defend against them, and restore compromisedinformation systems. Such practical skills can only be gained through hands-on experimentation.In the literature, ethical hacking1, 2 involving “red team/blue team” activities3-5, arerecommended for teaching advanced skills to information security students. More importantly,hands-on experimentation is an effective pedagogy to teach students higher order thinking skillsas defined within Bloom’s taxonomy, including analysis, evaluation, synthesis and creation. Awell designed hands-on activity can integrate skills from multiple levels of the taxonomy,thereby enhancing students’ technical, as well as critical, thinking skills.Providing information security students with hands-on experimentation is
Teamwork Efficacy, Attitudes and Interest: Insights on Their Relationships Kara Vance, Abdullah Konak, Sadan Kulturel-Konak Penn State Berks Gül Okudan Kremer Penn State University Park Ivan Esparragoza Penn State Brandywine AbstractStudents’ professional skills, such as teamwork, global awareness, ethics, and creative problemsolving, increase their likelihood for success throughout their education and career paths,especially in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM
as a trait of innovators. In addition, this is well aligned with Ulrich who notes decisions in product development are contextual and boundary spanning. Creating a framework that supports a variety of design tools, models, and best practices. As a template, the framework should accommodate a variety of paths through the design process but also support a particular path should the instructor specify one. Being extendable to include other context themes such as cultural, societal, environmental, sustainable, and ethical. A key measure of design process success is developing a solution in a broader market and societal context. Creating a framework to encourage creativity and innovation by
" responses. Responses to question 2 indicate that mentors were overconfident about their creative skills before participation in BEAM. This also indicates that mentors felt that they improved more than they had anticipated. Responses to question 7 indicate that mentors felt they had underestimated their leadership skills at the beginning of the semester. The "after" responses show that mentors gained more confidence as leaders. Responses to questions 1 and 8 seem to indicate that mentors felt BEAM had little impact on their analytical skills or standards of professional conduct. The response to question 8 could have stemmed from the fact that it was poorly worded and incorporated two different concepts (ethics and professionalism) into one
interdisciplinary problem; 5. Analyze and synthesize results from social, ethical, The home at 901 Pleasant St. in Worcester was originally humanistic, technical or other perspectives, asconstructed in the mid 1800s as a country estate (Fig. 1). appropriate;Today, the house is used as an office and meeting space by 6. Maintain effective working relationships within theseveral different nonprofit organizations. The building is three project team and with the project advisor(s), recognizingstories, with an unfinished basement. The office of the Center and resolving problems that may arise;for Nonviolent Solutions (an
. If knowing and writing are, indeed, socially constructed, itseems a logical next step to create a process of assessment that responds in kind.* All students with the exception of those in the Department of Engineering Science; that department has its ownseries of three communication and design courses, Engineering Praxis (ESC101, 102 and 201). Table 1: Communication curriculum in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering MSE290 – MSE390 – MSE490: Communication I: Communication II: Professional Practice Case Studies in Directed Study and Ethics Materials ScienceCourse ▪ Build on written/oral ▪ Build on written
’ collaborations and teamwork as result of using a new‘Moodle-based’ course management system (CMS) [15]. CATALOG DESCRIPTION, OBJECTIVES AND OUTLINEIntroduction to Engineering Practice: First year practical engineering experience; introduction to concepts,methods and principles of engineering practice. Problem solving, design, project planning, communication,teamwork, ethics and professionalism; innovative solution development and implementation. Introduction to variousengineering disciplines and degree programs.Required Text: Landis, Raymond B., Studying Engineering: A Roadmap to a Rewarding Career. Discovery Press,Los Angeles, CA. 3rd ed. 2007. ISBN 13-978-0-9646969-2-1 [16].Objectives: 1. To afford opportunities for hands-on
expose engineering freshmen to a survey of thediscipline through a FYE seminar or guest lectures4-7. Often these courses are characterized by alecture or seminar series that highlights the fundamentals of the discipline and/or the opportuni-ties that students might pursue after graduation. These courses may include some combination ofcomputer programming, computer aided design, economics, ethics, and/or overview of discipli-nary topics. These courses are typically offered in larger student cohorts and are more easilyscaled than project based courses. In these courses, guest lecturers or seminar speakers are acommon feature.There are several freshman year experience courses that encourage students to pursue a personalinterest in the field of
challenges withvideos use and show they don’t necessarily work in any environment. For example, [5] provideda set of short videos to a marketing class to allow class time to be spent on other items. Theauthors reported that students did not appear to watch the videos unless assigned to do so. Acomputer science course documented by Hsin and Cigas [6] used short videos and reported apositive impact in that students were more satisfied with the course, were less likely to withdraw,and were more likely to pass the course. Itani [3] examined survey results for 92 students andconcluded that videos were a beneficial tool for learning engineering ethics. In some senses,student-focused videos are a version of peer-led learning, which has also been spoken
Collinson’sanalysis, the diffusion literature suggests that teachers' work. The teacher had to manage not only classroom control,attitudes toward, and expertise with, technology often are key but also the ethical implications of technology and the moralfactors associated with their uses of technology [19. In Davis’ hazards. Those hazards include not only plagiarism andwork of predicting user acceptance, perceived usefulness and threats, but also external circumstances which took students’ease of use are two determinants to people’s acceptance or attention away from the plans she created involving therejection of technology [26]. Thus, a teacher’s attitude and technology [22]. Teachers must be concerned abouttrainability can
