Paper ID #25454Lessons Learned Creating a BSET with a Regional Campus ModelAimee T. Ulstad, Ohio State University Aimee Ulstad, P.E is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Integrated Systems Engineering Department at The Ohio State University. Prior to joining the faculty at Ohio State, Aimee was an industry professional in various field in engineering for over 30 years. Aimee received her degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Masters in Business Administration from Ohio State. She began her career as a packaging equipment engineer at Procter and Gamble, then moved to Anheuser-Busch where she worked for over 27
A Control System for a Small Autonomous Sailing Vessel Tobias Ferl and Stephen Hills Department of Engineering, Electrical Engineering United States Coast Guard AcademyAs a yearlong undergraduate project, we are developing a 1.2-meter autonomous sailboat for atrans-Atlantic attempt, from New England to Ireland, in the summer of 2020. The control systemfor the sailboat requires sensors for wind and location, a solar rechargeable power system, a low-powered microcontroller, and mechanical actuators for sail and rudder control. In addition to thehardware design, we are also developing custom software for autonomous navigation and controlof an
research. Studentswho are engaged in research projects report cognitive gains such as a) learning to think andanalyze, b) affective gains such as delight, c) psychosocial gains such as belonging to a team,identifying as an effective engineer, and d) behavioral gains such as motivations to pursuegraduate education or careers in engineering (Downing et al., 2011; Amamou and Cheniti-Belcadhi 2018; O’Sullivan 2013).This paper analyzes the students’ attitude and performance after experiencing a real researchprojects in “Measurement and Evaluation Techniques in Industrial Engineering” course. Uponcompletion of the course, students showed increased confidence in using Measurement andEvaluation techniques.Course Overview and Research MethodologyIn this
have previously taught statics and dynamics coursesover a sustained period of time are likely familiar with the practices listed below, which addressthe conventional evaluation of the appropriate moments-of-forces/couples equation that governsthe rotational behavior of a rigid body: Statics: Moments may be evaluated about axes through any selected point in space, which is typically on, in, or nearby the rigid body of interest. Dynamics: Moments should be evaluated about either (a) axes through the mass center of the body, or (b) a fixed axis about which the body is constrained to rotate (if applicable).This article presents another option for evaluation of the moments-of-forces/couples equation forthe targeted case of dynamics. The
] P. s. C. o. A. o. Science and Technology, Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America's Future: Executive Report. Executive Office of the President, President's Council of Advisors on …, 2010.[2] B. L. Yoder, "Engineering by the Numbers," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017, p. 11.[3] N. R. Council, Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. National Academies Press, 2009.[4] S. E. Lopez and W. H. Goodridge, "The State of Engineering Integration in K-12 Science Standards: Five Years After NGSS (Fundamental)," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[5] S. Virani and
level after required textbook readings, a passive learning method, isacceptable because of the observations previously made that such learning methods are bettersuited for understanding at lower Bloom’s levels. Additionally, having most of the paragraphwritten in the beginning tier will allow students to observe paragraph structure and the use oftechnical phrases—circling back to the psychological phenomenon of learning through imitation. Circle the correct term for each space in the paragraph describing pressure versus distance for incompressible flow through the venturi meter displayed below: From points A to B, where the cross-sectional area decreases, pressure will increase/decrease due to flow work/kinetic
Paper ID #27363Board 136: An Intersectional Perspective to Studying Microaggressions inEngineering ProgramsDr. Cristina Poleacovschi, Iowa State University Dr. Poleacovschi is an Assistant Professor at Iowa State University. She researches issues of diversity and focuses on intersectional aspects of microaggressions.Dr. Scott Grant Feinstein, Iowa State University Dr. Scott Feinstein is an expert in research design and comparative and identity politics.Dr. Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Stephanie Luster-Teasley is Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil, Architectural, and En
completeexplanation of the process and solution(s) used.Measuring Learner Achievement. The course intends to bring together most topics that studentshave learned in seeking their degree. It will include two primary components: a) the designprocess; b) productive team behaviors. Grades are based on demonstrated contribution to thecompletion of the interim and final project(s), including your individual contribution and the finalreport / presentation. The final report must include all specifications, testing procedures, datacollected, design decisions and performance of the final project in comparison to the initialspecifications for the product. It will not be accepted after the last scheduled class. The parts listand budget are due with this report.Since
tube B tube C (a) (3P) Which quantitative analytical method/instrument has been used to generate the graphs above? (i) UV-Vis spectrophotometry (ii) Fluorescence spectroscopy (iii) Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (iv) None of the above (b) (6P) Match the tubes (A, B, and C) with the corresponding gold nanoparticle size of your colloidal dispersions. _____ 14-nm gold nanoparticles _____ 60-nm gold nanoparticles _____ 100-nm gold nanoparticles (c) (3P) What is the appropriate unit label for the y-axis in the figure above
systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353-387. doi:10.1037/a0026838[9] Goodman, I., & Cunningham, C. (2002). Final Report of the Women's Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project (ED507394). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED507394[10] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2013). Women Engineering Students and Self-Efficacy: A Multi-Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self-Efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 27-38. doi:10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2009.tb01003.x[11] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in
Paper ID #25413Defining the Aims of Engineering Literacy with Lessons from a PioneeringAttempt to Measure Engineering Ability of Pre-University Students.Dr. John Krupczak Jr., Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division; Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division; Senior Fellow CASEE, Na- tional Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010; Program Officer, National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education 2013-2016.Dr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College
Value of Value of Scores of Scores of University A University B value University A University B University A University BCurrent proportion of students 100 x 100 xreceiving entrepreneurship x a% b% (a+b)% a%/(a+b)% b%/(a+b)% [a%/(a+b)%] [b
foreach material lie nearly on top of each other, confirming that the stresses due to an appliedbending moment are independent of beam material. (a) Measured strains and linear regression. (b) Stresses computed from strains. Figure 10. Measured strains and stresses computed from strains for Experiment 1.The results plotted in Fig. 11 show the same kind of behavior except now the measured strainsare almost the same (the aluminum and brass are almost coincident) while the stresses computedfrom the strains using the tabulated elastic moduli for each material show distinctly differentproportionalities. These results confirm that strains due to an applied tip displacement areindependent of the beam material. (a) Measured strains and
includes other attractivefeatures such as networking, I/O port, Wi-Fi, and etc. In this section, we will introduceRaspberry Pi in terms of specification, features, requirements, and its application fields.2.1 Introducing Raspberry PiRaspberry Pi was developed by Raspberry Pi Foundation based in United Kingdom (UK) to helppeople to teach and learn basic Computer Science with low cost high-performance computer.Raspberry Pi is low cost, credit-card sized computer introduced in 2012 as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Raspberry Pi 3 B plusInitially two models are developed, Model A and Model B in Raspberry Pi version 1. Thedifference of two models is different number of supporting USB ports and size of memory (i.e.,256 MB
, and developing achievement-related motivations and engagement,” in Handbook of socialization: theory and research, 2007.[14] S. Hidi and K. A. Renninger, “The four-phase model of interest development,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 111–127, Jun. 2006.[15] H. Markus and P. Nurius, “Possible selves,” American Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 954–969, 1986.[16] B. Gray, Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems, 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.[17] B. Gray and J. M. Purdy, Collaborating for our future: multistakeholder partnerships for solving complex problems, First edition. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2018.[18] A. M. Thomson and J. L. Perry, “Collaboration
communicate clearly to the team, group, or broad Communication audience. Discouraging A leader who induces a loss of hope or diminishes ambition in others.Table 2. Leader Role-Model Categories Scientist Scientists in fields such as physics that had notable achievements in their fields of studies. Current Elon Musk (b. 1971, Generation X), Bill Gates (b. 1955, Baby Boomer), Mark Leaders in Zuckerberg (b. 1984, Millennial). Both male and female students across Technology race/ethnicity only identified current technology leaders that are white males. Elon Musk came up consistently in interviews because of his innovation and also serving society by using technology to address societal needs
] P. Deshpande, C. B. Lee, and I. Ahmed, “Evaluation of Peer Instruction for Cybersecurity Education,” in Proceedings of the SIGCSE Conference, 2019.[9] F. Ning, W. Cong, J. Qiu, J. Wei, and S. Wang, “Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 80, pp. 369–378, 2015.[10] J. M. D. Hill, C. A. Carver, J. W. Humphries, and U. W. Pooch, “Using an isolated network laboratory to teach advanced networks and security,” in Proceedings of the thirty- second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE ’01, 2001, pp. 36–40.[11] D. Dasgupta, D. M. Ferebee, and Z. Michalewicz, “Applying Puzzle-Based
the author of several technical publications, including 17 journal papers and two book chapters. She received an NSF CAREER award in 2014. Dr. Marais has worked in engineering for two decades, first in industry and then in academia. She holds a B. Eng. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Stellenbosch, a B.Sc. in Mathematics from the University of South Africa, and an S.M and Ph.D. from the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT.Hanxi Sun, Purdue University Hanxi Sun is a Ph.D. candidate at the Department of Statistics of Purdue University. Her research focuses on nonparametric Bayesian statistics and applied statistics. Hanxi received a master degree in Statistics at
attemptedafter the student views the entire Course Content module. To pass the THORS course, aminimum score of 80% is required on the Post-Assessment. If an 80% is not achieved, thestudents are directed back to review the sections in the Course Content module on which theytested poorly. Afterward revisiting these sections, the student can retry the Post-Assessment. Anexample question from the Post-Assessment is shown in Figure 2B.Figure 2: Example of THORS interface for Course Content (A) and Post-Assessment (B) [9].*Used with permission from THORS eLearning Solutions.In lieu of homework assignments, students were assigned THORS courses (Tab. 1)corresponding to hands-on and active lecture components. Students were given 3 weeks tocomplete each course
