hardware. For the Fall 2015semester, the class was transformed to utilize microprocessors and focus on hardware limitations.The transformation was done for primarily two reasons. 1) To advance the course’s curriculum.2) Improve student retention.Every day we interact with and are surrounded by embedded systems. From cars to microwaves,they have become an integral part of everyday life. It’s no surprise then that the area ofembedded system design has grown tremendously in the past few years [1]. More graduates areworking with microprocessors as a result of the growing embedded systems field and wouldbenefit from working with them and coding during their undergraduate coursework. Therefore, itwas decided that the courses’ new focus would be centered
contributions to STEM. This paperdiscusses how she accomplished this somewhat hidden achievement and suggests a video anddiscussion activity geared toward prompting undergraduates to reframe their origin stories forcomputer science to include women. In another paper, we discuss the details of her algorithmand present a working program for use as an assignment for students in beginning computerclasses. IntroductionIn our engineering curriculum, we need to emphasize the human aspects of science andengineering. This need is clearly recognized by our accreditation agency, ABET, which requiresa portion of the curriculum to be set aside for such exposure. In order to be creative leaders inScience and Engineering
take place within the teamframework and are integrated closely with the team’s robot projects. Self-efficacy is indicatedwhen individuals on the team have gained mastery of subjects of high interest to them. If theteam’s performance is good, we have also achieved team efficacy.Our study has two stages—a pilot study during the 2006-2007 academic year and a central studyduring the 2007-2008 academic year.Pilot Study, 2006-2007This section summarizes the first-year pilot study that was implemented at Trinity College in2006-2007 as an activity of the Trinity College Robot Study Team (RST)9. The RST comprises10 – 15 undergraduate engineering students each semester, drawn from all four undergraduateclasses, who design robots to compete in the
language that each capstone project memberhas learned in at least one course in the CET curriculum. Therefore, developing the program inJava satisfies one of the capstone course objectives: to consolidate and integrate concepts, skillsand techniques acquired from the curriculum. Third, Android phones provide all the hardwareand connection features needed for the project. Specifically, GPS positioning will be used fordetermining the bus location and for trip planning. Android phones have built-in GPS receiverthus reducing the need for relying on cellular networks for location information, which is muchless accurate than GPS. In addition, Java classes for location services via GPS signal areavailable through the Android API.The mobile application is
learning multi-disciplinarydesign. The authors therefore plan to introduce the concepts of BIM and associated softwaretools at earlier stages of the curriculum.Another hurdle to be overcome, in terms of introducing any new technology at University level,is that faculty members do not always remain up-to-date with technical software applicationsused in industry. This may be alleviated with closer integration between industry and academia.Many of the institutions surveyed by the authors are keen to develop strong industry links andalready have visiting tutors and lecturers from industry, and this could extend to the teaching ofBIM processes and technologies.The authors aim to determine the most effective curriculum strategies that should be adopted
additionalscenarios was demonstrated by a student defining the problem as, ‘providing electricitywhenever and wherever electricity is not available’. This empirical evidence was collectedthrough content analysis, and cognitive processes of experts, as heuristics are based on collectedpast experiences and difficult to verbalize.Heuristics in instructional designFrom an instructional and curriculum design perspective, the use of heuristics can prove valuableas behavioral research shows that experts utilize heuristics effectively, which distinguishes themfrom novices23. Evidence suggests that expert instructional designers use heuristics whendesigning new or revising instructional systems5,24,25. A Delphi study conducted by York andErtmer5 examined previous
preparation needed to successfully pursue tenure-track faculty positions. A centralcomponent of the PFMF program consisted of an integrated view of the roles of a professionalacademic career through three key areas: 1) hands-on mentoring, 2) structured teachingexperiences and 3) evidenced-based professional development. Figure 1 provides a conceptualframework for linking the program activity inputs with the intended outcomes. The followingsection details the components of this integrated model. Preparing Future Minority Faculty in STEM (PFMF) INPUTS OUTCOMESFigure 1. Model for PFMF success.1) Hands-On MentoringDuring the