drawbacks. Over-reliance on AI can lead to decreased criticalthinking skills and reduced problem-solving abilities in students and generate results that align closely with the user's needs.who use it as a shortcut rather than a learning tool. There are also Ultimately, the responsibility lies with the user to provideconcerns about misinformation, as LLMs can sometimes structured input that guides the AI toward producing accurateproduce inaccurate or biased responses [6]. Furthermore, ethical and valuable outputs, making the interaction both efficient andconsiderations arise regarding data privacy and the potential for trustworthy.AI-generated content to be misused for plagiarism. While LLMs Fig. 8
) identified a significant lack of JEDI-relatedcontent in professional engineering societies, underscoring the urgent need to strengtheneducation in these areas to prepare inclusive and socially committed engineers. Armanios et al.(2021) highlighted how a curricular restructuring led to an increase from 17% to 69% in theincorporation of social justice concepts in students' final reflections, demonstrating the ability toinclude the social impact of engineering decisions. Similarly, Hess et al. (2024) emphasized theconnections between ethics and DEI, identifying the need to integrate and unify strategies thatenable engineering students to address both the social and technical aspects of their profession.Finally, Gupta, Talluri and Ghosh (2024
)education, according to a 2007 report2, “Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing andEmploying America for a Brighter Economic Future”. Additionally, other concerns about thequality and effectiveness of teaching learning environments in the U.S. are also registered.Educational paradigms that served us well in the past may not be adequate for the future. Welive in a rapidly changing world, with a global job market, global educational competition, aglobally integrated economy3, conflicting educational values, increasing multicultural trends,burdening educational cost, rising security crisis, growing ethical and moral conflicts, wideningincome gaps, and unstable financial conditions. Some strategic actions are needed for preventingfurther
Doing internships. as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical Participation in community work and competitions. responsibility Interacting with industry professionals and the community at large while trying to solve community- related problems. Doing internships. Running the
support a robust relational database management system. 5. Apply concepts of best practices in information technology management and security to enterprise processes. 6. Describe the ethical challenges that confront an IT professional 7. Demonstrate written and oral communication skills in collaborative environments by participating on teams that address solutions for IT management challenges. In this BS-ITM program, students learn theory, principles, and hands-on activities in the discipline through twelve one-month duration courses. Designated PLOs are achieved at the conclusion of the capstone project that span three months, covering areas of networking, wireless, database, client-server, information security, IT
faculty members deliver the content of a single course, sharing the burden ofcourse preparation, lecture, in-class tasks, and assessment 1, 2. One purpose of team-teaching isto supplement gaps in student education (typically gaps in math or communication or ethics or Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education 134leadership skills); this supplementation is accomplished not by tutoring or by external labs but byintegrating the supplemental instruction directly into a specific course content. By
relates to the engineering terminology and understanding the work requirements, laws, and ethics. Culture: Differences in culture leads many times to the lack of trust, misunderstanding, and hesitation by both refugee engineers and employers alike. Networking: In the United States, as in other countries, networking plays a big role in creating e opportunities and reinforcing the efforts to find employment. Background evaluation: In the United States, many employers would like to have candidates with US academic degrees and US experience, and they often ask for diplomas and references to support that. It is hard to convince many employers to give an engineer with overseas degrees and experience
ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2025, American Society forEngineering EducationIn general, the web provides democratized access to information. Printed materials are onlyavailable to those who have them. AI uses information from the web. AI helps overcomebarriers because it makes the web easier to use, so information is even more democratized.Q9: What challenges or limitations do you foresee in integrating AI into engineeringeducation (e.g., cost, ethical concerns, technical barriers)?All learning should be from basic theory up to application. AI adds one more level of learningthat is required. It is one more thing that must be taught. This adds to the burden of education.There are many ethical concerns. For example, AI will
held fellowships in Ethics of AI and Technology & Society organizations.James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian, PhD, is a Sr. Lecturer and Associate Academic Director with the Gordon-MIT En- gineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineer- ing and the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP
divided into five pieces where each piece has yellow end points. These breaksin the wave act as stop signs or decision points between the five stages. Before moving from onestage to another, designers are encouraged to take time to pause and reflect in order to makedecisions that are evidence based, ethical, and equitable. Thus, socially engaged designrecommends designers to be reflective practitioners—to look back at both their design processand current design outcomes at regular intervals [73]. Different decision points will requiredifferent kinds of reflection but generally designers may be asking themselves: Do I have enoughinformation to move forward? What information is still missing? Is this meeting the needs of mystakeholders? What