). The curriculum was based on the NGSS standard HS-LS1.B (Growth andDevelopment of Organisms) with additional resources created by her. The designed instructionaims to support the students’ understanding of the mechanism of the cell cycle, including the needfor DNA replication during the cell cycle and the duration of the phases of each cycle, and howdoes cancer cells’ cycle function. Rachel provided the students with necessary foundationalconcepts for further exploration of the cell division at the beginning of class. During the robotactivity, individual students acted out creating a pie chart to display the duration of the cell cyclephases using a robot. Rachel demonstrated to the students the use of the masking tape with therobot and guided
involved with developing and teaching laboratory content, leading the maintenance of the in-house robotics controller, and managing the development of the robotics project.Dr. Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is currently a member of the ASEE
comprehensive numericalstudies and application-based projects, as further described below. The instruction started withthe wave nature of light, as depicted in the left column of Figure 1. Wave Nature of Light Particle Nature of Light Maxwell Eqn. Helmholtz Eqn. Einstein A/B Coefficient Uniform Plane Wave (UPW) Rate equation Properties of UPW, Phase Blackbody radiation Photon statistics Polarization, TE/TM waves Reflection/Transmission (R/T) on interface Rate equation Total Internal Reflection 3- and 4- level
curriculum included (a) STEM hands-on activities focused on mathematicsand engineering (including mathematical visualization, engineering design process throughtowers and chain reaction machines, explorations with arduinos and circuits, and mathematicalthinking through folding), and (b) World of Work activities that centered on self- and career-exploration experiences (including career cards, games, virtual reality experiences, conversationswith and presentations from STEM professionals). The first week of the summer program thestudents focused on introductory STEM activities and explorations and alignment of their currentinterests and abilities to career pathways leading to STEM. In the second week, these activitieslaid the foundation for students
., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.013Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., … Zhang, H. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2004.tb00809
Paper ID #27701Exploring Within-Group Differences in Student-Faculty Interactions amongBlack Engineering Students at a Selective Four-Year Engineering CollegeMs. Felicia James Onuma, University of Maryland, College Park Felicia Onuma is a Ph.D. candidate in Higher Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her research interests center around the enrollment and retention of Black (immigrant) students in sci- ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields and the experiences of Black immigrant collegians at private elite U.S. colleges and universities. Felicia currently holds a graduate assistantship
thepercentages of success (blue bars) & failure (red bars) per question and Figure 3 represents thesummarization of these results. For this first study, two main concepts were selected to beconverted into PBH: non-perpendicular axis and 2D equilibrium with springs as shown in Figure3.a. Forces and Vectors with Non-Perpendicular Axis b. 2D Particle Equilibriumc. 2D Equilibrium with Springs d. 3D Particle Equilibrium Figure 2. Percentage of Correct/Incorrect Answers per Topic (First Midterm Examination) Figure 3. Percentages of Success/Failure per First Midterm Topic (Summary of 4 Sections)Same procedure was repeated for the second part of the class. The main topics covered for thismidterm
% 71.4% % Returning - 27.3% 50% % Caucasian/African American 100%/0% 91%/0% 79%/14% % from Minority Serving Districts 54.5% 45.4% 50% District School School Districts* a(2),b(1),c(2 a(2),b(2),c(1),f( a(1),b(3),c(3),g( ),d(1),e(1),f( 2),g(1),h(1),i(1) 1)h(3),I(1),j(1),l( 1),j(1), k(2) 1) % Math 27.3% 18.2% 42.9
Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” 2005.[5] W. Newstetter and M. Svinicki, “Learning Theories for Engineering Education Practice,” Cambridge Handb. Eng. Educ. Res., 2011.[6] P. Blikstein, Z. Kabayadondo, A. Martin, and D. Fields, “An Assessment Instrument of Technological Literacies in Makerspaces and FabLabs,” J. Eng. Educ., 2017.[7] B. Bevan, “The Promise and the Promises of Making in Science Education,” Stud. Sci. Educ., 2017.[8] S. Vossoughi and B. Bevan, “Making and Tinkering: A Review of the Literature,” 2015.[9] R. Seo-Zindy and R. Heeks, “Researching the Emergence of 3D Printing, Makerspaces, Hackerspaces and Fablabs in The Global South: A Scoping Review and Research Agenda on Digital Innovation and
consists of four parts: 1. The target, or subject: the information to be learned. 2. The source, or analog: the familiar thing to which the new information is compared. 3. The connector: the means by which the subject and analog are compared. 4. The ground: the description of the similarities and differences between the subject and analog.To facilitate the use of analogies, the ABCDE method of constructing an analogy is considered[23]. A. Analyze the subject: what is it you most want the learners to understand about the subject? B. Brainstorm potential analogs: what concrete items share the important features you have identified? C. Choose the analog: which candidate analog has the best
. ● Welcome Video ● Access and Services (where you can go and what you can do) a. Accessing Bern Dibner Library (Bobst & Dibner) web page, hours, reserve rooms a. Dibner Library Space (rooms, equipment, layout, snacks) b. Library Services (printing, course reserve, laptop loan, service desk) ● Learning and Events a. Workshops b. Atrium ActivitiesThe first section was a brief (0:00:57 minutes) welcoming video. The Access and Services andLearning and Events pages contained the topical videos on the left and a sidebar on the rightwith links and highlighted information in bullet form. See Figures 1 & 2 for screenshots.Figure 1: Welcome to Bern Dibner Library PageFigure 2: Learning and Events