, Gainesville. She did post-doctoral work with the USDA in Peoria, IL as a biochemist in soy- bean oligosaccharides before joining Central State University in 1989. Dr. Lowell maintains a research program in directed energy to kill weeds as an integrated pest management strategy. She mentors un- dergraduate students in funded research projects who have gone on to present at local, state and national conferences.Dr. Xiaofang Wei, Central State University Dr. Xiaofang Wei, Professor of Geography, GIS, and Remote Sensing at the Department of Water Re- sources Management (WRM) at Central State University. Dr. Wei received her bachelor degree from Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping and her doctoral degree from
Paper ID #27451”Ingeniero como vos”: An analysis of the Mby´a-Guaran´ı Practices Associ-ated with Engineering DesignDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. His current research investigates how the integration of the historically and culturally accumulated wealth of knowledge, skills, and practices - also known as funds of knowledge - and engineering design can serve as a pathway to and through engineering. Dr. Mejia is particularly interested in how Latinx adolescents bring forth unique ways of
with advisors and mentors, and provided brainstorming andsupport to help negotiate these relationships.Evaluation MethodologyAssessment and evaluation were an integral part of this project from its initial conception. Thebudget for this project proposed, and was funded, with an explicit eye for evaluation and anexperienced educator was hired to plan, execute, and evaluate the program. Approval for Page 26.825.5research with human subjects was obtained from the University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB), and participants were provided with an informed consent form and had the option toparticipate in the discussion series with—or without
assessment questions that include the skilltags dimensional analysis and system integration. To begin to place roughness into someappropriate context, the descriptor of “Specialist” or “Specialized” are used. These descriptorswould indicate that the given student has very strong talents in a few specific skills at theexpense of proficiency in other skills. Figure 3B represents the student with the largest averagecircular radius value, which means that that student has the highest level of average proficiencyacross all skill tag questions compared to the class. Though this student does not represent thelowest roughness value, when compared to others this student can be considered fairly “well-rounded”. A well-rounded profile may be likened to an
College of Engineering (CoE) graduation rates for 2015 at our Hispanic ServingInstitution revealed to be 73% for students from households with income above $50,000/year, and54% from households with income below $7,500/year. Similar trends were also noticed in retentionand persistence rates indicating higher attrition among students from lower income families. Thisprogram aims to increase these statistics among LIATS by integrating elements from Lent’s et al.Social Cognitive Career Theory [1] [2] and Tinto’s Departure Model [3][4] in conjunction with ascholarship program. The final objective is to establish an intervention model to be furtherinstitutionalized in the CoE, if proven to be effective [5][6]. In this program we have includedtools to
of EOE FIGs is managed by staff from the Equal Opportunity inEngineering (EOE) Program at UT Austin. With support from additional EOE staff, the leadprogram coordinator for EOE FIGs: (1) generates marketing material; (2) recruits participants;(3) generates the semester schedule and seminar curriculum; (4) reserves meeting rooms; (5)secures presenters and guest speakers as needed; (6) hires FIG student leadership team; (7)monitors students progress during the year; (8) evaluates student feedback; (9) and tracksretention data for previous EOE FIG participants.Recruiting Process for EOE FIG ParticipantsAt summer orientation, the EOE Program invites first time in college (FTIC) students to becomepart of an exciting community that focuses on
topic of interest in K-12 education. Childrenthat are exposed at an early age to STEM curriculum, such as computer programming andcomputational thinking, demonstrate fewer obstacles entering technical fields [1]. Increasedknowledge of programming and computation in early childhood is also associated with betterproblem solving, decision-making, basic number sense, language skills, and visual memory [2].As a digital competence, coding is explicitly regarded as a key 21st Century Skill, as the“literacy of today,” such that its acquisition is regarded as essential to sustain economicdevelopment and competitiveness [3]. Hence, the reliable evaluation of students’ process data incontext of problem solving tasks that require CT is of great
Technology. New course materials integrating the parallel and distributedcomputing concepts were developed and offered to undergraduate students. Project-basedlearning was introduced into classroom. More advanced concepts, such as computer vision andmachine learning were explored by undergraduate students. At the same time, the researchresults were disseminated in junior and senior level courses. Faculty members applied effectivepedagogy to teach new generation computing. For all the classes involved in this project, studentsurveys were collected to guide future project implementation. This article shares the currentoutcomes and findings of the project.IntroductionComputing technology has advanced to an unbelievable level compared to decades ago
