyGoogle tools to improve their teaching.Relevant work and motivationInitiated in 2009, Google’s Computer Science for High School (CS4HS) program1 aims toprovide professional development opportunities for high school teachers in the
importance comes from their ability to drive requirements andbusiness plans. Leaders take special care to their feedback for planning MDMimplementation. Table 2 shows 62.5% of respondents are employed by large ITorganizations (organizations with 500 or more employees). A large organization iscapable of investing in training, software and hardware. This information is necessary toknow how large organizations react to the factors in comparison to small one. Therelationship between factors influencing model selection and organization size is not partof this study.In addition to this, as shown in Table 3, a majority of respondents are currently usingSiperian MDM Hub (21.3%) in their organizations. Siperian MDM solution providessupport for FDM and CDM
academically when they regulate their learning19–22. SRL has beenoperationalized to measure aspects of students’ metacognition, motivation, and behaviors relatedto their academic self-regulation, such as the Self-Regulated Learning Interview Scale (SRLIS)developed by Zimmerman and Martinez-Pons19. SRLIS, a semi-structured interview protocolfocused on “hypothetical learning contexts”23 based on research with K-12 students comprises 14themes19,20, including self-evaluation, organizing and transforming, goal-setting and planning,seeking information, keeping records and monitoring, environmental structuring, self-consequences, rehearsing and memorizing, seeking social assistance (peers, teachers, adults),and reviewing records (notes, books, tests).Prior
andimplementation of practices and initiatives for increasing diversity of the student and faculty inthe mechanical engineering discipline must be a focus. Additionally, we believe that having awelcoming, inclusive environment is a precursor to improving diversity and thus should be animportant consideration in mechanical engineering education. We propose that introducing a fewcarefully designed practices that require very few resources and cause minimum disruption couldresult in a more welcoming and inclusive environment.Bringing about change for a more inclusive environment can be challenging, namely in that itcan be disruptive and require resources, but careful planning and strategic use of resources canhelp alleviate these challenges. A more inclusive
piece • 1 yard of tape: free • 1 yard of string: free • 1 marshmallow: free Figure 1 – Text of Engineering Design Challenge TaskParticipants in the session were first introduced to the EDP, reviewing the different phasesincluding identifying the problem and constraints, developing possible solution paths, selecting apath and building a prototype, evaluating the process and making improvements. Attendeesbegan by working in pairs (one engineering undergraduate student and one mathematicseducation masters student) to design their towers and plan how to spend resources for theirtowers (see Image 1). Image 1 – Planning the TowerAfter this initial designing period, pairs then transitioned to
contribute to support the named abilities/skills? • What is the impact of the PELARS’ technology seen from the final users: students and teachers? • Will the new technology change the accreditation procedures?The schedule for trials in PELARS is shown in figure 1.Creating a comprehensive plan for each of the trials include also ethics considerations. Allactivities are and will be carried out taking into account FP7 guidelines as well as nationalguidelines on ethic issues, guaranteed by the Ethics Committee under EU. Participation of users isin line with agreed European and National ethical procedures for user participation andremuneration of test subjects, and subject to sign off by the Ethics and Research committees
the classroom. Further, there are no five or fewer silver bullets. Systemic change requireschange across numerous elements in the system. Recommendations presented in two ASEEreports7,8 addressed who and what needs to change, and now it is critical that the engineeringeducation research community conduct research to support change agents as they developeffective plans to make these changes. The purpose of our work-in-progress paper is to offersample research questions to illustrate potentially productive research directions for improvingadaptation of evidence-based teaching approaches to improve student learning, which could beaddressed by the engineering education community. Based on results of a Delphi study, we offera framework for
architects started working on floor plans andother items before the engineering and construction management students started full-time workon the project. During this initial design stage, the architects brought in engineers andconstruction managers to consult as necessary. After design concepts were substantiallycomplete, the construction managers played a larger role in developing constructiondocumentation, specifications, and plans for construction. Shown in Figure 3, the ΔT-90 house officially placed first in the Affordability Contest of the