change impacts, and other topics. The revised ASCE Code of Ethicsdetails the engineer’s responsibility to society, the natural and built environment, profession,clients and employers, and peers. We use the Code of Ethics for focused discussions aboutcentering inclusivity, equity, climate mitigation and resilience, and social justice in theirengineering work. These activities fall under ABET student outcome 4 (an ability to recognizeethical and professional responsibilities in considering the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal and societal context).2.3 Computational and Data Science for Civil & Environmental EngineeringIn Spring 2021, we adapted a sophomore-level CEE course focused on computational and datascience to include DEI
program, each stu-dent sketches out the process they followed. They were all unique, but there were some importantthemes. None of them were the simple design process found in textbooks. Instead, they weretangled non-linear webs of activities – exactly what is needed to solve messy tangled problems.And their drawings contained a high number of non-traditional design topics - economic, ethical,historical, social and political impact - that were integrated into the traditional design process. Inessence, they had learned to view engineering design in a wider context.Without grades or credits, our role becomes that of a cognitive coach - a motivator, guide andemotional support. All feedback becomes formative. Self-reflection naturally becomes a
(systematic engineeringmethod), and an ethical value system for the continuous creation, development, and innovation of new /improved / breakthrough technology to responsibly meet the hopes, wants, and needs of people foradvancement of the quality of life for human betterment. And as Rogers, noted about the nature ofengineering thought, “No other one thing ties the engineering profession more closely together than thisway of thinking.” 12The Task Force notes, whereas scientific research is frequently needed in complex systems engineeringdevelopment projects to gain a better understanding of phenomena, arising or anticipated in the course oftechnology development, it is not the primary driving force for the creative profession and the practice
investment area inScience, Engineering, and Education for Sustainability (SEES) to “promote the research andeducation needed to address the challenges of creating a sustainable human future24”. In 1996,the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) revised its Code of Ethics to includesustainability principles as part of the canon of civil engineering practices25. Other professionalorganizations, including the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), theAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), and the American Society of ChemicalEngineers (AIChE) have endorsed sustainability education26,27.2. Types of Curricular ReformTwo common methods for effective incorporation of sustainability into university curriculainclude horizontal
apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineeringb) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret datac) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needsd) An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teamse) An ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problemsf) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityg) An ability to communicate effectivelyh) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal contexti) A recognition for the need for, and ability to engage in life-long learningj) A knowledge of contemporary issuesk) The ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of their disciplines; b. apply current knowledge and adapt to emerging applications of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology; c. conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve processes; d. apply creativity in the design of systems, components, or processes appropriate to program objectives; e. function effectively on teams; f. identify, analyze, and solve technical problems; g. communicate effectively; h. recognize the need for and possess the ability to pursue lifelong learning; i. Understand professional, ethical, and social responsibilities; j. recognize contemporary professional, societal, and global issues
. 2010. “Assessing the Standards for Assessment: Is it Time to Update Criterion 3?” Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, June.35. Russell, J. and Lenox, T. 2012. "The Raise the Bar Initiative: Charting the Future by Understanding the Path to the Present -- An Historical Overview." Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, June.36. Russell, J. S., and Stouffer, W. B. 2003a. “Some ethical dimensions of additional education beyond the BSCE.“ J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 129(4), 225–231.37. Russell, J. S., and Stouffer, W. B. 2003b. “Too liberal or not liberal enough: Liberal arts, electives, and professional skills
legal and ethical principles. and ethical impacts; 5. Function effectively as a member or leader of a 5. An ability to work effectively in multidisciplinary teams and multidisciplinary team engaged in activities appropriate to transfer findings from one knowledge domain to another; the program’s discipline. and, 6. Apply critical thinking, problem identification, problem 6. An ability to communicate in written, verbal, technical, and solving skills, theory, techniques, and tools throughout non-technical forms
diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). For the most part, these have not been presentin the education of engineers. As a result, the majority of engineering professors are ill-equippedto engage in discussions of these matters with their students.To address this reality, engineering education must begin to embrace and introduce students tosome of the tenets and course content of the arts, humanities, and social sciences. There areuniversities today that are conducting what is known as a Grand Challenge Scholars Program inwhich students are prepared to achieve competencies in entrepreneurship, systems thinking,ethics, the understanding of different cultures, and the recognition that their engineeringsolutions must serve the purpose of contributing
initiative, 25 engineering faculty members actually implemented S-Linto at least one of their courses during the 04-05 academic year and 34 faculty in 05-06. In2005-06 over the two semesters an average of 700 undergraduate students participated in S-Lprojects in 52 courses, some with required S-L projects and others elective. This wide variety ofcourses included, for example, a first year introduction to engineering with 300 students,kinematics, soil mechanics, heat transfer, engineering ethics, electronics, plastics design, strengthof materials, and a senior EE capstone course on assistive technology with 70 students.Community partners included the Lowell National Historical Park, many local rehabilitationclinics, a local food bank, the City