servicesto underserved, racial/ethnic groups through the valuing of differences and integration of cultural attitudes,beliefs, and practices…” [2].I believe that many professionals in engineering are on an elitist power trip; unwilling to share theirknowledge with anyone not like them. I also believe that there are some who are just unable to do sobecause they don’t know how to make the concepts practical. All they really know is the same lecturethey’ve taught over and over again. And I believe these individuals are afraid of being exposed, so theyhurl insults and derogatory comments to protect themselves. I believe it has become for them a badge ofhonor. It hasn’t matter on an individual level that our country is in an economic and technological
and society core curriculum classes specifically for incoming fresh- man with a STEM background. Perez has eight years of professional experience working as an electrical and computer engineer, providing technical support to faculty and students utilizing UGLC classrooms and auditoriums. Perez is committed to the highest level of service to provide an exceptional experience to all of the UGLC guests. Perez strongly believes that by providing exceptional customer service that UGLC patrons will return to make use of the various services the university offers. Perez enjoys work- ing on the professional development of the student employees at the UGLC. He shares with his student employees his practical experience in
and experience in specific areas of their speciality An understanding ofDFM principles and methods can help them understand the importance of an integrated approachto design and manufacturing. This will enable them to contribute to or lead in implementingDFM in their practice.MAJOR TOPICS PLANNED FOR COVERAGE IN THE COURSEDesign Methodology This section begins with an introduction to DFM, highlighting the background of DFM, the need for DFM, and the general approach needed for successful DFM. Specific principles and methodologies such as Concurrent Engineering, concurrent engineering design teams, empowerment, early consideration of design considerations / constraints, good product architecture, generation and
Benchmarking ActivitiesLawrence Tech has a rich history of incorporating innovative teaching strategies into theengineering curriculum with an emphasis on problem-based learning, active/collaborativelearning, and entrepreneurial minded learning. However, in order to achieve the desiredoutcomes of the new course, innovative teaching strategies needed to be implemented within thecontext of a more “real world” experience. In addition, a pedagogy that enhances theentrepreneurial mindset and is designed for maximum student engagement and retention wasdesired. Upon consideration, the format of a studio course was chosen for the second yearengineering design class. Studio courses are a unique format that typically integrate contentdelivery, hands on activity
visual tools and environments. Most end-userdevelopment is for visual environments, from graphical user interfaces (GUIs) to web pages. Thetools of choice have become highly visual integrated development environments (IDE). Visualmodeling languages such as Unified Modeling Language (UML) are a major element of programunderstanding and design. All of these tools and methods are problematic for a blind student.This paper describes the challenges we faced as both the instructor and student as we adaptedtools, material, and assignments in an object-oriented programming course.1 IntroductionIn the fall of 2013, Jordyn, a co-author of this paper, enrolled in an intermediate-level course inobject-oriented programming and modern development
Orientation at MSUOne of the major applications of electrical circuits in the ME curriculum was found to be in theirlaboratories. When conducting an experiment, the majority of the instrumentation and datarecording relies on a knowledge of electrical circuits. The ME department at MSU offers asequence of three laboratories, which are taken starting toward the end of the ME curriculum. Itincludes: ME3701 Experimental Orientation (EO), ME4721 Experimental Technique I (ET1),and ME4731 Experimental Technique II (ET2). The laboratories are intended to provide ahands-on environment to reinforce concepts learned in other courses, including those outside theME home department. ME3701 (EO) gives the students an introduction to the use ofinstrumentation for
an end-user perspectiveand that the outcomes will help to answer the above questions.This present study is an extension of a previous research cycle in which end users (students)developed gamification products to help students learn challenging concepts in industrialengineering courses. We selected four final gamification products for further evaluation:“Avengers”, “Bake-off-453”, “Gulf games” and “DungeoNIOSH”. These games are intended toteach the concepts of: “Discrete probability distributions”, “Gulf of evaluation vs. Gulf ofexecution”, “Interaction effects” and “NIOSH Lifting equation”. The first two are basic conceptsin statistics, and the last two relate to the human factor/ergonomics domain. In this study, we hadtwo student teams
data, analyze it, write a report and make an oral presentation on one of theexperiments they have studied.UPWARD BOUNDThe Upward Bound program is an intensive six (6) week summer program which meets five(5) days a week for students residing or attending high schools in Newark, NJ. As in theother programs, chemical engineering is only a part of the program and is alecture/laboratory integrated experience consisting of 3.5 hours per section, (25 students)one day per week. The lecture topics cover the theory of experimentation, statistics, unitdimensions, graphics, data collection and analysis, oral presentation and report writing. Thecourse also has a homework assignment component. The laboratory experience consisted ofexperiments on the
2006-1693: COMPUTER SCIENCE RECRUITING AND RETENTION OFUNDERGRADUATES TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE BUSINESS COMMUNITYJohn Fernandez, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Dr. Fernandez is Assistant Professor of Computer Science in the Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences. Having served 20 years in the U.S. Air Force and 10 years in private industry, Dr. Fernandez brings real-world experiences into the classroom for his students. His research interests are in HCI, information assurance, and software engineering.Phyllis Tedford, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Mrs. Tedford is an Instructor of Computer Science in the Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences. She
that there are other approaches to this course. We describe our own “solution.” Page 12.391.2A Bit of HistoryThe computing course was introduced to the engineering curriculum sometime in the late 1950sand early 1960s. If you got your engineering degree before 1965, you probably took a Fortranprogramming class using something like an IBM 1620. You prepared your program on punchedcards and “loaded” the cards along with the operating system components onto the machine.Computing technology dramatically changed over time - from cards to terminals and magnetictapes and from 16 bit machines to 64 bit machines (mainframes). Even the programminglanguage
. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in
. Realizeit developed an adaptive learning system for psychology, nursing, and algebra courses at the University of Central Florida. The results showed a moderate increase in performance and high student satisfaction—83% reported that the system helped them learn better. [22] • Increasing passing rates o Smart Sparrow and Australian Universities. Adaptive tutorials were developed to assist in the teaching of introductory mechanics. Failure rates dropped from 31% to 19% in the first year of use and, as the curriculum was tuned, continued to decrease over the next two years to under 10%. They also observed an improvement in performance by students
personalexperiences that led to their enrollment and persistence in a post- secondary engineeringprogram. These research findings will help enable K-14 educators to make informed decisionsabout deliberate efforts to engage and support young women, both in their career through pre-engineering and engineering curriculum supports and in the transition from high school tocollege.Research QuestionThe following research question was explored in this study: How do young women’s perceptionsof their K-14 STEM experiences influence their decision to enroll and persist in an engineeringmajor? The sequential approach allowed the researcher to construct specific focus group andinterview questions based on an initial quantitative survey to gain an in-depth understanding
engineering ABET criteria may force an even furthernarrowing of the engineering curriculum and thus limit the development of the so-called “21stcentury skills” for all students [25], organizations such as NSBE and SHPE continue to provideunique opportunities for engineering students of color to develop many of the professional skillsoutside of the classroom such as those described in the Engineer 2020 vision. These twoprofessional organizations provide unique opportunities for students to acquire skills and buildknowledge that is not (or cannot be) taught in traditional engineering classrooms. AfricanAmerican and Latina/o engineering students develop skills such as communication, ethics, andtime and resource management through interactions with the
all strategic and operational issues to ensure an effective and coordinated effort to meet Challenger Center’s strategic goals. Prior to joining Challenger Center, Ms. Kopecky spent 13 years in the classroom, having taught both upper and lower elementary grade levels. She developed and delivered curriculum and led profes- sional development courses. Ms. Kopecky holds a professional certification in Instructional Design from University of Wisconsin-Stout, as well as a Bachelor of Science in Psychology, and a Master of Teaching from Virginia Commonwealth University.Ms. Valerie A. Fitton-Kane, Challenger CenterDr. Lance Bush, Challenger Center Lance Bush is President and CEO of Challenger Center. With a goal to